A Concise Review on the Recent Developments in the Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Smart Aquaculture Practices

References

• Abakari G, Luo G, Kombat EO. 2021. Dynamics of nitrogenous compounds and their control in biofloc technology (BFT) systems: a review. Aquac Fish. 6(5):441–447. doi:10.1016/j.aaf.2020.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Acar U, Kane F, Vlacheas P, Foteinos V, Demestichas P, Yücetürk G, Drigkopoulou I, Vargün A. 2019. Designing an IoT cloud solution for aquaculture, in: 2019 Global IoT Summit (GIoTS). IEEE, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/GIOTS.2019.8766428
   Google Scholar
• Adi PDP, Kitagawa A. 2019. ZigBee Radio Frequency (RF) performance on raspberry Pi 3 for internet of things (IoT) based blood pressure sensors monitoring. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 10:18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Africa ADM, Aguilar JCCA, Lim CMS, Pacheco PAA, Rodrin SEC. 2017. Automated aquaculture system that regulates Ph, temperature and ammonia. In: 2017IEEE 9th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment and Management (HNICEM). IEEE, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Al Aani S, Bonny T, Hasan SW, Hilal N. 2019. Can machine language and artificial intelligence revolutionize process automation for water treatment and desalination? Desalination. 458:84–96. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2019.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen L, Benoist B. D, Dary O, Hurrell R. 2006. Guidelines on food fortification with micronutrients. Who, Fao Un. 341. doi:10.1242/jeb.02490.
   Google Scholar
• Antwi P, Zhang D, Luo W, Xiao L, WenMeng J, Kabutey FT, Ayivi F, Li J. 2019. Performance, microbial ­community evolution and neural network modeling of single-stage nitrogen removal by partial-nitritation/anammox process. Bioresour Technol. 284:359–372. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arakliotis S, Nikolos DG, Kalligeros E. 2016. Lawris: a rule-based Arduino programming system for young students. In: 2016 5th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST). IEEE, pp. 1–4. doi:10.1109/MOCAST.2016.7495150
   Google Scholar
• Arefin Mozumder S, Sharifuzzaman Sagar ASM. 2021. Smart IoT-Biofloc water management system using Decision regression tree. arXiv e-prints arXiv-2112.
   Google Scholar
• Badamasi YA. 2014. The working principle of an Arduino. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation, ICECCO 2014. doi:10.1109/ICECCO.2014.6997578.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan S, Sheeba Rani S, Ramya KC. 2019. Design and development of iot based smart aquaculture system in a cloud environment. Int J Ocean Oceanogr. 13:121–127.
   Google Scholar
• Barulin NV. 2019. Using machine learning algorithms to analyse the scute structure and sex identification of sterlet Acipenser ruthenus (Acipenseridae). Aquac Res. 50(10):2810–2825. doi:10.1111/are.14233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basnet B, Bang J. 2018. The state-of-the-art of knowledge-intensive agriculture: a review on applied sensing systems and data analytics. J Sensors. 2018:1–1. doi:10.1155/2018/7425720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergheim A, Schumann M, Brinker A. 2019. Water pollution from fish farms. Encycl Water Sci Technol Soc. 1:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Beveridge MCM, Thilsted SH, Phillips MJ, Metian M, Troell M, Hall SJ. 2013. Meeting the food and nutrition needs of the poor: the role of fish and the opportunities and challenges emerging from the rise of aquaculturea. J Fish Biol. 83(4):1067–1084. doi:10.1111/jfb.12187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd CE, Tucker CS, Viriyatum R. 2011. Interpretation of pH, acidity, and alkalinity in aquaculture and fisheries. N Am J Aquac. 73(4):403–408. doi:10.1080/15222055.2011.620861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brochu N, Gong L, Greener J, Miled A. 2020. Ultra-low power pH sensor powered by microbial fuel cells. In: Microfluidics, BioMEMS, and Medical Microsystems XVIII. International Society for Optics and Photonics, p. 112350L. doi:10.1117/12.2547233
   Google Scholar
• Brock JD, Bruce RF, Reiser SL. 2009. Using Arduino for introductory programming courses. J Comput Sci Coll. 25:129–130.
   Google Scholar
• Brous P, Janssen M, Herder P. 2019. Internet of Things adoption for reconfiguring decision-making processes in asset management. BPMJ. 25(3):495–511. doi:10.1108/BPMJ-11-2017-0328/FULL/HTML
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti S. 2016. The Fisheries and Aquaculture Advantage: Fostering food security and nutrition, increasing.
   Google Scholar
• Chang C-C, Wang J-H, Wu J-L, Hsieh Y-Z, Wu T-D, Cheng S-C, Chang C-C, Juang J-G, Liou C-H, Hsu T-H, et al. 2021. Applying artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to implement a practical smart cage aquaculture management system. J Med Biol Eng. 41:652–658. doi:10.1007/s40846-021-00621-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatvijitkul S, Claude EB, Allen D. 2015. Aquaculture feed composition helps define potential for water pollution. Retrieved July 17, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Hao X, Lu J, Yan K, Liu J, He C, Xu X. 2021. Research and design of distributed iot water environment monitoring system based on LoRa. Wirel Commun Mob Comput. 2021:1–13. doi:10.1155/2021/9403963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WP, Wang LK, Wang TT, Chen YT. 2013. An Intelligent Management System for Aquaculture’s Environmental Monitoring and Energy Conservation. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Workshop on Computer Science in Sports. doi:10.2991/iwcss-13.2013.52
   Google Scholar
• Chhabra N. 2013. Comparative analysis of different wireless technologies. Int J Sci Res Netw Secur Commun. 1:13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Chouler J, Di Lorenzo M. 2015. Water quality monitoring in developing Countries; Can microbial fuel cells be the answer? Biosensors (Basel). 5(3):450–470. doi:10.3390/bios5030450
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chrispin LC, Jothiswaran VV, Velumani T, Agnes DAS, Jayaraman R. 2020. Application of artificial intelligence in fisheries and aquaculture. Biot Res Today. 2:499–502. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.111
   Google Scholar
• Collotta M, Pau G, Talty T, Tonguz OK. 2018. Bluetooth 5: a concrete step forward toward the IoT. IEEE Commun Mag. 56(7):125–131. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2018.1700053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordova-Rozas M, Aucapuri-Lecarnaque J, Shiguihara-Juárez P. 2019. A cloud monitoring system for aquaculture using iot. In: 2019 IEEE Sciences and Humanities International Research Conference (SHIRCON). IEEE, pp. 1–4. doi:10.1109/SHIRCON48091.2019.9024849
   Google Scholar
• Daoliang LI, Chang LIU. 2020. Recent advances and future outlook for artificial intelligence in aquaculture. Smart Agric. 2(3):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Dauda AB, Ajadi A, Tola-Fabunmi AS, Akinwole AO. 2019. Waste production in aquaculture: Sources, components and managements in different culture systems. Aquac Fish. 4(3):81–88. doi:10.1016/j.aaf.2018.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Deb S, Noori MT, Rao PS. 2020. Application of biofloc technology for Indian major carp culture (polyculture) along with water quality management. Aquac Eng. 91:102106. doi:10.1016/j.aquaeng.2020.102106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb S, Noori MT, Srinivasa Rao P. 2017. Experimental study to evaluate the efficacy of locally available waste carbon sources on aquaculture water quality management using biofloc technology. Aquacult Int. 25(6):2149–2159. doi:10.1007/s10499-017-0180-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deekshath MR, Dharanya MP, Kabadia MKRD, Dinakaran MGD, Shanthini S. 2018. IoT based environmental monitoring system using arduino UNO and thingspeak. Int J Sci Technol Eng. 4(9):68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Dhenuvakonda K, Sharma A. 2020. Mobile apps and internet of things (IoT): a promising future for Indian fisheries and aquaculture sector. Artic. J Entomol Zool Stud. 8(1):1659–1669.
   Google Scholar
• Dhenuvakonda K, Sharma A, Prasad KP, Sharma R. 2019. Socioeconomic profile of fish farmers of telangana and usage of mobile apps. AJAEES. 1–9. doi:10.9734/ajaees/2019/v37i330268
   Google Scholar
• Doudoroff P, Shumway DL. 1970. Dissolved oxygen requirements of freshwater fishes.
   Google Scholar
• Duan Y, Edwards JS, Dwivedi YK. 2019. Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of big data: evolution, challenges and research agenda. Int J Inf Manage. 48:63–71. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzulqornain MI, Harun Al Rasyid MU, Sukaridhoto S. 2018. Design and Development of Smart Aquaculture System Based on IFTTT Model and Cloud Integration. In: MATEC Web of Conferences. doi:10.1051/matecconf/201816401030
   Google Scholar
• El Khaddar MA, Boulmalf M. 2017. Smartphone: the ultimate IoT and IoE device. Smartphones Appl Res Perspect. Chapter 7:137–162.
   Google Scholar
• Elazhary H. 2019. Internet of Things (IoT), mobile cloud, cloudlet, mobile IoT, IoT cloud, fog, mobile edge, and edge emerging computing paradigms: disambiguation and research directions. J. Netw Comput Appl. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2018.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkiran G, Nourani V, Abba SI. 2019. Multi-step ahead modelling of river water quality parameters using ensemble artificial intelligence-based approach. J Hydrol. 577:123962. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Encinas C, Ruiz E, Cortez J, Espinoza A. 2017. Design and implementation of a distributed IoT system for the monitoring of water quality in aquaculture, in: Wireless Telecommunications Symposium. doi:10.1109/WTS.2017.7943540
   Google Scholar
• Engle CR, Kumar G, Senten J. 2020. Cost drivers and profitability of U.S. pond, raceway, and RAS aquaculture. J World Aquacult Soc. 51(4):847–873. doi:10.1111/jwas.12706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans B. 2011. Beginning arduino programming. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fan M, Hu J, Cao R, Ruan W, Chemosphere XW. 2018. U., n.d. A review on experimental design for pollutants removal in water treatment with the aid of artificial intelligence. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.111
   Google Scholar
• FAO, F. and A.O. 2017. Fao 2017. Fao 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Figueroa R, Araneda M, … K C-P. 2018. GenDataSave: Information management platform for aquaculture genetic improvement programs optimized by means of parallel computing. researchgate.net.
   Google Scholar
• Geetha S, Gouthami S. 2016. Internet of things enabled real time water quality monitoring system. Smart Water. 2(1). doi:10.1186/s40713-017-0005-y
   Google Scholar
• Godoy-Olmos S, Jauralde I, Monge-Ortiz R, Milián-Sorribes MC, Jover-Cerdá M, Tomás-Vidal A, Martínez-Llorens S. 2022. Influence of diet and feeding strategy on the performance of nitrifying trickling filter, oxygen consumption and ammonia excretion of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) raised in recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquac Int. 30(2):581–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Gupta A, Hasija Y. 2022. Transforming IoT in aquaculture: a cloud solution. In: AI, Edge and IoT-Based Smart Agriculture. Amsterdam: Elsevier, p. 517–531.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves JA, Tucker CS. 2004. Managing ammonia in fish ponds. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center Stoneville.
   Google Scholar
• Haseeb K, Ud Din I, Almogren A, Islam N. 2020. An energy efficient and secure IoT-based WSN framework: an application to smart agriculture. Sensors. 20(7):2081. doi:10.3390/s20072081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He J, Baxter SL, Xu J, Xu J, Zhou X, Zhang K. 2019. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nat Med. 25(1):30–36. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong SR, Jeong HD, Hong S. 2010. QCM DNA biosensor for the diagnosis of a fish pathogenic virus VHSV. Talanta. 82(3):899–903. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2010.04.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hongpin L, Guanglin L, Weifeng P, Jie S, Qiuwei B. 2015. Real-time remote monitoring system for aquaculture water quality. Int J Agric Biol Eng. 8:136–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Z, Li R, Xia X, Yu C, Fan X, Zhao Y. 2020. A method overview in smart aquaculture. Environ Monit Assess. 192. doi:10.1007/S10661-020-08409-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huan J, Li H, Wu F, Cao W. 2020. Design of water quality monitoring system for aquaculture ponds based on NB-IoT. Aquac Eng. 90:102088. doi:10.1016/j.aquaeng.2020.102088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huan J, Li H, Wu F, Engineering WC-A. 2020. Undefined, n.d. Design of water quality monitoring system for aquaculture ponds based on NB-IoT. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain M, Amin Y, Lee K-G. 2020. A compact and flexible UHF RFID tag antenna for massive IoT devices in 5G system. Sensors. 20(19):5713. doi:10.3390/s20195713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan F, Min-Allah N, Düştegör D. 2021. Iot based smart water quality monitoring: recent techniques, trends and challenges for domestic applications. Water. 13(13):1729. doi:10.3390/w13131729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javvaji KSS, Hussain MA. 2020. Prototype of Aquaculture using IoT Technologies. In: 2020 11th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT). IEEE, pp. 1–4. doi:10.1109/ICCCNT49239.2020.9225519
   Google Scholar
• Jothiswaran V, … T V, B R. 2020. Application of artificial intelligence in fisheries and aquaculture. Bioticainternational.com 2:499–502.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyani Y, Collier R, Sensors, RC. 2021. A systematic survey on the role of cloud, fog, and edge computing combination in smart agriculture. mdpi.com. Sensors. 21(17):5922., doi:10.3390/s21175922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamaruidzaman NS, Nazahiyah Rahmat S. 2020. Water monitoring system embedded with internet of things (IoT) device: a review. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 498(1):012068. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/498/1/012068
   Google Scholar
• Karim S, Hussain I, Hussain A, Hassan K, Iqbal S. 2021. IoT based smart fish farming aquaculture monitoring system. Int J Emerg Technol. 12:45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Kemker C. 2014. Dissolved Oxygen-Environmental Measurement Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Kidwell JM, Phillips LJ, Birchard GF. 1995. Comparative analyses of contaminant levels in bottom feeding and predatory fish using the national contaminant biomonitoring program data. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 54(6). doi:10.1007/BF00197979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisi O, Alizamir M, Docheshmeh Gorgij AR. 2020. Dissolved oxygen prediction using a new ensemble method. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 27(9):9589–9603. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-07574-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klumpp M. 2018. Automation and artificial intelligence in business logistics systems: human reactions and collaboration requirements. Int J Logist Res Appl. 21(3):224–242. doi:10.1080/13675567.2017.1384451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong W, Huang S, Yang Z, Shi F, Feng Y, Khatoon Z. 2020. Fish feed quality is a key factor in impacting aquaculture water environment: evidence from incubator experiments. Sci Rep. 10:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar G, Engle C, Tucker C. 2018. Factors driving aquaculture technology adoption. J World Aquacult Soc. 49(3):447–476. doi:10.1111/jwas.12514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar NH, Baskaran S, Hariraj S, Krishnan V. 2016. An autonomous aquaponics system using 6LoWPAN based WSN. In: 2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud Workshops (FiCloudW). IEEE, p. 125–132. doi:10.1109/W-FiCloud.2016.37
   Google Scholar
• Lambrou TP, Anastasiou CC, Panayiotou CG, Polycarpou MM. 2014. A low-cost sensor network for real-time monitoring and contamination detection in drinking water distribution systems. IEEE Sensors J. 14(8):2765–2772. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2014.2316414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee PG. 2000. Process control and artificial intelligence software for aquaculture. Aquac Eng. 23(1–3):13–36. doi:10.1016/S0144-8609(00)00044-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B. h, Hou B. C, Yu W. T, Lu. X B, Yang C. W. 2017. Applications of artificial intelligence in intelligent manufacturing: a review. Front Inf Technol Electron Eng. 10.1631/FITEE.1601885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Li C. 2020. Intelligent aquaculture. J World Aquacult Soc. 51(4):808–814. doi:10.1111/jwas.12736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Liu S. 2013. Remote monitoring of water quality for intensive fish culture. In: Smart Sensors for Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring. Berlin: Springer, p. 217–238.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Han W, Zhang Y, Li L, Wang J, Zheng L. 2016. An Internet-of-things solution for food safety and quality control: a pilot project in China. J Ind Inf Integr. 3:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jii.2016.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YQ, Wu YX, Cao LL. 2014. The design of automatic control system for industrialized recirculating aquaculture: advanced materials research. AMR. 1046 :246–249. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1046.246
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Yu C, Hu Z, Zhao Y, Bai Y, Xie M, Luo J. 2020. Accurate prediction scheme of water quality in smart mariculture with deep Bi-S-SRU learning Network. IEEE Access. 8:24784–24798. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2971253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Li Y. 2019. Preparation and modification of biomass carbon and research of the adsorption of copper. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science. IOP Publishing, p. 52034. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/300/5/052034
   Google Scholar
• Lopes BDM, Silva LCB, Blanquet IM, Georgieva P, Marques CAF. 2021. Prediction of fish mortality based on a probabilistic anomaly detection approach for recirculating aquaculture system facilities. Rev Sci Instrum. 92. doi:10.1063/5.0045047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis L. 2016. Working principle of arduino and using it as a tool for study and research. IJCACS. 1(2):21–29. doi:10.5121/ijcacs.2016.1203
   Google Scholar
• Mallya YJ. 2007. The effects of dissolved oxygen on fish growth in aquaculture. United Nations Univ. Fish. Train. Program. Final Proj.
   Google Scholar
• Martin H. 2019. Aquaculture 4.0: applying industry strategy to fisheries management [WWW Document]. Innov. News Netw.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson R, Irvine J. 2020. Using smartphones to enable low-cost secure consumer IoT devices. IEEE Access. 8:28607–28613. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade JW. 1985. Allowable ammonia for fish culture. Progress Fish Culturist. 47(3):135–145. doi:10.1577/1548-8640(1985)47<135:AAFFC>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles RD, Chapman FA. 2007. The concept of ideal protein in formulation of aquaculture feeds. EDIS. 2007(11) doi:10.32473/edis-fa144-2007
   Google Scholar
• Moparthi NR, Mukesh C, Sagar PV. 2018. Water quality monitoring system using IoT. In: 2018 Fourth International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Electronics, Information, Communication and Bio-Informatics (AEEICB). IEEE, p. 1–5. doi:10.1109/AEEICB.2018.8480963
   Google Scholar
• Mota VC, Hop J, Sampaio LA, Heinsbroek LTN, Verdegem MCJ, Eding EH, Verreth JAJ. 2018. The effect of low pH on physiology, stress status and growth performance of turbot (Psetta maxima L.) cultured in recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquac Res. 49(10):3456–3467. doi:10.1111/are.13812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motlagh NH, Mohammadrezaei M, Hunt J, Zakeri B. 2020. Internet of things (IoT) and the energy sector. Energies. 13(2):494. doi:10.3390/en13020494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najah Ahmed A, Binti Othman F, Abdulmohsin Afan H, Khaleel Ibrahim R, Ming Fai C, Shabbir Hossain M, Ehteram M, Elshafie A. 2019. Machine learning methods for better water quality prediction. J Hydrol. 578:124084. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasirudin MA, Za’bah UN, Sidek O. 2011. Fresh water real-time monitoring system based on wireless sensor network and GSM. In: 2011 IEEE Conference on Open Systems, ICOS 2011. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 354–357. doi:10.1109/ICOS.2011.6079290
   Google Scholar
• Navarro E, Costa N, Pereira A. 2020. A systematic review of iot solutions for smart farming. Sensors (Switzerland). 20(15):4231. doi:10.3390/s20154231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndubuisi UC, Chimezie AJ, Chinedu UC, Chikwem IC, Alexander U. 2015. Effect of pH on the growth performance and survival rate of Clarias gariepinus fry. Int J Res Biosci. 4:14–20.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary DE. 2013. Artificial intelligence and big data. IEEE Intell Syst. 28:96–99. doi:10.1109/MIS.2013.39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oddsson GV. 2020. A definition of aquaculture intensity based on production functions-the aquaculture production intensity scale (APIS). Water (Switzerland). 12(3):765. doi:10.3390/w12030765
   Google Scholar
• Parra L, Sendra S, García L, Lloret J. 2018. Design and deployment of low-cost sensors for monitoring the water quality and fish behavior in aquaculture tanks during the feeding process. Sensors (Switzerland). 18(3):750. doi:10.3390/s18030750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parra L, Sendra S, Lloret J, Rodrigues JJPC. 2017. Design and deployment of a smart system for data gathering in aquaculture tanks using wireless sensor networks. Int J Commun Syst. 30(16):e3335. doi:10.1002/dac.3335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattillo DA. 2014. Water Quality Management for Recirculating Aquaculture.
   Google Scholar
• Piccialli F, Casolla G, Cuomo S, Giampaolo F, Di Cola VS. 2020. Decision making in IoT environment through unsupervised learning. IEEE Intell Syst. 35(1):27–35. doi:10.1109/MIS.2019.2944783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popenici SAD, Kerr S. 2017. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 12. doi:10.1186/S41039-017-0062-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pule M, Yahya A, Chuma J. 2017. Wireless sensor networks: a survey on monitoring water quality. J Appl Res Technol. 15(6):562–570. doi:10.1016/j.jart.2017.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Qingling D, Yiran LIU, Lu Z, Daoliang LI. 2018. State-of-the-art review for application of big data technology in aquaculture. Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions Chinese Soc. Agric. Mach. 49.
   Google Scholar
• Rajaee T, Ebrahimi H, Nourani V. 2019. A review of the artificial intelligence methods in groundwater level modeling. J Hydrol. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathi K, Somani P, Koul A, World KM-R. 2020. undefined, 2020. Applications of artificial intelligence in the game of football: the global perspective. researchgate.net. doi:10.18843/rwjasc/v11i2/03.
   Google Scholar
• Ray PP. 2018. A survey on Internet of things architectures. J. King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci. doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.10.003.
   Google Scholar
• Rembold U. 2020. Robot technology and applications, robot technology and applications. CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9781003066347.
   Google Scholar
• Ridha MT, Cruz EM. 2001. Effect of biofilter media on water quality and biological performance of the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus L. reared in a simple recirculating system. Aquac Eng. 24(2):157–166. doi:10.1016/S0144-8609(01)00060-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saberioon M, Gholizadeh A, Cisar P, Pautsina A, Urban J. 2017. Application of machine vision systems in aquaculture with emphasis on fish: state-of-the-art and key issues. Rev Aquacult. 9(4):369–387. doi:10.1111/raq.12143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Rajib RH, Kabir S. 2018. IoT Based Automated Fish Farm Aquaculture Monitoring System. In: 2018 International Conference on Innovations in Science, Engineering and Technology, ICISET 2018. p. 201–206. doi:10.1109/ICISET.2018.8745543
   Google Scholar
• Saiz-Rubio V, Rovira-Más F. 2020. From smart farming towards agriculture 5.0: a review on crop data management. Agronomy. 10(2):207. doi:10.3390/agronomy10020207
   Google Scholar
• Sanchit. 2008. The Internet of Things-Introduction and Applications. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2255.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt W, Raymond D, Parish D, Ashton IGC, Miller PI, Campos CJA, Shutler JD. 2018. Design and operation of a low-cost and compact autonomous buoy system for use in coastal aquaculture and water quality monitoring. Aquac Eng. 80:28–36. doi:10.1016/j.aquaeng.2017.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethi P, Sarangi SR. and, Engineering, S.S.-J. of E. and C., U. 2017. Internet of things: architectures, protocols, and applications. hindawi.com. 2017:1–25., doi:10.1155/2017/9324035
   Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Aquaculture KD. 2019. Virtual fisheries through mobile apps: the way forward. researchgate.net 7, 1093–1099.
   Google Scholar
• Šiljić Tomić A, Antanasijević D, Ristić M, Perić-Grujić A, Pocajt V. 2018. A linear and non-linear polynomial neural network modeling of dissolved oxygen content in surface water: inter- and extrapolation performance with inputs’ significance analysis. Sci Total Environ. 610-611:1038–1046. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne J. 2017. Artificial intelligence for marketing: practical applications - Jim Sterne. Google Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens R. 2009. Fish pond water quality: as simple as chemistry 101. Samuel Roberts Noble Found. Inc.[online] http://www.noble.org/ag/wildlife/fish-pond-water.
   Google Scholar
• Stonebraker M, Çetintemel U. 2018. “One size fits all” an idea whose time has come and gone, in: Making Databases Work: The Pragmatic Wisdom of Michael Stonebraker. pp. 441–462.
   Google Scholar
• Su J, Chen J, Wen J, Xie W, Lin M. 2020. Analysis decision-making system for aquaculture water quality based on deep learning, in. J Phys Conf Ser. 1544(1):012028. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1544/1/012028
   Google Scholar
• Sungkanak U, Sappat A, Wisitsoraat A, Promptmas C, Tuantranont A. 2010. Ultrasensitive detection of Vibrio cholerae O1 using microcantilever-based biosensor with dynamic force microscopy. Biosens Bioelectron. 26(2):784–789. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2010.06.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun M, Yang X, Xie Y. 2020. Deep learning in aquaculture: a review. J Comput. 31:294–319.
   Google Scholar
• Su X, Sutarlie L, Loh XJ. 2020. Sensors, biosensors, and analytical technologies for aquaculture water quality. Research (Wash D C). 2020:8272705–8272715. doi:10.34133/2020/8272705
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tawfeeq A, … H.A.W.-I.J. 2019. IoT based Aquaculture system with Cloud analytics. ripublication.com. 14:4136–4142.
   Google Scholar
• Terán M, Aranda J, Carrillo H, Mendez D, Parra C. 2017. IoT-based system for indoor location using bluetooth low energy. In: 2017 IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing (COLCOM). IEEE, p. 1–6. doi:10.1109/ColComCon.2017.8088211
   Google Scholar
• Tolentino LKS, De Pedro CP, Icamina JD, Navarro JBE, Salvacion LJD, Sobrevilla GCD, Villanueva AA, Amado TM, Padilla MVC, Madrigal GAM, et al. 2021. Development of an IoT-based intensive aquaculture monitoring system with automatic water correction. IJCDS. 10(1):1355–1365. doi:10.12785/ijcds/1001120
   Google Scholar
• Tumwesigye Z, Tumwesigye W, Opio F, Kemigabo C, Mujuni B. 2022. The effect of water quality on aquaculture productivity in Ibanda District, Uganda. Aquac J. 2(1):23–36. doi:10.3390/aquacj2010003
   Google Scholar
• Ubina NA, Cheng S-C, Chen H-Y, Chang C-C, Lan H-Y. 2021. A visual aquaculture system using a cloud-based autonomous drones. Drones. 5(4):109. doi:10.3390/drones5040109
   Google Scholar
• Udin Harun Al-Rasyid M, Sukaridhoto S, Dzulqornain MI, Rifai A. 2020. Integration of IoT and chatbot for aquaculture with natural language processing. Telkomnika. 18(2):640–648. doi:10.12928/telkomnika.v18i2.14788
   Google Scholar
• Ullo SL, Sinha GR. 2020. Advances in smart environment monitoring systems using iot and sensors. Sensors (Switzerland). 20(11):3113. doi:10.3390/s20113113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter A, Finger R, Huber R, Buchmann N. 2017. Smart farming is key to developing sustainable agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U. S. A. 10.1073/pnas.1707462114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Li Z, Wang T, Xu X, Zhang X, Li D. 2021. Intelligent fish farm—the future of aquaculture. Aquac Int. doi:10.1007/s10499-021-00773-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, Xu X, Wang C, Li Z, Li D. 2021. From smart farming towards unmanned farms: a new mode of agricultural production. Agric. 11(2):145–126. doi:10.3390/agriculture11020145
   Google Scholar
• Wang P, Yao J, Wang G, Hao F, Shrestha S, Xue B, Xie G, Peng Y. 2019. Exploring the application of artificial intelligence technology for identification of water pollution characteristics and tracing the source of water quality pollutants. Sci Total Environ. 693. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xinglong J, Boyd CE. 2005. Measurement of 5-day biochemical oxygen demand without sample dilution or bacterial and nutrient enhancement. Aquac Eng. 33(4):250–257. doi:10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Wang Z, Jiang Y, Yang Y, Wang F. 2019. Small-world network analysis on fault propagation characteristics of water networks in eco-industrial parks. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 149:343–351. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav S, Bharadwaj Y, Hariharan A, Choraria A, Tendolkar A, Pai MMM. 2022. Smart Aero-Spider: an adaptive and selective smart switching aerator system, in. J Phys: Conf Ser. Ser. 2161(1):012061. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2161/1/012061
   Google Scholar
• Yang L, Liu Y, Yu H, Fang X, Song L, Li D, Chen Y. 2021. Computer vision models in intelligent aquaculture with emphasis on fish detection and behavior analysis: a review. Arch Computat Methods Eng. 28(4):2785–2816. doi:10.1007/s11831-020-09486-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Zhang S, Liu J, Gao Q, Dong S, Zhou C. 2021. Deep learning for smart fish farming: applications, opportunities and challenges. Rev. Aquac. doi:10.1111/raq.12464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Tai H, Li D, Wei Y. 2011. A wireless sink node using information fusion for water quality information collection in factory aquaculture. In: International Conference on Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture. Berlin: Springer, pp. 414–426.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo SE, Binkowski FP, Morris JE. 2004. Aquaculture effluents and waste by-products characteristics. Potential Recover. Benef. Reuse.
   Google Scholar
• Yu H, Yang L, Li D, Chen Y. 2021. A hybrid intelligent soft computing method for ammonia nitrogen prediction in aquaculture. Inf Process Agric. 8(1):64–74. doi:10.1016/j.inpa.2020.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Yuan J, Xiang J, Liu D, Kang H, He T, Kim S, Lin Y, Freeman C, Ding W. 2019. Rapid growth in greenhouse gas emissions from the adoption of industrial-scale aquaculture. Nat Clim Chang. 9(4):318–322. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0425-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue K, Shen Y. 2021. An overview of disruptive technologies for aquaculture. Aquac Fish. 10.1016/j.aaf.2021.04.009.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng Q, Xiong L, Mo B, Lu W, Kim S, Wang Z. 2015. Temperature and humidity sensor powered by an individual microbial fuel cell in a power management system. Sensors (Basel). 15(9):23126–23144. doi:10.3390/s150923126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Boyd C. 2015. Ammonia nitrogen management in aquaculture ponds. Aquac. Mag. Oct.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Xu D, Chen L, Zhang S, Sun C, Yang X, Wang Y. 2019. Evaluation of fish feeding intensity in aquaculture using a convolutional neural network and machine vision. Aquaculture. 507:457–465. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.04.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Xu D, Lin K, Sun C, Yang X. 2018. Intelligent feeding control methods in aquaculture with an emphasis on fish: a review. Rev Aquacult. 10(4):975–993. doi:10.1111/raq.12218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zounemat-Kermani M, Seo Y, Kim S, Ghorbani MA, Samadianfard S, Naghshara S, Kim NW, Singh VP. 2019. Can decomposition approaches always enhance soft computing models? Predicting the dissolved oxygen concentration in the St. Johns River, Florida. Appl. Sci. 9(12):2534. doi:10.3390/app9122534
   Google Scholar