Potentials and limitations of GeoGebra in teaching and learning limits and continuity of functions at selected senior four Rwandan secondary schools

References

• Adams, C., & Dove, A. (2018). Calculus Students Flipped Out: The Impact of Flipped Learning on Calculus Students'. Achievement and Perceptions of Learning, PRIMUS, 28(6), 600–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2017.1332701
   Google Scholar
• Arini, F. Y., & Dewi, N. R. (2019). GeoGebraAs a tool to enhance student ability in calculus. KnE Social Sciences, 205–212-205–212. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i18.4714
   Google Scholar
• Baleanu, D., Lopes, A. M., & Machado, J. A. T. (2019). Applications in engineering, life and social sciences, part A. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110571905
   Google Scholar
• Bwalya, A., & Rutegwa, M. (2023). Technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacy of pre-service science and mathematics teachers: A comparative study between two Zambian universities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), em2222. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12845
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, D. (2019). The history of the emergence of technology in education. Classcraft. Retrived December 3, 2022, from https://www.classcraft.com/blog/features/the-history-of-the-emergence-of-technology-in-education
   Google Scholar
• Ciesielski, K., & Seoane-Sepúlveda, J. (2019). Differentiability versus continuity: Restriction and extension theorems and monstrous examples. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 56(2), 211–260. https://doi.org/10.1090/bull/1635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dana-Picard, T. N., & Kovács, Z. (2021). Networking of technologies: A dialog between CAS and DGS. Electronic Journal of Mathematics & Technology, 15(1), 43–59.
   Google Scholar
• Dündar, H., & Akçayır, M. (2012). Tablet vs. paper: The effect on learners' reading performance. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(3), 441–450.
   Google Scholar
• Elas, N., Majid, F., & Narasuman, S. (2019). Development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for English teachers: The validity and reliability. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Ijet), 14(20), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i20.11456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenwarter, M., Hohenwarter, J., Kreis, Y., & Lavicza, Z. (2008). Teaching and learning calculus with free dynamic mathematics software GeoGebra.
   Google Scholar
• Hohenwarter, J., Hohenwarter, M., & Lavicza, Z. (2010). Evaluating difficulty levels of dynamic geometry software tools to enhance teachers’ professional development. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 17(3), 127–134.
   Google Scholar
• Kasozi-Mulindwa, S., & Niyongabo, R. (2018). Transforming Delivery and Quality of Primary School Education Through Technology: One Laptop per Child Project in Rwanda. Proceedings of the ICERI 2018 (pp. 8349–8357). IATED.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101–111). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
   Google Scholar
• Körtesi, P., Simonka, Z., Szabo, Z. K., Guncaga, J., & Neag, R. (2022). Challenging examples of the wise use of computer tools for the sustainability of knowledge and developing active and innovative methods in STEAM and mathematics education. Sustainability, 14(20), 12991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142012991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge, 108 (6), 1017–1054.
   Google Scholar
• Mugiraneza, J. P. (2021). Digitalization in teaching and education in Rwanda. The Report, 28.
   Google Scholar
• Muhtadi, D., Kartasasmita, B. G., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017, December). The Integration of technology in teaching mathematics. Proceedings of the Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 943, No. (1), p. 012020). IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. D. (2006). An economic history of computing. Yale, Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Yale [en línea]. http://www.econ.yale.edu/~nordhaus/homepage/computing_June2006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ocal, M. F. (2017). The Effect of Geogebra on Students' Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Applications of Derivative. Higher Education Studies, 7(2), 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Rakes, C. R., Stites, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Bush, S. B., Fisher, M. H., Safi, F., Desai, S., Schmidt, A., Andreasen, J. B., Saderholm, J., Amick, L., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., & Viera, J. (2022). Teaching mathematics with technology: TPACK and effective teaching practices. Education Sciences, 12(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randell, B. (2013). The origins of digital computers: Selected papers. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, L., Pereira, F. D., Toda, A. M., Palomino, P. T., Pessoa, M., Carvalho, L. S. G., & Isotani, S. (2022). Gamification suffers from the novelty effect but benefits from the familiarization effect: Findings from a longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K. (2002). Instrumenting mathematical activity: Reflections on key studies of the educational use of computer algebra systems. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022108003988
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2020). Developing a short assessment instrument for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK. xs) and comparing the factor structure of an integrative and a transformative model. Computers & Education, 157, 103967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatar, E., & Zengin, Y. (2016). Conceptual understanding of definite integral with Geogebra. Computers in the Schools, 33(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2016.1177480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W., & Harel, G. (2021). Ideas foundational to calculus learning and their links to students’ difficulties. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53(3), 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01270-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uwurukundo, M. S., Maniraho, J. F., & Tusiime, M. (2022). Enhancing students’ attitudes in learning 3-Dimension geometry using GeoGebra. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(6), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.6.17
   Google Scholar
• Wallet, P., Kimenyi, E., Miao, F., & Domiter, A. (2015). Improving quality and relevance of education through mobile learning in Rwanda: A promise to deliver. Kigali-Rwanda.
   Google Scholar
• Wassie, Y. A., & Zergaw, G. A. (2019). Some of the potential affordances, challenges and limitations of using GeoGebra in mathematics education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(8), em1734. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108436
   Google Scholar
• Yerizon, F. S., Tasman, F., & Tasman, F. (2021). Development of a GeoGebra-assisted calculus worksheet to enhance students’ understanding. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(10), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.10.1550/
   Google Scholar
• Yerizon, S. F., Tasman, F., & Tasman, F. (2021). Development of a geogebra-assisted calculus worksheet to enhance students’ understanding. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(10), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.10.1550
   Google Scholar
• Zengin, Y., Furkan, H., & Kutluca, T. (2012). The effect of dynamic mathematics software geogebra on student achievement in teaching of trigonometry. Procedia-Social & Behavioral Sciences, 31, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.038
   Google Scholar
• Zulnaidi, H., Oktavika, E., & Hidayat, R. (2019). Effect of use of GeoGebra on achievement of high school mathematics students. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09899-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulnaidi, H., & Zamri, S. N. A. S. (2017). The effectiveness of the GeoGebra software: The intermediary role of procedural knowledge on students’ conceptual knowledge and their achievement in mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2155–2180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• أثر الدمج بين بيئات. (2020). السيد, ر. أ., أبوعلوان, ر., البـوسـعــيـدي ,& علي. ث. ح. ب CAS و DGS التفاعلية في التفکير الهندسي لدى طلبة التعليم العام في سلطنة عمان في ضوء معتقداتهم نحوها The effect of integration interactive CAS & DGS environments on Geometric thinking on general education students in the light of their beliefs towards these environments. (4) مجلةتربوياتالرياضيات, 23, 137–172.
   Google Scholar