Can Case-Management Teams Solve the Dilemmas of the Street-Level Bureaucrat? Evidence from a Nonprofit Case Study

References

• Allard, S. W., & Small, M. L. (2013). Reconsidering the Urban disadvantaged: The role of systems, institutions, and organizations. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 647(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716213479317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, E. A., (Ed.). (1972). The Professional and the Paraprofessional: Manpower and Education Implications. Continuing Education in Social Welfare: School of Social Work and the Effective Use of Manpower. Florida Board of Regents.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. Y., & Henly, J. R. (2018). They are underpaid and understaffed: How clients interpret encounters with street-level bureaucrats. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2), 165–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, M. C., Edin, K., Wood, H. M., & Mondé, G. C. (2018). Relationship repertoires, the price of parenthood, and the costs of contraception. The Social Service Review, 92(3), 313–348. https://doi.org/10.1086/699159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl_2), i253–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. (2012). Reflections on street-level bureaucracy: Past, present, and future [review article]. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02657.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. (2016). Street-Level Organizations, Inequality, and the Future of Human Services. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(5), 444. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1173503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancian, M. (2001). Rhetoric and reality of work-based welfare reform. Social Work, 46(4), 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/46.4.309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancian, M., & Danziger, S. (Eds.). (2009). Changing poverty, changing policies. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, D. A., & Stater, K. J. (2009). Revenue diversification in nonprofit organizations: Does it lead to financial stability?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 947–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crampton, D. S., Crea, T. M., Abramson-Madden, A., & Usher, C. L. (2008). Challenges of street-level child welfare reform and technology transfer: The case of team decisionmaking. Families in Society, 89(4), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.3823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danziger, S. K., Danziger, S., Seefeldt, K. S., & Shaefer, H. L. (2016). FROM WELFARE to a WORK-BASED SAFETY NET: AN INCOMPLETE TRANSITION: Point/counterpoint. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(1), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, G. J., & Caspary, G. (1997). Welfare dynamics and the 1996 welfare reform. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 11(11), 605–632.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, L. (1962). Differential use of staff: A method to expand social services. Social Work, 66–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froelich, K. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3), 246–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P., & Andre-Clark, A. (2000). When missions, markets, and politics collide: Values and strategy in the nonprofit human services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1_suppl), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000291S007
   Google Scholar
• Fyall, R. (2016). The power of nonprofits: Mechanisms for nonprofit policy influence. Public Administration Review, 76(6), 938–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyall, R., & Allard, S. W. (2017). Nonprofits and political activity: A joint consideration of the political activities, programs, and organizational characteristics of social service nonprofits. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(3), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1267054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, A. R., Myers, C., Morones, S., Ohene, S., & Kim, M. (2020). “It starts from the top”: Caseworkers, supervisors, and TripleP providers’ perceptions of implementation processes and contexts. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 4(3), 266–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2020.1755759
   Google Scholar
• Gooden, S. T. (2004). Examining the implementation of welfare reform by race: Do blacks, Hispanics and whites report similar experiences with welfare agencies? The Review of Black Political Economy, 32(2), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-004-1023-1
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y., (Ed.). (2009). The attributes of human service organizations. Human services as complex organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 9–32). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., & Buffat, A. (2014). A public service gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4), 548–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.854401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jindra, M., Paulle, B., & Jindra, I. W. (2020). Relational work in the struggle against poverty: Balancing scholarly critiques and emancipatory practices in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(1), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019861716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing, Y., & Hu, Y. (2017). From service contracting to collaborative governance: Evolution of government-nonprofit relations. Public Administration & Development, 37(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiser, L. R., & Soss, J. With good cause: Bureaucratic discretion and the politics of child support enforcement. (1998). American Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 1133–1156. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissane, R. J. (2010). The client perspective on nonprofit social service organizations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(3), 632–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine Daniel, J., & Fyall, R. (2019). The intersection of nonprofit roles and public policy implementation. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(6), 1351–1371. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1601114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2003). Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. (1975). Representative bureaucracy: An empirical analysis*. The American Political Science Review, 69(2), 526–542. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., Wrinkle, R. D., & Polinard, J. L. (1999). Representative bureaucracy and distributional equity: Addressing the hard question. The Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, M. K., Riccucci, N. M., & Lurie, I. (2001). Achieving goal congruence in complex environments: The case of welfare reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(2), 165–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. (2000). Managing for value: Organizational strategy in for-profit, nonprofit, and governmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1_suppl), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000291S009
   Google Scholar
• Mosley, J. E., Marwell, N. P., & Ybarra, M. (2019). How the “what works” movement is failing human service organizations, and what social work can do to fix it. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 43(4), 326–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulton, S., & Eckerd, A. (2012). Preserving the publicness of the nonprofit sector: Resources, roles, and public values. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(4), 656–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011419517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan, R. P., & Gais, T. L. (1998). Early findings about the newest new federalism for welfare. 28 (3),10. https://doi.org/10.2307/3330983
   Google Scholar
• Neubeck, K. J., & Cazenave, N. A. (2002). Welfare racism: Playing the race card against America’s poor. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oberfield, Z. W. (2009). Rule following and discretion at government’s frontlines: Continuity and change during organization socialization. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 735–755. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penfold, H. M., & Moore, E. E. (1968). The social work assistant. Social Casework, 49(9), 552–555.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, S., Pandey, S., & Pandey, S. K. (2015). Is there a nonprofit advantage? Examining the impact of institutional context on individual–organizational value congruence. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, V. (2019). A theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418822335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingold, B., & Smith, A. R. (2012). Welfare policymaking and intersections of race, ethnicity, and gender in U.S. state legislatures. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (1993). The marketization of welfare: Changing nonprofit and for-profit roles in the American welfare state. The Social Service Review, 67(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.1086/603963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., & Abramson, A. J. (1996). The federal budget and the nonprofit sector: Implications of the contract with America. Johns Hopkins University Institute for Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Sandfort, J. R., & Moulton, S. (2015). Effective implementation in practice: Integrating public policy and management. John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sandfort, J. R., & Moulton, S. (2020). Replication or innovation? Structuration in policy implementation. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(2), 141–154.
   Google Scholar
• Schram, S. F., Soss, J., Fording, R., & Houser, L. (2009). Deciding to discipline: Race, choice, and punishment at the frontlines of welfare reform. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 398–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400304
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, T. M. (2014). Coalescing: A comparative case study of antecedents to cohesion in child welfare teaming ( (2014-99171-039)). ProQuest Information & Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. A., Girth, A. M., & Hutzel, M. (2021). Assessing organizational role and perceptions of programmatic success in policy implementation. Administration & Society, 53(10), 1512–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211011624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soss, J. (2002). Unwanted claims: The politics of participation in the US welfare system. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzmueller, M. C. (2018). Remaking “community” mental health: Contested institutional logics and organizational change. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 42(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2017.1422071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talib, K. A. (2012). Policy Implementation by the New Street Level Bureacrats in Non Profit Organizations: Overcoming the Dilemma. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 20(2), 333–352.
   Google Scholar
• Thomann, E., Hupe, P., & Sager, F. (2018). Serving many masters: Public accountability in private policy implementation. Governance, 31(2), 299–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins-Hayes, C. (2009). Race-ing the bootstrap climb: Black and Latino bureaucrats in post-reform welfare offices. Social Problems, 56(2), 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2009.56.2.285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins-Hayes, C. (2011). Race, respect, and red tape: Inside the black box of racially representative bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl_2), i233–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq096
   Google Scholar
• Ybarra, M. (2015). Report to the agency: Case team observations and recommendations.
   Google Scholar
• Zacka, B. (2017). When the state meets the street. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar