1,423
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION

Psychometric properties of Grit-S scale in university students: An application of the graded response model

ORCID Icon
Article: 2162699 | Received 01 Jul 2021, Accepted 20 Dec 2022, Published online: 26 Dec 2022

References

  • Akin, A., Abaci, R., Arici, N., Uysal, R., & Uysal, C. (2011). Revised grit scale: The validity and reliability study. Paper presented at the National Symposium, September 8-10, Burdur, Turkey.
  • Alhadabi, A., Aldhafri, S., Alkharusi, H., Al-Harthy, I., AlBarashdi, H., & Alrajhi, M. (2019). Psychometric assessment and cross-cultural adaptation of the Grit-S scale among Omani and American universities’ students. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1175–21. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.1175
  • Alhadabi, A., & Karpinski, A. (2020). Grit, self-efficacy, achievement orientation goals, and academic performance in university students. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1679202
  • Arouty, D. (2015). Does character matter? The role of grit and resilience in predicting academic success ( Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3734780).
  • Baker, F. (2001). The basics of item response theory (2nd) ed.). Eric Clearing House on Assessment and Evaluation.
  • Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd) ed.). Routledge.
  • Cai, L., Thissen, D., & du Toit, S. (2011). IRTPRO user’s guide. Scientific Software International.
  • Cai, L., Thissen, D., & du Toit, S. (2017). IRTPRO 4.2 for Windows [Computer software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Canivez, G. L. (2016). Bifactor modeling in construct validation of multifactored tests: Implications for understanding multidimensional constructs and test interpretation. In K. Schweizer & C. DiStefano (Eds.), Principles and methods of test construction: Standards and recent advancements. (pp. 247–271) Hogrefe Publishers.
  • Chen, W., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Journal Of Educational And Behavioral Statistics, 22(3), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986022003265
  • Chiesi, F., Lau, C., Marunic, G., Sanchez-Ruiz, M., Plouffe, R., Topa, G., Yan, G., & Saklofske, D. (2020). Emotional intelligence in young women from five cultures: A TEIQue-SF invariance study using the omnicultural composite approach inside the IRT framework. Personality and Individual Differences, 164(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110128
  • Credé, M., Tynan, M. C., & Harms, P. D. (2017). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 492–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000102
  • Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to classical & modern test theory (2nd) ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Datu, J., Valdez, J., & King, R. (2016). Perseverance counts but consistency does not! Validating the short grit scale in a collectivist setting. Current Psychology, 35(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9374-2
  • De Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. The Guilford Press.
  • Duckworth, A., Peterson, C., Matthews, M., & Kelly, D. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
  • Duckworth, A., & Quinn, P. (2009). Development and validation of the short grit scale (Grit-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290
  • Dweck, C. (2008). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
  • Eskreis-Winkler, L., Shulman, E., Beal, S., & Duckworth, A. (2014). The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage. Frontiers in Personality Science and Individual Differences, 5(36), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00036
  • Fillmore, E. (2015). Grit and beliefs about intelligence: The relationship and role these factors play in the self-regulatory process involved in medical students learning across anatomy ( Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3703778).
  • Fleckenstein, J., Schmidt, F., & Moller, J. (2014). Who’s got grit? Perseverance and consistency of interest in preservice teacher: A German adaptation of the 12-item grit scale. Psychologie in Erziehung Und Unterricht, 61(4), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.2378/peu2014.art22d
  • Gay, L., Mills, G., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (10th) ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Gonzalez, O., Canning, J., Smyth, H., & MacKinnon, D. (2020). A psychometric evaluation of the short grit scale: A closer look at its factor structure and scale functioning. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(4), 646–657. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000535
  • Guerrero, L., Chung, P., Dosanjh, K., Wong, M., & Wong, M. D. (2016). Grit: A potential protective factor against substance use and other risk behaviors among Latino adolescents and self-control as predictors of first-year student success. Academic Pediatrics, 16(3), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2015.12.016
  • Han, X. (May, 2013). Item response models used within WinGen. https://www.umass.edu/remp/software/simcata/wingen/modelsF.html
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage.
  • Howard, J., Nicholson, B., & Chesnut, S. (2019). Relationships between positive parenting, overparenting, grit, and academic success. Journal of College Student Development, 60(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2019.0018
  • Immekus, J., Snyder, K., & Ralston, P. (2019). Multidimensional item response theory for factor structure assessment in educational psychology research. Frontiers in Education, 4(45), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00045
  • Jabrayilov, R., Emons, W., & Sijtsma, K. (2016). Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory in individual change assessment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40(8), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621616664046
  • Kwon, H. (2021). Are gritty people happier than others?: Evidence from the United States and South Korea. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(7), 2937–2959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00343-4
  • Lan, X. (2020). Grit and peer relationships in early adolescence: A person-centered approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(7), 2250–2269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520921557
  • Li, J., Fang, M., Wang, W., Sun, G., & Cheng, Z. (2018). The influence of grit on life satisfaction: Self-esteem as a mediator. Psychologica Belgica, 58(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.400
  • Linacre, J. (2002). Understanding Rasch measurement: Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85–106.
  • Midkiff, B., Demetriou, C., Panter, A., & Langer, M. (2016). Measuring grit among first-generation college students: A psychometric analysis. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, 196, 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56294-0_35
  • Morell, M., Yang, J., Gladstone, J., Faust, L., Ponnock, A., Lim, H., & Wigfield, A. (2020). Grit: The long and short of it. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000594
  • Muenks, K., Wigfield, A., Yang, J., & O’Neal, C. (2017). How true is grit? Assessing its relations to high school and college students’ personality characteristics, self-regulation, engagement, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000153
  • Nishikawa, K., Okugami, S., & Amemiya, T. (2015). Development of the Japanese short grit scale (Grit-S). The Japanese Journal of Personality Assessment, 24(2), 167–169. https://doi.org/10.2132/personality.24.167
  • Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further investigation of the performance of S - X2: An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27(4), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621603027004004
  • Paek, I., & Cai, L. (2014). A Comparison of item parameter standard error estimation procedures for unidimensional and multidimensional item response theory modeling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413500277
  • Ponnock, A., Muenks, K., Morell, M., Seung Yang, J., Gladstone, J. R., & Wigfield, A. (2020). Grit and conscientiousness: Another jangle fallacy. Journal of Research in Personality, 89, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104021
  • Reckase, M. (2009). Multidimensional Item Response Theory. Springer.
  • Reise, S. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
  • Reise, S., & Revicki, D. (2015). Handbook of item response theory modeling: Applications to typical performance assessment. Routledge.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self‐determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
  • Samejima, F. (2010). The general graded response model. In M. L. Nering & R. Ostini (Eds.), Handbook of polytomous item response theory models (pp. 77–107). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Stichter, M. (2020). Learning from failure: Shame and emotion regulation in virtue as skill. Ethical Theory & Moral Practice, 23(2), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10079-y
  • Ting-Toomey, S., & Chung, L. (2012). Understanding intercultural communication. Oxford University Press.
  • Toland, M. (2014). Practical guide to conducting an Item Response Theory analysis. Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(1), 120–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613511332
  • Toland, M., Sulis, I., Giambona, F., Porcu, M., & Campbell, J. (2017). Introduction to bifactor polytomous item response theory analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 60, 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.001
  • Ullén, F., Harmat, L., Theorell, T., & Madison, G. (2016). Flow and individual differences—A phenotypic analysis of data from more than 10,000 twin individuals. In L. Harmat, F. Ø. Andersen, F. Ullén, J. Wright, & G. Sadlo (Eds.), Flow experience: Empirical research and applications (pp. 267–288). Springer International Publishing AG.
  • Werner, K., & Milyavskaya, M. (2018). Motivation and self‐regulation: The role of want‐to motivation in the processes underlying self‐regulation and self‐control. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yq2j7
  • Whipple, S., & Dimitrova, G. (2020). Grit, fit, gender, and academic achievement among first‐year college students. Psychology in the Schools, 58(2), 332–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22449
  • Woods, C. (2009). Empirical selection of anchors for tests of differential item functioning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621607314044
  • Zanon, C., Hutz, C., Yoo, H., & Hambleton, R. (2016). An application of item response theory to psychological test development. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 29(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0040-x
  • Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Wang, W. (2021). The moderating role of grit in the relationship between perfectionism and depression among Chinese college students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 729089. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.729089