2,412
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Factors associated with occupational therapy students’ preferences for courses and teaching

| (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1431426 | Received 03 Dec 2017, Accepted 19 Jan 2018, Published online: 30 Jan 2018

References

  • Bonsaksen, T. (2015). Predictors of general self-efficacy and self-esteem in occupational therapy students: A cross-sectional study. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 31(3), 298–310. doi:10.1080/0164212X.2015.1055536
  • Bonsaksen, T., Brown, T., Lim, H. B., & Fong, K. (2017). Approaches to studying predict academic performance in undergraduate occupational therapy students: A cross-cultural study. BMC Medical Education, 17(76). doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0914-3
  • Bonsaksen, T., Fagermoen, M. S., & Lerdal, A. (2015). Factors associated with self-esteem in persons with morbid obesity and in persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional study. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 20(4), 431–442. doi:10.1080/13548506.2014.959529
  • Bonsaksen, T., Kottorp, A., Gay, C., Fagermoen, M. S., & Lerdal, A. (2013). Rasch analysis of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in a sample of persons with morbid obesity. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 202. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-11-202
  • Bonsaksen, T., Sadeghi, T., & Thørrisen, M. M. (2017). Associations between self-esteem, general self-efficacy, and approaches to studying in occupational therapy students: A cross-sectional study (early online). Occupational Therapy and Mental Health, 1–16. doi:10.1080/0164212X.2017.1295006
  • Bonsaksen, T., & Thørrisen, M. M. (2017). Psychometric properties of two interrelated measures: Conceptions of learning and Preferences for different types of courses and teaching. Ergoterapeuten, 60(4), 32–45.
  • Brown, T., Fong, K., Bonsaksen, T., Murdolo, Y., Cruz-Gonzales, P., Tan, H. L., & Lim, H. B. (2016). Approaches to learning among occupational therapy undergraduate students: A cross-cultural study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 24(4), 299–310. doi:10.1080/11038128.2016.1229811
  • Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2000). Learning style, academic self-belief systems, self-report student proficiency and academic achievement in higher education. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 307–322. doi:10.1080/713663740
  • Corporation, I. B. M. (2016). SPSS for Windows, version 24. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
  • Diseth, Å. (2001). Validation of Norwegian version of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (ASSIST): Application of structural equation modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(4), 381–394. doi:10.1080/0031380120096789
  • Diseth, Å. (2007). Approaches to learning, course experience and examination grade among undergraduate psychology students: Testing of mediator effects and construct validity. Studies in Higher Education, 32(3), 373–388. doi:10.1080/03075070701346949
  • Diseth, Å., & Martinsen, Ø. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(2), 195–207. doi:10.1080/01443410303225
  • Diseth, Å., Pallesen, S., Brunborg, G. S., & Larsen, S. (2010). Academic achievement among first semester undergraduate psychology students: The role of course experience, effort, motives and learning strategies. Higher Education, 59(3), 335–352. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9251-8
  • Duff, A. (2004). The revised approaches to studying inventory (RASI) and its use in management education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 56–72. doi:10.1177/1469787404040461
  • English, L., Luckett, P., & Mladenovic, R. (2004). Encouraging a deep approach to learning through curriculum design. Accounting Education, 13(4), 461–488. doi:10.1080/0963928042000306828
  • Entwistle, N. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Higher Education, 22(3), 201–204. doi:10.1007/BF00132287
  • Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Tait, H. (2006). ASSIST: Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
  • Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19(2), 169–194.10.1007/BF00137106
  • Entwistle, N., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(1), 33–48. doi:10.1007/bf03173165
  • Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2007). Quality of life. The assessment, analysis, and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (2nd ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.
  • Herrmann, K. J., McCune, V., & Bager-Elsborg, A. (2017). Approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement: Results from a large scale, multi-level analysis. Högre Utbildning, 7(1), 29–42. doi:10.23865/hu.v7.905
  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
  • Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1–46). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Leganger, A., Kraft, P., & Roysamb, E. (2000). General and task specific self-efficacy in health behaviour research: Conceptualization, measurement and correlates. Psychology & Health, 15(1), 51–69.10.1080/08870440008400288
  • Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52. doi:10.1080/03075070120099359
  • Maguire, M., Reynolds, A. E., & Delahunt, B. (2013). Self-efficacy in academic reading and writing, authorial identity and learning strategies in first-year students. The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 1111–11117.
  • Prat-Sala, M., & Redford, P. (2010). The interplay between motivation, self-efficacy, and approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 283–305. doi:10.1348/000709909X480563
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400876136
  • Salamonson, Y., Weaver, R., Chang, S., Koch, J., Bhathal, R., Khoo, C., & Wilson, I. (2013). Learning approaches as predictors of academic performance in first year health and science students. Nurse Education Today, 33(7), 729–733. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.01.013
  • Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio (pp. 35–37). Winsor: Nfer-Nelson.
  • Sharp, J. G., Hemmings, B., Kay, R., & Atkin, C. (2017). Academic boredom, approaches to learning and the final-year degree outcomes of undergraduate students (early online). Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1–23. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2017.1349883
  • Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Health measurement scales—A practical guide to their development and use (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231881.001.0001
  • Sun, H., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2016). Students’ perceptions of the academic environment and approaches to studying in British postgraduate business education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 384–399. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1017755
  • Tait, H., & Entwistle, N. J. (1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies. Higher Education, 31(1), 97–116.10.1007/BF00129109
  • Tait, H., Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A reconceptualisation of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving students as learners (pp. 262–271). Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.
  • Tambs, K. (2004). Moderate effects of hearing loss on mental health and subjective well-being: Results from the Nord-Trondelag Hearing Loss Study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66(5), 776–782.10.1097/01.psy.0000133328.03596.fb
  • Tambs, K., & Røysamb, E. (2014). Selection of questions to short-form versions of original psychometric instruments in MoBa. Norsk Epidemiologi, 24(1–2), 195–201.
  • Valadas, S. C., Almeida, L. S., & Araujo, A. M. (2016). The mediating effects of approaches to learning in the academic success of first-year college students (early online). Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1–14. doi:10.1080/00313831.2016.1188146
  • Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004
  • Ward, P. J. (2011). Influence of study approaches on academic outcomes during pre-clinical medical education. Medical Teacher, 33(12), e651–e662. doi:10.3109/014215x.2011.610843
  • Ystgaard, M. (1993). Sårbar ungdom og sosial støtte [Vulnerable youth and social support] ( Report No. 1/93). Oslo: Center for social networks and health [Senter for sosialt nettverk og helse].
  • Zeegers, P. (2001). Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 115–132. doi:10.1348/000709901158424