An online tutor for astronomy: The GEAS self-review library

References

• Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147–179. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2602_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College Testing. (2014). The condition of college and career readiness. Iowa City, IA. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/cccr14/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, J. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 167–207.10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64, 42–54.10.1177/108056990106400405
   Google Scholar
• Barmby, P. (2010, August 1–4). Characterizing online homework/tutorial systems for introductory astronomy. Paper presented at the Astronomical Society of the Pacific Cosmos in the Classroom 2010, Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E. (2001). How the internet will help large-scale assessment reinvent itself. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9. Retrieved on June 5, 2012, from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/334/460
   Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomena. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 123–144). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 3–16. doi:10.3102/0013189X013006004
   Google Scholar
• Bonham, S., Deardorff, D., & Beichner, R. (2003). Comparison of student performance using web and paper-based homework in college-level physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1050–1071. doi:10.1002/tea.10120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson, W. (2006). Affective learning companions: Strategies for empathetic agents with real-time multimodal affective sensing to foster meta-cognitive and meta-affective approaches to learning, motivation, and perseverance ( PhD thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Arts and Sciences, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237–248. doi:10.3102/00028312019002237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, A. T. (2001). Cognitive computer tutors: Solving the two-sigma problem. In M. Bauer, P. Gmytrasiewicz, & J. Vassileva (Eds.), User modeling 2001: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference, UM 2001 (pp. 137–147). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/3-540-44566-8
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S. D., Graesser, A. C., Sullins, J., & Gholson, B. (2004). Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with autotutor. Journal of Educational Media, 29, 241–250.10.1080/1358165042000283101
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, W., & Nakhleh, M. (2007). Student use of web-based tutorial materials and understanding of chemistry concepts. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26, 291–327.
   Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J., & Nash, C. (1997). How users reciprocate to computers: An experiment that demonstrates behavior change (pp. 331–332). In Proceedings of CHI Extended Abstracts. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Forestell, A., Brissenden, G., Prather, E., & Slater, T. (2008). Revisiting think-pair-share: An expanded “how-to” guide. Retrieved June 5, 2012, from http://astronomy101.jpl.nasa.gov/teachingstrategies/teachingdetails/?StrategyID=23
   Google Scholar
• Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 495–522. doi:10.1002/acp.2350090604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P. J. (2002). Peer instruction for astronomy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985). Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics, 53, 1056–1065. doi:10.1119/1.14031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Koedinger, K. R., Brunskill, E., Baker, R. S. J. d., McLaughlin, E. A., & Stamper, J. (2013). New potentials for data-driven intelligent tutoring system development and optimization. AI Magazine, 34, 27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75–94.10.1016/0747-5632(91)90030-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A. N. (2005). Generation of problems, answers, grade, and feedback—Case study of a fully automated tutor. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 5, doi:10.1145/1163405.1163408.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrenz, F., Huffman, D., & Appeldoorn, K. (2005). Enhancing the instructional environment: Optimal learning in introductory science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 34, 40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. L., & Bjork, E. L. (2011). Pretesting with multiple choice questions facilitates learning. In L. Carlson, C. Holscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 294–299). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Lyman, F. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion: The inclusion of all students. Mainstreaming digest. College Park: University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, A., McKagan, S. B., & Sayre, E. C. (2013). Gender gap on concept inventories in physics: What is consistent, what is inconsistent, and what factors influence the gap? Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 9, 020121. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020121
   Google Scholar
• Murray, T. (1999). Authoring intelligent tutoring systems: An analysis of the state of the art. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 98–129.
   Google Scholar
• Nass, C. (2004). Etiquette equality: Exhibitions and expectations of computer politeness. Communications of the ACM, 47, 35–37.10.1145/975817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences. (2007). Reconsidering the textbook. A workshop. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://serc.carleton.edu/textbook/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D. M., Hsieh, Y.-C. J., & Allen, G. D. (2006). The impact of web-based assessment and practice on students’ mathematics learning attitudes. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25, 251–279.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center Internet & American Life Project. (2011). College students and technology. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/College-students-and-technology/Report.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, III, H. L. (2013). Applying cognitive psychology to education: Translational educational science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 1–3. doi:10.1177/1529100612454415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrer, D., Dederick, R. F., & Burgess, K. (2014). The benefit of interleaved mathematics practice is not limited to superficially similar kinds of problems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1323–1330. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0588-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14, 50–71.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 1–16. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00158-6
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, P. M., & Tai, R. H. (2007). The two high-school pillars supporting college science. Science, 317, 458. doi:10.1126/science.1144214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). Learning versus performance. In D. S. Dunn (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies online: Psychology (pp. 1–41). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrianeas, S., Stewart, M., & Harmer, P. (2008). Beyond the printed page: Physiology education without a textbook? AJP: Advances in Physiology Education, 32, 76. doi:10.1152/advan.00031.2007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subotzky, G., & Prinsloo, P. (2011). Turning the tide: A socio-critical model and framework for improving student success in open distance learning at the University of South Africa. Distance Education, 32, 177–193. doi:10.1080/01587919.2011.584846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt, N. P., Cook, S. P., & Muise, A. S. (2013). A new resource for college distance education astronomy laboratory exercises. American Journal of Distance Education, 27, 189–200. doi:10.1080/08923647.2013.795365
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, C., Cormier, S., Prather, E., Brissenden, G. Hornstein, S., Lee, K., … Duncan, D. (2012). National archive for Astro 101 think-pair-share questions. Retrieved from http://astronomy101.jpl.nasa.gov/cats/projects/
   Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L. (2004). An initial examination of observed verbal immediacy and participants’ opinions of communication effectiveness in online group interaction. Journal of Online Behavior, 2. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2004-22200-001
   Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L., Wheeless, L. R., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71, 184. doi:10.1080/036452042000228054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodley, A. (2004). Conceptualizing student dropout in part-time distance education: Pathologizing the normal? Open Learning, 19, 47–63. doi:10.1080/0268051042000177845
   Google Scholar