Interactive effects of institutional requirements and screen vs. Print platforms on preference of Times New Roman and Calibri among university students

References

• Ali, A. Z., Wahid, R., Samsudin, K., & Idris, M. Z. (2013). Reading on the computer screen: Does font type have effects on web text readability? International Education Studies, 6(3), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Arditi, A. (2004). Adjustable typography: An approach to enhancing low vision text accessibility. Ergonomics, 47(5), 469–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0014013031000085680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arditi, A., & Cho, J. (2005). Serifs and font legibility. Vision Research, 45(23), 2926–2933. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamidele, G., & Salihu, I. (2019). Teachers’ perception of the impact of English language skills of students on media and information literacy. Ianna Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(1), 95–102. https://www.iannajournalofinterdisciplinarystudies.com/index.php/1/article/view/22
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, J., Majumdar, D., Pal, M. S., & Majumdar, D. (2011). Readability, subjective preference and mental workload studies on young Indian adults for selection of optimum font type and size during onscreen reading. Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences, 4(2), 131–143. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/50853367_
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, M., & Mills, M. 2000. So what size and type of font should I use on my website? Usability News, 2.2, 2000, Software Usability Research Laboratory (SURL), Wichita State University. http://wsupsy.psy.twsu.edu/surl/usabilitynews/2S/font.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, M., Mills, M., Peterson, M., & Storrer, K. 2001. A comparison of popular online fonts: Which are best and when? Usability News. http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews//32/font.asp
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, M. L., Chaparro, B. S., Mills, M. M., & Halcomb, C. G. (2003). Comparing the effects of text size and format on the readability of computer-displayed TNR and Arial text. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 59(6), 823–835. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00121-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigelow, C. (2019). Typeface features and legibility research. Vision Research, 165, 162–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16(6), 645–668. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847701600601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragg, D., Azenkot, S., Larson, K., Bessemans, A., & Kalai, A. (2017). Designing and evaluating livefonts. Proceedings of the 30th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (pp. 481–492). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3126594.3126660
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. 2019. Finding your type: Fonts and their influence on learning. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/fonts-influence-learning-finding-type
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. A., Cutler, F., McDonald, R., Putt, C., Rewak, M., Strong, G., & Whitton, H. (2005). Typographic legibility research project: Clear print report. CNIB/OCAD Research.
   Google Scholar
• Čerepinko, D., Keček, D., & Periša, M. (2017). Text readability and legibility on ipad with comparison to paper and computer screen. Tehnicki Vjesnik, 24(4), 1197–1201. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20160225140202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, J. 2020. Online shopping, ecommerce, and internet statistics (2020) you should know. Web Hosting Secret Revealed. https://www.buildthis.io/online-shopping-ecommerce-internet-stats
   Google Scholar
• Clason, G. (1926). The richest man in Babylon. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Conover, C. (2003). Designing for print: An in-depth guide to planning, creating and producing successful design projects. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• De Argaez, E. (Ed.). 2006. Usage and population statistics. InternetWworld Stats News, No. 14. In http://www.internetworldstats.com/pr/edi014.htm#3/
   Google Scholar
• Diemand-Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D., & Vaughan, E. (2011). Fortune favors the bold (and the italicized): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition, 118(1), 111–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobres, J., Chahine, N., & Reimer, B. (2017). Effects of ambient illumination, contrast polarity, and letter size on text legibility under glance-like reading. Applied Ergonomics, 60, 68–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressler, E. 2019. Understanding the effect of font type on reading comprehension/memory under time-constraints PhD dissertation. University of Nebraska at Omaha. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/university_honors_program/70
   Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, Y., Rana, N., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. (2017). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 719–734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, T. G., & Short, ca. 2002. Legibility and readability on the World Wide Web. http://bigital.com/english/files/2008/04/web_legibilty_redeability.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Geske, J. 2000. Readability of body text in computer mediated communications: Effects of type family, size and face. Retrieved http://www.public.iastate.edu/~geske/scholarship.html
   Google Scholar
• Gigante, M. 2013. How typefaces influence perception and persuasion. www.mdgadvertising.com/marketing-insights/how-typefaces-influence-perception-and-persuasion
   Google Scholar
• Haenschen, K., & Tamul, D. J. (2019). What’s in a font? Ideological perceptions of typography. Communication Studies, 71(2), 244-261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2019.1692884
   Google Scholar
• Halin, N. (2016). Distracted while reading? Changing to a hard-to-read font shields against the effects of environmental noise and speech on text memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1196), 570–590. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque, E., Haque, M., Razali, H. S., Ishak, K. I., Ariffin, M. A., Ajis, M. N., Than, M., & Islam, Z. (2018). Effect of font style on memory among the preclinical students of UniKL RCMP, Malaysia. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Allied Sciences, 7(4), 108–113. www.ijpras.com
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S., & Zelenkauskaite, A. (2009). Symbolic capital in a virtual heterosexual market: Abbreviation and insertion in Italian iTV SMS. Written Communication, 26(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308327911
   Google Scholar
• Josephson, S. (2008). Keeping your readers’ eyes on the screen: An eye-tracking study comparing san serif and serif typefaces. Visual Communication Quarterly, 15(1&2), 67–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15551390801914595
   Google Scholar
• Larhmaid, M., Thiburce, J., & Ursi, B. (2018). The Impact of print vs. digital resources on Moroccan university students’ reading habits, uses, and preferences. SHS Web of Conferences, 52, 02001. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185202001
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. 2009. Typeface personality traits and their design characteristics. Master’s dissertation. Concordia University Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Mangiafico, P. 2008. Do serif fonts get you better grades?. Duke University Libraries. https://blogs.library.duke.edu/blog/2008/01/15/do-serif-fonts-get-you-better-grades
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, J. S., Legge, G. E., & Bane, M. C. (1996). Psychophysics of reading XV: Font effects in normal and low vision. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 37(8), 1492–1501. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8675391/.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, S. A. (2018). Visual perception theory. In Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/perception-theories.html
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft. 2017. Typography: ClearType font collection. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/cleartype/clear-type-font-collection
   Google Scholar
• Moen, D. (1995). Newspaper layout and design: A team approach (3rd ed.). Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Moret-Tatay, C. M., & Perea, M. (2011). Do serifs provide an advantage in the recognition of written words? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), 619–624. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.546781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, E. 2012. Hear, all ye people; Hearken, o earth (part 1). The New York Times. https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/08/hear-all-ye-people-hearken-o-earth/?utm_source=slashdot&utm_medium=slashdot&utm_campaign=slashdot
   Google Scholar
• Morris, R., Aquilante, K., Yager, D., & Bigelow, ca. 2012. “Serifs slow RSVP reading at very small sizes, but don’t matter at larger sizes.” Society for Information Display (pp. P–13). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1889/1.1830242
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, B. A., Mansfield, J. S., & Legge, G. E. (2005). The effect of print size on reading speed in dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(3), 332–349. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/i.1467-9817.2005.00273.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, L., Jarkko, H., Hämäläinen, A., & Paavo, H. (2019). influence of reading skill and word length on fixation-related brain activity in school-aged children during natural reading. Vision Research, 165, 109–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Moret-Tatay, C., & Gómez, P. (2011). The effects of inter letter spacing in visual word recognition. ActaPschologica, 137(3), 345–351. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, T. (2006). Exploring typography. Thomson Delmar Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakoli, E., & Kheirzadeh, S. (2011). The effect of font size on reading comprehension skills: Scanning for key words and reading for general idea. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(7), 915–919. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.7.915-919
   Google Scholar
• Unger, G. (2007). While you are reading (1st ed.). Mark Batty.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. F. 2001. HTML e-mail: Text font readability study. Practical Ecommerce. http://www.wilsonweb.com/wmt6/html-email-fonts.html
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida, K. B. 2000. Avoiding typeface error. Society for technical communication proceedings. http://www.stc.org/confproceed/2000/PDFs/00006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zamzuri, A., Ali, M., Wahid, R., Samsudin, K., & Idris, M. Z. (2013). Reading on the computer screen: Does font type have effects on web text readability? International Education Studies, 6, 3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n3p26
   Google Scholar