A systematic literature review of Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in mathematics education: Future challenges for educational practice and research

References

• Alizadeh-Jamal, M., Shahvarani, A., Iranmanesh, A., & Tehranian, A. (2018). A study on the changes on teachers’ knowledge and beliefs after a workshop based on mathematics education software, by relying on fuzzy method. PNA Revista de Investigación en Didáctica de la Matemática, 13(1), 19–18. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v13i1.6593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altun, T., & Akyıldız, S. (2017). Investigating student teachers ’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) levels. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(5), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.555996
   Google Scholar
• Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakar, N. S. A., Maat, S. M., & Rosli, R. (2020). Mathematics teacher’s self-efficacy of technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10818.259-276
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Wilson, S. M. (1990). Knowing the subject and learning to teach it: Examining assumptions about becoming a mathematics teacher. American Educational Research Association, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Baram, E., & Uygun, E. (2016). Putting technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) in action: An integrated TPACK-design-based learning (DBL) approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Başaran, B. (2020). Examining preservice teachers’ TPACK-21 efficacies with clustering analysis in terms of certain variables. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(3), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2020.03.005
   Google Scholar
• Baysal, E. A. (2018). The effect of instructional material design process to mathematics teacher candidates’ TPACK. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(5), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1222082
   Google Scholar
• Berlinski, S., & Busso, M. (2015). Challenges in Educational Reform: An experiment on active learning in mathematics. IDB WORKING PAPER SERIES No. IDB-WP-561 (Issue February). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2581397
   Google Scholar
• Brantley-Dias, L., & Ertmer, P. A. (2013). Goldilocks and TPACK. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782615
   Google Scholar
• Bretscher, N. (2022). Conceptualising TPACK within mathematics education: Teachers’ strategies for capitalising on transitions within and beyond dynamic geometry software. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 9(2), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-022-00115-0
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, B. C., & Hogan, M. P. (2019). The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. In Lutkewitte, C. (Ed.), Writing in a technological world (pp. 191–207). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2013). Beyond technology: Children’s learning in the age of digital culture. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Educational Technology\& Society, 13(4), 63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde, M. Á., Sedano, F. J. R., Fernández-Llamas, C., Gonçalves, J., Lima, J., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2020). RoboSTEAM project systematic mapping: Challenge based learning and robotics. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125103
   Google Scholar
• Dakers, J. R., Dow, W., & McNamee, L. (2009). De-constructing technology’s masculinity: Discovering a missing pedagogy in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-009-9099-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal, M., Archambault, L., & Shelton, C. (2017). Professional development for International teachers: Examining TPACK and technology integration decision making. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1314780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durdu, L., & Dag, F. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ TPACK development and Conceptions through a TPACK-Based course. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(11), 150–171. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n11.10
   Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht, J., Llinares, S., & Borba, M. C. (2020). Transformation of the mathematics classroom with the internet. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(5), 825–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01176-4
   Google Scholar
• Enochsson, A.-B., & Rizza, C. (2009). ICT in initial teacher training: Research review. OECD Education Working Papers: OECD Publishing, 38, 41. https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan, A., & Sahin, I. (2010). Relationship between math teacher candidates’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2707–2711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.400
   Google Scholar
• Gadanidis, G., & Geiger, V. (2010). A social perspective on technology-enhanced mathematical learning: From collaboration to performance. ZDM, 42(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0213-5
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2001). Integrating technology in mathematics learning: What some students say. Technology, July, 238–247.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, G. G., & Gonzales, R. R. (2021). Introducing IWB to preservice mathematics teachers: An evaluation using the TPACK framework. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(2), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.18844/CJES.V16I2.5619
   Google Scholar
• Günbaş, N. (2020). Prospective mathematics teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge improvement via creating technology-based mathematics stories. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 7(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2020.03.018
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., William, M., & Phillips, M. (2018). If There’s TPACK, is There Technological Pedagogical Reasoning and Action? (pp. 2051–2061). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Hernawati, K., & Jailani, J. (2019). Mathematics mobile learning with TPACK framework. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(2), 022126. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/2/022126
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishartono, N., Nurcahyo, A., Waluyo, M., Razak, R. A., Sufahani, S. F., & Hanifah, M. (2022). GeoGebra-based flipped learning model: An alternative panacea to improve student’s learning independency in online mathematics learning. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 7(3), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v7i3.18141
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson-Proctor, R., Finger, G., & Albion, P. (2010). Auditing the TK and TPACK confidence of pre-service teachers: Are they ready for the profession? Australian Educational Computing, 25(1), 8–17.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, S. J., & Chen, K. C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service Science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9222-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juandi, D. (2021). Heterogeneity of problem-based learning outcomes for improving mathematical competence: A systematic literature review. Journal of Physics, 1722(1), 012108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012108
   Google Scholar
• Judson, E. (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection? Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 14(3), 581–597.
   Google Scholar
• Karakus, F. (2018). An examination of pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and beliefs using computer technology in mathematics instruction. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 3(November), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Karatas, I. (2014). Changing pre-service mathematics teachers’ beliefs about using computers for teaching and learning mathematics: The effect of three different models. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2013.870993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kholid, M. N., Agustin, R. L., & Pradana, L. N. (2019). Effect of TPS strategy with portfolio assessment and learning interest on mathematical learning achievement. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(9), 616–620.
   Google Scholar
• Kholid, M. N., Hamida, P. S., Pradana, L. N., & Maharani, S. (2020). Students‘ critical thinking depends on their cognitive style. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1).
   Google Scholar
• Kholid, M. N., Pradana, L. N., Maharani, S., & Swastika, A. (2022). GeoGebra in project-based learning (geo-PJBL): A dynamic tool for analytical geometry course. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(1), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1267
   Google Scholar
• Kholid, M. N., Rofi’ah, F., Ishartono, N., Waluyo, M., Maharani, S., Swastika, A., Faiziyah, N., & Sari, C. K. (2022). What are students’ difficulties in implementing mathematical literacy skills for solving PISA-Like problem? Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i2.5057
   Google Scholar
• Kholid, M. N., Sa’dijah, C., Hidayanto, E., & Permadi, H. (2020). How are students’ reflective thinking for problem solving? Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3), 1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.688210
   Google Scholar
• Kholid, M. N., Sadijah, C., Hidayanto, E., & Permadi, H. (2022). Students’ reflective thinking pattern changes and characteristics of problem solving. Reflective Practice, 23(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2021.2025353
   Google Scholar
• Kholid, M. N., Swastika, A., Ishartono, N., Nurcahyo, A., Lam, T. T., Maharani, S., Ikram, M., Murniasih, T. R., Majid, M., Wijaya, A. P., & Pratiwi, E. (2022). Hierarchy of students’ reflective thinking levels in mathematical problem solving. Acta Scientiae, 24(6), 24–59. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6883
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2018). Technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) and beliefs of preservice secondary mathematics teachers: Examining the relationships. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93179
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C. M., Kim, M. K., Lee, C. J., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – a systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyici, O. D., & Övez, F. T. D. (2021). Examination of technology acceptance and TPACK competencies of mathematics teachers who are involved in distance education practices during the pandemic process. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(4), 805–821. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1012204
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? the development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers and Education, 49(3), 740–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, J. H., Chai, C. S., & Natarajan, U. (2018). Developing Indonesia teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge for 21 st century learning (TPACK-21CL) through a multi-prong approach. Journal of International Education and Business, 3(1), 11–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kopcha, T. J. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers and Education, 59(4), 1109–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. J., & Kim, C. M. (2014). An implementation study of a TPACK-based instructional design model in a technology integration course. Educational Technology Research & Development, 62(4), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9335-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luik, P., Taimalu, M., & Suviste, R. (2018). Perceptions of technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) among pre-service teachers in Estonia. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 741–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9633-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, S., & Zou, D. (2022). A systematic review of research on technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) for online teaching in the humanities. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2139026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markauskaite, L. (2006). Gender issues in preservice teachers’ training: ICT literacy and online learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1304
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P. (2019). Considering contextual knowledge: The TPACK Diagram Gets an Upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611
   Google Scholar
• Morales-López, Y. (2019). Knowledge evidenced by prospective mathematics teachers when performing a task involving geometry, teaching and the use of technology. Acta Scientiae, 21(2), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.v21iss2id5081
   Google Scholar
• Morales-López, Y., Chacón-Camacho, Y., & Vargas-Delgado, W. (2021). TPACK of prospective mathematics teachers at an early stage of training. Mathematics, 9(15), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9151741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-López, Y., & Poveda-Vásquez, R. (2022). TPACK model: Teachers’ perceptions of their technological competence when conducting an experimental virtual lesson in the context of covid-19. Acta Scientiae, 24(5), 144–167. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7345
   Google Scholar
• Moran, J. M. (2007). A educação que desejamos: novos desafios e como chegar lá. Papirus Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Muhaimin, L. H., & Kholid, M. N. (2023). Pupils ’ mathematical literacy hierarchy dimension for solving the minimum competency assessment. Proceeding of International Summit on Education, Technology, and Humanity. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0141406
   Google Scholar
• Mutlu, Y., Polat, S., & Alan, S. (2019). Development of preservice mathematics teachers’ TPACK through micro teaching: Teaching the VuStat program. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 3(2), 107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Nantschev, R., Feuerstein, E., González, R. T., Alonso, I. G., Hackl, W. O., Petridis, K., Triantafyllou, E., & Ammenwerth, E. (2020). Teaching approaches and educational technologies in teaching mathematics in higher education. Education Sciences, 10(12), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. https://doi.org/10.2307/749544
   Google Scholar
• NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards of school mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• NCTM. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all.
   Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L. (2011). Investigating TPACK: Knowledge growth in teaching with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(3), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.3.c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L. (2013). Central component descriptors for levels of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.48.2.d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L., & Ronau, R. N. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. European Journal of Pharmacology, 9(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(88)90271-3
   Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L., & Roschelle, J. (2018). Transforming teachers’ knowledge for teaching mathematics with technologies through online knowledge-building communities. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Greenville, South Carolina (pp. 44–62).
   Google Scholar
• Njiku, J., Mutarutinya, V., & Maniraho, J. F. (2021). Building mathematics teachers’ tpack through collaborative lesson design activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30935/CEDTECH/9686
   Google Scholar
• Öz, H. (2015). Assessing pre-service English as a foreign language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. International Education Studies, 8(5), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n5p119
   Google Scholar
• Özgür, H. (2020). Relationships between teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), school support and demographic variables: A structural equation modeling. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozudogru, M., & Ozudogru, F. (2019). Technological pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics teachers and the effect of demographic variables. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.512515
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Patriarca, F. H., Lobo da Costa, N. M., & Kfouri da Silva, S. F. (2019). The continuing distance education program M@tmídias: Contributions to the teaching of trigonometry. Acta Scientiae, 21(3), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.v21iss3id4964
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, R., & Stacey, K. (2010). Mapping pedagogical opportunities provided by mathematics analysis software. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-010-9158-6
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2001.10782325
   Google Scholar
• Polly, D. (2011). Developing teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) through mathematics professional development. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 18(2).
   Google Scholar
• Polly, D., Martin, C., Wang, C., Lambert, R., Pugalee, D. K., & Middleton, C. W. (2016). The influence of professional development on primary teachers’ TPACK and use of formative assessment. In Handbook of research on transforming mathematics teacher education in the digital age (pp. 382–405). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Pradana, L. N., Sholikhah, O. H., Maharani, S., Kholid, M. N., & Surakarta, U. M. (2020). Virtual mathematics kits (VMK): Connecting digital media to mathematical literacy. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(3), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i03.11674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakes, C. R., Stites, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Bush, S. B., Fisher, M. H., Safi, F., Desai, S., Schmidt, A., Andreasen, J. B., Saderholm, J., Amick, L., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., & Viera, J. (2022). Teaching mathematics with technology: TPACK and effective teaching practices. Education Sciences, 12(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashad, J. (2016). Unpacking TPACK in mathematics education research: A systematic review of meta-analyses. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 2(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.2.1.19
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. J., Burón, D., Aguilar-González, Á., & Muñiz-Rodríguez, L. (2021). Secondary mathematics teachers’ perception of their readiness for emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Education Sciences, 11(5), 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., Shechtman, N., Tatar, D., Hegedus, S., Hopkins, B., Empson, S., Knudsen, J., & Gallagher, L. P. (2010). Integration of technology, curriculum, and professional development for advancing middle school mathematics: Three large-scale studies. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 833–878. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210367426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sa’dijah, C., Kholid, M. N., Hidayanto, E., & Permadi, H. (2020). Reflective thinking characteristics: A study in the proficient mathematics prospective teachers. Infinity Journal, 9(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i2.p159-172
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, J. (2006). Gender and technology: What the research tells us. In C. Skelton, L. Smulyan, & B. Francis (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gender and education. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607996
   Google Scholar
• Septiani, E. I., & Kholid, M. N. (2023). Pupils ’ mathematical literacy characteristics for solving. Proceeding of International Summit on Education, Technology, and Humanity 2021, 020034, 020034–1. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0141404
   Google Scholar
• Setiaputra, F. I., & Kholid, M. N. (2023). Pupil ’ s mathematical literacy object dimension for solving. Proceeding of International Summit on Education, Technology, and Humanity 2021, 020092, 020092–1. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0141407
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1988). The science of design: Creating the artificial. Design Issues, 4(1/2), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511391
   Google Scholar
• Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Elen, J., & Bishop, M. J. (2014). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology: Fourth edition. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5
   Google Scholar
• Sulistyanto, H., Prayitno, H. J., Sutama, S., Narimo, S., & Sutopo, A. (2023). The effectiveness of hybrid learning-based adaptive media to empower student’s critical thinking skills: Is it really for VARK learning style? Asian Journal of University Education, 19(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v19i1.21219
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2011). Life on the screen. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• van Leendert, A., Doorman, M., Drijvers, P., Pel, J., & van der Steen, J. (2021). Teachers’ skills and knowledge in mathematics education for braille readers. Technology, Knowledge & Learning, 27(4), 1171–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09525-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veal, W. R., & James, G. M. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education.
   Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., & McKenney, S. (2017). TPACK in teacher education: Are we preparing teachers to use technology for early literacy? Technology, Pedagogy & Education, 26(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1174730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahyu, K., Ratnasari, D., Mahfudy, S., & Etmy, D. (2019). Mathematics teachers and digital technology: A quest for teachers’ professional development in Indonesia. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 4(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v4i1.7547
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Z. M., Chai, C. S., & So, H. J. (2018). Creating tools for inquiry-based mathematics learning from technological pedagogical content knowledge perspectives: Collaborative design approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. R., Young, J., Hamilton, C., & Pratt, S. S. (2019). Evaluating the effects of professional development on urban mathematics teachers TPACK using confidence intervals. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 8(3), 312. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2019.3065
   Google Scholar
• Za’ba, N., Ismail, Z., & Abdullah, A. H. (2020). Preparing student teachers to teach mathematics with GeoGebra. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5 A), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081904
   Google Scholar