The contribution of cognitive abilities and general language proficiency to explaining listening comprehension in English as a foreign language

References

• Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Andringa, S., Olsthoorn, N., van Beuningen, C., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2012). Determinants of success in native and non-native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62, 49–10. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00706.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryadoust, V., & Baghaei, P. (2016). Does EFL readers’ lexical and grammatical knowledge predict their reading ability? Insights from a perceptron artificial neural network study. Educational Assessment, 21, 135–156. doi:10.1080/10627197.2016.1166343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (1968). A three minute reasoning test based on grammatical transformation. Psychonomic Science, 10, 341–342. doi:10.3758/BF03331551
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baghaei, P., & Grotjahn, R. (2014). Establishing the construct validity of conversational C-Tests using a multidimensional item response model. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 56, 60–82.
   Google Scholar
• Baghaei, P., Khoshdel-Niyat, F., & Tabatabaee-Yazdi, M. (2017). The Persian adaptation of Baddeley’s 3-min grammatical reasoning test. Psicologia: Reflexão E Crítica, 30, 16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghaei, P., Ravand, H., & Nadri, M. (2019). Is the d2 test of attention Rasch scalable? Analysis with the Rasch Poisson counts model. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 126, 70-86. doi:10.1177/0031512518812183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilker, W. B., Hansen, J. A., Brensinger, C. M., Richard, J., Gur, R. E., & Gur, R. C. (2012). Development of abbreviated nine-item forms of the Raven’s standard progressive matrices test. Assessment, 19, 354–369. doi:10.1177/1073191112446655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonk, W. (2000). Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14, 14–31. doi:10.1080/10904018.2000.10499033
   Google Scholar
• Brickenkamp, R., & Zillmer, E. (1998). The d2 test of Attention. Seattle, Washington: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Assessment English. (2017, February 14). Cambridge assessment. Retrieved from www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin, K. I. E. (2011). Effects of working memory training on reading in children with special needs. Reading and Writing, 24, 479–491. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9238-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422–433. doi:10.3758/BF03214546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckes, T., & Baghaei, P. (2015). Using testlet response theory to examine local dependency in C-Tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 28, 85–98. doi:10.1080/08957347.2014.1002919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckes, T., & Grotjahn, R. (2006). A closer look at the construct validity of C-tests. Language Testing, 23, 290–325. doi:10.1191/0265532206lt330oa
   Google Scholar
• Genesee, F. (1976). The role of intelligence in second language learning. Language Learning, 26, 267–280. doi:10.1111/lang.1976.26.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, C. C. M. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55–75. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2011). Self-efficacy and academic listening. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 113–117. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2008). Strategy clusters and sources of knowledge in French L2 listening comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 1–20. doi:10.1080/17501220802385866
   Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. H. (2011). Language proficiency in native and nonnative speakers: An agenda for research and suggestions for second language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8, 229–249. doi:10.1080/15434303.2011.565844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhof, M. (2010). What is going on in the mind of a listener? The cognitive psychology of listening. In A. D. Wolvin (Ed.), Listening and human communication in the 21st century (pp. 97–126). West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. (2016). Direct and mediated effects of language and cognitive skills on comprehension of oral narrative texts (listening comprehension) for children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 101–120. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S., & Phillips, B. (2014). Cognitive correlates of listening comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 49, 269–281. doi:10.1002/rrq.2014.49.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. M. (2006). How languages are learned (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, T. (1988). Listening. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadri, M. (2018). The contribution of attention, processing speed, and fluid intelligence to predicting Iranian EFL learners’ listening comprehension: Development and validation of two measures of auditory attention (Unpublished master’s thesis). Mashhad Islamic Azad University.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J. (2000). The Raven’s progressive matrices: Change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 1–48. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rost, M. (2011). Teaching and researching listening (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. Modern Language Journal, 78, 199–221. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, C. A. (2001). Improving attention and managing attentional problems. Adapting rehabilitation techniques to adults with ADD. Annals of the New York Academy Sciences, 931, 359–375. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05790.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, M. M. (1987). Effectiveness of an attention training program. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 9, 117–130. doi:10.1080/01688638708405352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staehr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Ssla, 31, 577–607.
   Google Scholar
• Steinborn, M. B., Langner, R., Flehmig, H. C., & Huestegge, L. (2018). Methodology of performance scoring in the d2 sustained-attention test: Cumulative-reliability functions and practical guidelines. Psychological Assessment, 30, 339–357. doi:10.1037/pas0000482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser, K., & Del Rio, F. (2014). The role of comprehension monitoring, theory of mind, and vocabulary depth in predicting story comprehension and recall of kindergarten children. Reading Research Quarterly, 49, 169–187. doi:10.1002/rrq.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaee-Yazdi, M., & Baghaei, P. (2018). Reading comprehension in English as a foreign language and some Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive ability factors. Reading Matrix, 18, 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled language listener. Language Learning, 53, 463–496. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65, 390-416. doi: 10.1111/lang.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C. M., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56, 431–462. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60, 470–497. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2017). Explaining listening comprehension among L2 learners of English: The contribution of general language proficiency, vocabulary knowledge and metacognitive awareness. System, 65, 139–150. doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington, D. L. (2017). Modeling and measuring cognitive components of listening. In D. L. Worthington & D. B. Graham (Eds.), The sourcebook of listening research: Methodology and measures (pp. 70–96). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar