Addressing Challenges Common to Modern Recreational Fisheries with a Buffet-Style Landscape Management Approach

References

• Aas, O., and R. Arlinghaus. New markets for recreational fishing, pp. 229–243. In: The Science of Human Dimensions (Manfredo, M. J., J. J. Vaske, P. J. Brown, D. J. Decker, and E. A. Duke, Eds.). Washington, DC: Island Press (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Aas, O., W. Haider, and L. Hunt. Angler responses to potential harvest regulations in a Norwegian sport fishery: a conjoint-based choice modeling approach. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 20: 940–950 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Agardy, T., G. N. Di Sciara, and P. Christie. Mind the gap: addressing the shortcomings of marine protected areas through large scale marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy, 35: 226–232 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus, R., and S. J. Cooke. Global impact of recreational fisheries. Science 307: 1561–1563 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus, R. A conceptual framework to identify and understand conflicts in recreational fisheries systems, with implications for sustainable management. Aquatic Resources Culture and Development 1(2): 145–174 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus, R. On the apparently striking disconnect between motivation and satisfaction in recreational fishing: the case of catch orientation of German anglers. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 26: 592–605 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus, R. Voluntary catch-and-release can generate conflict within the recreational angling community: a qualitative case study of specialised carp, Cyprinus carpio angling in Germany. Fisheries Management and Ecology 14(2): 161–171 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus, R., J. Alos, B. Beardmore, K. Daedlow, M. Dorow, M. Fujitana, D. Huhn, W. Haider, L. M. Hunt, B. M. Johnson, F. D. Johnston, T. Klefoth, S. Matsumura, C. Monk, T. Pagel, J. R. Post, T. Rapp, C. Riepe, H. Ward, and C. Wolter. Understanding and managing freshwater recreational fisheries as complex social-ecological systems. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquacult., 25: 1–41 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus, R., and S. J. Cooke. Recreational fisheries: socioeconomic importance, conservation issues and management challenges. Recreational Hunting, Conservation and Rural Livelihoods: Science and Practice, pp. 39–58 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus, R., R. Tillner, and M. Bork. Explaining participation rates in recreational fishing across industrialized countries. Fish. Manage. Ecol., 22: 45–55 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arterburn, J. E., D. J. Kirby, and C. R. J. Berry. A survey of angler attitudes and biologist opinions regarding trophy catfish and their management. Fisheries, 27: 10–21 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askey, P. J., E. A. Parkinson, and J. R. Post. Linking fish and angler dynamics to assess stocking strategies for hatchery-dependent, open-access recreational fisheries. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 33: 557–568 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, W. E. and J. N. Taylor. The importance of goals, objectives, and values in the fisheries management process and organization: a review. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 10: 365–375 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, L. A. K., T. A. Branch, R. A. Ranasinghe, and T. E. Essington. Old-growth fishes become scarce under fishing. Curr. Biol., 27: 1–6 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beardmore, B., W. Haider, L. M. Hunt, and R. Arlinghaus. The importance of trip context for determining primary angler motivations: are more specialized anglers more catch-oriented than previously believed?. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 31: 861–879 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beardmore, B., W. Haider, L. M. Hunt, and R. Arlinghaus. Evaluating the ability of specialization indicators to explain fishing preferences. Leis. Sci., 35: 273–292 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beardmore, B., L. M. Hunt, W. Haider, M. Dorow, and R. Arlinghaus. Effectively managing angler satisfaction in recreational fisheries requires understanding the fish species and the anglers. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 72: 500–513 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, E. L., E. Blencowe, K. Brandon, D. Brown, R. W. Burn, G. Cowlishaw, G. Davies, H. Dublin, J. E. Fa, E. J. Milner-Gulland, and J. G. Robinson. Hunting for consensus: reconciling bushmeat harvest, conservation, and development policy in West and Central Africa. Conserv. Biol., 21: 884–887 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J. Environ. Manage., 90: 1692–1702 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodmer, R. E., T. G. Fang, L. Moya, and R. Gill. Managing wildlife to conserve Amazonian forests: population biology and economic considerations of game hunting. Biol. Conserv., 67: 29–35 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolding, B., S. Bonar, and M. Divens. Use of artificial structure to enhance angler benefits in lakes, ponds and reservoirs: a literature review. Rev. Fish. Sci., 12: 75–96 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botsford, L. W. Optimal fishery policy for size-specific, density-dependent population models. J. Math. Biol., 12: 265–293 (1981).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, H. Leisure value systems and recreational specialization: the case of trout fishermen. J. Leis. Res., 9: 174–187 (1977).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camp, E. V, S. L. Larkin, R. N. M. Ahrens, and K. Lorenzen. Trade-offs between socioeconomic and conservation management objectives in stock enhancement of marine recreational fisheries. Fish. Res., 186: 446–459 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camp, E. V, K. Lorenzen, R. N. M. Ahrens, L. Barieri, and K. M. Leber. Potentials and limitations of stock enhancement in marine recreational fisheries systems: an integrative review of Florida’s red drum enhancement. Rev. Fish. Sci., 21: 388–402 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camp, E. V, B. T. van Poorten, and C. J. Walters. Evaluating short openings as a management tool to maximize catch-related utility in catch-and-release fisheries. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 35: 1106–1120 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, M. P., B. L. Sanderson, T. A. Friesen, K. A. Barnas, and J. D. Olden. Smallmouth bass in the Pacific Northwest: a threat to native species; a benefit for anglers. Rev. Fish. Sci., 19: 305–315 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. R. and W. A. Brock. Spatial complexity, resilience, and policy diversity: fishing on lake-rich landscapes. Ecol. Soc., 9(1): 8 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. R., W. A. Brock, G. J. A. Hansen, J. F. Hansen, J. M. Hennessy, D. A. Isermann, E. J. Pedersen, K. M. Perales, A. Rypel, G. G. Sass, T. D. Tunney, and M. J. Vander Zanden. Defining a safe operating space for recreational fisheries. Fish Fish., 18: 1150–1160 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers, T. R., K. Dabrowska, W. Haider, E. A. Parkinson, D. A. Varkey, H. G. M. Ward, M. K. McAllister, T. Godin, B. T. van Poorten, P. J. Askey, K. L. Wilson, L. M. Hunt, A. D. Clarke, E. Newton, C. Walters, and J. R. Post. Landscape scale social and ecological outcomes of dynamic angler and fish behaviours: processes, data, and patterns. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. (2018). doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2018-0168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, A. S. and S. E. Daniels. Examining the interaction between geographic scale and ways of knowing in ecosystem maangement: a case study of place-based collaborative planning. For. Sci., 49: 841–854 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, W. W. L. and U. R. Sumaila. Trade-offs between conservation and socio-economic objectives in managing a tropical marine ecosystem. Ecol. Econ., 66: 193–210 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chipman, B. D. and L. A. Helfrich. Recreational specializations and motivations of Virginia river anglers. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 8: 390–398 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Christie, N., K. Smyth, R. Barnes, and M. Elliot. Co-location of activities and designations: a means of solving or creating problems for marine spatial planning?. Mar. Policy, 43: 254–261 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill, T. N., P. W. Bettoli, D. C. Peterson, W. C. Reeves, and B. Hodge. Angler conflicts in fisheries management: a case study of the striped bass controversy at Norris Reservoir, Tennessee. Fisheries, 27: 10–19 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, W. G. F-35% revisited ten years later. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 22: 251–257 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, F. C., W. F. Figueira, J. S. Ueland, and L. B. Crowder. The impact of United States recreational fisheries on marine fish populations. Science 305(5692): 1958–60 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, S. J., E. H. Allison, T. D. J. Beard, R. Arlinghaus, A. H. Arthington, D. B. Bartley, I. G. Cowx, C. Fuentevilla, N. J. Leonard, K. Lorenzen, A. J. Lynch, V. M. Nguyen, S.-J. Youn, W. W. Taylor, and R. L. Welcomme. On the sustainability of inland fisheries: finding a future for the forgotten. Ambio, 45: 753–764 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowx, I. G. Recreational fishing, pp. 367–390. In: Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries (Hart, P. and J. Reynolds, Eds.). Volume 2. Oxford: Blackwell Science (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Cowx, I. G., and R. van Anrooy. Social, economic and ecological objectives of inland commercial and recreational fisheries. Fish. Manage. Ecol., 17: 89–92 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowx, I. G., R. Arlinghaus, and S. J. Cooke. Harmonising recreational fisheries and conservation for aquatic biodiversity in inland waters. J. Fish Biol., 76: 2194–2215 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, S. P., T. D. Beard, and C. Walters. Harvest control in open-access sport fisheries: hot rod or asleep at the reel? Bull. Mar. Sci., 70: 749–761 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, S. P., C. J. Walters, and J. R. Post. A model-based evaluation of active management of recreational fishing effort. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 23: 1294–1302 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder, L. B., and E. Norse. Essential ecological insights for marine ecosystem-based management and marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy, 32: 772–778 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditton, R. B., and S. G. Sutton. Substitutability in recreational fishing. Hum. Dimens. Wildl., 9: 87–102 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., and W. Stephenson. Assessing the potential for surf break co-management: evidence from New Zealand. Coast. Manage., 41: 537–560 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engstrom-Heg, R. A philosophy of trout stream management in New York. Fisheries, 6: 11–16 (1981).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedler, A. J., and R. B. Ditton. Understanding angler motivations in fisheries management. Fisheries, 19: 6–13 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenichel, E. P., and J. K. Abbott. Heterogeneity and the fragility of the first best: putting the “micro” in bioeconomic models of recreational resources. Resour. Energy Econ., 36: 351–369 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. R. Segmentation of the angler population by catch preference, participation, and experience: a management-oriented application of recreation specialization. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 17: 1–10 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, J. Developing information essential to policy, planning, and management decisions: the promise of GIS, pp. 18–24. In: Remote Sensing and GIS in Ecosystem Management (Sample, V. A., Ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, E. A., A. D. M. Smith, D. C. Smith, and I. E. van Putten. Human behaviour: the key source of uncertainty in fisheries management. Fish Fish., 12: 2–17 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Asorey, M. I., G. Escati-Penaloza, A. M. Parma, and M. A. Pascual. Conflicting objectives in trophy trout recreational fisheries: evaluating trade-offs using an individual-based model. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 68: 1892–1904 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigliotti, L. M., and R. B. Peyton. Values and behaviors of trout anglers, and their attitudes toward fishery management, relative to membership in fishing organizations: a Michigan case study. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 13: 492–501 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, S. J., and G. G. Sass. Trends in a northern Wisconsin Muskellunge fishery: results from a countywide angling contest, 1964-2010. Fish. Manag. Ecol., 23: 172–176 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granek, E. F., E. M. P. Madin, M. A. Brown, W. Figueira, D. S. Cameron, Z. Hogan, G. Kristianson, P. de Villiers, J. E. Williams, J. Post, S. Zahn, and R. Arlinghaus. Engaging recreational fishers in management and conservation: global case studies. Conserv. Biol., 22: 1125–1134 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, N. L., R. Hilborn, and O. Defeo. Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature, 470: 386–389 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwinn, D. C., M. S. Allen, F. D. Johnston, P. Brown, C. R. Todd, and R. Arlinghaus. Rethinking length-based fisheries regulations: the value of protecting old and large fish with harvest slots. Fish Fish., 16: 259–281 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, B. S., K. L. McLeod, and A. A. Rosenberg. Managing for cumulative impacts in ecosystem-based management through ocean zoning. Ocean Coast. Manage., 51: 203–211 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, G. J. A., J. S. Read, J. F. Hansen, and L. A. Winslow. Projected shifts in fish species dominance in Wisconsin lakes under climate change. Glob. Change Biol., 23: 1463–1476 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, G. J., J. W. Gaeta, J. F. Hansen, and S. R. Carpenter. Learning to manage and managing to learn: sustaining freshwater recreational fisheries in a changing environment. Fisheries, 40: 56–64 (2015a).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. F., G. G. Sass, J. W. Gaeta, G. A. Hansen, D. A. Isermann, J. Lyons, and M. J. Vander Zanden. Largemouth bass management in Wisconsin: intraspecific and interspecific implications of abundance increases. Pages 193–206Black bass diversity: multidisciplinary science for conservation. In: American Fisheries Society Sympsium, Bethesda, MD. Volume 82 (2015b).
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. K., R. H. Gimblett, and W. W. Shaw. Multiple use management: using a GIS model to understand conflicts between recreationists and sensitive wildlife. Soc. Nat. Resour., 8: 559–572 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendee, J. C. A multiple-satisfaction approach to game management. Wildl. Soc. Bull., 2: 104–113 (1974).
   Google Scholar
• Hilborn, R. Defining success in fisheries and conflicts in objectives. Mar. Policy, 31: 153–158 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilborn, R., and C. J. Walters. Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics and Uncertainty. New York: Chapman and Hall (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Holland, S. M., and R. B. Ditton. Fishing trip satisfaction: a typology of anglers. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 12: 28–33 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, L. Recreational fishing site choice models: insights and future opportunities. Hum. Dimens. Wildl., 10: 153–172 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, L. M., R. Arlinghaus, N. Lester, and R. Kushneriuk. The effects of regional angling effort, angler behavior, and harvesting efficiency on landscape patterns of overfishing. Ecol. Appl., 21: 2555–2575 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, L. M., E. Camp, B. van Poorten, and R. Arlinghaus. Catch and non-catch-related determinants of where anglers fish: a review of three decades of site choice research in recreational fisheries. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquacult. 27(3): 261–268 (2019).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, L. M., S. G. Sutton, and R. Arlinghaus. Illustrating the critical role of human dimensions research for understanding and managing recreational fisheries within a social-ecological system framework. Fish. Manage. Ecol., 20: 111–124 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings, J. A., C. Walters, and R. L. Haedrich. Is scientific inquiry incompatible with government information control?. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 1198–1210 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutt, C. P., and P. W. Bettoli. Preferences, specialization, and management attitudes of trout anglers fishing in Tennessee tailwaters. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 27: 1257–1267 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihde, T. F., M. J. Wilberg, D. a. Loewensteiner, D. H. Secor, and T. J. Miller. The increasing importance of marine recreational fishing in the US: challenges for management. Fish. Res., 108: 268–276 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentoft, S. The increasing importance of marine recreational fishing in the US: challenges for management. Mar. Policy, 13: 137–154 (1989).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, F. D., R. Arlinghaus, and U. Dieckmann. Diversity and complexity of angler behaviour drive socially optimal input and output regulations in a bioeconomic recreational-fisheries model. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 67: 1507–1531 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, F. D., R. Arlinghaus, and U. Dieckmann. Fish life history, angler behaviour and optimal management of recreational fisheries. Fish Fish., 14: 554–579 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, F. D., B. Beardmore, and R. Arlinghaus. Optimal management of recreational fisheries in the presence of hooking mortality and noncompliance — predictions from a bioeconomic model incorporating a mechanistic model of angler behavior. Can J Fish Aquat Sci., 53: 37–53 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellner, J. B., I. Tetreault, S. D. Gaines, and R. M. Nisbet. Fishing the line near marine reserves in single and multispecies fisheries. Ecological Applications 17(4):1039–1054 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiker, G. A., T. S. Bridges, A. Varghese, T. P. Seager, and I. Linkov. Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage., 1: 95–108 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliskey, A. D. Recreation terrain suitability mapping: a spatially explicity methodology for determining recreation potential for resource use assessment. Landsc. Urban Plan., 52: 33–43 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoche, S. and F. Lupi. Demand for fishery regulations: effects of angler heterogeneity and catch improvements on preferences for gear and harvest regulations. Fish. Res., 181: 163–171 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehn, J. Conservation and utilisation: harnessing forces for better outcomes for native fishes. Ecol. Manage. Restor., 11: 86 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Lackey, R. T. Options and limitations in fisheries management. Environ. Manage., 3: 109–112 (1979).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, P. A. An epitaph for the concept of maximum sustained yield. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 106: 1–11 (1977).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, N. P., T. R. Marshall, K. Armstrong, W. I. Dunlop, and B. Ritchie. A broad-scale approach to management of Ontario’s recreational fisheries. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 23: 1312–1328 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, W.-C., R. Arlinghaus, and T. Mehner. Documented and potential biological impacts of recreational fishing: insights for management and conservation. Rev. Fish. Sci., 14: 305–367 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzen, K. Understanding and managing enhancement fisheries systems. Rev. Fish. Sci., 16: 10–23 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvestuto, S. P., and M. D. Hudgins. Optimum yield for recreational fisheries management. Fisheries, 21: 6–17 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margenau, T. L., and J. B. Petchenik. Social aspects of muskellunge management in Wisconsin. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 24: 82–93 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. R., and K. L. Pope. Luring anglers to enhance fisheries. J. Environ. Manage., 92: 1409–1413 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. M., S. C. Newbold, and B. Gentner. Valueing water quality changes using a bioeconomic model of a coastal recreational fishery. J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 52: 482–500 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCorquodale, S. M. Cultural contexts of recreational hunting and native subsistence and ceremonial hunting: their significance for wildlife management. Wildl. Soc. Bull., 25: 568–573 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHarg, I. Design with Nature. Garden City, NY: The Natural History Press (1969).
   Google Scholar
• Mebane, W. R. J. and J. S. Sekhon. Genetic optimization using derivatives: the rgenoud package for R. J. Stat. Softw., 42: 1–26 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, E., J. Thacher, and W. Breffle. Using angler characteristics and attitudinal data to identify environmental preference classes: a latent-class model. Environ. Resour. Econ., 34: 91–115 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, R. A., K. G. Bowen, and N. J. Barrowman. Maximum reproductive rate of fish at low population sizes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56: 2404–2419 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, C.-O. and R. B. Ditton. Using recreational specialization to understand multi-attribute management preference. Leis. Sci., 28: 369–384 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, E. A., J. R. Post, and S. P. Cox. Linking the dynamics of harvest effort to recruitment dynamics in a multistock, spatially structured fishery. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 61: 1658–1670 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, D. L., and M. J. Hanson. A perspective on challenges to recreational fisheries management: Summary of the symposium on active management of recreational fisheries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 23: 1276–1282 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikitch, E., C. Santora, E. A. Babcock, A. Bakun, R. Bonfil, D. O. Conover, P. A. O. Dayton, P. Doukakis, D. Fluharty, B. Heneman, and E. D. Houde. Ecosystem-based fishery management. Science, 305: 346–347 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkerton, E. Co-Operative Management of Local Fisheries: new Directions for Improved Management and Community Development. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Pomeroy, R. S., and F. Berkes. Two to tango: the role of government in fisheries co-management. Mar. Policy, 21: 465–480 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Poorten, B. T., S. P. Cox, and A. B. Cooper. Efficacy of harvest and minimum size limit regulations for controlling short-term harvest in recreational fisheries. Fish. Manage. Ecol., 20: 258–267 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Poorten, B. T., and C. J. Walters. How can bioenergetics help us predict changes in fish growth patterns? Fish. Res., 180: 23–30 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Poorten, B. T., C. J. Walters, and H. G. M. Ward. Predicting changes in the catchability coefficient through effort sorting as less skilled fishers exit the fishery during stock declines. Fish. Res., 183: 379–384 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, J. G. Fisheries resource management theory and practice, pp. 56–62. In: New Zealand Finfish Fisheries: The Resources and Their Management (Taylor, T. J. and G. G. Baird, Eds.). Aukland, New Zealand: Trade Publications Limited (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Poplar-Jeffers, I. O., J. T. Petty, J. T. Anderson, S. J. Kite, M. P. Strager, and R. H. Fortney. Culvert replacement and stream habitat restoration: implications from brook trout management in an Appalachian watershed, USA. Restor. Ecol., 17: 404–413 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porch, C. E. and W. W. J. Fox. Simulating the dynamic trends of fisheries regulated by small daily bag limits. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 119: 836–849 (1990).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, J. R. Resilient recreational fisheries or prone to collapse? A decade of research on the science and management of recreational fisheries. Fish. Manage. Ecol., 20: 99–110 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, J. R., C. J. Mushens, A. Paul, and M. Sullivan. Assessment of alternative harvest regulations for sustaining recreational fisheries: model development and application to bull trout. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 23: 22–34 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, J. R., and E. A. Parkinson. Temporal and spatial patterns of angler effort across lake districts and policy options to sustain recreational fisheries. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 69: 321–329 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, J. R., E. A. Parkinson, and N. T. Johnston. Density-dependent processes in structured fish populations: interaction strengths in whole-lake experiments. Ecol. Monogr., 69: 155–175 (1999).2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, J. R., M. Sullivan, S. Cox, N. P. Lester, C. J. Walters, E. A. Parkinson, A. J. Paul, L. Jackson, and B. J. Shuter. Canada’s recreational fisheries: the invisible collapse?. Fisheries, 27: 6–17 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Development Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from https://www.R-project.org/ (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Radomski, P. J., G. C. Grant, P. C. Jacobson, and M. F. Cook. Visions for recreational fishing regulations. Fisheries, 26: 7–18 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, S. E., L. D. Rodwell, M. J. Attrill, M. C. Austen, and S. C. Mangi. The value of marine biodiversity to the leisure and recreation industry and its application to marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy, 34: 868–875 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricker, W. E. Computation and Interpretation of Biological Statistics of Fish Populations Bull. Fish. Res. Board Canada, 191: 1–382 (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, D. K. Exotic fish introductions and the decline of water clarity in small North Island, New Zealand lakes: a multi-species problem. Hydrobiologia, 583: 345–358 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royce, W. F. Trends in fisheries science. Fisheries, 8: 10–13 (1983).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salz, R. J. and D. K. Loomis. Recreation specialization and anglers’ attitudes towards restricted fishing areas. Hum. Dimens. Wildl., 10: 187–199 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Sass, G. G., J. W. Gaeta, M. S. Allen, C. D. Suski, and S. L. Francis. Effects of catch-and-release angling on a largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) population in a north temperate lake, 2001-2005. Fish. Res., 204: 95–102 (2018).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schill, D. J. Hooking mortality of bait-caught rainbow trout in an Idaho trout stream and a hatchery: implications for special-regulation management. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 16: 348–356 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, W. Artificial habitats and the restoration of degraded marine ecosystems and fisheries. Hydrobiologia, 580: 143–155 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, S. L., G. G. Sass, and L. E. Eslinger. Effects of angler harvest on adult Muskellunge growth and survival in Escanaba Lake, Wisconsin, 1956-2016. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 39: 124–134 (2019).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetter, D. S. and G. R. Alexander. Angling and trout populations on the North Branch of the Au Sable River, Crawford and Otsego counties, Michigan, under special and normal regulations, 1958-63. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 95: 85–91 (1966).2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuter, B. J., M. L. Jones, R. M. Korver, and N. P. Lester. A general, life history based model for regional management of fish stocks: the inland lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) fisheries of Ontario. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 55: 2161–2177 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, S. G. Constraints on recreational fishing participation in Queensland, Australia. Fisheries, 32: 73–83 (2007).2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thebaud, O., N. Ellis, L. R. Little, L. Doyen, and R. J. Marriott. Viability trade-offs in the evaluation of strategies to manage recreational fishing in a marine park. Ecol. Indic., 46: 59–69 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiller, R., T. Brekken, and J. Bailey. Norwegian aquaculture expansion and integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM): simmering conflicts and competing claims. Mar. Policy, 36: 1086–1095 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivonen, A. L., E. Roth, S. Navrud, G. Gudbergsson, H. Appelblad, B. Bengtsson, and P. Tuunainen. The economic value of recreational fisheries in Nordic countries. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 11(1):1–14 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, C. Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems. Conserv. Ecol., 1(2): 1 (1997). http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss2/art1/
   Google Scholar
• Walters, C. Impacts of dispersal, ecological interactions, and fishing effort dynamics on the efficacy of marine protected areas: how large should protected areas be? Bull. Mar. Sci., 66: 745–757 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, C. J. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. Caldwell, NJ: The Blackburn Press (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Walters, C. J. Improving links between ecosystem scientists and managers, pp. 272–286. In: Successes, Limitation, and Frontiers in Ecosystem Science. New York, NY: Springer (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Walters, C. J. Is Adaptive Management Helping to Solve Fisheries Problems? AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 36(4):304–307 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, C. J., R. Hilborn, and R. Parrish. An equilibrium model for predicting the efficacy of marine protected areas in coastal environments. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 64: 1009–1018 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, C. J., and J. R. Post. Density-dependent growth and competitive asymmetries in size-structured fish populations: a theoretical model and recommendations for field experiments. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 122: 34–45 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, C. and S. Martell. Fisheries Ecology and Management. Princeton: Princeton University Press (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ward, H. G. M., M. S. Allen, E. V Camp, N. Cole, L. M. Hunt, B. Matthias, J. R. Post, K. Wilson, and R. Arlinghaus. Understanding and managing social-ecological feedbacks in spatially structured recreational fisheries: the overlooked behavioral dimension. Fisheries, 41: 524–535 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, H. G. M., P. J. Askey, and J. R. Post. A mechanistic understanding of hyperstability in catch per unit effort and density-dependent catchability in a multistock recreational fishery. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 70: 1542–1550 (2013a).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, H. G. M., M. S. Quinn, and J. R. Post. Angler characteristics and management implications in a large, multistock, spatially structured recreational fishery. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 33: 576–584 (2013b).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wightman, R., S. Sutton, B.E. Matthews, K. Gillis, J. Colman, and J.-R. Samuelsen. Recruiting new anglers: driving forces, constraints and examples of success, pp. 303–323. In: Global Challenges in Recreational Fisheries. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Wild, G. R., R. K. Riechers, and R. B. Ditton. Differences in attitudes, fishing motives, and demographic characteristics between tournament and nontournament black bass anglers in Texas. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 18: 422–431 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. L., A. Cantin, H. G. M. Ward, E. R. Newton, J. A. Mee, D. A. Varkey, E. A. Parkinson, and J. R. Post. Supply–demand equilibria and the size–number trade‐off in spatially structured recreational fisheries. Ecol. Appl., 26: 1086–1097 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O. R., G. Osherenko, J. Ekstrom, L. B. Crowder, J. Ogden, J. A. Wilson, J. C. Day, F. Douvere, C. N. Ehler, K. L. McLeod, and B. S. Halpren. Solving the crisis in ocean governance: place-based management of marine ecosystems. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev., 49: 20–32 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar