1,296
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Learning conceptions and priorities of adult engineering students in higher education

ORCID Icon & | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1528700 | Received 11 Feb 2018, Accepted 22 Sep 2018, Published online: 08 Oct 2018

References

  • Angelo, T. (2013). Designing subjects for learning: Practical research-based principles and guidelines. In L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (eds.), University teaching in focus: A leaning-centred approach (pp. 93-111). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Arksey, H., & Knight, P. (1999). Interviewing for social scientists. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Barkley, E. (2009). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. New York: Jossey Bass.
  • Barrie, S. C. (2004). A research‐based approach to generic graduate attributes policy. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 261–275. doi:10.1080/0729436042000235391
  • Bergmark, U., & Westman, S. (2016). Co-creating curriculum in higher education: Promoting democratic values and a multidimensional view on learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 28–40. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2015.1120734
  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at University: What the student does. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.
  • Boev, O. V., Gruenwald, N., & Heitmann, G. (2013). Engineering curriculum design aligned with accreditation standards. Wismar: Hochschule Wismar.
  • Case, J., (2008). Educational theories on learning: An informal guide for the engineering education scholar. An Engineering subject guide. Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre. Retrieved May 07, 2015, from: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/bitstream/2134/9730/8/A4-Education%20theories-COMPLETE-lowres.pdf. .
  • Chin, W. W. (2010). Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications. In C. Vinzi & H. Wang (Eds), How to write up and report PLS analyses (pp. 665–690). London: Springer.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Cook, J. (1992). Negotiating the curriculum: Programming for learning. In G. Boomer, N. Lester, C. Onore, & J. Cook (eds.), Negotiating the curriculum: Educating for the 21st century (pp. 14-28). London: The Falmer Press.
  • Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering education: The CDIO approach (2nd ed.). Cham: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Crebert, G., Bates, M., Bell, B., Patrick, C. J., & Cragnolini, V. (2004). Developing generic skills at university, during work placement and in employment: Graduates’ perceptions. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(2), 147–165. doi:10.1080/0729436042000206636
  • Creswell, J. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Dickens, J., & Alertt, C. (2009). Key aspects of teaching and learning in engineering. In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, & S. Marshall (eds.), A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice (pp. 264-281). London: Routledge.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurements error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
  • Frith, A., de Jong, M., & Vansteenhuyse, K. (2012). Towards an institutional strategy for lifelong learning in higher professional education. Brussels: FLLLEX project Results and Recommendations.
  • Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (2009). Understanding student learning. In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, & S. Marshall (eds.), A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice (pp. 8-26). London: Routledge.
  • Gray, D. E. (2009). Doing research in the real world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hair, J. F. J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Heitmann, G. (2005). Challenges of engineering education and curriculum development in the context of the Bologna process. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(4), 447–458. doi:10.1080/03043790500213136
  • Hillier, Y. (2002). Reflective teaching in further and adult education. London/New York: Continuum.
  • Holland, D., Liadze, I., Rienzo, C., & Wilkinson, D. (2013). The relationship between graduates and economic growth across countries. Retrieved January 1, 2014, fromhttps://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/229492/bis-13-858-relationship-between-graduates-and-economic-growth-across-countries.pdf.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 155. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Huff, J. L., Zoltowski, C. B., & Oakes, W. C. (2016). Preparing engineers for the workplace through service learning: perceptions of EPICS alumni. Journal of Engineering Education, 105, 43–69. doi:10.1002/jee.v105.1
  • Hunt, L., Chalmers, D., & Macdonald, R. (2013). Effective classroom teaching. In L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (eds.), University teaching in focus: A leaning-centred approach (pp. 21-37). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Illeris, K. (2003). Adult education as experienced by the learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(1), 13–23. doi:10.1080/02601370304827
  • Jafar, A. (2016). Student engagement, accountability, and empowerment: A case study of collaborative course design. Teaching Sociology, 44(3), 221–232. doi:10.1177/0092055X16644489
  • Jarvis, P. (1987). Adult learning in the social context. London: Kogom Page.
  • Jarvis, P. (2004). Adult education and lifelong learning: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
  • Kaiser, F., & de Weert, E. (1994). Access policies and mass higher education: A comparative analysis of the use of policy-instruments in seven countries. In L. Goedegebuure & V. V. Frans (Eds.), Comparative policy studies in higher education. Utrecht: LEMMA.
  • Keating, S. B. (2015). Curriculum development and evaluation in nursing. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Knowles, M. (1996). Andragogy: An emerging technology for adult learning. In R. Edwards, A. Hanson, & P. Raggatt (eds.), Boundaries of adult learning (pp. 53-70). London: Routledge.
  • Land, R. (2013). Discipline-Based Teaching. In L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (eds.), University teaching in focus: A leaning-centred approach (pp. 38-55). London: Routledge.
  • Light, G., & Cox, R. (2001). Learning and teaching in higher education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
  • Loureiro, A., & Caria, T. H. (2013). To learn and to construct knowledge in the context of work with adult education: A Portuguese case study. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 32(2), 149–164. doi:10.1080/02601370.2012.733971
  • Martin, G. (2012). Motivation for lifelong learning: A biographical account of efficacy and control. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 31(6), 669–685. doi:10.1080/02601370.2012.723048
  • McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting statistical equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82.
  • McLinden, M. 2013. Flexible pedagogies: Part-time learners and learning in higher education. Higher Education Academy publication. Retrieved August, 7, 2014, from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/flexiblelearning/Flexiblepedagogies/ptlearners/fp_ptl_report.pdf.
  • Merriam, S. B., & Brockett, R. G. (2007). The profession and practice of adult education: An introduction. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Monroy, F., & González-Geraldo, J. L. (2018). Measuring learning: Discrepancies between conceptions of and approaches to learning. Educational Studies, 44(1), 81–98. doi:10.1080/03055698.2017.1345677
  • Moore, D. J., & Voltmer, D. R. (2003). Curriculum for an engineering renaissance. IEEE Transactions on Education, 46(4), 452–455. doi:10.1109/TE.2003.818754
  • Neary, M., Saunders, G., Hagyard, A., & Derricott, D. 2014. Student as producer: Research-engaged teaching, an institutional strategy. The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved March 12, 2018, from http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/14789/1/14789%20lincoln_ntfs_2010_project_final_report_fv.pdf.
  • Nieuwenhuis, J. (2012). Qualitative research designs and data gathering techniques. In K. Maree eds., First steps in research (pp. 70-92). Pretoria: Van Schaik.
  • Northey, G., Govind, R., Bucic, T., Chylinski, M., Dolan, R., & van Esch, P. (2018). The effect of “here and now” learning on student engagement and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 321–333. doi:10.1111/bjet.2018.49.issue-2
  • Ormrod, J. E. (2000). Educational psychology: Developing learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
  • Owusu-Agyeman, Y., & Fourie-Malherbe, M. (2018). Negotiating co-ownership of learning in higher education: An underexplored practice for adult learning. Studies in Continuing Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2018.1497591
  • Owusu-Agyeman, Y., Fourie-Malherbe, M., & Frick, L. (2018). Exploring the educational needs of adult learners: A study of three universities in Ghana. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education ( Advance online publication) 147797141878299. doi:10.1177/1477971418782997.
  • Päuler-Kuppinger, L., & Jucks, R. (2017). Perspectives on teaching: Conceptions of teaching and epistemological beliefs of university academics and students in different domains. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 63–76. doi:10.1177/1469787417693507
  • Preece, J., & Hoppers, C. O. (2011). Lifelong learning in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 30(1), 1–3. doi:10.1080/02601370.2011.538169
  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2017). Student learning and the experience of teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 4, 5–27.
  • Quinnan, T. W. (1997). Adult students “at-risk”: Culture bias in higher education. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
  • Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
  • Romiszowski, A. J. (2016). Designing instructional systems: Decision making in course planning and curriculum design. London: Routledge.
  • Sackney, L., & Mergel, B. (2007). Contemporary learning theories, instructional design and leadership. In J. M. Burger, C. F. Webber, & P. Klinck (eds.), Intelligent Leadership (pp. 67-98). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Säljö, R. (1979). Learning about learning. Higher Education, 8(4), 443–451. doi:10.1007/BF01680533
  • Sambell, K. (2011). Rethinking feedback in higher education: An assessment for learning perspective. ESCalate, Discussions in education series. Retrieved [July 07, 2014], from www.escalate.ac.uk
  • Santoro, M. D., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000). The institutionalization of knowledge transfer activities within industry–University collaborative ventures. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17(3), 299–319. doi:10.1016/S0923-4748(00)00027-8
  • Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1002
  • Scheerens, J., Luyten, H., Steen, R., & Luyten-de Thouars, Y. 2007. Review and meta-analyses of school and teaching effectiveness. Enschede. Retrieved March 01, 2016 from https://www.utwente.nl/bms/omd/Medewerkers/artikelen/scheerens/rev-meta-analysis2007.PDF.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
  • Shay, S. (2013). Conceptualizing curriculum differentiation in higher education: A sociology of knowledge point of view. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(4), 563–582. doi:10.1080/01425692.2012.722285
  • Svinicki, M., & McKeachie, W. J. (2010). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Taylor, C. A., & Bovill, C. (2018). Towards an ecology of participation: Process philosophy and co-creation of higher education curricula. European Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 112–128. doi:10.1177/1474904117704102
  • Tennant, M., & Pogson, P. (1995). Learning and change in the adult years. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Thijs, A., & van den Akker, J. 2009. Curriculum in development. Enschede, the Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO). Retrieved July 04, 2015, from http://www.slo.nl/downloads/2009/curriculum-in-development.pdf/.
  • Tzeng, G.-H., Chiang, C.-H., & Li, C.-W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32, 1028–1044. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.004
  • Usher, R. (2009). Experiences, pedagogy, and social practices. In K. Illeris (ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists in their own words (pp. 169-183). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • van Rossum, E. J., Deijkers, R., & Hamer, R. (1985). Students’ learning conceptions and their interpretation of significant educational concepts. Higher Education, 14(6), 617–641. doi:10.1007/BF00136501
  • Vezzani, C., Vettori, G., & Pinto, G. (2017). University students’ conceptions of learning across multiple domains. European Journal of Psychology of Education ( (Advance online publication)), 1–20. doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0349-6
  • Wheelahan, L. (2007). How competency-based training locks the working class out of powerful knowledge: A modified Bernteinian analysis. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(5), 637–651. doi:10.1080/01425690701505540
  • Yilmaz, K. (2008). Constructivism: Its theoretical underpinnings, variations, and implications for classroom instruction. Educational Horizons, 86(3), 161–172.
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.