Efficacy of Time-Area Fishing Restrictions and Gear-Switching as Solutions for Reducing Seabird Bycatch in Gillnet Fisheries

References

• Abbott JK, Wilen JE. 2009. Regulation of fisheries bycatch with common-pool output quotas. J Environ Econ Manag. 57(2):195–204. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison EH, Ellis F. 2001. The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Mar Policy. 25(5):377–388. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X(01)00023-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida A, Ameryk A, Campos B, Crawford R, Krogulec J, Linkowski T, Mitchell R, Mitchell W, Oliveira N, Oppel S, et al. 2017. Study on Mitigation Measures to Minimize Seabird Bycatch in Gillnet Fisheries. European Commission Service Contract No: EASME/EMFF/2015/1.3.2.1/SI2.719535.
   Google Scholar
• Alverson DL, Freeberg MH, Pope JG, Murawski SA. 1994. A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards. Rome (IT): FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No: 339.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson ORJ, Small CL, Croxall JP, Dunn EK, Sullivan BJ, Yates O, Black A. 2011. Global seabird bycatch in longline fisheries. Endang Species Res. 14(2):91–106. doi:10.3354/esr00347
   Google Scholar
• Baerum KM, Anker-Nilssen T, Christensen-Dalsgaard S, Fangel K, Williams T, Volstad JH. 2019. Spatial and temporal variations in seabird bycatch: Incidental bycatch in the Norwegian coastal gillnet-fishery. PLoS One. 14(3):e0212786. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barz F, Eckardt J, Meyer S, Kraak SBM, Strehlow HV. 2020. Boats don’t fish, people do’ – how fishers’ agency can inform fisheries-management on bycatch mitigation of marine mammals and sea birds. Mar Policy. 122:104268. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastardie F, Brown EJ, Andonegi E, Arthur R, Beukhof E, Depestele J, Döring R, Eigaard OR, García-Barón I, Llope M, et al. 2021. A review characterizing 25 ecosystem challenges to be addressed by an ecosystem approach to fisheries management in Europe. Front Mar Sci. 7:629186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batista VS, Fabre NN, Malhado ACM, Ladle RJ. 2014. Tropical artisanal fisheries: challenges and future directions. Rev Fish Sci Aquac. 22(1):1–15. doi:10.1080/10641262.2013.822463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellebaum J, Schirmeister B, Sonntag N, Garthe S. 2013. Decreasing but still high: bycatch of seabirds in gillnet fisheries along the German Baltic coast. Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 23(2):210–221. doi:10.1002/aqc.2285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbow S, Humber F, Oliver TA, Oleson KLL, Raberinary D, Nadon M, Ratsimbazafy H, Harris A. 2014. Lessons learnt from experimental temporary octopus fishing closures in south-west Madagascar: benefits of concurrent closures. Afr J Mar Sci. 36(1):31–37. doi:10.2989/1814232X.2014.893256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamins S, Kulka D, Lawson J. 2008. Incidental catch of seabirds in Newfoundland and Labrador gillnet fisheries, 2001–2003. Endang Species Res. 5:149–160. doi:10.3354/esr00094
   Google Scholar
• Bentzen R, Robards MD. 2014. Review of seabird bycatch in set-gillnets with specific reference to mitigating impacts to yellow-billed loons. Wildlife Conservation Society. p. 35. https://library.wcs.org/doi/ctl/view/mid/33065/pubid/DMX2983500000.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Berninsone LG, Bordino P, Gnecco M, Foutel M, Mackay AI, Werner TB. 2020. Switching gillnets to longlines: an alternative to mitigate the bycatch of franciscana dolphins (Pontoporia blainvillei) in Argentina. Front Mar Sci. 7:699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethoney ND, Schondelmeier BP, Stokesbury KDE, Hoffman WS. 2013a. Developing a fine scale system to address river herring (Alosa pseudoharengus, A. aestivalis) and American shad (A. sapidissima) bycatch in the U.S. Northwest Atlantic mid-water trawl fishery. Fish Res. 141:79–87. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethoney ND, Stokesbury KDE, Cadrin SX. 2013b. Environmental links to alosine at-sea distribution and bycatch in the northwest Atlantic mid-water trawl fishery. ICES J Mar Sci. 71(5):1246–1255. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fst013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisack KD, Sutinen JG. 2006. Harbour Porpoise Bycatch: ITQs or Time/Area Closures in the New England Gillnet Fishery. Land Econ. 82(1):85–102. doi:10.3368/le.82.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeg K. 2007. Towards low impact fishery techniques. World Wildlife Federation Germany, International Centre for Marine Conservation. Hamburg, Germany. http://charlie-gibbs.org/charlie/NEA_Website/Projects/Reports/WWF_Low_Impact_Fisheries_Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bull LS. 2007. Reducing seabird bycatch in longline, trawl and gillnet fisheries. Fish Fisheries.Fisheries 8(1):31–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2007.00234.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull LS. 2009. New mitigation measures reducing seabird by-catch in trawl fisheries. Fish Fish. 10(4):408–427. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2009.00327.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Ocean Science Trust (CA OST). 2013. Rapid assessments for selected California fisheries. Oakland, CA USA. August 2013. https://opc.ca.gov/webmaster/ftp/project_pages/Rapid%20Assessments/CA%20Rapid%20Assessments.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cantlay JC, Bond AL, Wells-Berlin AM, Crawford R, Martin GR, Rouxel Y, Peregoy S, McGrew KA, Portugal SJ. 2020. Ineffectiveness of light emitting diodes as underwater deterrents for Long-tailed Ducks Clangula hyemalis. Glob Ecol Conserv. 23:e01102. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro APB, Pearmain EJ, Oppel S, Clay TA, Phillips RA, Bonnet‐Lebrun A‐S, Wanless RM, Abraham E, Richard Y, Rice J, et al. 2020. A framework for mapping the distribution of seabirds by integrating tracking, ­demography and phenology. J Appl Ecol. 57(3):514–525. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen-Dalsgaard S, Anker-Nilssen T, Crawford R, Bond A, Sigurðsson GM, Glemarec G, Hansen ES, Kadin M, Kindt-Larsen L, Mallory M, et al. 2019. What’s the catch with lumpsuckers? A North Atlantic study of seabird bycatch in lumpsucker gillnet fisheries. Biol Conserv. 240:108278. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuenpagdee R, Morgan LE, Maxwell SM, Norse EA, Pauly D. 2003. Shifting gears: assessing collateral impacts of fishing methods in US waters. Front Ecol Environ. 1(10):517–524. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0517:SGACIO2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay TA, Small C, Tuck GN, Pardo D, Carneiro APB, Wood AG, Croxall JP, Crossin GT, Phillips RA. 2019. A comprehensive large‐scale assessment of fisheries bycatch risk to threatened seabird populations. J Appl Ecol. 56(8):1882–1893. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copello S, Blanco GS, Seco Pon JP, Quintana F, Favero M. 2016. Exporting the problem: Issues with fishing closures in seabird conservation. Mar Policy. 74:120–127. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford R, Ellenberg U, Frere E, Hagen C, Baird K, Brewin P, Crofts S, Glass J, Mattern T, Pompert J, et al. 2017. Tangled and drowned: a global review of penguin bycatch in fisheries. Endang Species Res. 34:373–396. doi:10.3354/esr00869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder LB, Murawski SA. 1998. Fisheries bycatch: implications for management. Fisheries 23(6):8–17. doi:10.1577/1548-8446(1998)023<0008:FBIFM>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croxall JP, Butchart SHM, Lascelles B, Stattersfield AJ, Sullivan B, Symes A, Taylor P. 2012. Seabird conservation status, threats and priority actions: a global assessment. Bird Conserv Int. 22(1):1–34. doi:10.1017/S0959270912000020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croxall JP. 2008. The role of science and advocacy in the conservation of Southern Ocean albatrosses at sea. Bird Conserv Int. 18(S1):S13–S29. doi:10.1017/S0959270908000300
   Google Scholar
• Dawson SM, Northridge S, Waples D, Read AJ. 2013. To ping or not to ping: the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries. Endang Species Res. 19(3):201–221. doi:10.3354/esr00464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond SL, Kleisner KM, Duursma DE, Wang Y. 2010. Designing marine reserves to reduce bycatch of mobile species: a case study using juvenile red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 67(8):1335–1349. doi:10.1139/F10-044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias MP, Martin R, Pearmain EJ, Burfield IJ, Small C, Phillips RA, Yates O, Lascelles B, Borboroglu PG, Croxall JP. 2019. Threats to seabirds: A global assessment. Biol Conserv. 237:525–537. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn DC, Boustany AM, Halpin PN. 2011. Spatio-temporal management of fisheries to reduce by-catch and increase fishing selectivity. Fish Fish. 12(1):110–119. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durant JM, Hjermann DO, Frederiksen M, Charrassin JB, Le Maho Y, Sabarros PS, Crawford RJM, Stenseth NC. 2009. Pros and cons of using seabirds as ecological indicators. Clim Res. 39(2):115–129. doi:10.3354/cr00798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eayrs S, Cadrin SX, Glass CW. 2015. Managing change in fisheries: a missing key to fishery-dependent data ­collection? ICES J Mar Sci. 72(4):1152–1158. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsu184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eero M, Hjelm J, Behrens J, Buchmann K, Cardinale M, Casini M, Gasyukov P, Holmgren N, Horbowy J, Hüssy K, et al. 2015. Eastern Baltic cod in distress: biological changes and challenges for stock assessment. ICES J Mar Sci. 72(8):2180–2186. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsv109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). 2017. Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 laying down criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters and specifications and standardized methods for monitoring and assessment, and repealing Decision 2010/477/EU. Off J Euro Union L 125:43–73.
   Google Scholar
• Exeter OM, Htut T, Kerry CR, Kyi MM, Mizrahi M, Turner RA, Witt MJ, Bicknel AWJ. 2021. Shining light on data-poor coastal fisheries. Front Mar Sci. 7:625766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field R, Crawford R, Enever R, Linkowski T, Martin G, Morkūnas J, Morkūnė R, Rouxel Y, Oppel S. 2019. High contrast panels and lights do not reduce bird bycatch in Baltic Sea gillnet fisheries. Glob Ecol Conserv. 18:e00602. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2010. Report of the FAO/unep expert meeting on impacts of destructive fishing practices, unsustainable fishing, and illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing on marine biodiversity and habitats, Rome. 23–25 September 2009. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 932 FIRF/R932.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2021. Fishing operations. Guidelines to prevent and reduce bycatch of marine mammals in capture fisheries. Rome: FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries . doi:10.4060/cb2887en
   Google Scholar
• Forney KA, Benson SR, Cameron GA. 2001. Central California gillnet effort and bycatch of sensitive species, 1990-1998. Proceedings of Seabird Bycatch: Trends, Roadblocks, and Solutions. University of Alaska Sea Grant. AK-SG-01-01. https://swfsc-publications.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/CR/2001/2001For.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Frimodig A, Horeczko M, Mason T, Owens B, Prall M, Tillman T, Wertz T. 2008. Review of California Halibut Trawl Fishery in the California Halibut Trawl Grounds. Report to the California Fish and Game Commission, State Fisheries Evaluation Project (06/27/2008). p. 43
   Google Scholar
• Fulton EA, Smith ADM. 2007. Alternative Management Strategies for Southeast Australian Commonwealth Fisheries: Stage 2: Quantitative Management Strategy Evaluation. Australian Fisheries Management Authority Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. p. 405. https://research.csiro.au/atlantis/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2015/10/AMS_Final_Report_v6.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• García-Flórez L, Morales J, Gaspar MB, Castilla D, Mugerza E, Berthou P, García de la Fuente L, Oliveira M, Moreno O, García del Hoyo JJ, et al. 2014. A novel and simple approach to define artisanal fisheries in Europe. Mar Policy. 44:152–159. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2013.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gascoigne J, Willsteed E. 2009. Moving towards low impact fisheries in Europe, policy hurdles & actions. Seas at Risk. p. 103. pp. https://seas-at-risk.org/images/pdf/archive/SAR_LIF.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gell FR, Roberts CM. 2002. The fishery effects of marine reserves and fishery closures. Washington DC (USA): WWF-US.
   Google Scholar
• Gilman EL, Dalzell P, Martin S. 2006. Fleet communication to abate fisheries bycatch. Mar Policy.30(4):360–366. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2005.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjertsen H, Hall M, Squires D. 2010. Incentives to address bycatch issues In: Allen R, Joseph JA, Squires D, editors. Conservation and management of transnational tuna fisheries. Oxford (UK): Wiley-Blackwell. p. 225–248.
   Google Scholar
• Glemarec G, Kindt-Larsen L, Scherffenberg Lundgaard L, Larsen F. 2020. Assessing Seabird Bycatch in Gillnet Fisheries Using Electronic Monitoring. Biol Conserv. 243:108461. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Zevallos D, Yorio P. 2006. Seabird use of discards and incidental captures at the Argentine hake trawl fishery in the Golfo San Jorge, Argentina. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 316:175–183. doi:10.3354/meps316175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grafton RQ, Arnason R, Bjørndal T, Campbell D, Campbell HF, Clark CW, Connor R, Dupont DP, Hannesson R, Hilborn R, et al. 2006. Incentive-based approaches to sustainable fisheries. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 63(3):699–710. doi:10.1139/f05-247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall MA, Alverson DL, Metuzals KI. 2000. Bycatch: problems and solutions. Mar Pollut Bull. 41(1-6):204–219. doi:10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00111-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall MA. 1998. An ecological view of the tuna-dolphin problem: impacts and trade-offs. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 8(1):1–34. doi:10.1023/A:1008854816580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall SJ, Mainprize BM. 2005. Managing by-catch and discards: how much progress are making and how can we do better? Fish Fish. 6(2):134–155. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2005.00183.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton S, Baker GB. 2019. Technical mitigation to reduce marine mammal bycatch and entanglement in commercial fishing gear: lessons learnt and future directions. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 29(2):223–247. doi:10.1007/s11160-019-09550-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanamseth R, Baker GB, Sherwen S, Hindell M, Lea MA. 2017. Assessing the importance of net color as a seabird bycatch mitigation measure in gillnet fishing. Aquat Conserv. 2017:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Haseltine AW, Thornton S. 1990. Alternative gear development off central California In: Haugen CW, editor. The California halibut, Paralichthys californicus, resource and fisheries. San Diego (CA): California Department of Fish and Game. Fish Bulletin 174. p. 341–358.
   Google Scholar
• Hazen EL, Scales KL, Maxwell SM, Briscoe DK, Welch H, Bograd SJ, Bailey H, Benson SR, Eguchi T, Dewar H, et al. 2018. A dynamic ocean management tool to reduce bycatch and support sustainable fisheries. Sci Adv. 4(5):eaar3001. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar3001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedgärde M, Berg CW, Kindt-Larsen L, Lunneryd SG, Königson S. 2016. Explaining the catch efficiency of different cod pots using underwater video to observe cod entry and exit behavior. J Ocean Technol. 11:67–90.
   Google Scholar
• Hobday AJ, Hartman K. 2006. Near real-time spatial management based on habitat predictions for a longline bycatch species. Fish. Manag. 13(6):365–380. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2400.2006.00515.x
   Google Scholar
• Holland DS, Martin C. 2019. Bycatch quotas, risk pools, and cooperation in the Pacific whiting fishery. Front Mar Sci. 6:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICES 2016. Report of the Working Group on Fishing Technology and Fish Behavior (WGFTFB). Merida, Mexico. ICES CM 2016/SSGIEOM:22. p. 183.
   Google Scholar
• ICES. 1997. Report of the Working Group on Fishing Technology and Fish Behavior (WGFTFB). Hamburg, Germany. http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/CM%20Doccuments/1997/B/B0297.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ICES. 2018. JWGBIRD Report 2018: report of the joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES working group on marine birds (JWGBIRD). ICES CM 2017/ACOM:24. p.79
   Google Scholar
• ICES. 2020. Cod (Gadus morhua) in subdivisions 24-32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea). ICES Advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort. Cod.27.24-32. https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Advice/2020/2020/cod.27.24-32.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jaramillo-Legorreta A, Rojas-Bracho L, Brownell RL, Jr, Read AJ, Reeves RR, Ralls K, Taylor BL. 2007. Saving the vaquita: immediate action, not more data. Conserv Biol. 21:1653–1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins LD, Garrison K. 2013. Fishing gear substitution to reduce bycatch and habitat impacts: An example of social–ecological research to inform policy. Mar Policy. 38:293–303. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith DM, Sameoto JA, Keyser FM, Ward-Paige CA. 2020. Evaluating socio-economic and conservation impacts of management: A case study of time-area closures on Georges Bank. PLoS One. 15(10):e0240322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King WB, Brown RGB, Sanger GA. 1979. Mortality to marine birds through commercial fishing In: Bartonek JC, Nettleship DN, editors. Conservation of Marine Birds of Northern North America Washington DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service, Wildlife Research Report 11. p. 195–200.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby DS, Ward P. 2014. Standards for the effective management of fisheries bycatch. Mar Policy. 44:419–426. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2013.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komoroske LM, Lewison RL. 2015. Addressing fisheries bycatch in a changing world. Front Mar Sci. 2:83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Königson SJ, Fredriksson RE, Lunneryd S-G, Strömberg P, Bergström UM. 2015. Cod pots in a Baltic fishery: are they efficient and what affects their efficiency? ICES J Mar Sci 75:1545–1554.
   Google Scholar
• Leathers A, Leslie A. 2017. Gear switching to remove threats to Māui dolphin and address the socio-economic barriers to effective conservation. International Whaling Commission Paper SC/67A/HIM/12.
   Google Scholar
• Lewison R, Crowder LB, Wallace BP, Moore JE, Cox T, Žydelis R, McDonald S, DiMatteo A, Dunn DC, Kot CY, et al. 2014. Global patterns of marine mammal, seabird, and sea turtle bycatch reveal taxa-specific and cumulative megafauna hotspots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111(14):5271–5276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewison R, Hobday AJ, Maxwell S, Hazen E, Hartog JR, Dunn DC, Briscoe D, Fossette S, O’Keefe CE, Barnes M, et al. 2015. Dynamic Ocean Management: 21st century approaches for marine resource management and conservation. Bioscience. 65(5):486–498. doi:10.1093/biosci/biv018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewison RL, Crowder LB, Read AJ, Freeman SA. 2004. Understanding impacts of fisheries bycatch on marine megafauna. Trends Ecol Evol. 19(11):598–604. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewison RL, Nel D, Taylor F, Croxall JP, Rivera K. 2005. Thinking big – taking a largescale approach to seabird bycatch. Mar Ornithol. 33:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Lewison RL, Soykan CU, Cox T, Peckham H, Pilcher N, LeBoeuf N, McDonald S, Moore J, Safina C, Crowder LB. 2011. Ingredients for addressing the challenges of fisheries bycatch. BMS 87(2):235–250. doi:10.5343/bms.2010.1062
   Google Scholar
• Løkkeborg S. 2011. Best practices to mitigate seabird bycatch in longline, trawl and gillnet fisheries – efficiency and practical applicability. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 435:285–303. doi:10.3354/meps09227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loring PA. 2017. The political ecology of gear bans in two fisheries: Florida’s net ban and Alaska’s Salmon wars. Fish Fish. 18(1):94–104. doi:10.1111/faf.12169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowman B, O’Keefe CE, Cadrin SX. 2021. Predictive models of yellowtail flounder bycatch in the U.S. sea scallop fishery on Georges Bank. J Northwest Atl Fish Sci. 52:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Mangel JC, Wang J, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Pingo S, Jimenez A, Carvalho F, Swimmer T, Godley BJ. 2018. Illuminating gillnets to save seabirds and the potential for multi-taxa bycatch mitigation. R Soc Open Sci. 5(7):180254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchowski D, Jankowiak Ł, Ławicki Ł, Wysocki D, Chylarecki P. 2020. Fishery bycatch is among the most important threats to the European population of Greater Scaup Aythya marila. Bird Conserv Int. 30(2):176–193. doi:10.1017/S0959270919000492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin GR, Crawford R. 2015. Reducing bycatch in gillnets: A sensory ecology perspective. Glob Ecol Conserv. 3:28–50. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2014.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell SM, Hazen EL, Lewison RL, Dunn DC, Bailey H, Bograd SJ, Briscoe DK, Fossette S, Hobday AJ, Bennett M, et al. 2015. Dynamic ocean management: Defining and conceptualizing real-time management of the ocean. Mar Policy. 58:42–50. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClanahan TR, Castilla JC, White AT, Defeo O. 2009. Healing small-scale fisheries by facilitating complex socio-ecological systems. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 19(1):33–47. doi:10.1007/s11160-008-9088-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melvin EF, Parrish JK, Conquest LL. 1999. Novel tools to reduce seabird bycatch in coastal gillnet fisheries In: Melvin EF, Parrish JK, editors. Seabird Bycatch: Trends, Roadblocks, and Solutions. Fairbanks (AK): University of Alaska Sea Grant AK-SG-01-01. p. 161–190.
   Google Scholar
• Merkel FR. 2011. Gillnet bycatch of seabirds in Southwest Greenland, 2003 - 2008. Technical Report No. 85, Pinngortitaleriffik, Greenland Institute of Natural Resources. http://old.naturgl.lfac.dk/fileadmin/user_files/Dokumenter/Tekniske_rapporter/GN_TR_85_Seabird-Bycatch_Merkel__2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moore JE, Wallace BP, Lewison RL, Žydelis R, Cox TM, Crowder LB. 2009. A review of marine mammal, sea turtle and seabird bycatch in USA fisheries and the role of policy in shaping management. Marine Pol. 33(3):435–451. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murawski SA. 2010. Rebuilding depleted fish stocks: the good, the bad, and mostly, the ugly. ICES J Mar Sci. 67(9):1830–1840. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsq125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray KT, Read AJ, Solow AR. 2000. The use of time/area closures to reduce bycatches of harbour porpoises: lessons from the Gulf of Maine sink gillnet fishery. J Cetacean Res Manag. 2:135–141.
   Google Scholar
• Myers RA, Hutchings JA, Barrowman NJ. 1997. Why do fish stocks collapse? The example of cod in Atlantic Canada. Ecol Appl. 7(1):91–106. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0091:WDFSCT2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northridge S, Coram A, Kingston A, Crawford R. 2017. Disentangling the causes of protected-species bycatch in gillnet fisheries. Conserv Biol. 31(3):686–695. doi:10.1111/cobi.12741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe CE, Cadrin SX, Stokesbury KDE. 2014. Evaluating effectiveness of time/area closures, quotas/caps and fleet communications to reduce fisheries bycatch. ICES J Mar Sci. 71(5):1286–1297. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fst063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe CE, DeCelles GR. 2013. Forming a partnership to avoid bycatch. Fisheries 38(10):434–444. doi:10.1080/03632415.2013.838122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orben RA, Adams J, Hester M, Shaffer SA, Suryan RM, Deguchi T, Ozaki K, Sato F, Young LC, Clatterbuck C, et al. 2021. Across borders: External factors and prior behavior influence North Pacific albatross associations with fishing vessels. J Appl Ecol. 58(6):1272–1212. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orphanides CD, Palka DL. 2013. Analysis of harbour porpoise gillnet bycatch, compliance, and enforcement trends in the US northwestern Atlantic, January 1999 to May 2010. Endang Species Res. 20(3):251–269. doi:10.3354/esr00499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österblom H, Fransson H, Olsson O. 2002. Bycatches of common guillemot (Uria aalge) in the Baltic Sea gillnet fishery. Biol Conserv. 105(3):309–319. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00211-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace RII, Cole TVN, Henry AG. 2014. Incremental fishing gear modifications fail to significantly reduce large whale series injury rates. Endang Species Res. 26(2):115–126. doi:10.3354/esr00635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons M, Mitchell I, Butler A, Ratcliffe N, Frederiksen M, Foster S, Reid JB. 2008. Seabirds as indicators of the marine environment. ICES J Mar Sci. 65(8):1520–1525. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsn155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascoe S, Innes J, Holland D, Fina M, Thébaud O, Townsend R, Sanchirico J, Arnason R, Wilcox C, Hutton T. 2010. Use of incentive-based management systems to limit bycatch and discarding. IRERE 4(2):123–161. doi:10.1561/101.00000032
   Google Scholar
• Pierre JP, Abraham ER, Cleal J, Middleton DAJ. 2012. Reducing effects of trawl fishing on seabirds by limiting foraging opportunities provided by fishery waste. Emu 112(3):244–254. doi:10.1071/MU12002
   Google Scholar
• Pott C, Wiedenfeld DA. 2017. Information gaps limit our understanding of seabird bycatch in global fisheries. Biol Conserv. 210:192–204. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regular P, Montevecchi W, Hedd A, Robertson G, Wilhelm S. 2013. Canadian fishery closures provide a large-scale test of the impact of gillnet bycatch on seabird populations. Biol Lett. 9(4):20130088. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas-Bracho L, Taylor BL. 2017. Vaquita Phocoena sinus The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T17028A50370296. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-2.RLTS.T17028A50370296.en
   Google Scholar
• Rouxel Y, Montevecchi W. 2018. Gear sustainability assessment of the Newfoundland inshore northern cod fishery. Ocean Coast Manag. 163:285–295. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senko J, White ER, Heppell SS, Gerber LR. 2014. Comparing bycatch mitigation strategies for vulnerable marine megafauna. Anim Conserv. 17(1):5–18. doi:10.1111/acv.12051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherley RB, Barham BJ, Barham PJ, Campbell KJ, Crawford RJM, Grigg J, Horswill C, McInnes A, Morris TL, Pichegru L, et al. 2018. Bayesian inference reveals positive but subtle effects of experimental fishery closures on marine predator demographics. Proc R Soc B. 285(1871):20172443. doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.2443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivlani M, Letson D, Sawczyn CR. 1998. Socioeconomic effects of the Florida net ban in Monroe County. Fla Geogr. 29:12–29.
   Google Scholar
• Smith S, Jacob S, Jepson M, Israel G. 2003. After the Florida net ban: the impacts on commercial fishing families. Soc Nat Resour. 16(1):39–59. doi:10.1080/08941920309174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonntag N, Schwemmer H, Fock HO, Bellebaum J, Garthe S. 2012. Seabirds, set-nets, and conservation management: assessment of conflict potential and vulnerability of birds to bycatch in gillnets. ICES J Mar Sci. 69:78–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tull CE, Germain P, May AW. 1972. Mortality of thick-billed murres in the West Greenland salmon fishery. Nature 237(5349):42–44. doi:10.1038/237042a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner SM, Manderson JP, Richardson DE, Hoey JJ, Hare JA. 2016. Using habitat association models to predict Alewife and Blueback Herring marine distributions and overlap with Atlantic Herring and Atlantic Mackerel: can incidental catches be reduced? ICES J Mar Sci. 73(7):1912–1924. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsv166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beest FM, Kindt‐Larsen L, Bastardie F, Bartolino V, Nabe‐Nielsen J. 2017. Predicting the population-level impact of mitigating harbour porpoise bycatch with pingers and time-area fishing closures. Ecosphere 8(4):e01785. doi:10.1002/ecs2.1785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetemaa M, Ložys L. 2009. Use of by-catch safe fishing gear in pilot project areas. LIFE Nature project “Marine Protected Areas in the Eastern Baltic Sea” LIFE 05 NAT/LV/000100, Action D1 Final Report http://lifempa.balticseaportal.net/media/upload/File/Deliverables/Action%20reports/D1_final_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Villasante S, P, Guimeráns C, Rodrigues J, Antelo M, Rodrígues R, Da Rocha JM, Coll M, Pita C, Pierce G, Hastie L, et al. 2015. Small-scale fisheries and the zero discard target. European Parliament Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department B Structural and Cohesion Policies, Fisheries. IP/B/PECH/IC/2014-084. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/540360/IPOL_STU(2015)540360_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Walters C. 2000. Impacts of dispersal, ecological interactions, and fishing dynamics on efficacy of Marine Protected Areas: how large should protected areas be? Bull Mar Sci 66:745–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WA DWF). 2020. Puget Sound Commercial Salmon Regulations. (https://wdfw.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/2020_comm_final_upload_07192020.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Wiedenfeld DA. 2016. Seabird bycatch solutions for fishery sustainability. Am Bird Conservancy p. 71. https://abcbirds.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Seabird-Bycatch-Solutions_2016_InternetRequired_LowRes.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wild PW. 1990. The central California experience: a case history of California halibut set net laws and regulations In: Haugen CW, editor. The California Halibut, Paralichthys californicus, Resource and Fisheries. San Diego (CA): California Department of Fish. Game Fish Bulletin 174. p. 321–340.
   Google Scholar
• Willison JHM, Côte RP. 2009. Counting biodiversity waste in industrial eco-efficiency: fisheries case study. J Clean Prod. 17(3):348–353. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou S, Daley RM, Fuller M, Bulman CM, Hobday AJ. 2019. A data-limited method for assessing cumulative fishing risk on bycatch. ICES J Mar Sci. 76(4):837–847. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsy206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žydelis R, Bellebaum J, Österblom H, Vetemaa M, Schirmeister B, Stipniece A, Dagys M, van Eerden M, Garth S. 2009. Bycatch in gillnet fisheries – An overlooked threat to waterbird populations. Biol Conserv. 142(7):1269–1281. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žydelis R, Small C, French G. 2013. The incidental catch of seabirds in gillnet fisheries: A global review. Biol. Conserv. 162:76–88. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar