Developing teachers’ responsive pedagogy in mathematics, does it lead to short-term effects on student learning?

References

• Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90–18). New York, NY: Routhledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 24(3), 317–350. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development (Vol.6.) Six theories of child development (pp. 1–60). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. assessment in education: principles. Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5-25.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box. Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199–231. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. doi:10.3102/00346543065003245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H.-P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?: A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101–129. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition Learning, 3, 231–264. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindset. The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Iver, D. M. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Perceived learning environment and students’ emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 17, 478–493. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M. (2015). Tilbakemelding for læring og utvikling [Feedback for Learning and Development]. Oslo: Gyldendal Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J. (2012). Quality assessment practice. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (2nd ed., pp. 103–122). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hafen, C. A., Hamre, B. K., Allen, J. P., Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H., & Pianta, R. C. (2015). Teaching through interactions in secondary school classrooms: Revisiting the factor structure and practical application of the classroom assessment scoring system-secondary. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35, 651–680. doi:10.1177/0272431614537117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Gan, M. (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 249–271). New York, NY: Routhledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. R., Russo, F., & Schoonenboom, J. (2017). Causation in mixed methods research: The meeting of philosophy, science, and practice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1–20. doi:10.1177/1558689817719610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. S. (2005). The effects of a constructivist teaching approach on student academic achievement, self-concept, and learning strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 7-19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie, S., Kjærnsli, M., Roe, A., & Turmo, A. (2001). Godt rustet for framtida? Norske 15-åringers kompetanse i lesing og realfag i et internasjonalt perspektiv. [Well prepared for future? Norwegian 15-year-olds in reading and science in an international perspective]. Oslo: University of Oslo, Acta Didactica (4/2001).
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). “What time is it, Denise?” Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice, 18(4), 285–294. doi:10.1080/00405847909542846
   Google Scholar
• Mevarech, Z. R., Tabuk, A., & Sinai, O. (2006). Meta-cognitive instruction in mathematics classrooms: Effects on the solution of different kinds of problems. In A. Desoete & M. Veenman (Eds.), Meta-cognition in mathematics (pp. 70–78). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Montague, M. (2003). Solve It! A mathematical problem-solving instructional program. Reston, VA: Exceptional Innovations.
   Google Scholar
• Niss, M., & Jensen, T. (2002). Kompetencer og matematiklaering Ideer og inspiration til udvikling af matematikundervisning i Danmark. [Skills and Mathematics Learning Ideas and inspiration for development of mathematics education in Denmark]. Copenhagen: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://static.uvm.dk/Publikationer/2002/kom/hel.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2004). The PISA 2003 assessment framework: Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills, PISA. Paris: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264101739-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 mathematics framework”, in PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. Paris: Author. doi:10.1787/13c8a22c-en
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(422). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J. A., & Huertas, J. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 806–813. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2018a). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. Australian Educational Researcher, 45, 13–31. doi:10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Broadbent, J., Boud, D., & Lodge, J. M. (2018b). Using formative assessment to influence self- and co-regulated learning: The role of evaluative judgement. European Journal of Psychology of Education. doi:10.1007/s10212-018-0407-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Klug, J., & Järvelä, S. (2016). Third wave of measurement in the self-regulated learning field: When measurement and intervention come hand in hand. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(6), 723–735. doi:10.1080/00313831.2015.1066436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Frenzel, A. C. (2005). Achievements emotions questionnaire – Mathematics (AEQ-M) user’s manual. Munich, Germany: University of Munich, Department of Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–105. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perels, F., Dignath, C., & Schmitz, B. (2009). Is it possible to improve mathematical achievement by means of self-regulation strategies? Evaluation of an intervention in regular math classes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(17), 17–31. doi:10.1007/BF03173472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to controlled regulation of learning processes: Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 85–102. doi:10.1080/0969595980050105
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. doi:10.1007/bf00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 77–84. doi:10.1080/0969595980050104
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Toward an analysis of discourse. The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., Gamlem, S., Sandal, A. K., & Engelsen, K. S. (2016). Educating for the future: A conceptual framework of responsive pedagogy. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1227021. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1227021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L., & Jerman, O. (2006). Math disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 249–274. doi:10.3102/00346543076002249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2011). Using student assessment for professional learning: Focusing on students’ outcomes to identify teachers’ needs (34). Melbourne, State of Victoria: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development. Best evidence synthesis iteration. Education. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/16901/TPLandDBESentireWeb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Villavicencio, F. T., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (2013). Positive academic emotions moderate the relationship between self-regulation and academic achievement. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329–340. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02064.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, C. E., Goetz, E. T., & Alexander, P. A. (Eds). (1988). Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49–77. doi:10.1007/BF02209024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2007). A theoretical foundation for formative assessment. In J. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment. theory into practice (pp. 29–42). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner; Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(4), 307–313. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(86)90027-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2), 73–86. doi:10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000a). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000b). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–40). San Diego, California: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement; An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Achieving academic excellence: A self-regulatory perspective. In M. Ferrari (Ed.), The pursuit of excellence through education (pp. 85–110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676. doi:10.3102/00028312029003663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar