15,916
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Analysing the impact of external examination on teaching and learning of English at the secondary level education

ORCID Icon & | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1574947 | Received 09 Jul 2018, Accepted 22 Jan 2019, Published online: 07 Feb 2019

References

  • Adegoke, B. (2010). A survey of examination: Malpractice among secondary school students-causes, effects and solutions. Retrieved from https://www.grin.com/document/178869
  • Aftab, A., Qureshi, S., & William, I. (2014). Investigating the washback effect of the Pakistani Intermediate English Examination. International Journal of English and Literature, 5(7), 149–14. doi:10.5897/IJEL2013.0521
  • Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115–129. doi:10.1093/applin/14.2.115
  • Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, abridged edition. New York: Longman.
  • Aworanti, O. (2011). Why candidates fail in public examinations. Paper presented at the Being a paper presented at the Federal Ministry of Education stakeholders consultative meeting on improving performance in public examinations. Retrieved from http://www.nabtebnigeria.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/WHY-CANDIDATES-FAIL-IN-PUBLIC-EXAMINATIONS.pdf.
  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Biggs, J. B. (1995). Assumptions underlying new approaches to educational assessment. Curriculum Forum, 4(2), 1–22.
  • Bloom, B., Krathwohl, D., & Masia, B. (1984). Bloom taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Borghouts, L. B., Slingerland, M., & Haerens, L. (2017). Assessment quality and practices in secondary PE in the Netherlands. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(5), 473–489. doi:10.1080/17408989.2016.1241226
  • Cheng, L. (1997). How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong Kong. Language and Education, 11(1), 38–54. doi:10.1080/09500789708666717
  • Curricullum, N. (2006). National curriculum for English 2006. Islamabad: Minsitry of Education, Government of Pakistan.
  • Falchikov, N. (2013). Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. London: Routledge.
  • Fullilove, J. (1992). The tail that wags. Institute of Language in Education Journal, 9(2), n.a.
  • Goldstein, H., & Leckie, G. (2016). Trends in examination performance and exposure to standardised tests in England and Wales. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 367–375. doi:10.1002/berj.3220
  • GoS. (2014). Major functions of education department. Government of Sindh. Reterived from http://www.sindheducation.gov.pk/aboutUs/functions.jsp
  • Gu, X., & Saville, N. (2016). Twenty years of Cambridge English examinations in China: Investigating impact from the test-takers’ perspectives. In G. Yu & Y. Jin (Eds.) Assessing Chinese learners of English (pp. 287–310). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hughes, A. (2007). Testing for language teachers. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Sprachen.
  • Islam, M. S. (2016). Dilemma of the high-stake public examination for primary education in Bangladesh: Can decentralization help? Bangladesh Education Journal, 15(2), 47–52.
  • Khattak, S. G. (2012). Assessment in schools in Pakistan. SA-eDUC, 9(2), 1–13.
  • Kirkpatrick, R., & Zang, Y. (2011). The negative influences of exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students: Backwash from classroom to child. Language Testing in Asia, 1(3), 1–36. doi:10.1186/2229-0443-1-4-1
  • Kirkpatrick, R., & Zang, Y. (2014). Erratum to: The negative influences of exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students: Backwash from classroom to child. Language Testing in Asia, 4(1), 2. doi:10.1186/2229-0443-4-2
  • Lau, C. Y., & Tam, C. O. (2017). The perfect marriage?–Language and art criticism in the Hong Kong public examination context. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(1), 61–70. doi:10.1111/jade.12071
  • Madaus, G. F. (1991). The effects of important tests on students: Implications for a national examination system. The Phi Delta Kappan, 73(3), 226–231.
  • Madaus, G. F., & Kellaghan, T. (1991). Examination systems in the European community: Implications for a national examination system in the United States. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED340775
  • Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 241–256. doi:10.1177/026553229601300302
  • Nomaan, S., Hanif, R., & Rehna, T. (2016). Factors underlying academic underachievement among Pakistani secondary school students. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 31(1), 311–320.
  • Pan, Y. C. (2016). A review of washback and its pedagogical implications. VNU Journal of Science: Foreign Studies, 25(4), 257–263.
  • Pearson, I. (1988). Tests as levers for change. ESP in the Classroom: Practice and Evaluation, 128, 98–107.
  • Peterson, P. E. (2007). The case for curriculum-based, external examinations that have significant consequences for students. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(4), 645–666. doi:10.1080/01619560701603072
  • Qi, L. (2004). Has a high-stakes test produced the intended changes?. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, and A. Curtis (Eds), Washback in language testing. (pp. 193–212). London: Routledge.
  • Rehmani, A. (2003). Impact of public examination system on teaching and learning in Pakistan. International Biannual Newsletter ANTRIEP, 8(2), 3–7.
  • Rind, I. A. (2015). Gender identities and female students’ learning experiences in studying English as second Language at a Pakistani University. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1115574. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2015.1115574
  • Spolsky, B. (1994). The examination-classroom backwash cycle: Some historical cases. In D. Nunan, R. Berry, & V. Berry (Eds.), Bringing about change in language education: Proceedings of the international language in education conference 1994 (pp. 55–66). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.
  • Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 319–370.
  • Sukyadi, D., & Mardiani, R. (2011). The washback effect of the English national examination (ENE) on English teachers’ classroom teaching and students’ learning. k@ ta lama, 13(1), 96–111.
  • Tayeb, Y. A., Aziz, M. S. A., Ismail, K., & Khan, A. B. M. A. (2014). The washback effect of the general secondary English examination (GSEE) on teaching and learning. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 14(3), 83–103. doi:10.17576/GEMA-2014-1403-06