2,072
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Education Policy

Key Factors to Foster Academic Performance in Online Learning Environment: Evidence From Indonesia During COVID-19 Pandemic

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2174726 | Received 23 Jul 2022, Accepted 25 Jan 2023, Published online: 16 Feb 2023

References

  • Abuhassna, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Kosnin, A. B. M., & Darwish, M. (2020). Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z
  • Afrianti, N., & Aditia, R. (2020). Online Learning Readiness in Facing the Covid-19 Pandemic at MTS Manunggal Sagara Ilmi, Deli Serdang, Indonesia. Journal of International Conference Proceedings (JICP), 3(2), 59–66.
  • Ahmed, S. T., & Roche, T. (2021). Making the connection: Examining the relationship between undergraduate students’ digital literacy and academic success in an English medium instruction (EMI) university. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4601–4620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10443-0
  • Al-htaybat, K., Von, A.-A. L., & Alhatabat, Z. (2018). Educating digital natives for the future: Accounting educators ’ evaluation of the accounting curriculum. Accounting Education, 1(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1437758
  • Andreev, P., Heart, T., Maoz, H., & Pliskin, N. (2009). Validating Formative Partial Least Squares (PLS) Models: Methodological Review and Empirical Illustration. ICIS 2009 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2009/193
  • Bail, F. T., Zhang, S., & Tachiyama, G. T. (2008). Effects of a self-regulated learning course on the academic performance and graduation rate of college students in an academic support program. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 39(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2008.10850312
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005
  • Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007083
  • Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and Concepts of Digital Literacy. Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices, Peter Lang.
  • Becker, J. M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical Latent Variable Models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for Using Reflective-Formative Type Models. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 359–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001
  • Blanz, M. (2014). How do study satisfaction and academic performance interrelate? An investigation with students of Social Work programs. European Journal of Social Work, 17(2), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2013.784190
  • Bossman, A., & Agyei, S. K. (2022). Technology and instructor dimensions, e-learning satisfaction, and academic performance of distance students in Ghana. Heliyon, 8(4), e09200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09200
  • Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy-What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(Jubileumsnummer), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.18261/1891-943X-2015-Jubileumsnummer-03
  • Burton, L. J., Summers, J., Lawrence, J., & Noble, K. (2015). Digital Literacy in Higher Education: The Rhetoric and the Reality. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137476982_9
  • Casey, L., & Bruce, B. C. (2011). The practice profile of inquiry: Connecting digital literacy and pedagogy. E-Learning and Digital Media, 8(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2011.8.1.76
  • Chang, S.-H.-H., & Smith, R. A. (2008). Effectiveness of personal interaction in a learner-centered paradigm distance education class based on student satisfaction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2008.10782514
  • Chin, W. W. (1998a). MIS quarterly (pp. vii–xvi). https://www.jstor.org/stable/249674
  • Chin, W. W. (1998b). Modern Methods for Business Research, 295. Psychology Press.
  • Chisholm, J. F. (2006). Cyberspace violence against girls and adolescent females. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1385.022
  • Ciavolino, E., & Nitti, M. (2013). Using the hybrid two-step estimation approach for the identification of second-order latent variable models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 40(3), 508–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2012.745837
  • Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press.
  • Crawford, J., Henderson, K. B., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P. A., & Lam, S. (2020). Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching COVID-19: 20 countries ’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational reserach: Planning, conducting and evaluating (4th ed.). Pearson.
  • Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003
  • Dong, C., Cao, S., & Li, H. (2020). Young children’s online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105440
  • Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
  • Elvers, G. C., Polzella, D. J., & Graetz, K. (2003). Procrastination in Online Courses: Performance and Attitudinal Differences. Teaching of Psychology, 30(2), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP3002_13
  • Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 93–106. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/4793/
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  • Fernández-Villavicencio, N. G. (2012). Alfabetización para una cultura social, digital, mediática y en red. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 35, 17–45. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.mono.976
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Sage Publications Sage CA.
  • Frey, A., Faul, A., & Yankelov, P. (2003). Student perceptions of web-assisted teaching strategies. Journal of Social Work Education, 39(3), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2003.10779148
  • Geisser, S. (1975). The predictive sample reuse method with applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(350), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1975.10479865
  • Gilster, P. (1997). Digital Literacy. Wiley & Sons.
  • Gonzalez-Nucamendi, A., Noguez, J., Neri, L., Robledo-Rella, V., Garc, R. M. G., & Escobar-Castillejos, D. (2021). The prediction of academic performance using engineering student’s profiles. Computers \& Electrical Engineering, 93, 107288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107288
  • Götz, O., Liehr-gobbers, K., & Krafft, M. (2010). Evaluation of structural equation models using the partial least squares (PLS) approach. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 691–711). Springer.
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
  • Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers \& Education, 80, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019
  • Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Using partial least squares path modeling in advertising research: Basic concepts and recent issues. In S. Okazaki (Ed.), Handbook of research on international advertising. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781001042
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New challenges to international marketing, 20, 277–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
  • Hockly, N. (2012). Digital literacies. ELT Journal, 66(1), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr077
  • Hong, J. C., Lee, Y. F., & Ye, J. H. (2021). Procrastination predicts online self-regulated learning and online learning ineffectiveness during the coronavirus lockdown. Personality and Individual Differences, 174(December), 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110673
  • Horton, M., & Freire, P. (1990). We make the road by walking: Conversations on education and social change. Temple University Press.
  • Ikeda, M., & Echazarra, A. (2021). How socio-economics plays into students learning on their own: Clues to COVID-19 learning losses. Pisa in Focus, 114, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1787/2417eaa1-en
  • Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1086/376806
  • Ko, W.-H., & Chung, F.-M. (2014). Teaching Quality, Learning Satisfaction, and Academic Performance among Hospitality Students in Taiwan. World Journal of Education, 4(5), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v4n5p11
  • Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
  • Lajoie, S. P., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Lan, W. Y. (1996). The effects of self-monitoring on students’ course performance, use of learning strategies, attitude, self-judgment ability, and knowledge representation. Journal of Experimental Education, 64(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1996.9943798
  • Lee, T.-H., Shen, P.-D., & Tsai, C.-W. (2008). Applying web-enabled problem-based learning and self-regulated learning to add value to computing education in Taiwan’s vocational schools. Journal of Educational Technology \& Society, 11(3), 13–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.11.3.13
  • Leung, L., & Lee, P. S. N. (2012). Impact of Internet Literacy, Internet Addiction Symptoms, and Internet Activities on Academic Performance. Social Science Computer Review, 30(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439311435217
  • Levy, Y., & Ramim, M. (2012). [Chais] A Study of Online Exams Procrastination Using Data Analytics Techniques. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 8(1), 97–113. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/180892/
  • Li, K. (2019). MOOC learners’ demographics, self-regulated learning strategy, perceived learning and satisfaction: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers \& Education, 132, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.003
  • Lohmöller, J.-B. (2013). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Physica Heidelberg.
  • Lucieer, S. M., Jonker, L., Visscher, C., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Themmen, A. P. N. (2016). Self-regulated learning and academic performance in medical education. Medical Teacher, 38(6), 585–593. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1073240
  • Marks, R. B., Sibley, S. D., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562904271199
  • Martin, A. (2005). DigEuLit–a European framework for digital literacy: A progress report. Journal of ELiteracy, 2(2), 130–136. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=7e9ba99227c94e610b9ff2a6ee08c187c179dc25
  • Michinov, N., Brunot, S., Le Bohec, O., Juhel, J., & Delaval, M. (2011). Procrastination, participation, and performance in online learning environments. Computers \& Education, 56(1), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.025
  • Miranda, P., Isaias, P., & Pifano, S. (2018). Digital Literacy in Higher Education: A Survey on Students’ Self-assessment. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10925(LNCS), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91152-6_6
  • Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers and Education, 82, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025
  • Nayak, J. K. (2018). Relationship among smartphone usage, addiction, academic performance and the moderating role of gender: A study of higher education students in India. Computers and Education, 123(May), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.007
  • Nye, C. D., Prasad, J., & Rounds, J. (2021). The effects of vocational interests on motivation, satisfaction, and academic performance: Test of a mediated model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 127, 103583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103583
  • OECD. (2018). Equity in Education. Pisa. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264073234-en
  • Orange, C. (1999). Using peer modeling to teach self-regulation. Journal of Experimental Education, 68(1), 21–39. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/00220979909598492
  • Perry, V., Albeg, L., & Tung, C. (2012). Meta-analysis of single-case design research on self-regulatory interventions for academic performance. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21(3), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-012-9156-y
  • Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007). MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 623–656. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148814
  • Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.01.001
  • Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640802039024
  • Rashidi, N., & Moghadam, M. (2014). The Effect of Teachers’ Beliefs and Sense of Self-Efficacy on Iranian EFL Learners’ Satisfaction and Academic Achievement. Tesl-Ej, 18(2), 1–23. http://www.tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej70/a3.pdf
  • Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2020). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1617–1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655
  • Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 36(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410402
  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. .
  • Rodríguez-de-Dios, I., & Igartua, -J.-J. (2016). Skills of Digital Literacy to Address the Risks of Interactive Communication. Journal of Information Technology Research, 9(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.4018/JITR.2016010104
  • Rodriguez-de-Dios, I., Igartua, -J.-J., & González-Vázquez, A. (2016). Development and validation of a digital literacy scale for teenagers. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 1067–1072.
  • Samruayruen, B., Enriquez, J., Natakuatoong, O., & Samruayruen, K. (2013). Self-regulated learning: A key of a successful learner in online learning environments in Thailand. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.48.1.c
  • Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, M. Zeidner, P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–649). Elsevier.
  • Siddiq, F., Gochyyev, P., & Wilson, M. (2017). Learning in Digital Networks – ICT literacy: A novel assessment of students’ 21st century skills. Computers and Education, 109, 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.014
  • Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111–133. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2984809
  • Topală, I. (2014). Attitudes towards Academic Learning and Learning Satisfaction in Adult Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.583
  • Topala, I., & Tomozii, S. (2014). Learning satisfaction: Validity and reliability testing for students ’ learning satisfaction questionnaire (SLSQ). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.175
  • Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Junior high school students’ Internet usage and self-efficacy: A re-examination of the gender gap. Computers and Education, 54(4), 1182–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.004
  • Unsworth, L. (2005). E-literature for children: Enhancing digital literacy learning. Routledge.
  • Upadhyaya, P. (2021). Impact of technostress on academic productivity of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1647–1664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10319-9
  • Vinzi, V. E., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. 2010. Handbook of partial least squares. Vol. 201(1):Springer.
  • Vrana, R. (2014). Digital literacy as a prerequisite for achieving good academic performance. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 492, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14136-7_17
  • Wang, C. H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
  • Watermeyer, R., Crick, T., & Knight, C. (2022). Digital disruption in the time of COVID-19: Learning technologists’ accounts of institutional barriers to online learning, teaching and assessment in UK universities. International Journal for Academic Development, 27(2), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1990064
  • Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Oppen, C. V. (2009). Assessing Using PLS Path Modeling Hierarchical and Empirical Construct Models: Guidelines. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
  • Wold, H. (1982). Systems under Indirect Observation. North-Holland.
  • Xiao, J., & Wilkins, S. (2015). The effects of lecturer commitment on student perceptions of teaching quality and student satisfaction in Chinese higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2014.992092
  • Zhu, Y., Au, W., & Yates, G. (2016). University students’ self-control and self-regulated learning in a blended course. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.04.001
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Elsevier.