Generated questions learning model (GQLM): Beyond learning styles

References

• Alzaghoul, A. F. (2012). The Implication of the learning theories on implementing e-learning courses. The Research Bulletin of Jordan ACM, 11, 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., & Bem, D. J. (1993). Introduction to Psychology (11th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Barbe, W. B., & Milone, Jr., M. N. (1981). What we know about modality strengths. Educational Leadership, 38, 378–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbe, W. B., Swassing, R. H., & Milone, Jr., M. N. (1979). Teaching through modality strengths: Concepts and practices. Columbus, OH: Zaner-Blosner.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, J., & Dowding, L. (2015). Leadership in health care. London: Sage. ISBN 978-4739-0455-2..
   Google Scholar
• Becta. (2005). Learning styles: An introduction to the research literature. Retrieved 2015, October 17 from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/14118/1/learning_styles.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (1992). Theory into practice: How do we link? Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp.17–33). ISBN 1136612270, 9781136612275.
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology, 45, 180–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. (1965). Structure and direction in thinking. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. (1966). Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153, 25–33.10.1126/science.153.3731.25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longmans Green.
   Google Scholar
• Boghossian, P. (2006). Behaviorism, constructivism, and socratic pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38, 713–722. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00226.x
   Google Scholar
• Bogod. (1998). Learning styles and multiple intelligence. Retrieved from http://www.ldpride.net/learningstyles.mi.htm
   Google Scholar
• Borowske, K. (2005, April 7–10). Curiosity and motivation-to-learn. In Comunicación presentada a la ACRL Twelfth National Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, G. H., & Hilgard, E. R. (1981). Theories of learning (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiesa, M. (1992). Radical behaviorism and scientific frameworks: From mechanistic to relational accounts. American Psychologist, 47, 1287–1299.10.1037/0003-066X.47.11.1287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiesa, M. (1994). Radical behaviorism: The philosophy and the science. Boston, MA: Authors’ Cooperative.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. (2002). Student-generated questions: Encouraging inquisitive minds in learning science. Teaching and Learning, 23, 59-67. ISSN 0129-7112
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 521–549. doi:10.1080/09500690110095249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christison, M. A. (1996). Multiple intelligences & second language learners. The Journal of the Imagination in Language Learning, 3, 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Claxton, G. (2009). 3.4 Cultivating positive learning dispositions. In H. Daniel, H. Lauder, & J. Porter (Eds.), Educational theories, cultures and learning: A critical perspective (p. 177). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning style and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. London: Learning and Skill Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Colbert, J. T., Olson, J. K., & Clough, M. P. (2007). Using the web to encourage student-generated questions in large-format introductory biology classes. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6, 42–48. doi:10.1187/cbe.06-07-0171
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collins, J. (1998). Seven kinds of smart. Time Magazine, 152, 94–96.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinidou, F., & Baker, S. (2002). Stimulus modality and verbal learning performance in normal aging. Brain and Language, 82, 296–311. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00018-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, D. A., Thompson, W. G., Thomas, K. G., & Thomas, M. R. (2009). Lack of interaction between sensing–intuitive learning styles and problem-first versus information-first instruction: A randomized crossover trial. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14, 79–90. doi:10.1007/s10459-007-9089-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crogman, T. H., Trebeau Crogman, A. M., Warner, L, Mustafa, A., & Peters, R. (2015). Developing a new teaching paradigm for the 21st century learners in the context of socratic methodologies. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 9, 62–95. doi:10.9734/BJESBS/2015/17825
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, D. J. (1992). Assessing constructions and constructing assessments: A dialogue. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Construtivism and the Technology of Instruction-A Conversation (pp. 34-44). New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates..
   Google Scholar
• Davey, B., & McBride, S. (1986a). Effects of question-generation training on reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 256. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey, B., & McBride, S. (1986b). Generating self-questions after reading: A comprehension assist for elementary students. The Journal of Educational Research, 80, 43–46. doi:10.1080/00220671.1986.10885720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Moors, A. (2013). What is learning? On the nature and merits of a functional definition of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 631–642. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0386-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennick, R., & Exley, K. (2004). Small group teaching: Tutorials, seminars and beyond. Routledge. ISBN 1134398557, 9781134398553.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, R. (1644). Principles of Philosophy, in descartes: Selected philosophical writings, 1988. (J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doorley, R. (2013). Sensory play: Early exploration through the senses. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/parents/child-development/sensory-play/developing-and-cultivating-skills-through-sensory-play/sensory-play-early-exploration-through-the-senses/
   Google Scholar
• Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 411–430. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199904)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. (1991). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology? Educational Technology, 31, 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, R., Beaudry, J. S., & Klavas, A. (1989). Survey of research on learning styles. Educational Leadership, 46, 50–58. ISSN 1531-2488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, R. S., & Dunn, K. J. (1978). Teaching students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach. Reston, VA: Reston Pub. ISBN 0879098082 9780879098087.
   Google Scholar
• Elder, L., & Paul, R. (1998). The role of socratic questioning in thinking, teaching, and learning. The Clearing House, 71, 297–301. doi:10.1080/00098659809602729
   Google Scholar
• Engel, S. (2011). Children's need to know: Curiosity in schools. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 625–645. doi:10.17763/haer.81.4.h054131316473115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26, 43–71. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.1993.tb00605.x
   Google Scholar
• Etkina, E. (2000). Weekly reports: A two-way feedback tool. Science Education, 84, 594–605.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etkina, E., & Harper, K. A. (2002). Closing the feedback loop in large enrollment physics courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31, 476–480.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78, 674–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. International journal of engineering education, 21, 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernyhough, C. (2008). A thousand days of wonder: A scientist’s chronicle of his daughter’s developing mind. ISBN-10: 1583333975. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, N. D. (2001). Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. Christchurch: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11, 137–143.http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/podimproveacad/246
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, D. L. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Geake, J. (2009). Neural interconnectivity and intellectual creativity: Giftedness, savants and learning styles. The Routledge international companion to gifted education, 10–17. https://e-publications.une.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/une:5706;jsessionid=51867A97CFACAB3FCD7F200A9BF1CF96?exact=sm_title%3A%22Neural+interconnectivity+and+intellectual+creativity%3A+giftedness%2C+savants%2C+and+learning+styles%22.
   Google Scholar
• Geake, J. G. (2004). How children’s brains think: Not left or right but both together. Education 3–13, 32, 65–72. doi:10.1080/03004270485200351
   Google Scholar
• Geake, J. G. (2008). Neuromythologies in education. Educational Research, 50, 123–133. doi:10.1080/00131880802082518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geake, J. G., & Dobson, C. S. (2005). A neuro-psychological model of the creative Intelligence of gifted children. Gifted and Talented International, 20, 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1990). Educational psychology: A realistic approach (4th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, M. J., Gelman, B. D., & Ranganath, C. (2014). States of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit. Neuron, 84, 486–496. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, G. (2003). The psychology of learning. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (Vol. 2, pp. 837–845). London: Nature Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, R. E. (2000). The role and experience in learning: Giving meaning and authenticity to the learning process in schools. Journal of Technology Education, 11, doi:10.21061/jte.v11i2.a.2
   Google Scholar
• Harper, K. A., Etkina, E., & Lin, Y. (2003). Encouraging and analyzing student questions in a large physics course: Meaningful patterns for instructors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 776–791. doi:10.1002/tea.10111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heady, J. E. (1983). Teaching embryology without lectures and without traditional laboratories–an adventure in innovation. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23, 87–91. ISSN-0047-231X.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, J. (2007, July). Professor Pans’ learning style’ teaching method. The Telegraph, 29. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1558822/Professor-pans-learning-style-teaching-method.html
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M. E., & McGinnis, J. (2007). The curiosity in marketing thinking. Journal of Marketing Education, 29, 52–62. doi:10.1177/0273475306297385
   Google Scholar
• Huitt, W. (1998). Critical thinking: An overview. Educational psychology interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved 2015, October 17 from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cogsys/critthnk.html
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. (1748). An inquiry concerning human understanding, 1955. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Hutt, C., & Bhavnani, R. (1972). Predictions from Play. Nature, 237, 171–172.10.1038/237171b0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, W. B., & Gardner, D. L. (1995). Learning styles: Implications for distance learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1995, 19–31. doi:10.1002/ace.36719956705
   Google Scholar
• Jirout, J., & Klahr, D. (2011). Children’s question asking and curiosity: A training study. Talk presented at the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness Fall 2011 Conference, Evanston, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Jirout, J., & Klahr, D. (2012). Children’s scientific curiosity: In search of an operational definition of an elusive concept. Developmental Review, 32, 125–160.10.1016/j.dr.2012.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1991a). Evaluating constructivistic learning. Educational Technology, 31, 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1991b). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, 5–14. doi:10.1007/BF02296434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jubran, S. (2012). Using multi-sensory approach for teaching English skills and its effect on students’ achievement at Jordanian schools. European Scientific Journal, 8, 50–60. ISSN .
   Google Scholar
• Kalia, A. A., Legge, G. E., & Giudice, N. A. (2008). Learning building layouts with non-geometric visual information: The effects of visual impairment and age. Perception, 37, 1677–1699.10.1068/p5915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T. Y., & Camerer, C. F. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20, 963–973. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02402.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In NASSP’s Student Learning Styles: Diagnosing and Proscribing Programs (pp. 1–17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principles. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED182859
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2, 26–34. doi:10.1007/BF02904345
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, C., & Hayden, B. Y. (2015). The psychology and neuroscience of curiosity. Neuron, 88, 449–460. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1989). Effects of self-questioning training on college students' comprehension of lectures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 366–381. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(89)90022-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children's problem solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 307–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 338–368. doi:10.3102/00028312031002338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, P. (2003). Rethinking the multiplicity of cognitive resources and curricular representations: Alternative to learning styles and multiple intelligences. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 45–81. doi:10.1080/00220270210141891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2012). Experiential learning theory. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 1215–1219). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1985). Learning style inventory: Self scoring inventory and interpretation booklet. Boston, MA: McBer & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Litzinger, T. A., Lee, S. H., Wise, J. C., & Felder, R. M. (2007). A psychometric study of the index of learning styles. Journal of Engineering Education, 96, 309.10.1002/jee.2007.96.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1700). An Essay Concerning Humane (sic) Understanding. London: Awnsam & John Churcill.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75–98. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, T. W. (1980, September). What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL symposium and the first SIGPC symposium on Small systems (pp. 162–169). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 5, 333–369.10.1207/s15516709cog0504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manolis, C., Burns, D. J., Assudani, R., & Chinta, R. (2013). Assessing experiential learning styles: A methodological reconstruction and validation of the Kolb learning style inventory. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 44–52. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marbach-Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2000). Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 854–870.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massa, L. J., & Mayer, R. E. (2006). Testing the ATI hypothesis: Should multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer-visualizer cognitive style? Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 321–335. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, M., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (2013). How fMRI can inform cognitive theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 108–113. doi:10.1177/1745691612469037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake, N., & Norman, D. A. (1979). To ask a question, one must know enough to know what is not known. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 357–364. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90200-7
   Google Scholar
• Nagowah, L., & Nagowah, S. (2009). A reflection on the dominant learning theories: Behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism. International Journal of Learning, 16, 279–285..
   Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the public interest, 9, 105–119. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2001). The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts & tools. Foundation Critical Thinking. ISBN 0944583105, 9780944583104.
   Google Scholar
• Payal, R., & Shukla, S. C. (2012). Learning styles in education. International Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 2, ISSN: .
   Google Scholar
• Peariso, J. F. (2008). Multiple intelligences or multiply misleading: The critic’s view of the multiple intelligences theory. Online Submission. ERIC Number: ED500515. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED500515
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, L. G. (2011). A comparison of the preferred learning styles of year 5, year 7 and year 9 students in science using the science laboratory environment inventory (SLEI) and a cooperative learning unit of work based on multiple intelligences ( Doctoral dissertation, Curtin University, Science and Mathematics Education Centre). Retrieved 2016, April 17 from http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/cgibin/espace.pdf?file=/2012/07/06/file_1/186433
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International University Press.10.1037/11494-000
   Google Scholar
• Ratna, S., & Tron, B. (2015). Learning theories: Implications in teacher education. Retrieved 2015, October 21 from https://www.academia.edu/6730061/Learning_Theories_Implications_in_Teacher_Education
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, S., & Riding, R. (1996). Cognitive style and school refusal. Educational Psychology, 16, 445–451.10.1080/0144341960160409
   Google Scholar
• Roussou, M. (2004). Learning by doing and learning through play: An exploration of interactivity in virtual environments for children. Computers in Entertainment, 2, 10–10. doi:10.1145/973801.973818
   Google Scholar
• Scarr, S., & Salapatek, P. (1970). Patterns of fear development during infancy. Merrill-Palmer quarterly of behavior and development, 16, 53–90.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1991). Learning theories: An educational perspective. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. M. (2006). Unifying perception and curiosity (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). New York, NY: University of Rochester.
   Google Scholar
• Shook, J. (2008). The greatest humanist: William James. Free Inquiry, 29, 52-53.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York, NY: Appleton-Century.
   Google Scholar
• Soloman, B. A., & Felder, R. M. (2005). Index of learning styles questionnaire. NC State University. Retrieved from http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html
   Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S., & Hermer, L. (1996). Early cognitive development: Objects and space. In R. Gelman & T. Kit-Fong (Eds.), Perceptual and cognitive development (pp.71-114). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A. (2002). Different strokes for different folks? In L. Abbeduto (Ed.), Taking sides: Clashing on controversial issues in educational psychology (pp. 98–107). Guilford, CT: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Stavredes, T. (2011). Developing cognitive, social, and teaching presence online. 27th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Capella University. The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., Ferrari, M., & Clinkenbeard, P. (1999). A triarchic analysis of an aptitude–treatment interaction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15(1), 1–11. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.15.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. C., & Hamdy, H. (2013). Adult learning theories: Implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83. Medical Teacher, 35, e1561-e1572. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.828153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolman, E. C., & Honzik, C. H. (1930). “Insight” in rats (Vol. 4, pp. 215–232). Berkeley, CA: University of California, Publications in Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhouse, L. (2006). Inadequate evidence for multiple intelligences, mozart effect, and emotional intelligence theories. Educational Psychologist, 41, 247–255.10.1207/s15326985ep4104_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. (2005). Howard Gardner: The myth of multiple intelligences. Institute of Education: University of London. ISBN 0854737243, 9780854737246.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. T. (1977). An overlooked objective. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 23, 124–125.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why don’t students like school?: A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M., & Peterson, P. L. (2006). Theories of learning and teaching: What do they mean for educators? Washington, DC: National Education Association. Retrieved from http://arc.duke.edu/documents/Wilson%20teaching%20and%20learning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, C. (2007). Construction of an adaptive e-learning environment to address learning styles and an investigation of the effect of media choice (Thesis). RMIT University, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, K. (2011). The cognitive perspective on learning: Its theoretical underpinnings and implications for classroom practices. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 84, 204–212.10.1080/00098655.2011.568989
   Google Scholar
• Zywno, M. S. (2003, June). A contribution to validation of score meaning for Felder-Soloman’s index of learning styles. In Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education annual conference & exposition (Vol. 119, pp. 1–5). Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar