Newly-published English course books under microscope: An exploration of teachers’ views about the Prospect series

References

• Abdi, H., Fahimnia, M., Nejati, E., & Asadi, B. (2017). EFL teachers’ perception of the Iranian junior high school English textbooks: Do the new books fill the gaps? Roshd FLT, 31(3), 48–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, A., & Derakhshan, A. (2014). The strengths and weaknesses of the Iranian junior high school English textbook” Prospect 1” from teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 7(4), 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ahour, T., & Golpour, F. (2016). Iranian new junior high school book (Prospect 1) weighted against material evaluation checklist from teachers’ perspective. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 6(13), 16–35.
   Google Scholar
• Akbari, Z. (2015). Current challenges in teaching/learning English for EFL learners: The case of junior high school and high school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199(12), 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.524
   Google Scholar
• Alamri, A. M. (2008). An evaluation of the sixth grade English language textbook for Saudi boys’ schools [An unpublished master thesis]. King Saud University. Retrieved February 20, 2013, from faculty.ksu.edu.sa/amri/Documents/MA%20thesis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alavimoghadam, B., Kheirabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, H. (2013). Prospect 1. Planning and research organization of the ministry of education. Iranian school books publication company.
   Google Scholar
• Alavimoghadam, B., Kheirabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, H. (2014). Prospect 2. Planning and research organization of the ministry of education. Iranian school books publication company.
   Google Scholar
• Alavimoghadam, B., Kheirabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, H. (2015). Prospect 3. Planning and research organization of the ministry of education. Iranian school books publication company.
   Google Scholar
• Alipour, A. M., Mohebzadeh, G. A., Gholamhosseinzadeh, M., & Mirzapour, M. (2016). Exploring Iranian EFL teachers’ perspective towards the junior high school textbook: Prospect 3. International Journal of Research in Linguistics, Language Teaching and Testing, 1(1), 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Asadi, M., Kiany, G. R., Akbari, R., & Samar, R. G. (2016). Program evaluation of the new English textbook (Prospect 1) in the Iranian ministry of education. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0602.10
   Google Scholar
• Asakereh, A., Yousofi, N., & Weisi, H. (2019). Critical content analysis of English textbooks used in the Iranian education system: Focusing on ELF features. Issues in Educational Research, 29(4), 10–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interaction Approach to Language Pedagogy. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., Becker, S., & Sempik, J. (2008). Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: A view from social policy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D. (2011). Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240).
   Google Scholar
• Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your course book. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Farhady, H. (2000). Evaluating students’ language achievement at junior high schools in Iran (Research report delivered to the Ministry of Education of Iran). Ministry of Education of Iran
   Google Scholar
• Gholami Pasand, P., & Ghasemi, A. A. (2018). An intercultural analysis of English language textbooks in Iran: The case of English Prospect series. Apples: Journal of Applied Language Studies, 12(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.17011/apples/urn.201804172107
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, M. R. (2011). Quantification and graphic representation of EFL textbook evaluation results. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(5), 511–520. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.5.511-520
   Google Scholar
• Golpour, F. (2012). Iranian junior high school English book series (Right path to English) weighted against material evaluation checklists. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(7), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.7p.170
   Google Scholar
• Goodarzi, A., Weisi, H., & Yousofi, N. (2020). CLT in Prospect series: A predictive evaluation of Iranian junior high school English textbooks. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 8(1), 195–221. https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2020.1881368.1162
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2007). Learner strategies and self-efficacy: Making the connection. Language Learning Journal, 35(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730701315832
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2016). ELT materials:claims, critiques and controversies. In G. Hall (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching. Routledge, pp. (113-126).
   Google Scholar
• Grenfell, M., & Harris, V. (1999). Modern languages and learning strategies: In theory and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, N. (2014). Content, consumption, and production: Three levels of textbook research. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching textbooks (pp. 1–41). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, D. M. (2007). It’s a small world after all: From stereotypes to invented worlds in secondary school Spanish textbooks. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 4(3), 117–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427580701389417
   Google Scholar
• Iran’s Ministry of Education. (2011). The national curricular.
   Google Scholar
• Iran’s Ministry of Education. (2018) . Fundamental evolution document of education and pedagogy.
   Google Scholar
• Kaffash, F., Yazdanmehr, E., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2018). EFL teachers’ and students’ evaluation of Prospect 3 in the light of Cisar’s communicative model. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.143
   Google Scholar
• Kamyabi Gol, A., & Baghaeeyan, J. (2015). Critical Analysis and teachers’ perspectives on Prospect One (Iranian junior high school English book). International Journal of Language and Applied Linguistics, 1(4), 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C., & Kennedy, J. (1996). Teacher attitudes and change implementation. System, 24(3), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(96)00027-9
   Google Scholar
• Khansir, A. A., & Mahammadifard, E. (2015). An evaluation of Prospect book (Prospect 1). Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(3), 485. doi:10.17507/tpls.0503.05
   Google Scholar
• Littlewood, W., & William, L. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Litz, D. R. (2005). Textbook evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean case study. Asian EFL journal, 48(1), 1–53
   Google Scholar
• Macaro, E. (2001). Learning strategies in foreign and second language classrooms: The role of learner strategies. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Maftoon, P., Yazdani Moghaddam, M., Gholebostan, H., & Beh-Afarin, S. R. (2010). Privatization of English education in Iran: A feasibility study. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 13(4), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Adrián, M., Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., & Basterrechea, M. (2019). On self-reported use of communication strategies by CLIL learners in primary education. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817722054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and method in ELT; A teacher’s guide. Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, I. (2013). Teaching materials and the roles of EFL/ESL teachers: Practice and theory. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and interpretation. Jos-sey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mustapha, A. S. (2013). Gender and language education research: Areview. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 4(3), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.3.454-463
   Google Scholar
• Namaziandost, E., Hashemifardnia, A., & Hosseini, S. E. (2019). Investigating speech acts in Iranian junior high school English textbooks. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i2.4215
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal, 41(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/41.2.136
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia‐Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589–613. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Heinle and Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Pinter, A. (2006). Teaching young language learners. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, D., & Roberts, J. (1981). Authentic listening activities1. ELT Journal, 36(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/36.1.37
   Google Scholar
• Rahimpour, M., & Hashemi, R. (2011). Textbook selection and evaluation in EFL context. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v1n2p62
   Google Scholar
• Razmjoo, S. A., & Riazi, A. M. (2006). Is communicative language teaching practical in the expanding circle? Journal of Language and Learning, 4(2), 144–171.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
   Google Scholar
• Sardabi, N., & Koosha, M. (2015). New perspective in prospect: An assessment of strengths and weaknesses of Iranian second year junior high school English textbooks. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 3(2), 57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. N. (2014). Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, 1–24 1 doi:10.1017/S0047404500006837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research-A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shahmohammadi, S. (2018). Textbook evaluation: Looking at Prospect series through teachers’ perspective. Research in English Language Pedagogy (RELP), 6(2), 182.
   Google Scholar
• Skierso, A. (1991). Textbook selection and evaluation. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 432–453). Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, B., Dat, B., Masuhara, H., & Rubdy, R. (2001). EFL courses for adults. ELT Journal, 55(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.1.80
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2017). The complete guide to the theory and practice of materials development for language learning. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Torki, F., & Chalak, A. (2017). An evaluation of English textbooks used in Iranian high schools: Teachers’ and learners’ attitudes. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 5(1), 52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Ur, P. (1997). A course in language teaching. Practice and theory. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding inter-observer agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Weninger, C., & Kiss, T. (2013). Culture in English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks: A semiotic approach. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 694–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarrabi, F., & Brown, J. R. (2015). English language teaching and learning analysis in Iran. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 9(10), 3485–3493. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1340254
   Google Scholar
• Zohoorian, Z., MatinSadr, N., & Shamabadi, F. (2018). A summative evaluation of Prospect 1: Employing the ARCS model. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11331a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar