The specific academic learning self-efficacy and the specific academic exam self-efficacy scales: construct and criterion validity revisited using Rasch models

References

• Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R. M. (2000). Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy – An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418–15. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.418.11876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguirre, J. F., Muñoz, F., De Rueda, B., & Blanco, J. R. (2012). Composición factorial de una escala de autoeficacia en la solución de problemas y comunicación en universitarios de ciencias sociales. Formación Universitaria, 5(5), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062012000500004
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, E. B. (1973). A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 38(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. Freeman. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.35-1826
   Google Scholar
• Bartimote-Aufflick, K., Bridgeman, A., Walker, R., Sharma, M., & Smith, L. (2016). The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1918–1942. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.999319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, S.-C., Lin, F.-M., & Tsai, -C.-C. (2015). An exploration of the relationship between Internet self-efficacy and sources of Internet self-efficacy among Taiwanese university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R., Spjøtvoll, E., Johansen, S., van Zwet, W. R., Bithell, J. F., Barndorff-Nielsen, O., & Keuls, M. (1977). The role of significance tests [with discussion and reply]. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 4(2), 49–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Cai, Y. (2009). Academic self-efficacy and academic self-concept: Reconsidering structural relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 499–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. W. (Eds.) (1995). Rasch models – Foundations, recent developments, and applications. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hamon, A., & Mesbah, M. (2002). Questionnaire reliability under the Rasch Model. In M. Mesbah, B. F. Cole, & M. L. T. Lee (Eds.), Statistical methods for quality of life studies. Design, measurement and analysis (pp. 155–168). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-36250_13
   Google Scholar
• Horton, M., Marais, I., & Christensen, K. B. (2013). Dimensionality. In K. B. Christensen, S. Kreiner, & M. Mesbah (Eds.), Rasch models health (pp. 137–158). ISTE and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118574454.ch9
   Google Scholar
• Kelderman, H. (1984). Loglinear Rasch model tests. Psychometrika, 49(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner, S. (2003). Introduction to DIGRAM. Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, S. (2007). Validity and objectivity: Reflections on the role and nature of Rasch models. Nordic Psychology, 59(3), 268–298. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276.59.3.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner, S. (2013). The Rasch model for dichotomous items. In K. B. Christensen, S. Kreiner, & M. Mesbah (Eds.), Rasch models health (pp. 5–26). ISTE and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118574454.ch1
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, S., & Christensen, K. B. (2002). Graphical Rasch models. In M. Mesbah, B. F. Cole, & M.-L. T. Lee (Eds.), Statistical methods for quality of life studies: Design, measurements and analysis (pp. 187–203). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3625-0_15
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, S., & Christensen, K. B. (2004). Analysis of local dependence and multidimensionality in graphical loglinear Rasch models. Communication in Statistics –theory and Methods, 33(6), 1239–1276. https://doi.org/10.1081/sta-120030148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner, S., & Christensen, K. B. (2007). Validity and objectivity in health-related scales: Analysis by graphical loglinear Rasch models. In von Davier & Carstensen (Eds.), Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models (pp. 329–346). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49839-3_21
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, S., & Christensen, K. B. (2013). Person parameter estimation and measurement in Rasch models. In K. B. Christensen, S. Kreiner, & M. Mesbah (Eds.), Rasch models health (pp. 63–78). ISTE and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118574454.ch4
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, S., & Nielsen, T. (2013). Item analysis in DIGRAM 3.04. Part I: Guided tours (Research report 2013/06). University of Copenhagen, Department of Public Health.
   Google Scholar
• Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesbah, M., & Kreiner, S. (2013). The Rasch model for ordered polytomous items. In K. B. Christensen, S. Kreiner, & M. Mesbah (Eds.), Rasch models health (pp. 27–42). ISTE and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118574454.ch2
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, T., Makransky, G., Vang, M. L., & Dammeyer, J. (2017). How specific is specific self-efficacy? A construct validity study using Rasch measurement models. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 57, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) (Technical Report No. 91-8-004). The Regents of the University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Pond, S. B., & Hay, M. S. (1989). The impact of task preview information as a function of recipient self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 35(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(89)90045-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Danish Institute for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R. (1989). Criterion-related construct validity. Psychometrika, 54(4), 625–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, U., Doña, B. G., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct?1. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15–31). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012750053-9/50003-6
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs, 1, 35–37.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029003663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar