Types of metaphors and mechanisms of comprehension

References

• Bakhtiar, M. (2016). “Pour water where it burns”: Dysphemistic conceptualizations of the enemy in Persian political discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 6(1), 103–9. doi:10.1075/msw
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banaruee, H., Khoshsima, H., Khatin-Zadeh, O., & Askari, A. (2017). Suppression of semantic features in metaphor comprehension. Cogent Psychology, 4(1), 1–6. doi:10.1080/23311908.2017.1409323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99002149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., & Tummolini, L. (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 263–292. doi:10.1037/bul0000089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–27. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13, 185–189. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33(1–2), 25–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A., & Tranel, D. (1993). Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 90(11), 4957–4960. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.11.4957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Fuente, J., Casasanto, D., Martínez-Cascales, J. I., & Santiago, J. (2016). Motor imagery shapes abstract concepts. Cognitive Science, 41, 1350–1360. doi:10.1111/cogs.12406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallah, N., & Moini, M. R. (2016). A critical metaphor analysis of Arab uprisings in “The Washington Post” and “Keyhan” editorials. Metaphor and the Social World, 6(1), 79–102. doi:10.1075/msw
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, J., & Narayanan, S. (2004). Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language, 89(2), 385–392. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00355-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandino, L., Humphries, C. J., Seidenberg, M. S., Gross, W. L., Conant, L. L., & Binder, J. R. (2015). Predicting brain activation patterns associated with individual lexical concepts based on five sensory-motor attributes. Neuropsychologia, 76, 17-26. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1988). Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy. Readings in Cognitive Science, 22(3), 303–310. doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50026-1
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3), 455–479. doi:10.1080/02643290442000310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., Costa Lima, P. L., & Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1189–1210. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1993). How metaphors work. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 401–424). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3–18. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M. S., & Manfredi, D. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 50–67. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.2479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., Newsome, M. R., & Goldvarg, Y. (2001). Inhibition of the literal: Filtering metaphor-irrelevant information during metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3–4), 277-298. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2001.9678898
   Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., Newsome, M. R., & Goldvarg, Y. (2001). Inhibition of the literal: Filtering metaphor-irrelevant information during metaphor comprehension. Metaphor & Symbol, 16, 277–293. doi:10.1080/10926488.2001.9678898
   Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., & McGlone, M. S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glucksbers, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 92–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamrozik, A., McQuire, M., Cardillo, E., & Chatterjee, A. (2016). Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1080–1089. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0861-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kan, I. P., Barsalou, L. W., Solomon, K. O., Minor, J. K., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2003). Role of mental imagery in property verification task: FMRI evidence for perceptual representations of conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 525–540. doi:10.1080/02643290244000257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatin-Zadeh., O., Banaruee, H., Khoshsima, H., & Marmolejo-Ramos, F. (2017). The role of motion concepts in understanding non-motion concepts. Behavioral Sciences, 7(4), 1–8. doi:10.3390/bs7040084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatin-Zadeh, O., Khoshsima, H., & Banaruee, H. (2017). Representational transformation: A facilitative process of understanding. International Journal of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, 6, 71–73.
   Google Scholar
• Khatin-Zadeh, O., & Vahdat, S. (2015). Abstract and concrete representations in structure-mapping and class-inclusion. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 2(2), 349–360. doi:10.1075/cogls
   Google Scholar
• Lakens, D., Semin, G. R., & Foroni, F. (2011). Why your highness needs the people. Social Psychology, 42, 205–213. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lan, C., & Zuo, D. (2016). Pictorial-verbal metaphors in Chinese editorial cartoons on food safety. Metaphor and the Social World, 6(1), 20–51. doi:10.1075/msw
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortony, A. (1979). Metaphor, language, and thought. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 1–19). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 1–25. doi:10.1037/h0025327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richardson, P. (2017). An investigation of the blocking and development of empathy in discussions between Muslim and Christian believers. Metaphor and the Social World, 7(1), 47–65. doi:10.1075/msw
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1975). Semantics and syntax of motion. In J. P. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 181–238). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and semantic description. Vol. 3 (Grammatical categories and the lexicon) (pp. 36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519. doi:10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thonus, T., & Hewett, B. L. (2016). Follow this path: Conceptual metaphors in writing center online consultations. Metaphor and the Social World, 6(1), 52–78. doi:10.1075/msw
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, N. L., & Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31, 721–731. doi:10.1080/15326900701399962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, E., Chrysikou, E. G., Hoffman, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2013). Manual experience shapes object representations. Psychological Science, 24, 909–919. doi:10.1177/0956797612464658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar