The Schematic Information-Processing (SIP) model of reading comprehension: Theoretical support for the utilization of text-relevant video segments to teach culturally unfamiliar texts in second/foreign language classrooms

References

• Aebersold, J., & Field, M. (1997). From reader to reading teacher: Issues and strategies for second language classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, W. A., & Smith, A. R. (2012). Effects of video podcasting on psychomotor and cognitive performance, attitudes and study behavior of student physical therapists. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(4), 401–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.728876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allwright, R. (1984). The importance of interaction in classroom language learning. Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 156–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.2.156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alptekin, C., & Ercetin, G. (2011). Effects of working memory capacity and content familiarity on literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. TESOL Quarterly, 45(2), 235–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.247705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E. (2001a). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents: Executive summary and paper commissioned by the National Reading Conference. Chicago: National Reading Conference.
   Google Scholar
• An, S. (2013). Schema theory in reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 130–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.1.130-134
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. (1984). Becoming a nation of readers. National Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14(4), 367–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312014004367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, D. P. (1988). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 37–55). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Angosto, A., Sánchez, P., Álvarez, M., Cuevas, I., & León, J. A. (2013). Evidence for top-down processing in reading comprehension of children. Psicología Educativa, 19(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5093/ed2013a14
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2007). Making instructional animations more effective: A cognitive load approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 695–700. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrani, T., Tam, S. S., & Zuraidah, M. D. (2014). Authentic language input through audiovisual technology and second language acquisition, SAGE Open, 1–8. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014550611
   Google Scholar
• Baker, E. A., & Dalton, B. (2011, April 18). Designing technology to support comprehension among monolingual and bilingual students. In Voice of literacy. http://voiceofliteracy.org.
   Google Scholar
• Bal-Gezegin, B. (2014). An investigation of using video vs. audio for teaching vocabulary. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 450–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.516
   Google Scholar
• Barreyro, J. P., Cevasco, J., Burín, D., & Marotto, C. M. (2012). Working memory capacity and individual differences in the making of reinstatement and elaborative inferences. The Spanish Journal of Psychology15(2), 471–479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BavaHarji, M., Alavi, Z., & Letchumanan, K. (2014). Captioned instructional video: Effects on content comprehension, vocabulary acquisition and language proficiency. English Language Teaching, 7(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n5p1
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. B. (2011). Understanding advanced second-language reading. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bölükbaş, F. (2013). The effect of reading strategies on reading comprehension in teaching Turkish as a foreign language. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(21), 2147–2154. https://academicjournals.org/journal/ERR/article-full-text-pdf/7DD1E8041524
   Google Scholar
• Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 6.1–6.6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canning-Wilson, C. (2000). Practical aspects of using video in the foreign language classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(11). http://iteslj.org/Articles/Canning-Video.html
   Google Scholar
• Carrell, P. L. (1983). Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or background knowledge in second language comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 1(2), 81–92. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/66968/1/1_2_10125_66968_rfl12carrell.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carrell, P. L. (1984). The effects of rhetorical organization on ESL readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18(3), 441–469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3586714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrell, P. L. (1985). Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 727–752. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3586673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrell, P. L. (1988a). Introduction. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 1–7). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrell, P. L. (1991). Second language reading: Reading ability or language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.2.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553–573. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3586613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carretti, B., Borella, E., Cornoldi, C., & De Beni, R. (2009). Role of working memory in explaining the performance of individuals with specific reading comprehension difficulties: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 246–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chastain, K. (1971). The development of modern language skills: Theory to practice. Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Christenson, S. L., & Thurlow, M. L. (2004). School dropouts: Prevention considerations, interventions, and challenges. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(1), 36–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301010.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01159.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996b). Facilitating reading comprehension with multimedia. System, 24(4), 503–519. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00038-3
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J. J. (1978). Words for schools: The applications in education of the vocabulary researches of. In E. L. Thorndike & P. Suppes (Eds.), The impact of research on education (pp. 107–195). National Academy of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, M. A. (1970). Suggestions for developing more positive attitude toward native speakers of Spanish. In H. N. Seelye (Ed.), Perspectives for teachers of Latin American culture. State Department of Public Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. D., Gholson, B., & Driscoll, D. M. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 428–434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruse, E. (2007). Using educational video in the classroom: Theory, research and practice. Library Video Company. http://www.libraryvideo.com/articles/article26.asp
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, R. I. S., & Escudero, M. D. (2012). Models of reading comprehension and their related pedagogical practices: A discussion of the evidence and proposal. Mextesol Journal, 36(2), 1–18. http://www.mextesol.net/journal/public/files/1fe8a21fd198da4984702855c5ee0846.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dai, L. (2011). Practical tips for cultural-based language teaching in the EFL classroom. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1031–1036. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.5.1031-1036
   Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2007). Attention cueing as a means to enhance learning from an animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 731–746. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a 790 framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for 791 research and design. Educational Psychology Review, 21(2), 113–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9098-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debue, N., & van De Leemput, C. (2014). What does germane load mean? An empirical contribution to the cognitive load theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diakidoy, I. N., Mouskounti, T., & Ioannides, C. (2011). Comprehension and learning from refutation and expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.46.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. T. (1998). Background knowledge, linguistic complexity, and second-language reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 30(2), 253–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969809547998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erten, İ. H., & Razi, S. (2009). The effects of cultural familiarity on reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 60–77. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/66632/1/21_1_10125_66632_erten.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, C. R. (1994). Levels of representation in memory for discourse. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 589–607). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology13(4), 266–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1965). Language, aptitude, intelligence, and second language achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 56(4), 191–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Genc, B., & Bada, E. (2005). Culture in language learning and teaching. The Reading Matrix, 5(1), 73–84. http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/genc_bada/article.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glasser, R. (1982). Instructional psychology: Past, present and future. American Psychologist, 37(3), 292–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.3.292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6(4), 126–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19388076709556976
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. (1973b). Analysis of oral reading miscues: Applied psycholinguistics. In F. Smith (Ed.), Psycholinguistics and reading (pp. 158–176). Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. S. (1971). Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process. In P. Pimsleur & T. Quinn (Eds.), The psychology of second language learning (pp. 135–142). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. S. (1973a). On the psycholinguistic method of teaching reading. In F. Smith (Ed.), Psycholinguistics and reading (pp. 177–182). Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (2001). Reading for academic purposes: Guidelines for the ESL/EFL teacher. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 187–203). Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W., & Stoller, F., . L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference: L@S ’14 (pp. 41–50). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Habók, A., & Magyar, A. (2019). The effects of EFL reading comprehension and certain learning related factors on EFL learners’ reading strategy use. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1616522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, B. (2012). Understanding the relative contributions of lower-level word processes, higher- level processes, and working memory to reading comprehension performance in proficient adult readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(2), 125–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2001). A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasler, B. S., Kersten, B., & Sweller, J. (2007). Learner control, cognitive load and instructional animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 713–729. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, D. J. (2011). Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. Annie E. Casey Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Herron, C., Dubreil, S., Cole, S. P., & Corrie, C. (2000). Using instructional video to teach culture to beginning foreign language students. CALICO Journal, 17(3), 395–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v17i3.395-429
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, E. D. (2003). Reading comprehension requires knowledge—of words and the world. American Educator, 27(1), 10–13, 16–22, 28–29, 48. https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/Hirsch.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hsin, W. J., & Cigas, J. (2013). Short videos improve student learning in online education. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 28(5), 253–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5555/2458569.2458622
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Duke, N. K. (2020). Content counts and motivation matters: Reading comprehension in third-grade students who are English learners. AERA Open, 6(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419899075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, P., & Huang, P. (2011). Using subtitles to enliven reading. English Language and Literature Studies, 1(1), 2–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v1n1p2
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, M., Antonenk, P. D., Greenwood, C. M., & Wheeler, D. (2012). Effects of segmenting, signaling, and weeding on learning from educational video. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 220–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2011.585993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeung, H., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology, 17(3), 329–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170307
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2012). An introduction to using video for research (Working paper). London: National Centre for Research Methods.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L., & Plass, J. L. (2002). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition with multimedia annotations. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 546–561. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199908)13:4<351::AID-ACP589>3.0.CO;2-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karami, A. (2019). Implementing audio-visual materials (videos), as an incidental vocabulary learning strategy, in second/foreign language learners’ vocabulary development: A current review of the most recent research. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 9(2), 60–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.9.2.15519
   Google Scholar
• Karami, A. (2020). The use of schema theory, information-processing theory, and sociocultural theory in teaching culturally unfamiliar texts in second/foreign language classrooms. Educational Practice and Theory, 42(2), 23–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7459/ept/42.2.03
   Google Scholar
• Karami, A., Bowles, F. A., & Liggett, C. A. (2021). Text-related video segments and reading comprehension: A brief review of research within the last 20 years. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 111, 40–52. https://imanagerpublications.com/article/17393/
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & O’Brien, E. J. (2018). Reading comprehension theories: A view from the top down. In M. F. Schober, D. N. Rapp, & M. A. Britt (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse processes (pp. 7–21). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitao, K. (1991). Teaching culture in foreign language instruction in the United States. In Doshisha Studies in English, 52(53),285–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14988/pa.2017.0000001677
   Google Scholar
• Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koolstra, C., Voort, T., & Kamp, L. (1997). Television’s impact on children’s reading comprehension and decoding skills: A three-year panel study. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(2), 128–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.32.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovács, G. (2017). Culture in language teaching: A course design for teacher trainees. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 9(3), 73–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/ausp-2017-0030
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C. (2001). Language and culture. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., & Steyn, F. (2013). Subtitles and eye tracking: Reading and performance. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucer, S. B. (2001). Dimensions of literacy: A conceptual base of teaching reading and writing in school settings. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Morris, R. D., Morrow, L. M., Woo, D. G., Meisinger, E. B., Sevick, R. A., Bradley, B. A., & Stahl, S. A. (2006). Teaching children to be fluent and automatic readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(4), 357–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3804_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusumaraysdyati, K. (2004). Listening, viewing, and imagination: Movies in EFL classes. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Imagination and Education, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Fostering learning from instructional video in a second language. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(5), 648–654. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. Y., & List, A. (2019). Processing of texts and videos: A strategy-focused analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2), 268–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, A., & Reves, T. (1994). The four-dimension model: Interaction of schemata in the process of reading comprehension. TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), 71–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v11i2.634
   Google Scholar
• Lin, L. (2016). The impact of video-based materials on Chinese-speaking learners’ English text comprehension. English Language Teaching, 9(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n10p1
   Google Scholar
• Lin, L., Lee, J., & Robertson, T. (2011). Reading while watching video: The effect of video content on reading comprehension and media multitasking ability. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.45.2.d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861–883. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljubojevic, M., Vaskovic, V., Stankovic, S., & Vaskovic, J. (2014). Using supplementary video in multimedia instruction as a teaching tool to increase efficiency of learning and quality of experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1825
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, S. A., & Robertson, C. L. (2012). Screencast tutorials enhance student learning of statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 39(1), 67–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311430640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch, R., & Lorch, E. (1996). Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, A., Woods, A., & Dooley, K. (2011). Comprehension as social and intellectual practice: Rebuilding curriculum in low socioeconomic and cultural minority schools. Theory into Practice, 50(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.558445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, J. J. (2004). Using DVD films to enhance college freshmen’s English listening comprehension and motivation [unpublished master thesis]. National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu. Taiwan, R.O.C.
   Google Scholar
• Lusk, M. M., & Atkinson, R. K. (2007). Animated pedagogical agents: Does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 747–764. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A. S. (1997). Using CNN news video in the EFL classroom. The Internet TEFL Journal, 3(2), http://www.aitwech.ac.jp/~iTESLj/
   Google Scholar
• Mancilla-Martinez, J. (2020). Understanding and supporting literacy development among English learners: A deep dive into the role of language comprehension. AERA Open, 6(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420912198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, P. L. (2001). The influence of culture-specific background knowledge and captions on second language comprehension. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 29(4), 331–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2190/15TA-GX8P-74XP-YUA1
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. M. (2002). Learning with technology. San Diego State University.
   Google Scholar
• Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E. (2001). Signaling as a cognitive guide in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 377–389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multi-media learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2005c). Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pretraining, and modality principles. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 169–182). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Pilegard, C. (2014). Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pre-training, and modality principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbooks in psychology. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 316–344). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, M. G., Crosson, A. C., Moore, D. W., & Beck, I. L. (2018). Word knowledge and comprehension effects of an academic vocabulary intervention for middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 55(3), 572–616. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217744181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B. (1983). Second language learning: An information processing perspective. Language Learning, 33(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00532.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. P. (2009). Towards a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 297–383). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, L. (2011). Investigating the contributions of background knowledge and reading comprehension strategies to L2 reading comprehension: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing, 24(8), 883–902. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9230-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melby-Lervag, M., & Lervag, A. (2014). Reading comprehension and its underlying components in second-language learners: A meta-analysis of studies comparing first-and second-language learners. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 409–433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metruk, R. (2018). The effects of watching authentic English videos with and without subtitles on listening and reading skills of EFL learners. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2545–2553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90088
   Google Scholar
• Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
   Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52(2), 439–481. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. (2011). Issues in second-language reading: Implications for acquisition and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.46.2.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel (U.S.), & National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.). (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence- based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Ness, M. (2009). Reading comprehension strategies in secondary content area classrooms: Teacher use of and attitudes towards reading comprehension instruction. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 49(2), 143–164. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol49/iss2/5
   Google Scholar
• Ng, C. F., & Ng, P. K. (2015). A review of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations of ESL learners. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 1(2), 98–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7763/IJLLL.2015.V1.20
   Google Scholar
• Nikitina, L. (2011). Creating an authentic learning environment in the foreign language classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 4(1), 33–46. http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2011_1_3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nouwens, S., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). How working memory relates to children’s reading comprehension: The importance of domain-specificity in storage and processing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9665-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olasina, G. (2017). An evaluation of educational values of YouTube videos for academic writing. The African Journal of Information Systems, 9(4), 232–261. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ajis/vol9/iss4/2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, L. S. (2004). What every teacher needs to know about comprehension. Reading Teacher, 58(3), 272–280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.3.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 849–894). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pilonieta, P. (2010). Instruction of research-based comprehension strategies in basal reading programs. Reading Psychology, 31(2), 150–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710902754119
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2006). Solving problems in the teaching of literacy. Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, C. P., Dalton, B., & Grisham, D. L. (2007). Scaffolding English language learners and struggling readers in a universal literacy environment with embedded strategy instruction and vocabulary support. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960709336758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rackaway, C. (2012). Video killed the textbook star? Use of multimedia supplements to enhance student learning. Journal of Political Science Education, 8(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2012.667684
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D. (2015). Computational models of reading: A primer. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(7), 271–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2012). Eye movements in reading versus nonreading tasks: Using E-Z reader to understand the role of word/stimulus familiarity. Visual Cognition, 20(4–5), 360–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2012.667006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B. (1985). Instructional psychology. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education: Research and studies (pp. 2569–2581). Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D., & Lloyd, C. (1991). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices in reading comprehension instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 559–586. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312028003559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99–135). Lawrence ErIbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance (pp. 573–603). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, E. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatin, I. M. (2013). The effect of cultural background knowledge on learning English language. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 1(4), 1148–2148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14486/IJSCS39
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing. I. detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahnazari, M. T., & Dabaghi, A. (2014). A critical overview of models of reading comprehension with a focus on cognitive aspects. Research in English Language Pedagogy (RELP), 2(1), 7–19. http://relp.khuisf.ac.ir/article_533602_ce4ff5f6b91c28a330424e337db69956.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Beck, I. L. (2006). Effective literacy teaching for English-language learners. In D. L. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in a second language: Report of the National Literacy Panel (pp. 415–488). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., Dronjic, V., & Park, B. (2019). The interplay between working memory & background knowledge in L2 reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 53(2), 320–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., & Broughton, S. H. (2011). Bridging reading comprehension and conceptual change in science: The promise of refutation text. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 374–393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., & Ritchot, K. F. M. (1996). The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing. Memory & Cognition, 24(6), 733–743. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. B. (1965). American reading instruction. International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Rand.
   Google Scholar
• Spanjers, I. A. E., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2010). A theoretical analysis of how segmentation of dynamic visualizations optimizes students’ learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9135-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. J. (1980). Constructive processes in prose comprehension. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 245–278). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Stainer, F. (1971). Culture: A motivating factor in the French classroom. In C. Jay & P. Castle (Eds.), French language education: The teaching of culture in the classroom. State Department of Public Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/747348
   Google Scholar
• Steffensen, M. S., Jogdeo, C., & Anderson, R. C. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/747429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, R. M., Benner, G. J., Martella, R. C., & Marchand-Martella, N. E. (2007). Three-tier models of reading and behavior: A research review. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(4), 239–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007070090040601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockwell, B. R., Stockwell, M. S., Cennamo, M., & Jiang, E. (2015). Blended learning improves science education. Cell, 162(5), 933–936. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. (1994). Inauthentic authenticity or authentic inauthenticity? Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 1(2), 1–10. http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume1/ej02/ej02a1/
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Schnakenberg, J. B., Fall, A. M., Vaughn, M. G., & Wexler, J. (2015). Improving reading comprehension for high school students with disabilities: Effects for comprehension and school retention. Exceptional Children, 82(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915585478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velandia, R. (2008). The role of warming up activities in adolescent students’ involvement during the English class. Profile Journal, 10(1), 9–26. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/10561/11021
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B. J. F., Lei, P., Hernandez, A. C., & August, D. L. (2018). Improving content area reading comprehension of Spanish speaking English learners in grades 4 and 5 using web- based text structure instruction. Reading and Writing, 31(9), 1969–1996. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9802-9
   Google Scholar
• Young, C., Mohr, K., & Rasinski, T. (2015). Reading together: A successful reading fluency intervention. Literacy Research and Instruction, 54(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2014.976678
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar