Validating the normalization of vocabulary systems in a university EFL program

References

• Bax, S. (2003). CALL - past, present, and future. System, 31(1), 13–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(02)00071-4
   Google Scholar
• Bax, S. (2011). Normalization revisited: The effective use of technology in language education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.2011040101
   Google Scholar
• Bielawaski, L., & Metcalf, D. (2003). Blended e-learning: Integrating knowledge, performance support, and online learning. HRD Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1(1), 5–22. https://www.herdsa.org.au/herdsa-review-higher-education-vol-1/5-22
   Google Scholar
• Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2008.31413871
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• Browne, C., Culligan, B., & Phillips, J. (2013). The new general service list. http://www.newgeneralservicelist.org
   Google Scholar
• Chapell, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jameison, J. (2010). Does an argument-based approach to validity make a difference? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 29(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00165.x
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. A. (2014). Arguments for technology and language learning. Keynote presentation at the EuroCALL 2014 Conference. Groningen, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jameieson, J. M. (Eds.). (2008). Building a validity argument for the test of English as a foreign language. Rougledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203937891
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.12.1.82.s2
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, J. (2018). Recognizing and resolving the challenges of being an insider researcher in work-integrated learning. International Journal of Work-integrated Learning, 19(3), 311–320. https://www.ijwil.org
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books, Inc. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2064031
   Google Scholar
• Gleason, J. (2013). An interpretive argument for blended course design. Foreign Language Annals, 46(4), 588–609. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golonka, E., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 105–170.
   Google Scholar
• Gruba, P., Cárdenas-Claros, M., Suvorov, R., & Rick, K. (2016). Blended language program evaluation. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514370
   Google Scholar
• Gruba, P., & Nguyen, N. B. C. (2019). Evaluating technology integration in a Vietnamese university language program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5–6), 619–637. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. (2006). Validation. In R. Brennen (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. (Ed.). (2005). Second language needs analysis (Cambridge applied linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667299
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. (2012). Blended learning: Creating learning opportunities for language learners. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, J. M. (2016). Language Program Evaluation. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 169–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, J. M., Davis, J. M., Sinicrope, C., & Watanabe, Y. (Eds.). (2009). Toward useful program evaluation in college foreign language education. National Foreign Language Resource Center.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D., & Bailey, K. M. (2008). Exploring second language classroom research: A comprehensive guide (1st ed.). Heinle ELT.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R., & Jung, S.-H. (2007). National guidelines for technology integration in TESOL programs: Factors affecting (non)implementation. In M. Peters, K. Murphy-Judy, R. Z. Lavine, & M. A. Kassen (Eds.), Preparing and developing technology-proficient L2 teachers (pp. 23–48). Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• The Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, S. (2015). The effects of blended learning on EFL students’ vocabulary enhancement. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 641–647. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.592
   Google Scholar
• Walvoord, B. E., Carey, A. K., Smith, H. L., Soled, S. W., Way, P. K., & Zorn, D. (2000). Academic departments: How they work, how they change. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. J., & Gruba, P. (2019). Evaluating normalization: An argument-based approach. System, 83, 4–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar