Impacts of implicit, explicit, and emergent feedback strategies on EFL learners’ motivation, attitude and perception

References

• Abdollahifam, S. (2014). Investigating the effects of interactional feedback on EFL students’ writings. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 16–17. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.383
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, D. (2015). Are Iranian EFL learners’ opinions about oral corrective feedback strategies in line with their teachers’ actual classroom practices? International Researchers, 4(2), 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–483. doi:10.1111/modl.1994.78.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amador, Y. A. (2008). Learner attitudes toward error correction in a beginners English class. Revista Comunicacion, 29(1), 18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ananda, D. R., Febriyanti, E. R., Yamin, M., & Muin, F. (2017). Students’ preferences toward oral corrective feedback in speaking class at English department of Lambung Mangkurat university academic year 2015/2016. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(3), 176–186. doi:10.17507/tpls.0703.03
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 46–60. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Dornyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2007). Corrective feedback in theory, research and practice. Retrieved from www.Celea.org.cn/2007/keynote/ppt/Ellis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3–18. doi:10.5070/L2.V1I1.9054
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2010). A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 335–349. doi:10.1017/S0272263109990544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. SSLA, 28, 575–600.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Grombczewska, M. (2011). The relationship between teacher’s feedback and students’ motivation. Humanism Language Teaching, 13(3), 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Guilloteaux, M. J., & Dornyei, Z. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1), 55–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haji Mohammadi, M. (2017). Iranian EFL learners’ L2 motivational self system: A study of selves and attitudes towards L2 culture and community. Canadian Social Science, 13(11), 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hamidun, N., Hashim, S., & Othman, N. F. (2012). Enhancing students’ motivation by providing feedback on writing: The case of international students from Thailand. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(6), 591–594.
   Google Scholar
• Jalongo, M. R. (2007). Beyond benchmarks and scores: Reasserting the role of motivation and interest in children’s academic achievement. Childhood Education, 83(6), 98–113. doi:10.1080/00094056.2007.10522958
   Google Scholar
• Jin, L. (2012). Sociocultural theory-guided college-level Mandarin Chinese hybrid course design. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 42(1), 30–50. doi:10.17161/iallt.v42i1.8501
   Google Scholar
• Kim, T. U. (2009). The sociocultural interface between ideal self and ought to self: A case study of two Korean students’ ESL motivation. In Z. Dornyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 274–294). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Genung, P. B. (2002). ‘I’d rather switch than fight’: An activity theoretic study of power, success, and failure in a foreign language. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 175–196). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In B. Van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 197–221). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Latham-Koenig, C., Oxenden, C., & Seligson, P. (2014). American English File 2 (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J. (2016). Reducing international graduate students’ language anxiety through oral pronunciation corrections. System, 56, 78–95. doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. (2002). Giving feedback in language classes. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2013). Oral corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 68(2), 196–198. doi:10.1093/elt/cct076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. The Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 536–556. doi:10.1111/modl.2006.90.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M. H. (2006). Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA (pp. 75–116). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40. doi:10.1017/S0261444812000365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, D. P. (2010). Handling oral error feedback in language classrooms. Minne WITESOL Journal, 27, 67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2003). The student motivation scale: Further testing of an instrument that measures school students’ motivation. Australian Journal of Education, 47(1), 88–106. doi:10.1177/000494410304700107
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, J. D. (2008). Linguistic risk-taking and corrective feedback. In J. D. Martinez (Ed.), Oral communication in the EFL classroom (pp. 165–193). Sevilla: Ediciones Alfar.
   Google Scholar
• Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573–595. doi:10.2307/3588241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosper, M. (2002). The impact of learners’ attitudes on second or foreign language learning. Sciences Socialies et Humanies, 4, 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Roothooft, H., & Breeze, R. (2016). A comparison of EFL teachers’ and students’ attitudes to oral corrective feedback. Language Awareness, 25(4), 318–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, L. (2012). Students’ attitudes towards corrective feedback in the second language classroom (Unpublished Manuscript). Trinity College, University of Dublin, Ireland. doi:10.1094/PDIS-11-11-0999-PDN
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. (2010). Correct me if I’m wrong: Investigating the preferences in error correction among adult English language learners (Unpublished master’s thesis). The University of Central Florida, Orlando.
   Google Scholar
• Sultana, R. (2015). The survey on using oral corrective feedback in ESL classroom in Bangladeshi context (Unpublished master’s thesis). BRAC University, Bangladesh.
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, T., Magid, M., & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dornyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66–97). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (2001). Using context to enrich and challenge our understanding of motivational theory. In S. Volet & S. Jarvela (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 85–104). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Van Compernolle, R. A., & Henery, A. (2015). Learning to do concept-based pragmatics instruction: Teacher development and L2 pedagogical content knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 351–372. doi:10.1177/1362168814541719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., Abraham, L. B., & Negueruela-Azarola, E. (2013). Using concept-based instruction in the L2 classroom: Perspectives from current and future language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 363–381. doi:10.1177/1362168813482950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M., & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers’ choice and learners’ preference of corrective feedback types. Language Awareness, 17(1), 78–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarei, M., Ahour, T., & Seifoori, Z. (2018). The effects of implicit, explicit, and emergent oral feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ accuracy, fluency, and attitude. Language Horizons, 2(2), 75–102.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, W. (2015). Learners’ preferences for oral corrective feedback and their effects on second language noticing and learning motivation (Unpublished master’s thesis). McGill University, Montreal.
   Google Scholar