1,059
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Open comparisons of social services in Sweden—Why, how, and for what?

| (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1404735 | Received 25 Apr 2017, Accepted 03 Nov 2017, Published online: 21 Nov 2017

References

  • Alm, M. (2015). När kunskap ska styra – om organistoriska och professionella villkor för kunskapsstyrning inom missbruksvården [When knowledge is the ruling force – on organizational and professional conditions for knowledge governance in substance abuse treatment] (Dissertations No 215/2015). Växjö: Linnaeus University.
  • Berg, L., & Spehar, A. (Eds.). (2011). EU och välfärdens Europa. Familj – arbetsmarknad – migration [EU and the welfare of Europe. Family – labor market – migration]. Malmö: Liber.
  • Blomgren, M., & Waks, C. (2011). Öppna jämförelser inom hälso- och sjukvården – en utmaning mot den professionella byråkratin? [Open Comparisons in health care – a challenge for the professional bureaucracy]. Arbetsmarknad & Arbetsliv, 17(4), 95–108.
  • Carlstedt, E. (2015). En socialtjänst med kvalitet? Öppna jämförelser som skyltfönster och verktyg [Social work with quality? Public Comparisons as show-window and tool]. Masteruppsats, Socialhögskolan: Lunds universitet.
  • de la Porte, C., & Pochet, P. (2012). Why and how (still) study the open method of co-ordination (OMC)? Journal of European Social Policy, 22(3), 336–349.10.1177/0958928711433629
  • European Commission. (2016). Social protection and social inclusion. Retrieved August 11, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=750
  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Garsten, C., & Jacobsson, K. (2011). Post-political regulation: Soft power and post-political visions in global governance. Critical Sociology, 39(3), 421–437.
  • Järholt, B., Engström, S., & Lindström, K. (2008). Kan kvalitetsregister värdera vårdkvalitet? [Can quality registers assess quality of care?]. Läkartidningen, 47(105), 3452–3455.
  • Kajonius, P. J., & Kazemi, A. (2014). Rankning av Sveriges kommuners äldreomsorg i Öppna jämförelser [Ratings of elderly care in Swedish municipalities in Open Comparisons]. Socialmedicinsk tidskrift, 4, 323–331.
  • Lindgren, L. (2008). Utvärderingsmonstret. Kvalitets- och resultatmätning i den offentliga sektorn [The evaluation monster. Quality and performance measurement in the public sector]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Lindgren, L. (2014). Nya utvärderingsmonstret. Om kvalitetsmätning i den offentliga sektorn [The new evaluation monster. Quality and performance measurement in the public sector]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • NBHW – National Board of Health and Welfare. (2015). see Socialstyrelsen (below).
  • Nye, J. (1990). Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • OECD. (2014). Society at a glance. OECD Social Indicators. The crisis and its aftermath. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Power, M. (1999). The audit society. Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198296034.001.0001

SALAR see Sveriges kommuner och landsting (below)