Improving the Care Order Decision-Making Processes: Viewpoints of Child Welfare Workers in Four Countries

References

• Aspalter, C. (2011). The development of ideal-typical welfare regime theory. International Social Work, 54(6) 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Berrick, J., Dickens, J., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (In press). Time and quality of decision making in child protection: A cross-country analysis. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership, & Governance.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berrick, J., Peckover, S., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (2015). The formalized framework for decision-making in child protection care orders: A cross-country analysis. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(4), 366–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, A., & Lennings, C. (2010). Clinical opinions of structured risk assessments for forensic child protection: The development of a clinically relevant device. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(10), 1300–1310. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.04.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Bortoli, L., & Dolan, M. (2014). Decision making in social work with families and children: Developing decision-aids compatible with cognition. British Journal of Social Work, bcu087, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ellett, A. J., Ellis, J. I., Westbrook, T. M., & Dews, D. (2007). A qualitative study of 369 child welfare professionals’ perspectives about factors contributing to employee retention and turnover. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(2), 264–281. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E., & Shlonsky, A. (2000). Risk assessment in context. Children and Youth Services Review, 22(11–12), 813–837. doi:10.1016/S0190-7409(00)00123-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., Parton, N., & Skivenes, M. (2011). Child protection systems: International trends and orientations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, D. I., & Thorsvik, J. (2013). Hvordan organisasjoner fungerer. [How organizations work]. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Juby, C., & Scannapieco, M. (2007). Characteristics of workload management in public child welfare agencies. Administration in Social Work, 31(3), 95–109. doi:10.1300/J147v31n03_06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, I., & Skivenes, M. (in press). Public trust in the child protection system – A population study of California, England, Finland and Norway. Social policy and Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Kriz, K., & Skivenes, M. (2014). Street-level policy aims of child welfare workers in England, Norway and the United States: An exploratory study. Children and Youth Service Review, 40, 71–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietz, C. (2010). Critical thinking in child welfare supervision. Administration of Social Work, 34, 68–78. doi:10.1080/03643100903432966
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S. W., & Musheno, M. C. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (1999). Common errors of reasoning in child protection work. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(8), 745–758. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(99)00053-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2010). Learning to reduce risk in child protection. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1135–1151. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissly, J. A., Mor Barak, M. E., & Levin, A. (2005). Stress, social support, and workers’ intentions to leave their jobs in public child welfare. Administration of Social Work, 29(1), 79–100. doi:10.1300/J147v29n01_06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N., & Berridge, D. (2011). Child protection in England. In N. Gilbert, N. Parton, & M. Skivenes (Eds.), Child protection systems: International trends and orientations (pp. 60–85). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pösö, T., & Huhtanen, R. (in press). Removals of children in Finland: A mix of voluntary and involuntary decisions. In K. Burns, T. Pösö, & M. Skivenes (Eds.), (In press). Child welfare removals by the state: A cross-country analysis of decision-making systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samantrai, K. (1992). Factors in the decision to leave: Retaining social workers with MSWs in public child welfare. Social Work, 37, 454–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1965). Administrative Behaviour: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. D., & Donovan, S. E. (2003). Child welfare practice in organizational and institutional context. Social Service Review, 77(4), 541–563. doi:10.1086/378328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, J. (2011). An exploratory study of the relationship between child protection system stressors and case outputs. Administration in Social Work, 35, 46–59. doi:10.1080/03643107.2011.533620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge—improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S., & Nielsen, V. L. (2008). Implementering af politik. Århus, DK: Academica.
   Google Scholar