Enhancing liveability through urban intensification: The idea and role of neighbourhood

References

• Allen, N. (2016). Quality of urban life and intensification: Understanding housing choices, trade-offs, and the role of urban amenities (Doctor of Philosophy). The University of Auckland, Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, N. (2017). Delivering liveable neighbourhoods: What does this mean to residents? Paper presented at the 10th Making Cities Liveable Conference Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, N. , & Davey, M. (2017). The value of constructivist grounded theory for built environment researchers. Journal of Planning Education and Research , 1 (11), doi:10.1177/0739456X17695195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auckland Council . (2012). Auckland plan . Auckland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Auckland Council . (2017). Unitary plan . Auckland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government . (2012). State of Australian cities . Canberra: Department of Infrastructure and Transport, Major Cities Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, L. , & Haarhoff, E. (2011). Questions about ‘smart growth:’ A critical appraisal of urban growth strategies in Australasian and North American cities . Paper presented at the New Urbanism and Smart Transport Conference, Perth.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, K. (2017). The New Zealand housing preferences survey: Attitudes towards medium-density housing . Wellington: BRANZ.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, M. , & Tieman, G. (2004). Urban consolidation in Melbourne 1988–2003: The policy and practice . Melbourne: RMIT Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Buys, L. , & Miller, E. (2012). Residential satisfaction in inner urban higher density Brisbane, Australia: Role of dwelling design, neighbourhood and neighbours. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management , 55 (3), 319–338.10.1080/09640568.2011.597592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CABRE . (2017). Auckland marketflash – The apartment cycle in numbers . Retrieved from https://www.cbre.com/
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. (1997). Perspectives on neighborhood and community: A review of the literature. Social Service Review , 71 (4), 521–547.10.1086/604277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHRANZ . (2011). Improving the design, quality and affordability of residential intensification in New Zealand . Auckland: CityScope Consultants/Centre for Housing Research Atearoa New Zealand. Retrieved November 30, 2015, from http://www.chranz.co.nz/pdfs/improving-the-design-quality-affordability-residential-intensification.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. , Lloyd, R. , Wong, K. , & Jain, P. (2002). Amenities drive urban growth. Journal of Urban Affairs , 24 (5), 493–515.10.1111/1467-9906.00134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrado, G. , Corrado, L. , & Santoro, E. (2013). On the individual and social determinants of neighbourhood satisfaction and attachment. Regional studies: Journal of the Regional Studies Association , 47 , 544–562.10.1080/00343404.2011.587797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulton, C. , Korbin, J. , Chan, T. , & Su, M. (2001). Mapping residents’ perceptions of neighborhood boundaries: A methodological note. American Journal of Community Psychology , 29 (2), 371–383.10.1023/A:1010303419034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos, J. , Van Acker, V. , & Witlox, F. (2016). Urban sprawl: Neighbourhood dissatisfaction and urban preferences. Some evidence from Flanders. Urban Geography , 37 (6), 839–862.10.1080/02723638.2015.1118955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, C. , & Richardson, L. (2009). ‘Neighbourhood’: A site for policy action, governance … and empowerment? In C. Durose , S. Greasley , & L. Richardson (Eds.), Changing local governance, changing citizens (pp. 31–52). University of Bristol: Policy Press.10.1332/policypress/9781847422170.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, R. , & Gooder, H. (2007). At home with diversity in medium-density housing. Housing, Theory and Society , 24 (3), 166–182.10.1080/14036090701374530
   Google Scholar
• Foord, J. (2010). Mixed-use trade-offs: How to live and work in a ‘compact city’ neighbourhood. Built Environment , 36 (1), 47–62.10.2148/benv.36.1.47
   Google Scholar
• Grogan-Kaylor, A. , Woolley, M. , Mowbray, C. , Reischl, T. , Guster, M. , Karb, R. , & Alaimo, K. (2006). Predictors of neighborhood satisfaction. Journal of Community Practice , 14 (4), 27–50.10.1300/J125v14n04_03
   Google Scholar
• Guest, A. , & Lee, B. (1983). Determinants of neighborhood satisfaction: A metropolitan-level analysis. The Sociological Quarterly , 24 (2), 287–303. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1983.tb00703.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haarhoff, E. , Beattie, L. , Dixon, J. , Dupuis, A. , Lysnar, P. , & Murphy, L. (2012). Future intensive: Insights for Auckland’s housing . Auckland: The University of Auckland; Transforming Cities.
   Google Scholar
• Haarhoff, E. , Beattie, L. , & Dupuis, A. (2016). Does higher density housing enhance liveability? Case studies of housing intensification in Auckland. Cogent Social Sciences , 2 , 1243289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. , & Winther, L. (2010). Amenities and urban and regional development: Critique of a new growth paradigm . Paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Annual International Conference, Pécs, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Hipp, J. (2010). What is the ‘neighbourhood’ in neighbourhood satisfaction? Comparing the effects of structural characteristics measured at the micro-neighbourhood and tract levels. Urban Studies , 47 , 2517–2536.10.1177/0042098009359950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hourihan, K. (1984). Residential satisfaction, neighbourhood attributes, and personal characteristics: An exploratory path analysis in Cork, Ireland . Environment and Planning A.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, P. , Scott, M. , & Redmond, D. (2009). Sustainability versus liveability: An investigation of neighbourhood satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management , 52 (6), 847–864.10.1080/09640560903083798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks, M. , & Dempsey, N. (2007). Defining the neighbourhood: Challenges for empirical research. Town Planning Review , 78 (2), 152–177.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. , & Alony, I. (2011). Guiding the use of grounded theory in doctoral studies – An example from the Australian film industry. International Journal of Doctoral Studies , 6 , 95–114.10.28945/1429
   Google Scholar
• Kallus, R. , & Law-Yone, H. (1997). Neighbourhood - The metamorphosis of an Idea. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research , 14 (2), 107–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B. , & Campbell, K. (1997). Common ground? Urban neighborhoods as survey respondents see them. Social Science Quarterly , 78 (4), 922–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. , & Park, N. (2010). Housing satisfaction and quality of life among temporary residents in the United States. Housing and Society , 37 (1), 43–67.10.1080/08882746.2010.11430580
   Google Scholar
• Leenen, J. P. M. (2009). Perceived liveability in Dutch neighbourhoods: The influence of individual characteristics and characteristics of the residential area on Dutch citizen’s neighbourhood satisfaction . Universiteit van Tilburg. Sociologie.
   Google Scholar
• Marans, R. , & Stimson, R. (Eds.). (2011). Investigating quality of urban life: Theory, methods, and empirical research . Dordrecht: Springer, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, V. (2008). Walkable streets: Pedestrian behavior, perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability , 1 (3), 217–245.
   Google Scholar
• Minnery, J. , Knight, J. , Byrne, J. , & Spencer, J. (2009). Bounding neighbourhoods: How do residents do it? Planning Practice & Research Planning Practice & Research , 24 (4), 471–493.10.1080/02697450903327170
   Google Scholar
• Oktay, D. , & Marans, R. W. (2010). Overall quality of urban life and neighborhood satisfaction: A household survey in the walled city of famagusta. Open House International: Housing and the Built Environment: Theories, Tools And Practice , 35 (3), 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, C. (2009). Does housing make a community livable? Housing consumption and neighborhood satisfaction in metropolitan areas (Master of Public Policy). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Permentier, M. , Bolt, G. , & van Ham, M. (2011). Determinants of neighbourhood satisfaction and perception of neighbourhood reputation. Urban Studies , 48 , 977–996.10.1177/0042098010367860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randolph, B. (2006). Delivering the compact city in Australia: Current trends and future implications ( 6).
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, J. (2010). The 21st century suburb. Urban Design International , 115 , 31–33.
   Google Scholar
• Sandalack, B. , Alaniz Uribe, F. , Eshghzadeh Zanjani, A. , Shiell, A. , McCormack, G. , & Doyle-Baker, P. (2013). Neighbourhood type and walkshed size. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability , 6 (3), 236–255.
   Google Scholar
• Saville-Smith, K. (2009). A national survey of neighbourhood experiences and characteristics: Opportunities for data use . Auckland: Beacon Pathway Limited. Retrieved from http://www.beaconpathway.co.nz/images/uploads/Public_Report_NH3102(4)_National_Neighbourhoods_Data.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, A. (2003). New shape of suburbia: Trends in residential development . Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sirgy, J. , & Cornwell, T. (2002). How neighbourhood features affect quality of life. Social Indicators Research , 59 , 79–114.10.1023/A:1016021108513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand . (2017). Statistics New Zealand website . Retrieved from http://www.stats.govt.nz/
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H. , & Taylor, M. (2007). Theories of ‘neighbourhood’ in urban policy. In I. Smith , E. Lepine , & M. Taylor (Eds.), Disadvantaged by where you live?: Neighbourhood governance in contemporary urban policy (pp. 21–42). University of Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. , Walton, D. , & Lamb, S. (2010). The influence of simulated home and neighbourhood densification on perceived liveability. Social Indicators Research , 104 (2), 253–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. (2008). A tale of two cities: Physical form and neighborhood satisfaction in metropolitan Portland and Charlotte. Journal of the American Planning Association , 74 (3), 307–323.10.1080/01944360802215546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeoman, R. , & Akehurst, G. (2015). The housing we’d choose: A study of housing preferences, choices and trade-offs in Auckland (Auckland Council technical report, TR2015/016). Prepared by Market Economics Limited for Auckland Council. Auckland: Market Economics Limited.
   Google Scholar