Characterising ranking stability in interval pairwise comparison matrices

References

• Abdi, H. (2007). The Kendall rank correlation coefficient. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, 2, 508–510.
   Google Scholar
• Ágoston, K. C., & Csató, L. (2022). Inconsistency thresholds for incomplete pairwise comparison matrices. Omega, 108((April), 102576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2021.102576.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, Y., Butt, M., Sabir, M., Mumtaz, U., & Salman, A. (2018). Selection of suitable site in Pakistan for wind power plant installation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Journal of Control and Decision, 5(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/23307706.2017.1346490
   Google Scholar
• Ali, Y., Rasheed, Z., Muhammad, N., & Yousaf, S. (2018). Energy optimization in the wake of China Pakistan economic corridor (CPEC). Journal of Control and Decision, 5(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/23307706.2017.1353929
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, E. D., & Andersen, K. D. (2000). The MOSEK interior point optimizer for linear programming: an implementation of the homogeneous algorithm. In High performance optimization (pp. 197–232). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barzilai, J., & Golany, B. (1990). Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices: The additive case. Operations Research Letters, 9(6), 407–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6377(90)90062-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bérubé, J. F., Gendreau, M., & Potvin, J.-Y. (2009). An exact ε-constraint method for bi-objective combinatorial optimization problems: Application to the Traveling Salesman Problem with Profits. European Journal of Operational Research, 194(1), 39–50. ISSN 0377-2217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.014
   Google Scholar
• Blankmeyer, E. (1987). Approaches to consistency adjustment. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 54(3), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozóki, S., Fülöp, J., & Rónyai, L. (2010). On optimal completion of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52(1–2), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2010.02.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, B., & Brunelli, M. (2018). A general unified framework for interval pairwise comparison matrices. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 93(February), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, A., Kalaba, R., & Spingarn, K. (1979). A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 27(4), 531–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00933438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, W. D., & Kress, M. (1988). Deriving weights from pairwise comparison ratio matrices: An axiomatic approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 37(3), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(88)90198-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, G., & Williams, C. (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(85)90002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbach, I., Lahdelma, R., & Salminen, P. (2014). The analytic hierarchy process with stochastic judgements. European Journal of Operational Research, 238(2), 552–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. S. (1990). Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 36(3), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.3.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faramondi, L., Oliva, G., & Setola, R. (2020). Multi-criteria node criticality assessment framework for critical infrastructure networks. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 28((March), 100338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2020.100338.
   Google Scholar
• Faramondi, L., Oliva, G., Setola, R., & Bozóki, S. (2022). Robustness to rank reversal in pairwise comparison matrices based on uncertainty bounds. European Journal of Operational Research, 304(2), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.04.010
   Google Scholar
• Gai, T., Cao, M., Chiclana, F., Zhang, Z., Dong, Y., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Wu, J. (2022). Consensus-trust driven bidirectional feedback mechanism for improving consensus in social network large-group decision making. In Group Decision and Negotiation (pp. 1–30). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kwiesielewicz, M. (1996). The logarithmic least squares and the generalised pseudoinverse in estimating ratios. European Journal of Operational Research, 93(3), 611–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00079-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F. (2009). Acceptable consistency analysis of interval reciprocal comparison matrices. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 160(18), 2686–2700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2009.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazurek, J., Perzina, R., Ramík, J., & Bartl, D. (2021). A numerical comparison of the sensitivity of the geometric mean method, eigenvalue method, and best–worst method. Mathematics, 9(5), 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9050554
   Google Scholar
• Menci, M., Oliva, G., Papi, M., Setola, R., & Scala, A. (2018). A suite of distributed methodologies to solve the sparse analytic hierarchy process problem. In 2018 European Control Conference (ECC) (pp. 1447–1453).  IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, G. (1976). Some comments on measuring world influence. Journal of Peace Science, 2(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/073889427600200104
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process – what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1988). What is the analytic hierarchy process? In Mathematical models for decision support (pp. 109–121). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1990). An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper ‘remarks on the analytic hierarchy process’. Management Science, 36(3), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.3.259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L., & Hu, G. (1998). Ranking by eigenvector versus other methods in the analytic hierarchy process. Applied Mathematics Letters, 11(4), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-9659(98)00068-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (1987). Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 32(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(87)90275-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siraj, S., Mikhailov, L., & Keane, J. A. (2012). Preference elicitation from inconsistent judgments using multi-objective optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(2), 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y., & Hua, Z. (2008). On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(2), 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Li, Z. (2021). Personalized individual semantics-based consistency control and consensus reaching in linguistic group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 52(9), 5623–5635. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2021.3129510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar