12,296
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Home-based digital leisure: Doing the same leisure activities, but digital

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1309741 | Received 22 Sep 2016, Accepted 19 Mar 2017, Published online: 31 Mar 2017

References

  • Abbott-Chapman, J., & Robertson, M. (2001). Youth, leisure and home: Space, place and identity. Loisir et Société, 24, 485–506.10.7202/ls
  • Allen, M. (2010). The experience of connectivity. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 350–374. doi:10.1080/13691180903456553
  • Anderson, B. (2008). The social impact of broadband household internet access. Information, Communication & Society, 11, 5–24. doi:10.1080/13691180701858810
  • Anderson, B., Gale, C., Gower, A. P., France, E. F., Jones, M. L. R., Lacohee, H. V., … Trimby, M. (2002). Digital living—people-centred innovation and strategy. BT Technology Journal, 20, 11–29. doi:10.1023/A:1015632120289
  • Anderson, B., & Tracey, K. (2001). Digital living: The impact (or Otherwise) of the internet on everyday life. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 456–475. doi:10.1177/00027640121957295
  • Beck, M. E., & Arnold, J. E. (2009). Gendered time use at home: An ethnographic examination of leisure time in middle-class families. Leisure Studies, 28, 121–142. doi:10.1080/02614360902773888
  • Boczkowski, P. J. (2010). The consumption of online news at work. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 470–484. doi:10.1080/13691181003639841
  • Bovill, M., & Livingstone, S. (2001). Bedroom culture and the privatization of media use. In S. Livingstone & M. Bovill (Eds.), Children and their changing media environment: A European comparative study. London: LSE Research Online.
  • Buswell, L., Zabriskie, R., Lundberg, N., & Hawkins, A. (2012). The relationship between father involvement in family leisure and family functioning: The importance of daily family leisure. Leisure Sciences, 34, 172–190. doi:10.1080/01490400.2012.652510
  • Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2010). Mobile communication and civic life: Linking patterns of use to civic and political engagement. Journal of Communication, 60, 536–555. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01496.x
  • Carr, D., Schott, G., Burn, A., & Buckingham, D. (2004). Doing game studies: A multi-method approach to the study of textuality, interactivity, and narrative space. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy, 110, 19–30.
  • Churchill, S. L., Clark, V. L. P., Prochaska-Cue, K., Creswell, J. W., & Ontai-Grzebik, L. (2007). How rural low-income families have fun: A grounded theory study. Journal of Leisure, 39, 271–294.
  • Colwell, J., Grady, C., & Rhaiti, S. (1995). Computer games, self-esteem, and gratification of needs in adolescents. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 195–206. doi:10.1002/casp.2450050308
  • Cox, A. M., Clough, P. D., & Marlow, J. (2008). Flickr: A first look at user behaviour in the context of photography as serious leisure. Information Research, 13, 336–351.
  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage.
  • DeSmet, A., Van Ryckeghem, D., Compernolle, S., Baranowski, T., Thompson, D., Crombez, G., … Vandebosch, H. (2014). A meta-analysis of serious digital games for healthy lifestyle promotion. Preventive Medicine, 69, 95–107.10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.026
  • Dolfsma, W. (2004a). Consuming pop music/constructing a life world: The advent of pop music. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7, 421–440. doi:10.1177/1367877904047862.
  • Dolfsma, W. (2004b). Institutional economics and the formation of preferences: The advent of pop music. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9781845420727
  • English-Lueck, J. (1998). Technology and social change: The effects on family and community. In P. Agre, J. English-Lueck, & D. Hakken (Eds.), Information technology and social change: The effects on families, communities, workplaces and civil society. San Diego, CA: COSSA. Retrieved from http://www.cossa.org/seminarseries/technology.htm
  • Flichy, P. (1995). Dynamics of modern communication: The shaping and impact of new communication technologies (Vol. 12). London: Sage.
  • Gershuny, J. (2003). Web use and net nerds: A neofunctionalist analysis of the impact of information technology in the home. Social Forces, 82, 141–168. doi:10.1353/sof.2003.0086
  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory. strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
  • Green, E., & Adam, A. (1998). On-line leisure: Gender, and ICTs in the home. Information, Communication & Society, 1, 291–312. doi:10.1080/13691189809358971
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). London: Sage.
  • Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults' use of the internet. Communication Research, 35, 602–621. doi:10.1177/0093650208321782
  • Helsper, E. J. (2010). Gendered internet use across generations and life stages. Communication Research, 37, 352–374. doi:10.1177/0093650209356439
  • Irani, L., Jeffries, R., & Knight, A. (2010). Rhythms and plasticity: Television temporality at home. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14, 621–632. doi:10.1007/s00779-009-0280-1
  • Jupp, B., & Bentley, T. (2001). Surfing alone? E commerce and social capital. In J. Wilsdon (Ed.), Digital futures: Living in a dot-com world (pp. 97–118). London: Earthscan.
  • Kaliszewska, I. (2009). EdEt. Warsaw: Instytut Etnologii i Antropologii Kulturowej. Retrieved from http://www.etnologia.uw.edu.pl/www/program-edet
  • Kennedy, T., & Wellman, B. (2007). The networked household. Information, Communication & Society, 10, 645–670. doi:10.1080/13691180701658012
  • Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet Paradox Revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49–74. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00248
  • Lally, E. (2002). At home with computers. Oxford: Berg. PMC.
  • Larson, R. W., Gillman, S. A., & Richards, M. H. (1997). Divergent experiences of family leisure: Fathers, mothers, and young adolescents. Journal of Leisure Research, 29, 78–97.
  • Lejeune, C. (2011). From normal business to financial crisis … and back again. An illustration of the benefits of cassandre for qualitative analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1513
  • Leung, L. (2001). College student motives for chatting on ICQ. New Media & Society, 3, 483–500. doi:10.1177/14614440122226209
  • Livingstone, S. (2007). From family television to bedroom culture: Young people’s media at home. In E. Devereux (Ed.), Media studies: Key issues and debates (pp. 302–321). London: LSE online.
  • López Sintas, J., Rojas de Francisco, L., & García Álvarez, E. (2015). The nature of leisure revisited: an interpretation of digital leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 47, 79–101.
  • Martinson, A. M., Schwartz, N., & Vaughan, M. W. (2002). Women’s experiences of leisure: Implications for design. New Media & Society, 4, 29–49. doi:10.1177/146144480200400103
  • Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family characteristics and intergenerational conflicts over the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 473–495. doi:10.1080/13691180600858705
  • ONTSI. (2013). Perfil sociodemográfico de los internautas Análisis de datos [Sociodemographic profile of Internet users data analysis]. Retrieved from http://www.ontsi.red.es/ontsi/es/estudios-informes/perfil-sociodemogr%C3%A1fico-de-los-internautas-datos-ine-2012
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (2007). Validity issues in narrative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 471–486. doi:10.1177/1077800406297670
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 2: Do they really think differently? On the horizon, 9, 1–6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816
  • Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Richardson, H. J. (2009). A ‘smart house’ is not a home: The domestication of ICTs. Information Systems Frontiers, 11, 599–608. doi:10.1007/s10796-008-9137-9
  • Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Riessman, C. K. (2002). Narrative Analysis. In M. Huberman & Miles M. B. (Eds.), The qualitative researcher’s companion (pp. 217–270). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Rojas de Francisco, L., López-Sintas, J., & García-Álvarez, E. (2016). Social leisure in the digital age. Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure, 39, 258–273. doi:10.1080/07053436.2016.1198598
  • Rundell, J. (1995). Gadamer and the circles of interpretation. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
  • Schroeder, R. (2006). Being there together and the future of connected presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15, 438–454. doi:10.1162/pres.15.4.438
  • Schroeder, R. (2010). Mobile phones and the inexorable advance of multimodal connectedness. New Media & Society, 12, 75–90. doi:10.1177/1461444809355114
  • Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K.Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (p. 643). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Shaw, S. M., & Dawson, D. (2001). Purposive leisure: Examining parental discourses on family activities. Leisure Sciences, 23, 217–231. doi:10.1080/01490400152809098
  • Shaw, S. M., & Dawson, D. (2003). Contradictory aspects of family leisure: Indealization versus experience. Leisure/Loisir, 28, 179–201.10.1080/14927713.2003.9651312
  • Silk, M., Millington, B., Rich, E., & Bush, A. (2016). (Re-)thinking digital leisure. Leisure Studies, 35, 712–723. doi:10.1080/02614367.2016.1240223
  • Stald, G. (2008). Mobile identity: Youth, identity, and mobile communication media. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 143–164). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic books.
  • Van Rompaey, V., & Roe, K. (2004). The home as multimedia environment. Families’ concept of space and the introduction of information and communication technologies in the home. In K. Renckstorf, D. McQuail, J. E. Rosenbaum, & G. Schaap (Eds.), Action theory and communication research: Recent developments in Europe (pp. 231–251). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
  • Venkatraman, M. (2012). Consuming digital technologies and making home. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1–8.
  • Viñals-Blanco, A. (2015). The transformation of leisure in the digital age. In B. Çoban (Ed.), Social media and social movements: The transformation of communication patterns (pp. 165–180). Lanhan, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Zabriskie, R. B., & McCormick, B. P. (2001). The influences of family leisure patterns on perceptions of family functioning. Family Relations, 50, 281–289. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00281.x
  • Zabriskie, R. B., & McCormick, B. P. (2003). Parent and child perspectives of family leisure involvement and satisfaction with family life. Journal of Leisure Research, 35, 163–189.