The effect of cooperative learning approach and semantic mapping strategy on the acquisition of L2 Persian vocabulary

References

• Abdollahzadeh, E., & Amiri, N. (2009). The effect of semantic mapping as a vocabulary instruction technique on EFL learners with different perceptual learning styles. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 2(4), 1–27. http://jal.iaut.ac.ir/article_524139.html
   Google Scholar
• Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoush, K. H. (2012). The effectiveness of using “semantic mapping strategy” on reading comprehension of Jordanian university students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(6), 714–729. https://journal-archieves24.webs.com/714-729.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, G. (1989). Discourse in “Language teaching: A scheme for teacher education” series. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Debat, E. V. (2006). Applying current approaches to the teaching of reading. English Teaching Forum, 44(1), 8–15. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1107882.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dilec, Y., & Yuruk, N. (2013). Using semantic mapping technique in vocabulary teaching at pre-intermediate level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1531–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.221
   Google Scholar
• Faghihi, F. (1992). A summary of the studies about cooperative learning. Quarterly Journal of Education, 4(30), 114–130. http://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20110218151229-198.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L., & Anderson, M. (2012). Techniques and principles in language teaching. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, Z. (2009). Collaborative learning and critical thinking. Journal of Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologists, 5(19), 199–210. http://jip.azad.ac.ir/article_512345_8175a5f34debc4a32c8f51d7de42e54a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ingleton, C., Doube, L., & Rogers, T. (2000).Leap into collaborative learning. LEAP archive series. Centre for Learning and Professional Development (CLPD), University of Adelaide. http://www.adelaide.edu.au/clpd/…/leap/leapinto/CollaborativeLearning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jabbari, S. (2005). The effect of metacognitive reading through cooperative learning approach on the reading comprehension of late learning children. Journal of Social and Human Sciences of Shiraz University, 22(4), 82–93. http://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20110226101942.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., Beer, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. C. (2006). Strategies for teaching reading comprehension. http://www.readingquest.org/strat/graphic.html
   Google Scholar
• Keshavarz, M. H., Atai, M. R., & MossahebiMohammadi., S. (2006). The effect of semantic mapping strategy instruction on vocabulary learning of intermediate EFL students. Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities, 49(198), 149–176. http://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20110215140622-5.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Khamesan, A., & BaradaranKhaksar, Z. (2011). Comparison between collaborative and individual concept mapping with the traditional method in teaching English. Foreign Language Research Journal, 1(1), 57–75. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=160631
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic Assessment. In E. Shohamy & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (Vol. 7, 2nd ed., pp. 273–284). Springer Science +Business Media, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. (1997). What’s in a word that makes it hard or easy: Some interlexical factors that affect the learning of words. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 140–155). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, D. A., Steer, D. N., Owens, K. D., & Knight, C. C. (2005). How students think: Implications for learning in introductory geoscience courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.5408/McConnell_v53p462
   Google Scholar
• Mesrabadi, J., FathiAzar, E., & Ostovar, N. (2005). The efficacy of the provision of pre-planned, individual and cooperative methods of preparing concept maps as an instructional strategy. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations, 4(13), 11–31. http://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20101214094838-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. (2003). Welcome to exemplary practices in vocabulary instruction. Retrieved April 22, 2013 from www.bridgew.edu/Library/CAGS_Projects/MMORGAN/web%20page/literature%20review.htm
   Google Scholar
• Neisi, A., Najarian, B., & Sheikhiani, M. (2004). Comparing the effect of cooperative learning and traditional teaching on the academic achievement, learning, progress motivation, and self conception of grade 2high school students of Bushehr. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences, 11(3–4), 25–44. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=11364
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2001). Relationship between peer orientation and achievement in cooperative learning-based research methodology courses. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(3), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670109599913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce,&, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Saeidi, M., & Atmani, S. (2011). Teaching vocabulary through semantic mapping as a pre-reading activity across genders. JournalofEnglish Studies, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, 1(1), 51–64. http://jes.srbiau.ac.ir/article_5621_3f1fc709c786af3ef00dd413b871c819.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seif, A. (2007). Modern educational psychology. Doran Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Singhal, M. (1998). A comparison of L1 and L2 reading: Cultural differences and schema. The Internet TESL Journal, 4(10). http://iteslj.org/Articles/Singhal-ReadingL1L2.html
   Google Scholar
• Sirafi, N. (1995). The effect of cooperative learning on the academic achievement of the students [Unpublished MA thesis]. Faculty of Psychology and Educational sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivas, H. (2010). Collaborative Learning. http://www.gdrc.org/kmgmt/c-learn/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., & Vancil, S. J. (1986). Discussion is what makes semantic maps work in vocabulary instruction. The Reading Teacher, 40(1), 62–67. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20199306?seq=1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tateum, S. (2007). A case study of the implementation of semantic mapping as a pre-teaching vocabulary activity to 2ndyear English major students at Lamping Rajabhat University. A research paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Language Institute, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Tinkham, T. (1993). The effect of semantic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. System, 21(3), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(93)90027-E
   Google Scholar
• Vaezi, S. (2006). Theories of reading. http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/think/articles/theories-reading.
   Google Scholar
• Vakilifard, A., & Madani, R. (2002). Reading and comprehending Persian by foreign students. Parak Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., & Edmonds, M. (2006). Reading comprehension for older readers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(3), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512060410030101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring, R. (1997). The negative effects of learning words in semantic sets: A replication. System, 25(2), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00013–4
   Google Scholar
• Whicker, K. M., Bol, L., & Nunnery, J. A. (1997). Cooperative learning in the secondary mathematics classroom. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679709597519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, C. J. (1988). The role of associational patterns and semantic networks in vocabulary development. English Teaching Forum, 26(4), 9–12. https://books.google.com/books?id=HcRLAQAAMAAJ&pg=RA7-PA9&lpg=RA7-PA9&dq=The+role+of+associational+patterns+and+semantic+networks+in+vocabulary+development.&source=bl&ots=oM57inhtx9&sig=ACfU3U17BulgOxY6OMQ22NW6WlcQQCjang&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj5scHg4JzpAhVhrHEKHcJdCdMQ6AEwBHoECAsQAQ#v=onepage&q=The%20role%20of%20associational%20patterns%20and%20semantic%20networks%20in%20vocabulary%20development.&f=false
   Google Scholar
• Zahedi, Y., & Abdi, M. (2012). The effect of semantic mapping strategy on EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 2273–2280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.198
   Google Scholar