Governance paradigm in public administration and the dilemma of national question in Nigeria

References

• Accountability. (2006). Partnership governance and accountability: Reinventing development pathways. London: The PGA Framework PGA General Report. Retrieved from www.pgaframework
   Google Scholar
• Al-Habil, W. (2011). Governance and government in public administration. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 3, 123–128. Retrieved from http://www.academicjournals.org/jpapr
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, R. (1994). Markets and good government: The way forward for economic and social development. Geneva: UN Non-Governmental Liaison Services.
   Google Scholar
• Basheka, B. C. (2012). The paradigms of public administration re-examined: A reflection. Journal of Public Administration, 47, 8–25.
   Google Scholar
• Berkett, N., Challenger, I., Sinner, J., & Tadaki, M. (2013). Values, collaborative processes and indicators for freshwater planning. Auckland: Auckland Council National Policy Statement Freshwater Management Implementation Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2009). Politics matters: Political economy and aid effectiveness. The IDL Group. Retrieved November 12, 2014, from www.theidlgroup.com/.../Politics_Matters_final_NORAD_talk.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cadman, T. (n.d.). Evaluating the quality of contemporary global governance: A theoretical and Analytical framework. Retrieved October 20, 2016, from http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/49003/82273_1.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Derlien, H.-U. (1999). On the selective interpretation of Max Weber’s concept of bureaucracy in organization theory and administrative science. In P. Ahonen & K. Palonen (Eds.), Dis-Embalming Max Weber. SoPhi: Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Ewalt, J. A. G. (2001). Theories of governance and new public management: Links to understanding welfare policy implementation. Paper Prepared for presentation at the Annual Conference of the American Society for Public Administration Newark, NJ. Retrieved April 11, 2016, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/ASPA/UNPAN000563.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2002). Preface. Administrative reform in developing nations. Westport: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, V., Kaiser, K., & Levy, B. (2009). Problem-driven governance and political economy analysis: Good practice framework. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, T. (1968). Public administration. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Retrieved September 26, 2016, from http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Public_administration.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, J. M. (1950). Trends in the theory of public administration. Public Administration Review, 10, 161–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. (2011). A primer on collaborative multi-level governance, Canadian regional development: A critical review of theory, practice and potential. Retrieved March 20, 2016, from https://cdnregdev.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/primercollaborativemultilevelgovernance-gibson.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goodnow, F. J. (1900). Politics and administration: A study in government. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Grindle, M. S. (2002). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Paper Prepared for the Poverty Reduction Group of the World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Grindle, M. S. (2005). Good enough governance revisited: A report for DFID with reference to the governance target strategy paper, 2001. Retrieved September 9, 2016 from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/events-documents/1281.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grindle, M. S. (2007). Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review, 25, 533–574. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00385.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grindle, M. S. (2010). Good governance: The inflation of an idea (Working Papers No 202). Centre for International Development at Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Gulick, L. H. & Urwick, L. F. (1937). Papers on the science of Administration. New York, NY: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, N. (1975). Paradigms of public administration. Public Administration Review, 35, 378–386.10.2307/974540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, N. (2007). Public administration and public affairs (10th ed.). New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, S., & Moon, I. (2009). Are we treating networks seriously? The Growth of Network Research in Public Administration & Public Policy. Retrieved on October 21, 2016, from https://www.insna.org/PDF/Connections/v29/2009_I-2_P-4-17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ikeanyibe, M. O., & Njoku, I. (2006). Conflicts and national unity: An appraisal of Nigeria’s nation building policy and conflict management method. In D. G. Omotor, F. A. Sanubi, & A. I. Ohwona (Eds.), Readings in conflict management and peace-building in Africa (Vol. 1). Abraka: Faculty of Social Sciences, Delta State.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeanyibe, O. M. (2016). Uniformity in local government system and the governance model in Nigeria. Journal of Asian and African Studies. 1–15. doi:10.1177/0021909616666105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. (1968). Public administration. Encyclopedia.com. Retrieved September 26, 2016, from http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G23045001014.html
   Google Scholar
• Kauzya, J. M., & Balogun, J. (2005). Governance and public administration reforms and innovations in African countries: A Focus on Achievements, Setbacks and Future Directions. Regional Forum on Reinventing Government in Africa: Repositioning the Public Sector for the Challenges of NEPAD. 17–19 January 2005. Sandton Convention Centre. South Africa, Johannesburg.
   Google Scholar
• Kendhammer, B. (2014). Citizenship, federalism and power sharing: Nigeria’s federal character and the challenges of institutional design. Ethno Politics: Formerly Global Review of Ethno-politics, 13, 396.
   Google Scholar
• Ladi, S. (2008). Good governance and public administration reform in the black sea economic cooperation (BSEC) member states. Athens: International Centre for Black Sea Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, M. (1962). Political science and public administration: ‘field’ and the concept of decision-making. In S. Mailick, E. H. van Ness, (Eds.), Concepts and Issues in Administrative Behavior (pp. 1–28). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, J. E. (1994). Will public management drive out public administration? Asian Journal of Public Administration, 16, 139–151.
   Google Scholar
• Leftwich, A. (1994). Governance, the state and the politics of development. Development and Change, 25, 363–386.10.1111/dech.1994.25.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnette, P. (2003). European governance and civic participation: Beyond elitist citizenship? Political Studies, 51, 144–160.10.1111/1467-9248.00417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado, N. (2010). The World Bank’s evolving concept of good governance and its impact on human rights. Doctoral workshop on development and international organizations, Stockholm, Sweden, May 29–30, 2010. Retrieved October 3, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2003). The changing nature of public administration: From easy answers to hard questions. Viešoji Politika ir Administravimas, 5, 1–1.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44, 652–667.10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50, 17–28.10.1111/issj.1998.50.issue-155
   Google Scholar
• Tamayao, M. J. M. (2014). What is governance? Law, Politics, and Philosophy. Retrieved October 7, 2016, from https://tamayaosbc.wordpress.com/2014/08/21/what-is-governance/
   Google Scholar
• The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) and the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2013). Good governance in the public sector—Consultation draft for an international framework. Retrieved September 23, 2016, www.ifac.org
   Google Scholar
• Todorut, A. V., & Tselentis, V. (2015). Designing the model of public value management. Proceedings of the International Management Conference, 9, 74–80.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, K., & Stewart, J. (1992). Change in the management of public services. Public Administration, 70, 499–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WaterAid Nigeria. (2013). Annual Report 2012-2013. Retrieved September 26, 2016 from www.wateraid.org/ng/~/media/Files/Nigeria/ANNUAL-REPORT-FY-2012-13.pdf?
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, G. T. (2001). Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21, 795–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197–222.10.2307/2139277
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. (1953). The study of administration. In Dwight Waldo (Ed.), Ideas and issues in public administration (pp. 65–75). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (1994). Governance: The world bank’s experience. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2000). Federal Republic of Nigeria: Water Supply & Sanitation Interim Strategy Note. Retrieved September 26, 2016 from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/NIGERIAEXTN/Resources/wss_1100.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., & He, J. (2009). Paradigm shift in public administration: Implications for teaching in professional training programs. Public Administration Review, 6. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227699058 doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02085.x
   Google Scholar