Comparative study of using 5E learning cycle and the traditional teaching method in chemistry to improve student understanding of water concept: The case of primary school

References

• Adunola, O. M. O. T. E. R. E. (2011). The impact of teachers’ teaching methods on the academic performance of primary school pupils in Ijebu-ode local. Cut Area of Ogun State.
   Google Scholar
• Akkus¸, H. S., Kadayifc, I. H., Atasoy, B., & Geban, O. M. (2003). Effectiveness of instruction based on the constructivist approach on understanding chemical equilibrium concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21(2), 209–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514032000127248
   Google Scholar
• Almala, A. H. (2005). A constructivist conceptual framework for a quality e-learning environment. Distance Learning, 2(5), 9.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, L. (2007). Comparison of teacher educators’ instructional methods with the constructivist ideal. The Teacher Educator, 42(3), 157–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730709555401
   Google Scholar
• Balcı, S. (2005). 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin fotosentez ve bitkilerde solunum kavramlarını öğreniminin 5E öğrenme modeli ve kavramsal değişim metinleri kullanılarak geliştirilmesi. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University (ODTÜ), Ankara, .
   Google Scholar
• Barufaldi, J. (2002). The 5e model of instruction. Eisenhower Science Collaborative.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, K. H., & Maunsaiyat, S. (2004). A comparison of students’ achievement and attitudes between constructivist and traditional classroom environments in Thailand vocational electronics programs. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 29(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.5328/JVER29.2.133
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin, I., Coşkun, H., & Aktaş, I. (2013). The effect of 5E learning cycle on mental ability of elementary students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(5), 592. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/13.12.592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Ascd.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Heinemann. 88 Post Road West, PO Box 5007,Westport, CT 06881.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. (2006August). Enhancing science teaching and student learning: A BSCS perspective. In Proceeding of Research Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, Co: BSCS, 5, 88–98.
   Google Scholar
• Caprio, M. W. (1994). Easing into constructivism. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(4), 210–212.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, M. A. (2001). Inquiry approach: The 5 E learning cycle. Retrieved january, 26, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1991). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. Educational Technology, 31(5), 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ergin, I., Kanli, U., & Ünsal, Y. (2008). An example for the effect of 5e model on the academic success and attitude levels of students’: “inclined projectile motion”. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5(3), 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. (2004). Learning with inquiring minds. The Science Teacher, 71(1), 27.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, C. E., Jr., & Ravitch, D. (1997). Education reform 1995-1996. A report from the educational excellence network to its education policy committee and the American people.
   Google Scholar
• Gatlin, L. S. (1998). The effect of pedagogy informed by constructivism: A comparison of student achievement across constructivist and traditional classroom environments. University of New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Guloba, M., Wokadala, J., & Bategeka, L. (2010). Does teaching methods and availability of teaching resources influence pupils’. performance: evidence from four districts in Uganda (No. 677-2016-46673)?.
   Google Scholar
• Kılavuz, Y. (2007). The effects of 5E learning cycle model based on constructivist theory on tenth grade students’ understanding of acid-base concepts (Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, T. C., Peng, H., Wu, W. H., & Lin, M. S. (2009). The effects of mobile natural-science learning based on the 5E learning cycle: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 344–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makanong, A. (2000). The effects of constructivist approaches on ninth grade algebra achievement in Thailand secondary school students. University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, O. O., & Oyebanji, R. K. (2000). The effects of inquiry and lecture teaching approaches on the cognitive achievement of integrated science students. Journal of Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria, 35(1&2), 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• O’brien, T. (2010). Brain-powered science: Teaching and learning with discrepant events. NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saigo, B. W. (1999). A study to compare traditional and constructivism-based instruction of a high school biology unit on biosystematics. The University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Tebabal, A., & Kahssay, G. (2011). The effects of student-centered approach in improving students’ graphical interpretation skills and conceptual understanding of kinematical motion. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 5(2), 9.
   Google Scholar