Plagiarism among accounting and business postgraduate students: a fraud diamond framework moderated by understanding of artificial intelligence

References

• Ahmadi, A. (2014). Plagiarism in the academic context: A study of Iranian EFL learners. Research Ethics, 10(3), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016113488859
   Google Scholar
• Ahsan, K., Akbar, S., & Kam, B. (2022). Contract cheating in higher education: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(4), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1931660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Serhan, O., Houjeir, R., & Aldhaheri, M. (2022). Academic dishonesty and the fraud diamond: A Study on attitudes of UAE undergraduate business students during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(10), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.10.5
   Google Scholar
• Al Shbail, M. O., Esra’a, B., Alshurafat, H., Ananzeh, H., & Al Kurdi, B. H. (2021). Factors affecting online cheating by accounting students: the relevance of social factors and the fraud triangle model factors. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Alshurafat, H., Al Shbail, M. O., Hamdan, A., Al-Dmour, A., & Ensour, W. (2023). Factors affecting accounting students’ misuse of chatgpt: an application of the fraud triangle theory. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 22(2), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-04-2023-0182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierstaker, J., Brink, W. D., Khatoon, S., & Thorne, L. (2024). Academic fraud and remote evaluation of accounting students: An application of the fraud triangle. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05628-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, D. D., & Sanney, K. J. (2018). Applying the fraud triangle to higher education: Ethical implications. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 35(1), 5–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlse.12068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo, F., & Tan, K. (2008). The effect of fraud triangle factors on students’ cheating behaviors. Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations, 9, 205–220.
   Google Scholar
• Dehouche, N. (2021). Plagiarism in the age of massive Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT-3). Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 21, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00195
   Google Scholar
• Dorminey, J., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M.-J., & Riley, R. Jr. (2012). The evolution of fraud theory. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(2), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50131
   Google Scholar
• Eisa, T. A. E., Salim, N., & Alzahrani, S. (2015). Existing plagiarism detection techniques: A systematic mapping of the scholarly literature. Online Information Review, 39(3), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-12-2014-0315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadersair, K., & Subagyo, S. (2019). Perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa akuntansi: dimensi fraud pentagon (Studi kasus pada mahasiswa Prodi Akuntansi Ukrida). Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 12(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.30813/jab.v12i2.1786
   Google Scholar
• Foltýnek, T., Meuschke, N., & Gipp, B. (2019). Academic plagiarism detection: A systematic literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 52(6), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, J., & Kohlbeck, M. (2020). Addressing cheating when using test bank questions in online classes. Journal of Accounting Education, 52, 100671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2020.100671
   Google Scholar
• Grace, K., Salvatier, J., Dafoe, A., Zhang, B., & Evans, O. (2018). When will AI exceed human performance? Evidence from AI experts. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 62, 729–754. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckler, N. C., Forde, D. R., & Bryan, C. H. (2013). Using writing assignment designs to mitigate plagiarism. Teaching Sociology, 41(1), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X12461471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendy, N. T., & Montargot, N. (2019). Understanding Academic dishonesty among business school students in France using the theory of planned behavior. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husain, F. M., Al-Shaibani, G. K. S., & Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2017). Perceptions of and attitudes toward plagiarism and factors contributing to plagiarism: A review of studies. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(2), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-017-9274-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutson, J. (2024). Rethinking plagiarism in the era of generative AI. Journal of Intelligent Communication, 4(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.54963/jic.v4i1.220
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, T. (2020). Understanding college student perceptions of artificial intelligence. Systemics. Cybernetics and Informatics, 18(2), 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Khalid, F. M., Rauf, F. H. A., Othman, N. H., & Zain, W. N. W. M. (2020). Factors influencing academic dishonesty among accounting students. Global Business Management Research, 12(4), 701–711.
   Google Scholar
• Khasni, F. N., Keshminder, J., Chuah, S. C., & Ramayah, T. (2023). A theory of planned behaviour: Perspective on rehiring ex-offenders. Management Decision, 61(1), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2021-1051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köbis, N., & Mossink, L. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N., & Lynn, G; Texas A&M International University. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546–580. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., Verma, A., & Aggarwal, S. P. (2023). Reviewing academic integrity: Assessing the influence of corrective measures on adverse attitudes and plagiaristic behavior. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09467-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrinac, M., Brumini, G., Bilić-Zulle, L., & Petrovecki, M. (2010). Construction and validation of attitudes toward plagiarism questionnaire. Croatian Medical Journal, 51(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2010.51.195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozgovoy, M., Kakkonen, T., & Cosma, G. (2010). Automatic student plagiarism detection: Future perspectives. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(4), 511–531. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.43.4.e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurcahyono, N., & Hanum, A. N. (2023). Determinants of academic fraud behavior: The perspective of the pentagon fraud theory. Paper Read at 1st Lawang Sewu International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences 2022 (LEWIS 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Oktarina, D., & Ramadhan, N. S. (2023). Academic fraud behavior of accounting students in dimensions of fraud hexagon theory. Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting, 11(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.21107/jaffa.v11i1.18432
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students–literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301677
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, M., Gezgin, U. B., & Roe, J. (2020). Reducing plagiarism through academic misconduct education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-00052-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putra, I. E., Jazilah, N. I., Adishesa, M. S., Al Uyun, D., & Wiratraman, H. P. (2023). Denying the accusation of plagiarism: Power relations at play in dictating plagiarism as academic misconduct. Higher Education, 85(5), 979–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00875-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Becker, J. (2015). SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Scheg, A. G. (2013). The impact of Turnitin to the student-teacher relationship. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 2(1), 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2020). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Selemani, A., Chawinga, W. D., & Dube, G. (2018). Why do postgraduate students commit plagiarism? An empirical study. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0029-6
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., Emerson, D., Haight, T., & Wood, B. (2023). An examination of online cheating among business students through the lens of the Dark Triad and Fraud Diamond. Ethics & Behavior, 33(6), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2022.2104281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. J., Emerson, D. J., & Mauldin, S. (2021). Online cheating at the intersection of the dark triad and fraud diamond. Journal of Accounting Education, 57, 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100753
   Google Scholar
• Specht, D. (2019). Reading, desk research, taking notes and plagiarism. In Media and communications study skills student guide (pp. 27–45). The University Of Westminster Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning Teaching, 6(1)
   Google Scholar
• Theotama, G., Waskita, Y. D., & Hapsari, A. N. S. (2023). Fraud hexagon in the motives to commit academic fraud. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 26(1), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v26i1.7395
   Google Scholar
• Umar, H., Partahi, D., & Purba, R. B. (2020). Fraud diamond analysis in detecting fraudulent financial report. International Journal of Scientific Technology Research, 9(3), 6638–6646.
   Google Scholar
• Utami, D. P. W., & Purnamasari, D. I. (2021). The impact of ethics and fraud pentagon theory on academic fraud behavior. Journal of Business Information Systems, 3(1), 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Uzun, A. M., & Kilis, S. (2020). Investigating antecedents of plagiarism using extended theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 144, 103700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: The SCORE model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. (1998). Student plagiarism in universities: What are we doing about it? Higher Education Research Development, 17(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436980170105
   Google Scholar
• Wardani, D. K., & Putri, A. T. (2023). The fraud triangle of accounting student’s academic cheating. Proceeding International Conference on Accounting and Finance (pp. 32–39). https://journal.uii.ac.id/inCAF/article/view/27412
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.
   Google Scholar