Signal Weighted Teacher Value-Added Models

References

• Amrein-Beardsley, A., and Close, K. (2019), “Teacher-Level Value-Added Models on Trial: Empirical and Pragmatic Issues of Concern across Five Court Cases,” Educational Policy, 0895904819843593. DOI: 10.1177/0895904819843593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amrein-Beardsley, A., and Collins, C. (2012), “The SAS education value-added assessment system (SAS[textregistered] EVAAS[textregistered]) in the Houston Independent School District (HISD): Intended and unintended consequences,” Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 20, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bacher-Hicks, A., and de la Campa, E. (2020), “The Impact of New York City’s Stop and Frisk Program on Crime: The Case of Police Commanders,” Available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxbK9/_9mPwopEGyAyvJ606jrqCL1rwxT/view. Accessed November 4, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, L. A., and Glick, J. E. (2013), “Does it Matter if Teachers and Schools Match the Student? Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Problem Behaviors,” Social Science Research, 42, 1180–1190. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béguin, A. A., and Glas, C. A. (2001), “MCMC Estimation and Some Model-Fit Analysis of Multidimensional IRT Models,” Psychometrika, 66, 541–561. DOI: 10.1007/BF02296195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, R. D., Murakl, E., and Pfeiffenberger, W. (1988), “Item pool maintenance in the presence of item parameter drift,” Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, 275–285. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1988.tb00308.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broatch, J., and Lohr, S. (2012), “Multidimensional Assessment of Value Added by Teachers to Real-World Outcomes,” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 37, 256–277. DOI: 10.3102/1076998610396900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., and Rockoff, J. E. (2014), “Measuring the Impacts of Teachers II: Teacher Value-added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood,” American Economic Review, 104, 2633–2679. DOI: 10.1257/aer.104.9.2633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Friedman, J., Hilger, N., Saez, E., Schanzenbach, D. W., and Yagan, D. (2011), “How Does your Kindergarten Classroom Affect your Earnings? Evidence from Project Star,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 1593–1660. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjr041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Close, K., Amrein-Beardsley, A., and Collins, C. (2019), “Mapping America’s Teacher Evaluation Plans under ESSA,” Phi Delta Kappan, 101, 22–26. DOI: 10.1177/0031721719879150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, L. L., and Eignor, D. R. (1991), “IRT Equating Methods,” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10, 37–45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00207.x.
   Google Scholar
• Dee, T. S., and Wyckoff, J. (2015), “Incentives, Selection, and Teacher Performance: Evidence from IMPACT,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34, 267–297. DOI: 10.1002/pam.21818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egalite, A. J., Kisida, B., and Winters, M. A. (2015), “Representation in the Classroom: The Effect of Own-race Teachers on Student Achievement,” Economics of Education Review, 45, 44–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlert, M., Koedel, C., Parsons, E., and Podgursky, M. (2013), “The Sensitivity of Value-added Estimates to Specification Adjustments: Evidence from School- and Teacher-level Models in Missouri,” Statistics and Public Policy, 1, 19–27. DOI: 10.1080/2330443X.2013.856152.
   Google Scholar
• Guarino, C. M., Reckase, M. D., and Wooldridge, J. M. (2015), “Can Value-added Measures of Teacher Performance be Trusted?” Education Finance and Policy, 10, 117–156. DOI: 10.1162/EDFP_a_00153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D., and Herrington, C. D. (2015), “Editors’ Introduction: The Use of Teacher Value-Added Measures in Schools: New Evidence, Unanswered Questions, and Future Prospects,” Educational Researcher, 44, 71–76. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X15576142.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, M., Walsh, E., and Isenberg, E. (2016), “Shrinkage of Value-added Estimates and Characteristics of Students with Hard-to Predict Achievement Levels,” Statistics and Public Policy, 3, 1–10. Policy Analysis Archives, 20(12), n12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isenberg, E., and Walsh, E. (2014), Measuring Teacher Value Added in DC, 2013–2014 School Year. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. K. (2018), “What do Test Scores Miss? The Importance of Teacher Effects on Non–test Score Outcomes,” Journal of Political Economy, 126, 2072–2107. DOI: 10.1086/699018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, T. J., and Staiger, D. O. (2008). Estimating teacher impacts on student achievement: An experimental evaluation (No. w14607). National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Karl, A. T., Yang, Y., and Lohr, S. L. (2013), “A Correlated Random Effects Model for Nonignorable Missing Data in Value-added Assessment of Teacher Effects,” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 577–603. DOI: 10.3102/1076998613494819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koedel, C., Mihaly, K., and Rockoff, J. E. (2015), “Value-added Modeling: A Review,” Economics of Education Review, 47, 180–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, J. R., and McCaffrey, D. F. (2009), “Exploring Student–Teacher Interactions in Longitudinal Achievement Data,” Education Finance and Policy, 4, 439–467. DOI: 10.1162/edfp.2009.4.4.439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, J. R., and McCaffrey, D. F. (2014), “Correcting for Test Score Measurement Error in ANCOVA Models for Estimating Treatment Effects,” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 22–52. DOI: 10.3102/1076998613509405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, D. F., Lockwood, J. R., Koretz, D. M., Louis, T. A., and Hamilton, L. (2004), “Models for Value-added Modeling of Teacher Effects,” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 67–101. DOI: 10.3102/10769986029001067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulhern, C. (2020), “Personalized Information and College Choices: The Role of School Counselors, Technology, and Siblings,” Doctoral dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Papay, J. P., and Kraft, M. A. (2015), “Productivity Returns to Experience in the Teacher Labor Market: Methodological Challenges and New Evidence on Long-Term Career Improvement,” Journal of Public Economics, 130, 105–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. F., and Raudenbush, S. W. (2009), “Assumptions of Value-added Models for Estimating School Effects,” Education, 4, 492–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckase, M. D., and Martineau, J. A. (2015), “The Evaluation of Teachers and Schools using the Educator Response Function (ERF),” in Educator Response Function in Value Added Modeling and Growth Modeling with Particular Application to Teacher and School Effectiveness, eds. R. W. Lissitz and H. Jiao, pp. 219–236. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Roju, N. S., Van der Linden, W. J., and Fleer, P. F. (1995), “IRT-based Internal Measures of Differential Functioning of Items and Tests,” Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 353–368. DOI: 10.1177/014662169501900405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotherham, A. J., and Mitchel, A. L., (2014), Genuine Progress, Greater Challenges: A Decade of Teacher Effectiveness Reforms, Bellwether Education Partners. https://bellwethereducation.org/sites/default/files/JOYCE_Teacher%20Effectiveness_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, J. (2009), “Student Sorting and Bias in Value-added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables,” Education Finance and Policy, 4, 537–571. DOI: 10.1162/edfp.2009.4.4.537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. (1973), “Homogeneous Case of the Continuous Response Model,” Psychometrika, 38, 203–219. DOI: 10.1007/BF02291114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass, T. R. (2008), “The Stability of Value-Added Measures of Teacher Quality and Implications for Teacher Compensation Policy. Brief 4.” National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Stacy, B., Guarino, C., and Wooldridge, J. (2018), “Does the Precision and Stability of Value-added Estimates of Teacher Performance Depend on the Types of Students they Serve?” Economics of Education Review, 64, 50–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stan Development Team. (2018), RStan: The R Interface to Stan. R package version 2.17. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T., and Zeng, L. (1998), “Item Parameter Estimation for a Continuous Response Model Using an EM Algorithm,” Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 333–344. DOI: 10.1177/014662169802200402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zumbo, B. D. (1999), A Handbook on the Theory and Methods of Differential Item Functioning (DIF), Ottawa: National Defense Headquarters.
   Google Scholar