An investigation of a nationwide exam from a critical language testing perspective

References

• Al-Amri, M. (2010). Direct spoken English testing: Is still a real challenge to be worth bothering about. English Language Teaching, 3(1). Retrieved May12, 2012 from www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/article/download/.../4339
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. (1986) Innovations in language testing. In M. Portal (Ed.), Innovations in language testing: Proceedings of the IUS/NFER conference (pp. 93–105), Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14, 115–129.10.1093/applin/14.2.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, G., & Arsenault, N. (1998). Fundamentals of educational research (2nd ed.). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach, E. (1995). The politics of the ESL classroom: Issues of power in pedagogical choices. In J. Tollefson (Ed.), Power and inequality in language education (pp. 933–956). Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 257–279.10.1177/026553229601300303
   Google Scholar
• Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2003). Research in education (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 653–675.10.2307/3587999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., & Curtis, A. (2004). Washback or backwash: A review of the impact of testing on teaching and learning. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 3–17). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438–481.10.3102/00346543058004438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhady, H. (2006). Twenty-five years of living with applied linguistics: Collection of articles. Tehran: Rahnama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glasser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York, NY: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412986120
   Google Scholar
• Kellaghan, T., & Greaney, V. (1992). Using examinations to improve education: A study in fourteen African countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Khany, R., & Tarlani-Aliabadi, H. (2016). Studying power relations in an academic setting: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of EAP classes in Iran. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 72–85.10.1016/j.jeap.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madaus, G. (1991). Current trends in testing in the USA. Paper presented at the conference on Testing and Evaluation, Feedback Strategies for Improvement of Foreign Language Learning, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 241–256.10.1177/026553229601300302
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, M. (2007). High-stakes testing washback: A survey on the effect of Iranian MA entrance examination on teaching. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/aljarf/documents/english%20language%20teaching%20conference%20-%20iran%202008/mojtaba%20mohammadi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Noam, G. (1996). Assessment at a crossroads: Conversation. Harvard Educational Review, 66(3), 631–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, A. J., & Smith, M. L. (1994). Measurement-driven reform: Research on policy, practice, repercussion (Tech. Rep. 381). Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Designing qualitative studies. Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rea-Dickins, P. (1997). So why we need relationship with stakeholders in language testing? A view from UK. Language Testing, 14(3), 304–314.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaee, A. A., & Salehi, M. (2008). The construct validity of a language proficiency test: A multitrait multimethod approach. TELL, 2(8), 93–110.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Salehi, M. (2011). Test taking strategies: Implications for validation. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(4), 850–858.
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (1992). Beyond proficiency testing: A diagnostic feedback testing model for assessing foreign language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 76(4), 514–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (2001a). Democratic assessment as an alternative. Language Testing, 18(4), 373–391.10.1177/026553220101800404
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (2001b). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Essex: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203387962
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (2007). The power of language tests: The power of the English language and the role of ELT. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of english language teaching (pp. 521–531). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8
   Google Scholar