581
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

An investigation into the efficacy of technical illustrations depicting physical orientation in sports procedures

& | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1375591 | Received 23 Nov 2016, Accepted 18 Aug 2017, Published online: 15 Sep 2017

References

  • Adolph, K. E., & Berger, S. A. (2006). Motor development. In D. Kuhn, & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed.). (pp. 161–213). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Amorim, M. A., Isableu, B., & Jarraya, M. (2006). Embodied spatial transformations: “body analogy” for the mental rotation of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 327–347.10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.327
  • Bryant, D. J., Tversky, B., & Franklin, N. (1992). Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 74–98.10.1016/0749-596X(92)90006-J
  • Decety, J. (1996a). Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate? Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 87–93.10.1016/0926-6410(95)00033-X
  • Decety, J. (1996b). The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behavioural Brain Research, 77, 45–52.10.1016/0166-4328(95)00225-1
  • Dixon, P., & Gabrys, G. (1991). Learning to operate complex devices: Effects of conceptual and operational similarity. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 33, 103–120.10.1177/001872089103300108
  • Erkelens, C. J. (2010). Interaction of monocular and binocular vision. Perception, 39(Supplement), 71.
  • Ganier, F. (2004). Factors affecting the processing of procedural instructions: Implications for document design. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, 15–26.10.1109/TPC.2004.824289
  • Ganier, F. (2012). Enhancing the design of instructions for use; a contribution of cognitive psychology. In M. Torrance, D. Alamargot, M. Castello, F. Ganier, O. Kruse, A. Mangen, L. Tolchinsky, & L. van Waes (Eds.), Learning to write effectively: Current trends in European Research (pp. 323–325). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Goldstein, E. B. (2014). Sensation and perception (9th ed.). Pacific Grove CA: Wadsworth.
  • Greer, K. (1984). Physiology of motor control. In M. M. Smyth, & A. M. Wing (Eds.), Psychology of Human Movement (pp. 17–46). New York, NY: Academic.10.1016/B978-0-12-653020-9.50007-6
  • Guillot, A., & Collet, C. (2008). Construction of the motor imagery integrative model in sport: A review and theoretical investigation of motor imagery use. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1, 31–44.10.1080/17509840701823139
  • Guillot, A., Moschberger, K., & Collet, C. (2013). Coupling movement with imagery as a new perspective for motor imagery practice. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 9, doi:10.1186/1744-9081-9-8
  • Heiser, M., Ginet, D., & Tversky, B. (2002, May 22–24). Diagrams and text in instruction: Comprehension of the assembly process. In Attention, Perception and Data Visualization, Office of Naval Research Workshop. Fairfax, VA.
  • Hertzog, C., & Rypma, B. (1991). Age differences in components of mental rotation task performance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 209–212.10.3758/BF03342680
  • Hochberg, J. (1978). Perception (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hochberg, J. (1979). Pictorial limitations on Perception. In C. F. Nodine & D. F. Fisher (Eds.), Perception and Pictorial Representation (pp. 313–350). New York, NY: Praeger.
  • Holmes, P. S., & Collins, D. J. (2001). The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: A functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 60–83.10.1080/10413200109339004
  • Johnson, A. M. (1990). Speed of mental rotation as a function of problem-solving strategies. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 803–806.10.2466/pms.1990.71.3.803
  • Johnson, P. (1984). The acquisition of skill. In M. M. Smyth, & A. M. Wing (Eds.), Psychology of Human Movement (pp. 215–240). New York, NY: Academic.10.1016/B978-0-12-653020-9.50013-1
  • Jones, B., & Anuza, T. (1982). Effects of sex, handedness, stimulus and visual field on “mental rotation”. Cortex, 18, 501–514.10.1016/S0010-9452(82)80049-X
  • Kieras, D. E., & Bovair, S. (1984). The role of a mental model in learning to operate a device. Cognitive Science, 8, 255–273.10.1207/s15516709cog0803_3
  • Krull, R., D’Souza, S., Roy, D., & Sharp, D. M. (2004). Designing procedural illustrations. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, 27–33.10.1109/TPC.2004.824288
  • Krull, R., Roy, D., D’Souza, S., & Morgan, M. (2003, May 18–21). User perceptions and point of view in technical illustrations. Proceeding 50th STC Conference (pp. 205–210). Dallas, TX.
  • Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2006). The visual brain in action (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524724.001.0001
  • Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Parsons, L. M. (2001). Integrating cognitive psychology, neurology and neuroimaging. Acta psychologica, 107, 155–181.
  • Roy, D. (2006, October 23–25). Text-graphic Instructions that help readers mentally animate procedures: A case study with surgical patient education modules. Proceedings of the IEEE Professional Communication Society Conference (pp. 278–290). Saratoga Springs, NY.
  • Roy, D., & Crabbe, S. (2014, November 13–16). A study into the understandability of technical illustrations shown from different height perspectives and camera positions. Proceedings of the IAFOR Asian Conference on Media and Mass Communication (pp. 55–70). Osaka, Japan.
  • Schacter, D. L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wegner, D. (2010). Psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
  • Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Illinois: Human Kinetics.
  • Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach (4th ed.). Illinois: Human Kinetics.
  • Wakefield, C., Smith, D., Moran, A. P., & Holmes, P. (2013).  Functional equivalence or behavioral matching? A critical reflection on 15 years of research using the PETTLEP model of motor imagery. International Review Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6, 105–121.10.1080/1750984X.2012.724437
  • Zacks, J. M., Mires, J., Tversky, B., & Hazeltine, E. (2002). Mental spatial transformations of objects and perspective. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 2, 315–322.