A Global Blue Revolution: Aquaculture Growth Across Regions, Species, and Countries

References

• Abate TG, Nielsen R, Nielsen M. 2018. Agency rivalry in a shared regulatory space and its impact on social welfare: the case of aquaculture regulation. Aquacult Econ Manag. 22(1):27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abate T, Nielsen R, Tveterås R. 2016. Stringency of environmental regulation and aquaculture growth: a cross-country analysis. Aquacult Econ Manag. 20(2):201–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• African Union Commission and New Partnership for Africa’s Development (AUC-NEPAD). 2014. The Policy Framework and Reform Strategy for Fisheries and Aquaculture in Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Amundsen VS, Gauteplass AÅ, Bailey JL. 2019. Level up or game over: the implications of levels of impact in certification schemes for salmon aquaculture. Aquacult Econ Manag. 23(3):237–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JL. 2002. Aquaculture and the future: why fisheries economists should care. Mar Resour Econ. 17(2):133–151.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson JL, Asche F, Garlock T. 2018. Globalization and commoditization: the transformation of the seafood market. J Commod Mark.12:2–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alston JM, Beddow JM, Pardey PG. 2009. Agricultural research, productivity, and food prices in the long run. Science 325(5945):1209–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche F. 2008. Farming the sea. Mar Resour Econ. 23(4):527–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche F, Bjørndal T. 2011. The Economics of Salmon Aquaculture. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Asche F, Bellemare M, Roheim C, Smith MD, Tveterås S. 2015. Fair enough? Food security and the International trade of seafood. World Dev. 67:151–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche F, Cojocaru A, Roth B. 2018. The development of large scale aquaculture production: a comparison of the supply chains for chicken and salmon. Aquaculture 493:446–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche F, Garlock T, Anderson J, Bush S, Smith M, Anderson C, Chu J, Garrett K, Lem A, Lorenzen K, et al. 2018. The three pillars of sustainability in fisheries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 115(44):11221–11225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche F, Roheim CA, Smith MD. 2016. Trade intervention: not a silver bullet to address environmental externalities in global aquaculture. Mar Policy. 69:194–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche F, Smith M. 2018. Induced innovation in fisheries and aquaculture. Food Policy. 76:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell JD, Kronen M, Vunisea A, Nash WJ, Keeble G, Demmke A, Pontifex S, Andrefouet S. 2009. Planning the use of fish for food security in the Pacific. Mar Policy. 33(1):64–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belton B, Bush SR, Little D. 2018. Not just for the wealthy: rethinking farmed fish consumption in the global south. Glob Food Secur. 16:85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Bergesen O, Tveterås R. 2019. Innovation in seafood value chains: the case of Norway. Aquacult Econ Manag. 23(3):292–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostock J, McAndrew B, Richards R, Jauncey K, Telfer T, Lorenzen K, Little D, Ross L, Handisyde N, Gatward I, et al. 2010. Aquaculture: global status and trends. Philos Trans R Soc B. 365(1554):2897–2912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braekkan EH, Thyholdt SB, Asche F, Myrland Ø. 2018. The demands they are a-changin. Eur Rev Agric Econ. 45(4):531–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush SR, Belton B, Little DS, Islam MS. 2019. Emerging trends in aquaculture value chain research. Aquaculture 498:428–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceballos A, Dresdner-Cid JD, Quiroga-Suazo MA. 2018. Does the location of salmon farms contribute to the reduction of poverty in remote coastal areas? An impact assessment using a Chilean case study. Food Policy. 75:68–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu J, Anderson JL, Asche F, Tudur L. 2010. Stakeholders’ perceptions of aquacuture and implications for it’s future: a comparison of the U.S.A. and Norway. Mar Resour Econ. 25(1):61–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu J, Tudur L. 2014. Looking to grow outside the United States. Mar Resour Econ. 29(4):323–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland BR, Taylor MS. 1994. North-south trade and the environment. Q J Econ. 109(3):755–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauda AB, Natrah I, Karim M, Kamarudin MS, Bichi AH. 2018. African catfish aquaculture in Malaysia and Nigeria: status, trends, and prospects. Fish Aquac J. 9(1):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva SS, Nguyen TT, Turchini GM, Amarasinghe US, Abery NW. 2009. Alien species in aquaculture and biodiversity: a paradox in food production. Ambio. 38(1):24–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado CL, Wada N, Rosengrant MW, Meijer S, Ahmed M. 2003. Fish to 2020: supply and demand in changing global markets. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 226 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards P, Zhang W, Belton B, Little DC. 2019. Misunderstandings, myths and mantras in aquaculture: its contribution to world food supplies has been systematically over reported. Marine Policy. 106:103547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle CR, Stone NM. 2013. Competitiveness of U.S. aquaculture within the current U.S. regulatory framework. Aquacult Econ Manag. 17:251–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) 2010. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2010. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2018a. FishStatJ. Rome: FAO. [Accessed 2018 July 5].
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2018b. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018 - Meeting the sustainable development goals; Rome. [Accessed 2018 August 25]. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. http://www.fao.org/3/i9540en/i9540en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2018c. FAOSTAT. Rome: FAO. [Accessed 2018 July 7]. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home.
   Google Scholar
• Filipski M, Belton B. 2018. Give a man a fishpond: modeling the impacts of aquaculture in the rural economy. World Dev. 110:205–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froehlich HE, Gentry RR, Rust MB, Grimm D, Halpern BS. 2017. Public perceptions of aquaculture: evaluating spatiotemporal patterns of sentiment around the world. PloS One. 12(1):e0169281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froehlich HE, Runge CA, Gentry RR, Gaines SD, Halpern BS. 2018. Comparative terrestrial feed and land use of an aquaculture-dominant world. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 115(20):5295–9146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gephart JA, Froehlich HE, Branch TA. 2019. To create sustainable seafood industries, the United States needs a better accounting of imports and exports. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 116(19):9142–5300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillen J, Asche F, Carvalho N, Fernández Polanco JM, Llorente I, Nielsen R, Nielsen M, Villasante S. 2019. Aquaculture subsidies in the European Union: evolution, impact and future potential for growth. Marine Policy. 104:19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilborn R, Banobi J, Hall SJ, Pucylowski T, Walsworth TE. 2018. The environmental cost of animal source foods. Front Ecol Environ. 16(6):329–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamu D, Chapotera M, Chinsinga B. 2012. Synthesis of aquaculture policy and development approaches in Africa. Malawi: WorldFish. [Accessed 2018 August 31]. https://www.worldfishcenter.org/content/synthesis-aquaculture-policy-and-development-approaches-africa.
   Google Scholar
• Khan A, Guttormsen A, Roll KH. 2018. Production risk of pangas (Pangasius hypophthalmus) fish farming. Aquacult Econ Manag. 22(2):192–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp G, Rubino MC. 2016. The political economics of marine aquaculture in the United States. Rev Fish Sci Aquac. 24(3):213–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi M, Msangi S, Batka M, Vannuccini S, Dey MM, Anderson JL. 2015. Fish to 2030: the role and opportunity for aquaculture. Aquacult Econ Manag.19 (3):282–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar G, Engle C. 2016. Technological advances that led to growth of shrimp, salmon, and tilapia farming. Rev Fish Sci Aquac. 24:136–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar G, Engle C. 2017. Economics of intensively aerated catfish ponds. J World Aquacult Soc. 47:416–429.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar G, Engle C, Tucker C. 2018. Factors driving aquaculture technology adoption. J World Aquacult Soc. 49(3):447–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir JF, Gitonga N, Omar I, Pouomogne V, Radwan I. 2006. Hidden harvests: unlocking the potential of aquaculture in Africa. Technical Review Paper. NEPAD-Fish-for-All. Cairo: WorldFish Center.
   Google Scholar
• National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2017. Fisheries of the United States, 2016. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Current Fishery Statistics No. 2016. [Accessed 2018 August 25]. https://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/commercial-fisheries/fus/fus16/index.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor RL, Williams SL, Strong DR. 2001. Aquaculture—a gateway for exotic species. Science. 294(5547):1655–1656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD). 2005. The NEPAD Action Plan for the Development of African Fisheries and Aquaculture. Abuja, Nigeria: NEPAD.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen R. 2011. Green and technical efficient growth in danish fresh water aquaculture. Aquacult Econ Manag. 15(4):262–277.
   Google Scholar
• Norman-Lopez A, Bjørndal T. 2009. Is tilapia the same product worldwide or are market segmented? Aquacult Econ Manag.13:138–154.
   Google Scholar
• Osmundsen T, Almklov P, Tveterås R. 2017. Fish farmers and regulators coping with the wickedness of aquaculture. Aquacult Econ Manag. 21(1):163–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincinato RBM, Asche F. 2016. The Development of Brazilian Aquaculture: introduced and native species. Aquacult Econ Manag. 20(2):222–234.
   Google Scholar
• Primavera JH. 2006. Overcoming the impacts of aquaculture on the coastal zone. Ocean Coast Manage. 49(9–10):531–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman MT, Nielsen R, Khan MA. 2019. Agglomeration externalities and technical efficiency: an empirical application to the pond aquaculture of Pangas and Tilapia in Bangladesh. Aquacult Econ Manag. 23:158–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scuderi SB, Chen X. 2018. Assessing price integration and trade policy in the U.S. Catfish Market. Aquacult Econ Manag. 22:112–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamshak GL, Anderson JL, Asche F, Garlock TM, Love D. 2019. U.S. seafood consumption. J World Aquacult Soc. 50(4):715–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh K, Dey MM. 2011. International competitiveness of catfish in the U.S. market: A constant market share analysis. Aquacult Econ Manag.15:214–229.
   Google Scholar
• Smith MD, Roheim CA, Crowder LB, Halpern BS, Turnipseed M, Anderson JL, Asche F, Bourillón L, Guttormsen AG, Khan A, et al. 2010. Economics. Sustainability and global seafood. Science. 327(5967):784–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thitamadee S, Prachumwat A, Srisala J, Jaroenlak P, Salachan PV, Sritunyalucksana K, Flegel TW, Itsathitphaisarn O. 2016. Review of current disease threats for cultivated penaeid shrimp in Asia. Aquaculture 452:69–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troell M, Naylor RL, Metian M, Beveridge M, Tyedmers PH, Folke C, Arrow KJ, Barrett S, Crépin A-S, Ehrlich PR, et al. 2014. Does aquaculture add resilience to the global food system? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111(37):13257–13263.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tveterås S. 2015. Price analysis of export behavior of aquaculture producers in Honduras and Peru. Aquacult Econ Manag. 19:125–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Senten J, Dey MM, Engle C. 2018. Effects of regulations on technical efficiency of U.S. Baitfish and Sportfish producers. Aquacult Econ Manag. 22:284–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Senten J, Engle CR, Hartman K, Johnson KK, Gustafson LL. 2018. Is there an economic incentive for farmer participation in a uniform health standard for aquaculture farms? An empirical case study. Prev Vet Med.156:58–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villasante S, Rodriguez SR, Molares Y, Martinez M, Remiro J, Garcia-Diez C, Lahoz C, Omar I, Bechardas M, Elago P, et al. 2015. Are provisioning ecosystem services from rural aquaculture contributing to reduce hunger in Africa. Ecosyst Serv. 16:365–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar