Modified generated question learning, and its classroom implementation and assessment

References

• Allen, D. E., Duch, B. J., & Groh, S. E. (1996). The power of problem-based learning in teaching Introductory science courses. In L. Wilkerson & W. H. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice (pp. 43–52). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Arámbula-Greenfield, T. (1996). Implementing problem-based learning in a college science class: Testing problem-solving methodology as a viable alternative to traditional science-teaching techniques. Journal of College Science Teaching, 26(1), 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (1982). Reasoning, learning, and action: Individual and organizational. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, I. (2011). John Hattie: Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. International Review of Education, 57, 219–221. doi:10.1007/s11159-011-9198-8
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2001). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70, 181–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, R. B., Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (Eds.). (2005). “They thought the world was flat?”: Applying the principles of how people learn in teaching high school history. How students learn. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battistich, V., Schaps, E., & Wilson, N. (2004). Effects of an elementary school intervention on students’ “connectedness” to school and social adjustment during middle school. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 24(3), 243–262.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 349–377.10.1080/09500690802582241
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Billingsley, B. S., & Wildman, T. M. (1988). The effects of prereading activities on the comprehension monitoring of learning disabled adolescents. Learning Disabilities Research, 4(1), 364.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1997). The teacher-child relationship and children’s early school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 61–79.10.1016/S0022-4405(96)00029-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA, 30(9), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 5(1), 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Bligh, D. A. (1971). What’s the use of lecturing. Devon: Teaching Services Centre, University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longmans Green.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Vye, N. J., & Sherwood, R. D. (1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can’t be told. In S. Vosiadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 470–497). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, C. A. (1986). The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 47–59.10.2307/3586388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brualdi, A. C. (1998a). Classroom Questions. Washington, DC: ERIC/AE Digest.
   Google Scholar
• Brualdi, A. C. (1998b). Implementing performance assessment in the classroom. Washington, DC: ERIC/AE Digest.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Chia, L. G. (2006). Problem-based learning: Using ill-structured problems in biology project work. Science Education, 90(1), 44–67.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, N. (1988). Nuts and bolts of running a lecture course. In A. L. Deneff, C. D. Goodwin, & E. S. McCrate (Eds.), The Academic Handbook. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C. E. (2006). Problem-based learning: How do the outcomes compare with traditional teaching? British Journal of General Practice, 56(530), 722–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing groupwork: Strategies for heterogeneous classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Colbert, J. T., Olson, J. K., & Clough, M. P. (2007). Using the web to encourage student-generated questions in large-format introductory biology classes. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6, 42–48. doi:10.1187/cbe.06-07-0171
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Comer, J. P. (2001). Schools that develop children. The American Prospect, 12(7), 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, M. (2010). Socratic circles: Fostering critical and creative thinking in middle and high school. Portland, MN: Stenhouse.
   Google Scholar
• Covey, S. R. (1989). The 7 habits of highly effective people (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Crogman, T. H., Trebeau Crogman, A. M., Warner, L., Mustafa, A., & Peters, R. (2015). Developing a new teaching paradigm for the 21st century learners in the context of socratic methodologies. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 9, 62–95. doi:10.9734/BJESBS/2015/17825
   Google Scholar
• Crogman, H. (2017). Language and Thinking in Learning Theories: Grasping the Interplay Between the Verbal Cultural Diversity and Critical Thinking, and Their Consequences for African American Education. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 2, p. 64). Frontiers.
   Google Scholar
• Crogman, H., & Trebeau Crogman, M. (2016). Generated questions learning model (GQLM): Beyond learning styles. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1202460. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1202460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438–481.10.3102/00346543058004438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks, T. (2001). The validity of formative assessments. British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Leeds, September 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Introduction: Teaching and learning for understanding. In Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding (pp. 1–9). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Di Vesta, F. J., & Smith, D. A. (1979). The pausing principle: Increasing the efficiency of memory for ongoing events. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4(3), 288–296.10.1016/0361-476X(79)90048-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, J. (1988a). Questioning and teaching: A manual of practice (London, Croom Helm). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J. T. (1988b). The remedial status of student questioning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(3), 197–210.10.1080/0022027880200301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn, D. S. (1989). Simulation games: One more tool on the pedagogical shelf. Teaching Sociology, 17, 1–18.10.2307/1317920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, S., & Randall, K. (2009). How teachers respond to children’s inquiry. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 183–202.10.3102/0002831208323274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3–4), 391–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, K. A. (1976). The superior college teacher from the students’ view. Research in Higher Education, 5(3), 243–288.10.1007/BF00991967
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11, 137–155.10.1002/tia2.1992.11.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Folmer, V., Barbosa, N. D. V., Soares, F. A., & Rocha, J. B. T. (2009). Experimental activities based on ill-structured problems improve Brazilian school students’ understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Revista electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 8(1), 232–254.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, D. Y. (2010). Reversing underachievement among gifted Black students (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, D. Y. (2013). Recruiting and retaining culturally different students in gifted education. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, S., & Scott, D. (2013). Inquiry-based learning: A review of the research literature. Edmonton: Alberta Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. A. (1997). Problem-based learning: Where did it come from, what does it do, and where is it going? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20(4), 332–362.10.1177/016235329702000402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R., III, & Hsin, Y. (2008). Reading and children with emotional/behavioral disorders. Balanced Reading Instruction, 15(2), 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K., & Shaw, C. M. (2010). Assessment of active learning. The International Studies Encyclopedia. doi:10.1111/b.9781444336597.2010.x. Retrieved From http://webs.wichita.edu/depttools/depttoolsmemberfiles/carolynshaw/Gibson%20Shaw%20compendium.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, B. (2010). Good teachers may not fit the mold. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 79–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Baggett, W., & Williams, K. (1996). Question-driven explanatory reasoning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, S17–S32.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & Olde, B. A. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 524.10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104–137.10.3102/00028312031001104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. (1978). Natures of problem-solving ability. Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (pp. 239–270). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Green, L. (1998). Stereotypes: Negative racial stereotypes and their effect on attitudes toward African-Americans. Perspectives on Multiculturalism and Cultural Identity, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/links/VCU.htm
   Google Scholar
• Green, L. J. (2002). African American English: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-89138-8.10.1017/CBO9780511800306
   Google Scholar
• Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand- student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.10.1119/1.18809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116.
   Google Scholar
• Harasim, L. (1996). Online education. Computer networking and scholarly communication in the twenty-first-century University, 203–214.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., & Davies, I. K. (1978). Note-taking: A critical review. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 15(3), 207–224.10.1080/0033039780150305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analysis relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99–136.10.3102/00346543066002099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment and next-generation assessment systems: Are we losing an opportunity? Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Hertel, J. P., & Millis, B. J. (2002). Using simulation to promote learning in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Miller, N. (1992). Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, B., McGee, S., Shin, N., & Shia, R. (2001). The triarchic theory of intelligence and computer-based inquiry learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 49–69.10.1007/BF02504947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaques, D. (1991). Learning in groups (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. D., & Dasgupta, N. (2005). Traditional versus non-traditional teaching: Perspectives of students in introductory statistics classes. Journal of Statistics Education, 13(2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Keough, S. M. (2012). Clickers in the classroom: A review and a replication. Journal of Management Education, 36(6), 822–847.10.1177/1052562912454808
   Google Scholar
• Kerry, T. (1987). Classroom questions in England. Questioning Exchange, 1(1), 32–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kimber, D. (1996). Collaborative learning in management education: Issues, benefits, problems and solutions: A literature review. Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. (1990). Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioning. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 664–687.10.3102/00028312027004664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children’s problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 307–317.10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1992a). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and note-taking review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 303–323.10.3102/00028312029002303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1992b). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 111–126.10.1207/s15326985ep2701_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1994). Autonomy and question asking—the role of personal control in guided student-generated questioning. Learning and Individual Differences, 6, 163–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1995). Inquiring minds really do want to know—using questioning to teach critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 13–17.10.1207/s15328023top2201_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchener, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26, 222–232.10.1159/000272885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273.10.1111/josh.2004.74.issue-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, A., & Shulamith, G. E. (1991). Improvement of reading comprehension of physics texts by students’ question formulation. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 473–485.10.1080/0950069910130410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koegel, L. K., Camarata, S. M., Valdez-Menchaca, M., & Koegel, R. L. (1997). Setting generalization of question-asking by children with autism. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 102(4), 346–357.10.1352/0895-8017(1998)102<0346:SGOQBC>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Krain, M., & Lantis, J. S. (2006). Building knowledge? Evaluating the effectiveness of the global problems summit simulation. International Studies Perspectives, 7(4), 395–407.10.1111/insp.2006.7.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3 & 4), 313–350.10.1080/10508406.1998.9672057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushnir, L. P. (2013). The clicker way to an “A”! New evidence for increased student learning and engagement: Understanding the pedagogy behind the technology. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 2212–2221). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• LeBrun, M. J., & Johnstone, R. (1994). The quiet (r)evolution: Improving student learning in law. Sydney: Law Book.
   Google Scholar
• Leite, W. L., Svinicki, M., & Shi, Y. (2010). Attempted validation of the scores of the VARK: Learning styles inventory with multitrait-multimethod confirmatory factor analysis models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(2), 323–339.10.1177/0013164409344507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leming, J. S. (1985). School curriculum and social development in early adolescence. Childhood Education, 61(4), 257–262.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Lieux, E. M. (1996). A comparative study of learning in lecture versus problem-based learning. About Teaching, 50, 25–27.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75–98. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, M. C. (2003). Problem-solving. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (pp. 728–733). London: Nature Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Luszcz, M. A. (1984). Theoretical models of everyday problem solving in adulthood. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.), Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications (pp. 24–37). New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytinen, P., Poikkeus, A. M., & Laakso, M. L. (1997). Language and symbolic play in toddlers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21(2), 289–302.10.1080/016502597384875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, T. W. (1980). “What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games,” In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL Symposium and the First SIGPC Symposium on Small Systems (pp. 162–169). New York, NY: ACM.10.1145/800088
   Google Scholar
• Manis, C. (2012). Quick peer evaluation form. Daily Teaching Tools. Retrieved from http://www.dailyteachingtools.com
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (1991). Nominalization in science and humanities: Distilling knowledge and sca olding text. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics; Approaches and uses (pp. 307–337). Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, N. M., & Duke, N. K. (2011). Intervention to enhance informational text comprehension. In A. McGill-Franzen & R. L. Allington (Eds.), Handbook of reading disability research (pp. 345–361). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, E. (1993). Understanding or memorization: Are we teaching the right thing? Proceedings of the Resnick Conference on Introductory Physics Courses. Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W. F. (2004). The nature of science. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• McKeachie, W. J. (1987). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, M., Bailey, D. B., & Wolery, M. (1996). Assessing infants and preschoolers with special needs (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McMurry, L. (1981). George Washington Carver: Scientist & symbol. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meacham, J. A., & Emont, N. M. (1989). The Interpersonal basis of everyday problem solving. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.), Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications (pp. 7–23). New York, NY: Praege.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, N., & Norman, D. A. (1979). To ask a question one must know enough to know what is not known. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 357–364.10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90200-7
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. K. (2008). Exploring the pedagogical effectiveness of clickers. Insight: A journal of scholarly teaching, 3, 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Nastasi, B. K., & Clements, D. H. (1991). Research on cooperative learning: Implications for practice. School Psychology Review, 20, 110–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Newhall, P. W. (2012). Language-based learning disabilities. Prides Crossing, MA: Landmark School Outreach Program.
   Google Scholar
• Newhall, P. W. (2012). Language-based learning disabilities. In P. W. Newhall (Ed.), Language-based teaching series. Prides Crossing, MA: Landmark School Outreach Program.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M. (1992). The assessment of discourse in social studies, In H. Berlak et al (Eds.), Toward a new science of educational testing and assessment (pp. 53–69). Albany, NY: University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M. S., Pennbrant, S., Pilhammar, E., & Wenestam, C. G. (2010). Pedagogical strategies used in clinical medical education: An observational study. BMC Medical Education, 10(1), 1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oros, A. L. (2007). Let’s debate: Active learning encourages student participation and critical thinking. Journal of Political Science Education, 3(3), 293–311.10.1080/15512160701558273
   Google Scholar
• Otero, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2001). PREG: Elements of a model of question asking. Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 143–175.10.1207/S1532690XCI1902_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace, D., Bishel, B., Beck, R., Holquist, P., & Makowski, G. (1990). Structure and spontaneity: Pedagogical tensions in the construction of a simulation on the cuban missile crisis. History Teacher, 24, 53–65.10.2307/494205
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem-solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 325–344.10.1006/ceps.1996.0025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmen, A., Didden, R., & Arts, M. (2008). Improving question asking in high- functioning adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Effectiveness of small-group training. Autism, 12(1), 83–98.10.1177/1362361307085265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101.10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner, J. G. (1984). Why many college teachers cannot lecture: How to avoid communication breakdown in the classroom. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas, Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., & Cook, M. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (Vol. 8, No. 5, p. 18). New York, NY: International Universities Press.10.1037/11494-000
   Google Scholar
• Powner, L. C., & Allendoerfer, M. G. (2008). Evaluating hypotheses about active learning. International Studies Perspectives, 9(1), 75–89.10.1111/insp.2008.9.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ram, A. (1991). Theory of questions and question asking. Journal of Learning Sciences, 1(3 & 4), 273–318.10.1080/10508406.1991.9671973
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, C. (2010). Do role-playing simulations generate measurable and meaningful outcomes? A simulation’s effects on exam scores and teaching evaluations. International Studies Perspectives, 11(1), 51–60.10.1111/insp.2010.11.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., McGuire, J. M., & Neu, T. W. (2000). Compensation strategies used by high-ability students with learning disabilities who succeed in college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(2), 123–134.10.1177/001698620004400205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221.10.3102/00346543066002181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, V. (2003). The Socratic method: What is it and how to use it in the classroom. Stanford University Newsletter on Teaching, 13(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhl, K. L., Hughes, C. A., & Schloss, P. J. (1987). Using the pause procedure to enhance lecture recall. Teacher education and special education, 10(1), 14–18.10.1177/088840648701000103
   Google Scholar
• Schacter, D. L. (1996). Searching for memory: The brain, the mind, and the past. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R. A., Schulze, S., & John, J. (1995). Students’ understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 131–166.10.1207/s15327809jls0402_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., Bendixen, L. D., & Roedel, T. D. (1995). Does a general monitoring skill exist? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 433.10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 631–649). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 783 pp.10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50048-2
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A., & Gordon, L. (2013). Classroom clickers offer more than repetition: Converging evidence for the testing effect and confirmatory feedback in clicker- assisted learning. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 2(1), 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Sharan, S. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory and research. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Sharan, S., & Shachar, H. (1988). Language and learning in the cooperative classroom. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-3860-7
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. M. (2006). Unifying perception and curiosity (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Rochester, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Shellman, S. M., & Turan, K. (2006). Do simulations enhance student learning? An empirical evaluation of an IR simulation. Journal of Political Science Education, 2(1), 19–32.10.1080/15512160500484168
   Google Scholar
• Shergill, H. K. (2012). Experimental psychology.Delhi: PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Silberman, M. (1996). Active learning: 101 strategies to teach any subject. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 48, 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. T., & Boyer, M. A. (1996). Designing in-class simulations. PS: Political Science and Politics, 29(4), 690–694.10.1017/S1049096500045686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokoloff, D. R., & Thornton, R. K. (2004). Interactive lecture demonstrations (p. 374). Wiley-VCH. ISBN 0-471-48774-0.
   Google Scholar
• Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., & Hay, K. E. (1994). Learner-centered design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st century. interactions, 1(2), 36–47.10.1145/174809.174813
   Google Scholar
• Stice, J. E. (1987). Using Kolb’s learning cycle to improve student learning. Engineering Education, 77(5), 291–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meij, H. (1988). Constraints on question asking in classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 401.10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Klaveren, C. (2011). Lecturing style teaching and student performance. Economics of Education Review, 30(4), 729–739.10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, A., & Leary, H. (2009). A problem based learning meta-analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1), 6–28.
   Google Scholar
• Wenning, C. J. (2011a). Experimental inquiry in introductory physics courses. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 6(2), 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wenning, C. J. (2011b). The levels of inquiry model of science teaching. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 6(2), 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, G. (2009). Gifted black males: Understanding and decreasing barriers to achievement and identity. Roeper Review, 31, 224–233.10.1080/02783190903177598
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, B., Van Burch, J. W. & Render, G. F. (1995) Mastery learning in the classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the AERA San Francisco 1995, available from ERIC ED382688.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, B. Y., & Jones, W. (1982). Increasing meta comprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5(3), 228–240.10.2307/1510290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. (2010). ED382688.n Francisco 31, 224–233 and decreasing barriers to CILASS (Centre for Inquiry-based Learning in the Arts and Social Sciences). University of Sheffield. https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.122794!/le/IBL_in_Arts-FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wood, P. K. (1993). Context and development of reflective thinking: A secondary analysis of the structure of individual differences. Unpublished manuscript, University of Missouri at Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S. (2006). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 65–77.10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91.10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Practice, 41, 64–71.10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar