Developing and integrating digital resources in online mathematics instruction and assessment during Covid-19

References

• Roasoft. (2004). Sample size calculator. Online accessed from http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html.
   Google Scholar
• Adedokun-Shittu, N. A., & Shittu, A. J. K. (2015). Assessing the impacts of ICT deployment in teaching and learning in higher education: Using ICT impact assessment model. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 7(2), 180–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2013-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adesemowo, A. K., Oyedele, Y., & Oyedele, O. (2017). Text-based sustainable assessment: A case of first-year information and communication technology networking students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agbatogun, A. (2010). Self-concept, computer anxiety, gender and attitude towards interactive computer technologies: A predictive study among Nigerian teachers. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 6(2), 55–68. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1085002.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, R. D. B., Lirani, L. D. S., & de Francisco, A. C. (2020). Construct validity and reliability of the work environment assessment instrument WE-10. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrahim, F. A. (2020). Online teaching skills and competencies. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 9–20. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1239983.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, S., Barnett, D., Mann, S., Mackay, A., Slenger, M., & Whitby, G. (2013). Beyond the classroom: A new digital education for young Australians in the 21^st Century. Digital Education Advisory Group of Australia. https://apo.org.au/node/34413
   Google Scholar
• Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliasgari, M., Riahinia, N., & Mojdehavar, F. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction and student attitudes towards learning mathematics. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 3(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/17537981011022779
   Google Scholar
• AlMahdawi, M., Senghore, S., Ambrin, H., & Belbase, S. (2021). High school students’ performance indicators in distance and online learning in chemistry during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(11), 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amhag, L., Hellstrom, L., & Stigmar, M. (2019). Teacher educators’ use of digital tools and needs for digital competence in higher education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(4), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169
   Google Scholar
• Awofala, A. O., Akinoso, S. O., & Fatade, A. O. (2017). Attitudes towards computer and computer self-efficacy as predictors of preservice mathematics teachers’ computer anxiety. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(3), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.10.3.9
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, A. F., Rovai, A. A., & Goncalves, G. K. (2019). Empowering students to become agents of social transformation through mobile learning in Brazil: A case study by the UNESCO-Fazhen project on best practices in mobile learning. UNESCO. Retrieved April 23, 2022, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366724
   Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Hermna, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach (pp. 1–267). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, V. M. (2021). Learning Management System (LMS) use with online instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 4(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bringula, R., Reguyal, J. J., Tan, D. D., & Ulfa, S. (2021). Mathematics self-concept and challenges of learners in an online learning environment during COVID-19 pandemic. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00168-5
   Google Scholar
• Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. The International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 8(1), 136–155. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1084227.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models (1st ed.). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8885-2_1
   Google Scholar
• Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st-century challenges: The case for the European digital competence framework for educators. European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan, M. N., Long, J. J., van Es, E. A., Reich, S. M., & Rutherford, T. (2018). How teachers integrate a math computer game: Professional development use, teaching practices, and student achievement. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantú-Ballesteros, L., Urías-Murrieta, M., Figueroa-Rodríguez, S., & Salazar-Lugo, G. M. (2017). Teachers’ digital skills in relation to their age, gender, time of usage and training with a tablet. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(5), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i5.2311
   Google Scholar
• Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Flipped classroom as a reform-oriented approach to teaching mathematics. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(7), 1291–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01191-5
   Google Scholar
• Chen, R. (2010). Investigating models for preservice teachers’ use of technology to support student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 55(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 799–843. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M. H., & Heron, M. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: The role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark-Wilson, A. (2017). Transforming mathematics teaching with digital technologies: A community of practice perspective. In A. Marcus-Quinn & T. Hourigan (Eds.), Handbook on digital learning for K-12 schools (pp. 45–58). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Confrey, J. (2016). Designing curriculum for digital middle grades mathematics: Personalized learning ecologies. In M. Bates & Z. Usiskin (Eds.), Digital curricula in school mathematics (pp. 7–33). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. J. (2010). Formal to informal learning with IT: Research challenges and issues for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00483.x
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, P. (2017). Assessment rubrics: Towards clearer and more replicable design, research, and practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeley, S. J. (2018). Using technology to facilitate effective assessment for learning and feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1356906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, A. J., Wardlow, L., McKnight, K., & O’Malley, K. (2015). Educational technology: A review of the integration, resources, and effectiveness of technology in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 14, 397–416. http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol14/JITEv14ResearchP397-416Delgado1829.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drijvers, P. (2015). Digital technology in mathematics education: Why it works (or doesn’t). In S. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12^th international congress on mathematics education (pp. 135–151). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Etcuban, J. O., & Pantinople, L. D. (2018). The effects of mobile application in teaching high school mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3906
   Google Scholar
• Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research & Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. JRC technical report. Publication Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/82116
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, R. D. (2017). Sampling methods for online surveys. In J. Burger (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (2nd ed., pp. 162–183). SAGE publication. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957992.n10
   Google Scholar
• Gebhardt, E., Thomson, S., Ainley, J., & Hillman, K. (2019). Gender differences in computer and information literacy: An in-depth analysis of data from ICILS (Vol. 8). IEA Research for Education Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26203-7
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, I. W. (2001). At the intersection of technology and pedagogy: Considering styles of learning and teaching. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1–2), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390100200102
   Google Scholar
• Gnawali, Y. P., Upadhayaya, P. R., Sharma, B., & Belbase, S. (2022). Access, efficiency, inconvenience, and scarcity as issues of online and distance learning in higher education. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 1115–1131. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.1115
   Google Scholar
• Government of Nepal Ministry of Communication and Information Technology. (2018). 2019 digital Nepal framework: Unlocking Nepal’s growth potential. The Author. Retrieved June 13, 2023, from https://nepalindata.com/media/resources/items/15/bEN_Digital_Nepal_Framework_V7.2March2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greefrath, G., Hertleif, C., & Siller, H.-S. (2018). Mathematical modelling with digital tools—A quantitative study on mathematising with dynamic geometry software. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(1–2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0924-6
   Google Scholar
• Greiffenhagen, C. (2014). The materiality of mathematics: Presenting mathematics on the blackboard. The British Journal of Sociology (BJS), 65(3), 502–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Mayorga-Fernández, M. J., & Contreras-Rosado, J. A. (2021). Incidence of gender in the digital competence of higher education teachers in research work: Analysis with descriptive and comparative methods. Education Sciences, 11(3), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddif, G. (2017, February). Principles of redesigning an e-task based on a paper-and-pencil task: The case of parametric functions. In Proceedings of CERME 10 TWG22: Curricular Resources and Task Design in Mathematics Education (pp. 3690–3698). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01950501/document
   Google Scholar
• Halder, S., & Chaudhuri, S. (2011). Computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety of trainee teachers: Issue of concern. Proceedings of episteme, 4, 1–7. https://tinyurl.com/mrzj5cr8
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T., Long, B. T., Flanagan, E., Flynn, P., & Lenaghan, J. (2017). Design-based research as intelligent experimentation: Towards systematizing the conceptualization, development, and evaluation of digital learning in schools. In A. Marcus-Quinn & T. Hourigan (Eds.), Handbook on digital learning for K-12 schools (pp. 59–74). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, R. (2010). The evolution and redefining of ‘cal’: A reflection on the interplay of theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00340.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, K., Huscroft D’Angelo, J., & Crawford, L. (2019). Effects of technology in mathematics on achievement, motivation, and attitude: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 283–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117748416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, S., Hillman, A., Neustaedter, C., & Pang, C. (2019, May). “I Have a Life” teacher communication & management outside the classroom. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312943
   Google Scholar
• Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153, 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://arrow.tudublin.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=buschmanart
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, D. R., Adhikari, K. P., Khanal, B., Khadka, J., Belbase, S., & Saqr, M. (2022). Behavioral, cognitive, emotional and social engagement in mathematics learning during COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One, 17(11), e0278052. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, D. R., Chitrakar, R., Belbase, S., & Khanal, B. (2021). ICT competency of mathematics teachers at secondary schools of Nepal. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(1), e02107. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/10847
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, D. R., Khanal, B., & Belbase, S. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions toward student support in using information and communication technology for mathematics learning. The International Journal of Technologies in Learning, 29(2), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0144/CGP/v29i02/57-73
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, D. R., Neupane, U., & Joshi, P. R. (2021). Synthesis review of digital frameworks and DEPSWALIC Digital competency framework for teachers from basic to university level. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 13(2), 108–136. https://tinyurl.com/4mwucaxm
   Google Scholar
• Khanal, B., Belbase, S., & Joshi, D. R. (2021). Effect of digital awareness on mathematics achievements at school to university levels in Nepal. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 12(4), 47–68. https://tinyurl.com/2pv5kywk
   Google Scholar
• Lam, L. W. (2012). Impact of competitiveness on salespeople’s commitment and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1328–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudari, S., Pradhan, S., & Lama, S. (2021). Remote teaching in Nepalese higher education during COVID-19: Teachers ’ perspectives. Higher Learning Research Communication, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v11i2.1269
   Google Scholar
• Ma, W., Adesope, O. O., Nesbit, J. C., & Liu, Q. (2014). Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 901–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meccawy, Z., Meccawy, M., & Alsobhi, A. (2021). Assessment in ‘survival mode’: Student and faculty perceptions of online assessment practices in HE during Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00083-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education Singapore. (2021). Educational technology plan: Gain insights on the strategic focus of our Educational Technology (EdTech) plan. Ministry of Education. Retrieved April 23, 2022, from https://www.moe.gov.sg/education-in-sg/educational-technology-journey/edtech-plan
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, D., Palacios, A., Barreras, Á., & Pascual, V. (2020). An assessment of the impact of teachers’ digital competence on the quality of videos developed for the flipped math classroom. Mathematics, 8(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8020148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nattland, A., & Kerres, M. (2009). Computerbasierte methoden im unterricht [Computer-based methods in class]. In K.-H. Arnold, U. Sandfuch, & J. Wiechmann (Eds.), Handbuch unterricht (2nd ed., pp. 317–324). Julius Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Educational Technology. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 national education technology plan update. US Department of Education. Retrieved April 23, 2022, from https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Omar, H. A., Ali, E. M., & Belbase, S. (2021). Graduate students’ experience and academic achievements with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(23), 13055. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panero, M., & Aldon, G. (2016). How teachers evolve their formative assessment practices when digital tools are involved in the classroom. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-016-0012-x
   Google Scholar
• Panworld Education. (2017). Benefits of digital learning over traditional education methods. Retrieved April 23, 2022, from https://tinyurl.com/4actsjw2
   Google Scholar
• Passey, D. (2011). Learning mathematics using digital resources: Impacts on learning and teaching for 11- to 14-year-old pupils. In A. Oldknow & C. Knights (Eds.), Mathematics education with digital technology (pp. 46–60). Continuum International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Passey, D. (2014). Inclusive technology-enhanced learning: Overcoming cognitive, physical, emotional and geographic challenges. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pepin, B., Choppin, J., Ruthven, K., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Digital curriculum resources in mathematics education: Foundations for change. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(5), 645–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0879-z
   Google Scholar
• Pingping, L., Chao, W., & Bailin, L. (2017). Research on resource sharing mechanism of MOOC based on big data. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research (ICSEHR 2017), 152, 202–205. https://doi.org/10.2991/icsehr-17.2017.32
   Google Scholar
• Raaheim, A., Mathiassen, K., Moen, V., Lona, I., Gynnild, V., Bunaes, B. R., & Hasle, E. T. (2018). Digital assessment – how does it challenge local practices and national law? A Norwegian case study. European Journal of Higher Education, 9(2), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1541420
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. N., Humphrey, S. M., & Steele, J. P. (2019). Using technology tools for formative assessments. Journal of Educators Online, 16(2), 1–8. https://www.thejeo.com/archive/archive/2019_162/robertson_humphrey_steele
   Google Scholar
• Sailer, M., Murböck, J., & Fischer, F. (2021). Digital learning in schools: What does it take beyond digital technology? Teaching and Teacher Education, 103, 103346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Cruzado, C., Campion, R. S., & Sanchez-Compana, M. T. (2021). Teacher digital literacy: The indisputable challenge after COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(4), 1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, B., & Chakraborty, S. (2021). Structural equation modeling-based performance estimation and parametric analysis of wire electrical discharge machining processes. Sadhana - Academy Proceedings in Engineering Sciences, 46(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01546-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonlau, M., Fricker, R. D., & Elliott, M. N. (2002). Conducting research surveys via email and the web. RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Semerci, A., & Aydin, M. K. (2018). Examining high school teachers’ attitudes towards ICT use in education. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.139.7
   Google Scholar
• Sepulveda-Escobar, P., & Morrison, A. (2020). Online teaching placement during the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1820981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharadgah, T. A., & Sadi, R. A. (2020). Preparedness of institutions of higher education for assessment in virtual learning environments during the COVID-19 lockdown: Evidence of bona fide challenges and pragmatic solutions. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 19, 756–771. https://doi.org/10.28945/4615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Cooper, H. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on K–12 students’ mathematical learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 970–987. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St-Onge, C., Ouellet, K., Lakhal, S., Dubé, T., & Marceau, M. (2022). COVID-19 as the tipping point for integrating e-assessment in higher education practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2016). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: Opportunities, challenges, and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 454–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinsley, D., & Johnson, D. C. (Eds.). (1998). Information and communication technologies in school mathematics. Chapman & Hall. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35287-9
   Google Scholar
• United Arab Emirates Government. (2015). Science, technology & innovation policy in the United Arab Emirates. Retrieved April 23, 2022, from https://u.ae/en/information-and-services/education/education-documents
   Google Scholar
• Upadhayaya, P. R., Sharma, B., Gnawali, Y. P., & Belbase, S. (2021). Factors influencing graduate students’ perceptions of online and distance learning in Nepal. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 236–269. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.961844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victoria Government, Australia. (2021). Digital learning in schools. Retrieved April 23, 2022, from https://www2.education.vic.gov.au/pal/digital-learning/resources
   Google Scholar
• Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, R., & Watson, S. (2007). An argument for clarity: What are learning management systems, what are they not, & what should they become? TechTrends, 51(2), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-007-0023-y
   Google Scholar
• Yerushalmy, M., Nagari-Haddif, G., & Olsher, S. (2017). Design of tasks for online assessment that supports understanding of students’ conceptions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(5), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0871-7
   Google Scholar