Cooperative learning: Homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping of Iranian EFL learners in a writing context

References

• Allwright, D. (2014). Observation in the language classroom. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (2003). Grouping and achievement in cooperative learning. College Teaching, 51, 169–175.10.1080/87567550309596434
   Google Scholar
• Barros, B., & Verdejo, F. (1998). Designing workspaces to support collaborative learning. Castellón: National University of Distance Education.10.1007/3-540-64574-8
   Google Scholar
• Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (1989). Research in education. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Calderon, M. (Ed.). (1990). Cooperative leaning for limited English proficient students (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language learning research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2013). Second language acquisition. In The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (p. 193).
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 933–940.10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, R., Ashman, A., & Terwel, J. (2008). The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Series, 8, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, P. M. (1984). A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 117–138). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hadley, A. O. (2003). Teaching language in context. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, M. (1993). Pair work—A blessing or a curse? An analysis of pair work from pedagogical, cultural, social and psychological perspectives. System, 21, 343–348.10.1016/0346-251X(93)90024-B
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, F. (2000). Teacher management of writing workshops: Two case studies. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 272–294.10.3138/cmlr.57.2.272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, G. M. (1987). First experiences with peer feedback on compositions: Student and teacher reaction. System, 15, 325–333.10.1016/0346-251X(87)90006-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition; A practical approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MI: Interaction Book.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, W. D., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1994). Cooperative learning in the classroom. Virginia, VA: Supervision and Curriculum Development Alexandria.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella, K. (1996). Designing group work that supports and enhances diverse classroom work style. TESOL Journal, 6, 24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1999). Promoting reading comprehension, content learning, and English acquisition through collaborative strategic reading (CSR). The Reading Teacher, 52, 738–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, M. Y. (2010). Using synchronous online peer response groups in EFL writing: Revision-related discourse. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 45–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, A., & Mattos, A. (2000). A Vygotskian approach to evaluation in foreign language contexts. ELT Journal, 54, 335–345.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, M. B. (1997). Cooperative learning: A brief review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13, 7–20.10.1080/1057356970130102
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, S., & Oliver, R. (1998). Secondary school ESL learners perceptions of pair work in Australian classrooms. TESOL in Context, 8, 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Mynard, J., & Almarzouqi, I. (2006). Investigating peer tutoring. ELT Journal, 60, 13–22.10.1093/elt/cci077
   Google Scholar
• Naughton, D. (2006). Cooperative strategy training and oral interaction: Enhancing small group communication in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 90 ( ii): 160–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition process in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 223.10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskams, T. (1999). Chinese EFL students’ attitudes to peer feedback and peer assessment in an extended pairwork setting. RELC Journal, 30, 79–123.10.1177/003368829903000105
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153–173.10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337.10.1111/modl.1998.82.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lier, L. (2014). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar