Teachers’ role in the development of EFL curriculum in Saudi Arabia: The marginalised status

References

• Acker-Hocevar, M., & Touchton, D. (1999). A model of power as social relationships: Teachers as leaders describe the phenomena of effective agency in practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal
   Google Scholar
• Akbari, R. (2008). Transforming lives: Introducing critical pedagogy into ELT classrooms. ELT journal, 62, 276–283.‏
   Google Scholar
• Alajroush, H. (1980). Historical development of the public secondary school curriculum in Saudi Arabia from 1930 to the present ( Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis). Oklahoma: Oklahoma University.
   Google Scholar
• Albedaiwi, S. A. (2014). EFL materials in public school classrooms in Saudi Arabia: An investigation of the extent to which teachers engage in materials/textbooks development in order to design learning experiences to meet the needs of their students as an indicator of teacher autonomy ( PhD thesis). Glasgow: University of Glasgow..
   Google Scholar
• Al-Sadan, I. A. (2000). Educational assessment in saudi arabian schools. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 7, 143–155.10.1080/713613320
   Google Scholar
• Banegas, D. L. (2011). Teachers as ‘reform-doers’: Developing a participatory curriculum to teach English as a foreign language. Educational Action Research, 19, 417–432.‏10.1080/09650792.2011.625654
   Google Scholar
• ‏Bangs, J., & Frost, D. (2012). Teacher self-efficacy, voice and leadership: Towards a policy framework for education international. Paper presented at the Education International Research Institute, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Brain, K., & Reid, I. (2006). Teachers as mediators between educational policy and practice. Educational Studies, 32, 411–423.10.1080/03055690600850396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‏Brown, J. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Carl, A. (2005). The “voice of the teacher” in curriculum development: A voice crying in the wildernes. South African Journal of Education, 25, 223–228.‏
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, M., & Kottkamp, B. (1993). Teachers: The missing voice in education. Albany: State University of New York Press.‏
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2010). The Good Research Guide: for small scale research projects (4th ed.). Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erss, M., Mikser, R., Löfström, E., Ugaste, A., Rõuk, V., & Jaani, J. (2014). Teachers’ views of curriculum policy: The case of Estonia. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62, 393–411.10.1080/00071005.2014.941786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handler, B. (2010). Teacher as curriculum leader: A consideration of the appropriateness of that role assignment to classroom-based practitioners. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 3, 32–42.‏
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2011). The far side of educational reform. Ottawa: Canadian Teachers’ Federation.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, D. (2010). Teacher participation in curriculum and pedagogical decisions: Insights into curriculum leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38, 613–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In Y. S. Lincoln & N. K. Denzin (Eds.) The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 303–342). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• ‏Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). TESOL methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 59–81.‏10.2307/40264511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liton, H. A. (2013). EFL teachers’ perceptions, evaluations and expectations about English language courses as EFL in Saudi universities. International Journal of Instruction, 6, 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• ‏Mahib ur Rahman, M., & Alhaisoni, E. (2013). Teaching English in Saudi Arabia: Prospects and challenges.‏ Academic Research International, 4, 112–118.
   Google Scholar
• Mullick, H. (2013). Voices imprisoned within classrooms: A critical approach to curriculum development and teacher voice on a preparatory year English language program in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Bilingual & Multilingual Teachers of English, 1, 37–48.‏
   Google Scholar
• Oloruntegbe, K. O. (2011). Teachers’ involvement, commitment and innovativeness in curriculum development and implementation. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 2, 443–449.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (1999). Introduction: Critical approaches to TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 329–348.10.2307/3587668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. London: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• ‏Pennycook, A. (2010). Critical and alternative directions in applied linguistics. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• ‏ Pessoa, R., & Urzêda Freitas, M. (2012). Challenges in critical language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 753–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapsford, R., & Jupp, V. (1996). Data collection and analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saracaloğlu, S., Yılmaz, S., Çengel, M., Çöğmen, S., Karademir, Ç. A., & Kanmaz, A. (2010). Elementary teachers’ views about their roles in curriculum development and evaluation process: The case of Denizli. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2427–2434.‏10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.349
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D., & Morrison, M. (2005). Key ideas in educational research. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, S. (2010). Critical research in applied linguistics. In B. Paltridge, & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Continuum companion to research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 127–142). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Troudi, S. (2006). Empowering ourselves through action research. In P. Davidson, M. Al-Hamly, J. Aydelott, C. Coombe, & S. Troudi (Eds.), Teaching, learning, leading: Proceedings of the 11th TESOL Arabia conference (pp. 277–290). Dubai: TESOL Arabia Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Troudi, S. (2009). Recognising and rewarding teachers'contributions. In M. Al-Hamly, C. Coombe, A. Shehada, & S. Troudi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th TESOL Arabic conference: Finding your voice: Critical issues in ELT (pp. 60–67). Dubai. TESOL Arabia Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Troudi, S. (2010). Paradigmatic nature and theoretical framework in educational research. In M. Al-Hamly, C. Coombe, P. Davidson and A. Shehada (Eds.) English in learning: Learning in English (pp. 315–323). Dubai: TESOL Arabia Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Troudi, S., & Alwan, F. (2010). Teachers’ feelings during curriculum change in the United Arab Emirates: Opening Pandora’s box. Teacher Development, 14, 107–121.10.1080/13664531003696659
   Google Scholar
• Viirpalu, P., Krull, E., & Mikser, R. (2014). Investigating Estonian teachers’ expectations for the general education curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16, 54–70.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P. T. (2002). Teacher power: The exercise of professional autonomy in an era of strict accountability. Teacher Development, 6, 47–62.10.1080/13664530200200156
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. (2000). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Zohrabi, M. (2014). Promoting teacher development through an interactive approach to curriculum development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 2025–2034.‏10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.638
   Google Scholar