Approaches to studying: Associations with learning conceptions and preferences for teaching

References

• Asikainen, H., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do students develop towards more deep approaches to learning during studies? A systematic review on the development of students’ deep and surface approaches to learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 205–233. doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9406-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centered learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243–260. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakken, A. (2017). Ungdata 2017 - Nasjonale resultater [Young data 2017 - National results]. NOVA-report no. 10. Oslo: NOVA.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantine, J. A., Duff, A., & Larres, P. M. (2008). Accounting and business students’ approaches to learning: A longitudinal study. Journal of Accounting Education, 26(4), 188–201. doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2009.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Beccaria, L., Kek, M., Huijser, H., Rose, J., & Kimmins, L. (2014). The interrelationships between student approaches to learning and group work. Nurse Education Today, 34(7), 1094–1103. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T. (2018). Factors associated with occupational therapy students’ preferences for courses and teaching. Cogent Education, 5. Article 1431426. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2018.1431426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T., Brown, T., Lim, H. B., & Fong, K. (2017). Approaches to studying predict academic performance in undergraduate occupational therapy students: A cross-cultural study. BMC Medical Education, 17(76). doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0914-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T., Sadeghi, T., & Thørrisen, M. M. (2017). Associations between self-esteem, general self-efficacy, and approaches to studying in occupational therapy students: A cross-sectional study. Occupational Therapy and Mental Health, 33(4), 326–341. doi:10.1080/0164212X.2017.1295006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T., Småstuen, M. C., Thørrisen, M. M., Fong, K., Lim, H. B., & Brown, T. (in press). Factor analysis of the approaches and study skills inventory for students in a cross-cultural undergraduate occupational therapy student sample. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T., & Thørrisen, M. M. (2017). Psychometric properties of two interrelated measures: ‘Conceptions of learning’ and ‘Preferences for different types of courses and teaching’. Ergoterapeuten, 60(4), 32–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T., Thørrisen, M. M., & Sadeghi, T. (2017). Occupational therapy students in Norway: Do their approaches to studying vary by year in the program? Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 5(4), 11–12. Article 11. doi:10.15453/2168-6408.1339
   Google Scholar
• Brandsford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., Fong, K., Bonsaksen, T., Murdolo, Y., Cruz-Gonzales, P., Tan, H. L., & Lim, H. B. (2016). Approaches to learning among occupational therapy undergraduate students: A cross-cultural study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 24(4), 299–310. doi:10.1080/11038128.2016.1229811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2004). Validation of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (ASSIST) using accounting students in USA and Ireland: A research note. Accounting Education, 13(4), 449–459. doi:10.1080/0963928042000306792
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å. (2001). Validation of Norwegian version of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST): Application of structural equation modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(4), 381–394. doi:10.1080/0031380120096789
   Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å. (2007). Approaches to learning, course experience and examination grade among undergraduate psychology students: Testing of mediator effects and construct validity. Studies in Higher Education, 32(3), 373–388. doi:10.1080/03075070701346949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å., & Martinsen, Ø. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(2), 195–207. doi:10.1080/01443410303225
   Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å., Pallesen, S., Brunborg, G. S., & Larsen, S. (2010). Academic achievement among first semester undergraduate psychology students: The role of course experience, effort, motives and learning strategies. Higher Education, 59(3), 335–352. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9251-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å., Pallesen, S., Hovland, A., & Larsen, S. (2006). Course experience, approaches to learning and academic achievement. Education and Training, 48(2/3), 156–169. doi:10.1108/00400910610651782
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. (1998). Motivation and approaches to learning. In S. Brown, G. Thompson, & S. Armstrong (Eds.), Motivating students (pp. 15–24). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. (2007). Research into student learning and university teaching. In N. Entwistle & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), British Journal of Educational Psychology, Monograph Series II: Psychological Aspects of Education – Current Trends, Number 4 (pp. 1–18). Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Tait, H. (2006). ASSIST: Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19(2), 169–194. doi:10.1007/BF00137106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(1), 33–48. doi:10.1007/bf03173165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Yates, G. C. R. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, K. J., McCune, V., & Bager-Elsborg, A. (2017). Approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement: Results from a large scale, multi-level analysis. Högre Utbildning, 7(1), 29–42. doi:10.23865/hu.v7.905
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. (2003). The relationship between students’ course perception and their approaches to studying in undergraduate science courses: A Canadian experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(1), 57–75. doi:10.1080/0729436032000058623
   Google Scholar
• Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52. doi:10.1080/03075070120099359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, W., Chung, E.-K., Elliot, D., & Fisher, D. (2012). The relationship between medical students’ learning approaches and performance on summative high-stakes clinical performance examination. Medical Teacher, 34(4), 236–241. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.652995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedregård, T., & Olsen, R. (2014). Studentenes helse- og trivselsundersøkelse [The students’ survey of health and thriving; SHoT]. Oslo/Trondheim: TNS Gallup. Retrieved from http://www.sio.no/wps/wcm/connect/87ddcb00457b7f69a728ff19336f98c7/SHoT_2014_Rapport_endelig.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, T. A., Kranz, P. L., & Scoggin, A. E. (2008). Perceived stress in occupational therapy students. Occupational Therapy International, 15(4), 221–231. doi:10.1002/oti.256
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Razali, N. M., & Yap, B. W. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro–Wilk, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson–Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Approaches to studying, conceptions of learning and learning styles in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 288–293. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2013). Approaches to studying across the adult life span: Evidence from distance education. Learning and Individual Differences, 26(4), 74–80. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamonson, Y., Weaver, R., Chang, S., Koch, J., Bhathal, R., Khoo, C., & Wilson, I. (2013). Learning approaches as predictors of academic performance in first year health and science students. Nurse Education Today, 33(7), 729–733. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severiens, S., & Dam, G. (1998). A multilevel meta-analysis of gender differences in learning orientations. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(4), 595–608. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01315.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2016). Students’ perceptions of the academic environment and approaches to studying in British postgraduate business education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 384–399. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1017755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, H., Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A reconceptualisation of the approaches to studying inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving students as learners (pp. 262–271). Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57–70. doi:10.1023/A:1003548313194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, P. J. (2011a). First year medical students’ approaches to study and their outcomes in a gross anatomy course. Clinical Anatomy, 24(1), 120–127. doi:10.1002/ca.21071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, P. J. (2011b). Influence of study approaches on academic outcomes during pre-clinical medical education. Medical Teacher, 33(12), e651–e662. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.610843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickramasinghe, D. P., & Samarasekera, D. N. (2011). Factors influencing the approaches to studying of preclinical and clinical students and postgraduate trainees. BMC Medical Education, 11, 22. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-11-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 310(20), 2191–2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeegers, P. (2001). Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 115–132. doi:10.1348/000709901158424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar