A dynamic analysis of the investment in product innovation in a supply chain under reference price effect: competition vs cooperation

References

• Adcock, C., Hua, X., Mazouz, K., & Yin, S. (2014). Does the stock market reward innovation? European stock index reaction to negative news during the global financial crisis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 49, 470–491. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., Griffiths, R., & van Reenen, J. (1999). Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Review of Economic Studies, 66(3), 529–554. doi: 10.1111/1467-937X.00097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cellini, R., & Lambertini, L. (2005). R&D incentives and market structure: Dynamic analysis. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 126(1), 85–96. doi: 10.1007/s10957-005-2659-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cellini, R., & Lambertini, L. (2009). Dynamic R&D with spillovers: Competition vs cooperation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 33(3), 568–582. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2008.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenavaz, R. (2012). Dynamic pricing, product and process innovation. European Journal of Operational Research, 222(3), 553–557. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenavaz, R. (2016). Dynamic pricing with reference price dependence. Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 10, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenavaz, R. Y., & Jasimuddin, S. M. (2017). An analytical model of the relationship between product quality and advertising. European Journal of Operational Research, 263(1), 295–307. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., Levin, R. C., & Mowery, D. C. (1987). Firm size and R & D intensity: A re-examination. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 543–565. doi: 10.2307/2098587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, P. R., & Sawyer, A. G. (1990). The price knowledge and search of supermarket shoppers. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 42–53. doi: 10.1177/002224299005400304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockner, E. J., Jorgensen, S., Long, N. V., & Sorger, G. (2000). Differential games in economics and management science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dye, C. Y., Yang, C. T., & Wu, C. C. (2018). Joint dynamic pricing and preservation technology investment for an integrated supply chain with reference price effects. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(6), 811–824. doi: 10.1057/s41274-017-0247-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EI Ouardighi, F. (2014). Supply quality management with optimal wholesale price and revenue sharing contracts: A two-stage game approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 156, 260–268. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EI Ouardighi, F., & Erickson, G. (2015). Production capacity buildup and double marginalization mitigation in a dynamic supply chain. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(8), 1281–1296. doi: 10.1057/jors.2014.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EI Ouardighi, F., Jørgensen, S., & Pasin, F. (2013). A dynamic game with monopolist manufacturer and price-competing duopolist retailers. OR Spectrum, 35(4), 1059–1084. doi: 10.1007/s00291-012-0300-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EI Ouardighi, F., & Kim, B. (2010). Supply quality management with wholesale price and revenue-sharing contracts under horizontal competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 206(2), 329–340. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.02.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EI Ouardighi, F., Sim, J. E., & Kim, B. (2016). Pollution accumulation and abatement policy in a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(3), 982–996. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feichtinger, G., Lambertini, L., Leitmann, G., & Wrzaczek, S. (2016). R&D for green technologies in a dynamic oligopoly: Schumpeter, arrow and inverted-U’s. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(3), 1131–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fibich, G., Gavious, A., & Lowengart, O. (2003). Explicit solutions of optimization models and differential games with nonsmooth (asymmetric) reference-price effects. Operations Research, 51(5), 721–734. doi: 10.1287/opre.51.5.721.16758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geroski, P. A. (1990). Innovation, technological opportunity, and market structure. Oxford Economic Papers, 42(3), 586–602. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalwani, M. U., Yim, C. K., Rinne, H. J., & Sugita, Y. (1990). A price expectations model of customer brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 251–262. doi: 10.1177/002224379002700301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyanaram, G., & Winer, R. S. (1995). Empirical generalizations from reference price research. Marketing Science, 14(3), G161–G169. doi: 10.1287/mksc.14.3.G161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamien, M. I., & Schwartz, N. L. (1982). Market structure and innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, B. w., & EI Ouardigh, F. (2007). Supplier-manufacturer collaboration on new product development. In S. Jørgensen, M. Quincampoix, & T. L. Vincent (Eds.), Advances in dynamic game theory: Numerical methods, algorithms, and applications to ecology and economics (pp. 527–545). Boston, MA: Birkhäuser Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Kopalle, P. K., Rao, A. G., & Assuncao, J. L. (1996). Asymmetric reference price effects and dynamic pricing policies. Marketing Science, 15(1), 60–85. doi: 10.1287/mksc.15.1.60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertini, L., & Mantovani, A. (2009). Process and product innovation by a multiproduct monopolist: A dynamic approach. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(4), 508–518. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertini, L., Orsini, R., & Palestini, A. (2017). On the instability of the R&D portfolio in a dynamic monopoly. Or, one cannot get two eggs in one basket. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 703–712. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.08.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertini, L., & Zaccour, G. (2015). Inverted-U aggregate investment curves in a dynamic game of advertising. Economics Letters, 132, 34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2015.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., & Ni, J. (2016). A dynamic analysis of investment in process and product innovation with learning-by-doing. Economics Letters, 145, 104–108. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, L., Gou, Q., Tang, W., & Zhang, J. (2016). Joint pricing and advertising strategy with reference price effect. International Journal of Production Research, 54(17), 5250–5270. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1165878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Herrán, G., Taboubi, S., & Zaccour, G. (2012). Dual role of price and myopia in a marketing channel. European Journal of Operational Research, 219(2), 284–295. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazumdar, T., Raj, S. P., & Sinha, I. (2005). Reference price research: Review and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 84–102. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noori-daryan, M., & Taleizadeh, A. A. (2016). Coordinating pricing and ordering decisions in a multi-echelon pharmacological supply chain under different market power using game theory. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 9(1), 35–56.
   Google Scholar
• Putler, D. S. (1992). Incorporating reference price effects into a theory of consumer choice. Marketing Science, 11(3), 287–309. doi: 10.1287/mksc.11.3.287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandner, P. G., & Block, J. (2011). The market value of R&D, patents and trademarks. Research Policy, 40, 969–985. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayadi, M. K., & Makui, A. (2014). Optimal advertising decisions for promoting retail and online channels in a dynamic framework. International Transactions in Operational Research, 21, 777–796. doi: 10.1111/itor.12061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Sorger, G. (1988). Reference price formation and optimal marketing strategies. Optimal Control Theory and Economic Analysis, 3, 97–120.
   Google Scholar
• Takayama, A. (1985). Mathematical economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taleizadeh, A. A., & Noori-daryan, M. (2016). Pricing, inventory and production policies in a supply chain of pharmacological products with rework process: A game theoretic approach. Operational Research, 16(1), 89–115. doi: 10.1007/s12351-015-0188-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taleizadeh, A. A., Noori-daryan, M., & Govindan, K. (2016). Pricing and ordering decisions of two competing supply chains with different composite policies: A Stackelberg game-theoretic approach. International Journal of Production Research, 54(9), 2807–2836. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1154621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taleizadeh, A. A., Noori-daryan, M., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2015). Pricing and ordering decisions in a supply chain with imperfect quality items and inspection under buyback of defective items. International Journal of Production Research, 53(15), 4553–4582. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.997399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, K., Chiang, W. K., & Liang, L. (2011). Dynamic pricing and channel efficiency in the presence of the cost learning effect. International Transactions in Operational Research, 18, 579–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2011.00816.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Liu, N. (2017). Research on closed loop supply chain with reference price effect. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28(1), 51–64. doi: 10.1007/s10845-014-0961-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Zhang, D., & Zhang, C. (2017). The influence of reference effect on pricing strategies in revenue management settings. International Transactions in Operational Research, 24, 907–924. doi: 10.1111/itor.12371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Gou, Q., Liang, L., & Huang, Z. (2013). Supply chain coordination through cooperative advertising with reference price effect. Omega, 41(2), 345–353. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2012.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Kevin Chiang, W. y., & Liang, L. (2014). Strategic pricing with reference effects in a competitive supply chain. Omega, 44, 126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Lei, L., Zhang, S., & Song, L. (2017). Dynamic vs. static pricing in a supply chain with advertising. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 109, 266–279. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar