Teachers’ perceptions of examining students’ thinking: Changing mathematics instructional practice

References

• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2006). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417–436. doi:10.1016/j.tate.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Busi, R., & Jacobbe, T. (2014). Examining student work in the preparation of preservice elementary school teachers. The Mathematics Educator, 23, 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 3–20.10.1086/esj.1996.97.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Doerr, H. (2006). Examining the tasks of teaching when using students’ mathematical thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 3–24. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-4437-9
   Google Scholar
• Everett, S. A., Luera, G. R., & Otto, C. A. (2006). Pre-service elementary teachers bridge the gap between research and practice. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 653–689.10.3102/00028312038003653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frykholm, J. (2004). Teachers’ tolerance for discomfort: Implications for curricular reform in mathematics. Journal of Curriculum & Supervision, 19, 125–149.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 147–179.10.1023/A:1023477131081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (2000). Learner-centered professional development. Phi Delta Kappa International Research Bulletin, 27, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 105, 11–30.10.1086/esj.2004.105.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMAP: Integrating Mathematics and Pedagogy. (2001). IMAP web-based beliefs survey. Retrieved January 17, 2013, from http://www.sci.sdsu.edu/CRMSE/IMAP/pubs.html
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, C., & Lehrer, R. (2000). Teacher appropriation and student learning of geometry through design. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 71–88.10.2307/749820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203–235.10.1023/B:JMTE.0000033084.26326.19
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2004). A deeper look at lesson study. Educational Leadership, 61, 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (1999). Organizing schools for teacher learning. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 233–262). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsely, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & DiRanna, K. (2008). The data coach’s guide to improving learning for all students: Unleashing the power of collaborative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mewborn, D. S. (2003). Teaching, teachers’ knowledge, and their professional development. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 289–303). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1978). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2007). Mathematics teaching today. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., McDougall, D., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & LeSage, A. (2003). A survey measuring elementary teachers’ implementation of standards-based mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 344–363.10.2307/30034787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. L., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). The frame and the tapestry: Standards-based reform and professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 341–375). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Warzon, K. B., & Christensen, A. (2011). Motivating mathematics learning: Changes in teachers’ practices and beliefs during a nine-month collaboration. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 718–762. doi:10.3102/0002831210385103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J. (2006). Why some teachers resist change and what principals can do about it. NASSP Bulletin, 90, 238–249.10.1177/0192636506291521
   Google Scholar