Rethinking Organizational Reforms in Human Service Organizations: Lessons, Dilemmas, and Insights

References

• Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organizational development interventions: A cognitive approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23, 483–500. doi:10.1177/002188638702300404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battagio, P. R., Jr., & Condrey, S. E. (2009). Reforming public management: Analyzing the impact of public service reform on organizational and managerial trust. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 689–707. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezes, P., Fimmreite, A. L., LeLidec, P., & Laegreid, P. (2013). Understanding organizational reforms in the modern state: Specialization and integration in Norway and France. Governance, 26, 147–175. doi:10.1111/j-1468-0491.2012.01608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G. (2001). Pride and performance in public service: Some patterns of analysis. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 67, 9–20. doi:10.1177/0020852301671002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, C. (2009, December 16). Service delivery reform: Designing a system that works for you. Canberra, Australia: Address to the National Press Club. Retrieved from http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/Parllnfo/download/media/pressrel
   Google Scholar
• Brudney, J. L., Burke, B., & Cho, C. L. (2009). No “one best way” to manage change: Developing and describing distinct administrative reform dimensions across fifty American states. Public Administration Quarterly, 33, 197–232.
   Google Scholar
• Brudney, J. L., & Herbert, F. T. (1999). Reinventing government in the American states: Measuringand explaining administrative reforms. Public Administration Review, 59, 19–30. doi:10.2307/977476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N. (2006). Administrative reforms as routines. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 22, 243–252. doi:10.1016/0956-5221(89)90028-6
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N. (2009). Reform as routine: Organizational change and stability in the modern world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., & Olsen, J. (2009). The reforming organization: Making sense of administrative change. London, UK: Routledge Library Editions: Management.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (1999). NPM - Design, resistance, or transformation: A study of how modern reforms are received in a civil service system. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23, 169–193. doi:10.2307/3380777
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2007). Regulatory agencies: The challenges of balancing agency autonomy and political control. Governance, 20, 499–520. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00368.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, S., Garabedian, L., & Snyder, K. (2012). Performance-based contracts in New York City: Lessons learned from welfare-to-work. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute of Government. Retrieved from http://www.rockinst.org/pdf/workforce_welfare_and_social_services/2016-06-performance-based-contracts.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grizzle, G. A., & Pettijohn, C. D. (2002). Implementing performance-based program budgeting: A system-dynamic perspective. Public Administration Review, 62, 51–62. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyomarch, A. (1999). Public service, public management and the modernization of French public administration. Public Administration, 77, 171–193. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, A. L., & Preker, A. S. (2002). A conceptual framework for organizational reforms in the hospital sector. In A. S. Preker & A. Harding (Eds.), Innovations in health service delivery. Vol 1, The corporatization of public hospitals, 23-37. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2004). Inclusive and exclusive educational change: Emotional responses of teachers and implications for practice. School Leadership & Management, 24, 287–309. doi:10.1080/1363243042000266936
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. (2015). What exactly is human services management? Human Service Organizations, Leadership, Management & Governance, 39, 1–5. doi:10.1080/23303131.2015.1007773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A new public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2013). Reflections on public service reform in cold fiscal climate. In S. Griffiths, H. Kippen, & G. Stoker (Eds.), Public services: A new reform agenda (pp. 215–229). London, England: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less? Evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK central government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons, Education Committee. (2016). Social work reform. Third report of session 2016–17. The House of Commons. The Inquiry Publications Page of the Committee’s Website. Retrieved from www.parliament.UK/education-committee
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C., Johansson, S., & Hoftstrom, M. (2013). The project organization as a policy tool in implementing welfare reforms in the public sector. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 28, 122–137. doi:10.1002/hpm.2120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., & Austin, M. E. (2008). Evidence-based practice in the social services: Implementation for organization change. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 5, 239–269. doi:10.1300/J147v30n03_06
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerlin, J. A. (2005). Social service reform in the post communist state: Decentralization in Poland. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M. (2001). Public management reforms in the Netherlands: Social reconstruction of reform ideas and underlying frames of reference. Delft, Netherlands: Eburn.
   Google Scholar
• Knut, F., Breit, E., Andreassen, T. A., & Klamsdal, L. (2015). Managing institutional complexity in public sector reform: Hybridization in front-line service organizations. Public Administration, 93, 290–306. doi:10.1111/padm.12144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koprich, I., Wollmann, H., & Marcou, G. (Eds.). (2018). Evaluating reforms of local public and social services in Europe. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S. (2010). Performance measurement in European local government: A comparative analysis of reform experiences in Great Britain, France, Sweden and Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2), 1–15. doi:10.1177/0020852310372050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2011). The evaluation of institutional reforms at sub-national government levels: A still neglected research agenda. Local Government Studies, 37, 479–494. doi:10.1080/03003930.2011.604542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuotsai, T. L., & Korsec, R. (2009). Implementing organizational reform strategies in state governments. Public Administration Quarterly, 33, 429–452.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1–13. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.4001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liesbet, H. (2018). Reform in Europe: Breaking the barriers in government. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health of the Republic of Finland. (2017, March 2). Social services, health care and regional government reform before parliament. Press release No. 30/2017. Retrieved from http://www.publicnow.com/view/1272A3371CC1D11E1B3AD3CAC879D1C61400A93?2017-03-02-12:30:53+00:00.xxx4968
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report – A child centred system. Presented to the Parliament by the Secretary of State for Education by Command of Her Majesty, London, UK, Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, Y., & Park, J. J. (2011). New link between administrative reforms and job attitude: The role of interpersonal trust in peers as a mediator on organizational commitment. International Review of Public Administration, 16(3), 65–87. doi:10.1080/12294659.2011.10805208
   Google Scholar
• Ongaro, E. (2009). Public management reform and modernization: Trajectories of administrative change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gabler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (Ed.). (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives in theory and practice of public governance. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2018). From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: Are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation? Public Management Review, 20, 225–231. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Randor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18, 639–653. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patapas, A., Raipa, A., & Vainius, S. (2014). New public governance: The tracks of changes. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 45(5), 25–32. doi:10.18533/ijbsr.v4i5.478
   Google Scholar
• Payne, C. (2008). So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions and social analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Politt, C. (2000). Is the emperor in his underwear? An analysis of impact of public management reform. Public Management, 2, 181–199. doi:10.1080/146166700411229
   Google Scholar
• Politt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Politt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – New public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, H. (2009). Agency-environment relations: Understanding task environments. In R. Patti (Ed.), The handbook of human services management (2nd ed., pp. 411–433). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, H. (2010). Leadership styles and leadership change in human and community service organizations. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (2nd ed., pp. 193–205). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, H., & Morali Sagiv, D. (2018). The reform in social service departments: The current situation, achievements and difficulties in implementing changes in social services. Hevra Urevaha [Society and Welfare], 38, 175–203 (Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Seashore, L. K. (2008). Learning to support improvement-next steps for research on district practice. American Journal of Education, 114, 681–689. doi:10.1086/589320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalen, P. (2004). New public management reform and the construction of organizational identities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17, 251–263. doi:10.1108/09513550410530171
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. R., & Phillips, S. D. (2016). The changing and challenging environment of nonprofit human services: Implications for governance and program implementation. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 7, 63–76. doi:10.1515/npf-2015-0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wideen, M. F., & Grimmett, P. P. (Eds.). (1995). Changing times in teacher education: Restructuring or reconceptualization? London, UK: Palmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wollmann, H. (2003). Evaluation in public sector reform: Trends, potentials and limits in International perspective. In H.Wollmann(Ed.), Evaluation in public policy reform (pp.231-258). Cheltenham UK/Northampton: Edgar Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar