REFERENCES
- Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., and Sander, W. (2007), “Teachers and Student Achievement in the Chicago Public High Schools,” Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 95–135.
- Barlevy, G., and Neal, D. (2012), “Pay for Percentile,” American Economic Review, 102, 1805–1831.
- Betebenner, D.W. (2009), “Norm- and Criterion-Referenced Student Growth,” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28, 42–51.
- Betts, J. (1995), “Does School Quality Matter? Evidence From the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 231–250.
- Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., and Vidgor, J.L. (2006), “Teacher-Student Matching and the Assessment of Teacher Effectiveness,” Journal of Human Resources 41, 778–820.
- Ehlert, M., Koedel, C., Parsons, E., and Podgursky, M. (2013), “Selecting Growth Measures for School and Teacher Evaluations: Should Proportionality Matter?” CALDER Working Paper No. 80.
- Goldhaber, D., Walch, J., and Gabele, B. (2012), “Does the Model Matter? Exploring the Relationship Between Different Student Achievement-Based Teacher Assessments,” . CEDR Working Paper 2012–2016.
- Goldhaber, D., and Hansen, M. (2013). “Is It Just a Bad Class?: Assessing the Long-Term Stability of Estimated Teacher Performance,” Economica, 80, 589–612.
- Han, B., McCaffrey, D.F., Springer, M., and Gottfried, M. (2012), “Teacher Effect Estimates and Decision Rules for Establishing Student-Teacher Linkages: What are the Implications for High-Stakes Personnel Policies in an Urban School District?” Statistics, Politics, and Policy, 3, 2051.
- Hanushek, E. (1996), “Measuring Investment in Education,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 9–30.
- Hanushek, E.A., and Rivkin, S.G. (2010), “Generalizations About Using Value-Added Measures of Teacher Quality,” American Economic Review (P&P), 100, 267–271.
- Kane, T.J., and Staiger, D.O. (2002), “The Promises and Pitfalls of Using Imprecise School Accountability Measures,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 91–114.
- Koedel, C., and Betts, J.R. (2010), “Value-Added to What? How a Ceiling in the Testing Instrument Affects Value-Added Estimation,” Education Finance and Policy, 5, 54–81.
- ——— (2011), “Does Student Sorting Invalidate Value-Added Models of Teacher Effectiveness? An Extended Analysis of the Rothstein Critique,” Education Finance and Policy, 6, 18–42.
- McCaffrey, D.F., Lockwood, J.R., Koretz, D.M., and Hamilton, L.S. (2003), Evaluating Value-Added Models for Teacher Accountability, Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
- McCaffrey, D.F., Lockwood, J.R., Sass, T.R., and Mihaly, K. (2009), “The Inter-Temporal Variability of Teacher Effect Estimates,” Education Finance and Policy, 4, 572–606.
- Raudenbush, S., and Willms, D.J. (1995), “The Estimation of School Effects,” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20, 307–335.
- Sass, T.R., Hannaway, J., Xu, Z., Figlio, D.N., and Feng, L. (2012), “Value Added of Teachers in High-Poverty Schools and Lower Poverty Schools,” Journal of Urban Economics, 72, 104–122.
- Wiswall, M. (2013), “The Dynamics of Teacher Quality,” Journal of Public Economics, 100, 61–78.