1,265
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE EDUCATION

Education regime and creativity: the Eastern Confucian and the Western Enlightenment types of learning in the PISA test

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2144025 | Received 13 Sep 2021, Accepted 01 Nov 2022, Published online: 29 Nov 2022

References

  • Anders, J., Has, S., Jerrim, J., Shure, N., & Zieger, L. (2019). Is Canada really an education superpower? The impact of exclusions and non-response on results from PISA 2015. Working Paper, No. 19-11. UCL Institute of Education.
  • Avvisati, F. (2020). The measure of socio-economic status in PISA: A review and some suggested improvements. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 8(8), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-00086-x
  • Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the worlds’ best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey & Company.
  • Benoliel, P., & Berkovich, I. (2018). A cross-national examination of the effect of the Schwartz cultural dimensions on PISA performance assessments. Social Indicators Research, 139(2), 825–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1732-z
  • Boman, B. (2022). Educational achievement among East Asian schoolchildren 1967–2020: A thematic review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100168
  • Cheng, K. M. (2011). Shanghai: How a big city in a developing country leaped to the head of the class. In M. S. Tucker (Ed.), Surpassing Shanghai: An agenda for American education built on the world’s leading systems (pp. 21–50). Harvard Education Press.
  • Chmielewski, A. K. (2019). The global increase in the socioeconomic achievement gap, 1964 to 2015. American Sociological Review, 84(3), 517–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419847165
  • Deng, Z., & Gopinathan, S. (2016). PISA and high-performing education systems: Explaining Singapore’s education success. Comparative Education, 52(4), 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1219535
  • Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. School Journal, 54(1), 77–80. https://dewey.pragmatism.org/creed.htm
  • Eisenstadt, S. N. (Ed.). (2002). Multiple modernities. Routledge.
  • Elman, B. A. (2013). The civil examination system in late imperial China, 1400–1900. Frontiers of History in China, 8(1), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.3868/s020-002-013-0003-9
  • Feniger, Y., & Lefstein, A. (2014). How not to reason with PISA data: An ironic investigation. Journal of Education Policy, 29(6), 845–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.892156
  • Feyerabend, P. K. (19751993). Against method. Verso.
  • Florida, R., Mellander, C., & King, K. M. (2015). The Global Creativity Index 2015. http://martinprosperity.org/content/the-global-creativity-index-2015/
  • Freedman, D. A. (2006). On the so-called “Huber sandwich estimator” and “robust standard errors”. The American Statistician, 60(4), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152207
  • Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505
  • Gorry, J. (2011). Cultures of learning and learning culture: Socratic and confucian approaches to teaching and learning. Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2011.040302
  • Grey, S., & Morris, P. (2022). Capturing the spark: PISA, twenty-first century skills and the reconstruction of creativity. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2022.2100981
  • Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. A. (2015). The knowledge capital of nations: Education and the economics of growth. MIT Press.
  • Ho, D. Y. F., & Ho, R. T. H. (2008). Knowledge is a dangerous thing: Authority relations, ideological conservatism, and creativity in Confucian‐heritage cultures. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00357.x
  • Hon, T. K. (2017). Introduction: Confucianism for the contemporary world. In T. K. Hon & K. Stapleton (Eds.), Confucianism for the Contemporary world (pp. xi–xxix). SUNY Press.
  • Hsin, A., & Xie, Y. (2014). Explaining Asian Americans’ academic advantage over whites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8416–8421. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1406402111
  • Jerrim, J. (2015). Why do East Asian children perform so well in PISA? An investigation of Western-born children of East Asian descent. Oxford Review of Education, 41(3), 310–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1028525
  • Jerrim, J., Lopez-Agudo, L. A., Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. D., & Shure, N. (2017). What happens when econometrics and psychometrics collide? An example using the PISA data. Economics of Education Review, 61, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.09.007
  • Jerrim, J., & Micklewright, J. (2014). Socio-economic gradients in children’s cognitive skills: Are cross-country comparisons robust to who reports family background? European Sociological Review, 30(6), 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu072
  • Jerrim, J., Oliver, M., & Sims, S. (2020). The relationship between inquiry-based teaching and students’ achievement. New evidence from a longitudinal PISA study in England. Learning and Instruction, 61(June 2019), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.004
  • Kember, D. (2016). Why do Chinese students out-perform those from the West? Cogent Education, 3(1), 1248187. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1248187
  • Kennedy, K. J. (2013). Singapore’s school curriculum for the future beyond: National development? In Deng, Z., Gopinathan, S., & Lee, C. E. (eds). Globalization and the Singapore curriculum (pp. 205–224). Springer.
  • Kennedy, K. J., & Lee, J. C. K. (2007). The changing role of schools in Asian societies: Schools for the knowledge society. Routledge.
  • Kim, S. W. (2019). Is socioeconomic status less predictive of achievement in East Asian countries? A systematic and meta-analytic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.05.009
  • Koh, K. H., Tan, C., & Ng, P. T. (2012). Creating thinking schools through authentic assessment: The case in Singapore. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9138-y
  • Komatsu, H., & Rappleye, J. (2017a). A new global policy regime founded on invalid statistics? Hanushek, Woessmann, PISA, and economic growth. Comparative Education, 53(2), 166–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1300008
  • Komatsu, H., & Rappleye, J. (2017b). A PISA paradox? An alternative theory of learning as a possible solution for variations in PISA scores. Comparative Education Review, 61(2), 269–297. https://doi.org/10.1086/690809
  • Komatsu, H., & Rappleye, J. (2021). Rearticulating PISA. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1878014
  • Korendijk, E. J., Maas, C. J., Moerbeek, M., & Van der Heijden, P. G. (2008). The influence of misspecification of the heteroscedasticity on multilevel regression parameter and standard error estimates. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 4(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.67
  • Kuhn, T. S. (19622012). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
  • Kwon, S. K., Lee, M., & Shin, D. (2017). Educational assessment in the Republic of Korea: Lights and shadows of high-stake exam-based education system. Assessment in Education, 24(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1074540
  • Lai, K. (2006). Li in the ‚Analects‘: Training in moral competence and the question of flexibility. Philosophy East and West, 56(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2006.0001
  • Leighanne, Y. U. H. (2019). Loyalty to the king and love for country: Confucian traditions, Western-style learning, and the evolution of early modern Korean education, 1895–1910. Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies, 19(2), 189–212. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/739804
  • Li, E. (2017). The “Chinese Learner”: A historical and cultural biography. SFU Educational Review, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.21810/sfuer.v10i1.312
  • Lim, W. K. (2010). Asian test-score culture thwarts creativity. Science, 327(5973), 1576–1577. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.327.5973.1576-b
  • Ma, X., Jong, C., & Yuan, J. (2013). Exploring reasons for the East Asian success in PISA. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power, and policy. The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 225–245). Symposium Books.
  • Morrison, K. (2006). Paradox lost: Toward a robust test of the Chinese Learner. Education Journal, 34(1), 1–30. https://www.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/ceric/ej/200600340001/0001.htm
  • Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. McKinsey & Company.
  • Muench, R., & Wieczorek, O. (2022). In search of quality and equity: the United Kingdom and Germany in the struggle for PISA scores. International Journal of Educational Reseach Open, 3, 100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100165
  • Münch, R. (1984). Die Struktur der Moderne. Suhrkamp. 3-518-57687-9.
  • Münch, R. (1986). Die Kultur der Moderne (Vol. 1 and 2). Suhrkamp. 3-518-57821-9.
  • Münch, R. (2001). The Ethics of Modernity. Rowman & Littlefield. 0-8476-9921-8.
  • Münch, R. (2020). Governing the School under three Decades of Neoliberal Reform: From Educracy to the Educational-Industrial Complex. Routledge. 978-0-367-36535-6.
  • Needham, J. (19692005). The grand titration: Science and society in East and West. Routledge.
  • Niu, W. (2012). Confucian ideology and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(4), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.18
  • O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
  • OECD. (2008). Student questionaire for PISA 2009.
  • OECD. (2010a). PISA 2009 results (Vol. III).
  • OECD. (2010b). PISA 2009 results (Vol. IV).
  • OECD. (2012). PISA 2009 technical Report.
  • OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results (Vol. V).
  • OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Vol. II.).
  • OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 technical report.
  • OECD. (2020). PISA 2000-2018 database.
  • Ortmann, S., & Thompson, M. R. (2016). China and the” Singapore model”. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0004
  • Rutkowski, D., & Rutkowski, L. (2013). Measuring socioeconomic background in PISA: One size might not fit all. Research in Comparative and International Education, 8(3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2013.8.3.259
  • Schleicher, A. (2014). What Asian schools can teach the rest of the world. CNN, February 3, 2014. https://edition.cnn.com/2013/12/03/opinion/education-rankings-commentary-schleicher/index.html. Accessed 9 July 2022
  • Schleicher, A. (2018). World class. How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (19432013). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge.
  • Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 49(4), 464–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2013.770943
  • Seo, H.-A., Lee, E. A., & Kim, K. H. (2005). Korean science teachers’ understanding of creativity in gifted education. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2–3), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-476
  • Sim, J. B. Y., & Chow, L. T. (2019). Confucian thinking in Singapore’s citizenship education. Journal of Moral Education, 48(4), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2018.1556155
  • Singapore Department of Statistics. (2010). Household income in 2009 lower than in 2008, but still higher than in earlier years. https://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/data/pdfdoc/20100226005/2009_hhinc_op_-_press_release.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2022
  • Sjøberg, S. (2018). The power and paradoxes of PISA: Should inquiry-based science education be sacrificed to climb on the rankings? Nordic Studies in Science Education, 14(2), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.6185
  • Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1994). Modeled variance in two-level models. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(3), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124194022003004
  • Staats, L. K. (2011). The cultivation of creativity in the Chinese culture—past, present, and future. Journal of Strategic Leadership, 3(1), 45–53. https://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/jsl/vol3iss1/Staats_V3I1_pp45-53.pdf
  • Suen, H. K., & Yu, L. (2006). Chronic consequences of high stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam. Comparative Education Review, 50(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1086/498328
  • Tan, C. (2012a). Learning from Shanghai: Lessons on achieving educational success. Springer.
  • Tan, C. (2012b). “Our shared values” in Singapore: A Confucian perspective. Educational Theory, 62(4), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2012.00456.x
  • Tan, C. (2016). Confucius and creativity. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 1(1), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.18536/jge.2016.01.1.1.09
  • Tan, C. (2017). A Confucian conception of critical thinking. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(1), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12228
  • Teng, S. S., Manzon, M., & Poon, K. K. (2019). Equity and excellence in East Asian high-performing education systems: A paradoxical relationship? In S. S. Teng, M. Manzon, & K. K. Poon (Eds.), Equity in excellence: Experiences of East Asian high-performing education systems (pp. 1–9). Springer.
  • Tienken, C. H. (2008). Rankings of international achievement test performance and economic strength: Correlation or conjecture? International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 3(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2008v3n4a110
  • Tienken, C. (2017). Defying Standardization: Creating Curriculum for an Uncertain Future. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Tsai, K. C. (2013). Is it fair to blame Confucianism as a detrimental factor of creativity? International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2(9), 23–28. https://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v2(9)/Version-2/D0292023028.pdf
  • Tucker, M. S. (Ed.). (2011). Surpassing Shanghai: An agenda for american education built on the world’s leading systems. Harvard Education Press.
  • Tweed, R. G., & Lehmann, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.89
  • Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.). (1996). The Chinese Learner. Cultural psychological and contextual influences. Comparative Education Research Centre.
  • Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.). (2001). Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives. Hong Kong University Press.
  • Weber, M. (1951). The Religion of China. Confucianism and Taoism. Free Press.
  • Weber, M. (2002). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Roxbury.
  • World Bank. (2022). Gini Index. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI?end=2020&most_recent_year_desc=false&start=2001. Accessed 3 July 2022
  • You, Y. (2019). The ‘new Orientalism’: Education policy borrowing and representations of East Asia. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(5), 742–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2018.1559038
  • Zha, Q. (2011). China’s move to mass higher education in a comparative perspective. Compare, 41(6), 751–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2011.590316
  • Zhao, Y. (2014). Who’s Afraid of the big bad dragon: Why China has the best (and worst) education system in the world. John Wiley & Sons.