Attempting to change behaviors and aspirations in a HOPE VI neighborhood through a phantom homeowners’ association

References

• Abdulkadiroğlu, A., Angrist, J. D., Dynarski, S. M., Kane, T. J., & Pathak, P. A. (2011). Accountability and flexibility in public schools: Evidence from boston’s charters and pilots. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(2), 699–748. doi:10.1093/qje/qjr017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axtell, R., & Tooley, M. (2015). The other side of hope: Squandering social capital in louisville’s hope vi. Journal of Poverty, 19(3), 278–304. doi:10.1080/10875549.2014.999968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, D. R. (2013). The evidence does not show that homeownership benefits children. In Cityscape (pp. 231–234).
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, R., & Meltzer, R. (2014). Why and where do homeowners associations form? Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 16(3).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cisneros, H. G., & Endgahl, L. (Eds.). (2009). From despair to hope: Hope vi and the new promise of public housing in america’s cities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coley, R. L., Lynch, A. D., & Kull, M. (2015). Early exposure to environmental chaos and children’s physical and mental health. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 32, 94–104. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Community Associations Institute. (2016). 2014 national and state statistical review. Retrieved from https://www.caionline.org/Pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, N. E., & Li, H. (2013). Measuring the external benefits of homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics, 77(C), 57–67. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2013.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dilger, R. (1992). Neighborhood politics: Residential community associations in american governance. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbie, W., & Fryer, R. G. (2011). Are high-quality schools enough to increase achievement among the poor? Evidence from the harlem children’s zone. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(3), 158–187. doi:10.1257/app.3.3.158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44(4), 237–251. doi:10.3102/0013189X15584327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhardt, G. V., Eriksen, M. D., Gale, W. G., & Mills, G. B. (2010). What are the social benefits of homeownership? Experimental evidence for low-income households. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(3), 249–258. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, A. (2014). On the run: Fugitive life in an american city. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golann, J. W. (2015). The paradox of success at a no-excuses school. Sociology of Education, 88(2), 103–119. doi:10.1177/0038040714567866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grogger, J., & Karoly, L. A. (2005). Welfare reform: Effects of a decade of change. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handler, J. F., & Hasenfeld, Y. (2006). Blame welfare, ignore poverty and inequality. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harms, E. (2012). Beauty as control in the new saigon: Eviction, new urban zones, and atomized dissent in a southeast asian city. American Ethnologist, 39(4), 735–750. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01392.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. (2000). Policies to foster human capital. Research in Economics, 54(1), 3–56. doi:10.1006/reec.1999.0225
   Google Scholar
• Hycner, R. H. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 8(3), 279–303. doi:10.1007/BF00142995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L. (2006). Is mixed-income development an antidote to urban poverty? Housing Policy Debate, 17(2), 209–234. doi:10.1080/10511482.2006.9521567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L. (2010). Creating mixed-income developments in chicago: Developer and service provider perspectives. Housing Policy Debate, 20(1), 91–118. doi:10.1080/10511481003599894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L., & Chaskin, R. (2010). Living in a mixed-income development: Resident perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of two developments in chicago. Urban Studies. doi:10.1177/0042098009357959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadduri, J. (2001). Deconcentration: What do we mean? What do we want? Cityscape, 5(2), 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Low, S. M. (2001). The edge and the center: Gated communities and the discourse of urban fear. American Anthropologist, 103(1), 45–58. doi:10.2307/683921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manturuk, K. R., Lindblad, M. R., & Quercia, R. G. (2017). A place called home: The social dimensions of homeownership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, B. J. (2013). Are homeowners better citizens? Homeownership and community participation in the united states. Social Forces, 91(3), 929–954. doi:10.1093/sf/sos185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia: Homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, L. M. (Ed.). (1997). The new paternalism: Supervisory approaches to poverty. Wasington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D., & Staeheli, L. A. (2006). Clean and safe? Property redevelopment, public space, and homelessness in downtown san diego. In The politics of public space (pp. 143–175).
   Google Scholar
• Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Severely Distressed Public Housing. (1992). Preliminary report and proposed national action plan of the national commission on severely distressed public housing. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from https://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/DOC_9836.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, D., Fraser, J., & Bazuin, J. (2015). The imagined self-sufficient communities of hope vi: Examining the community and social support component. Urban Affairs Review, 51(5), 726–746. doi:10.1177/1078087414544461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattillo, M. (2009). Investing in poor black neighborhoods ‘as is’. In M. A. Turner, S. J. Popkin, & L. Rawlings (Eds.), Public housing and the legacy of segregation (pp. 31–46). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. (2012). Regulating the poor: The functions of public welfare. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Katz, B., Cunnigham, M. K., Brown, K. D., Gustafson, J., & Turner, M. A. (2004). A decade of hope vi: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/alfresco/publication-pdfs/411002-A-Decade-of-HOPE-VI.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Levy, D. K., & Buron, L. (2009). Has hope vi transformed residents’ lives? New evidence from the hope vi panel study. Housing Studies, 24(4), 477–502. doi:10.1080/02673030902938371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M., & Lindblad, M. (2013). Reexamining the social benefits of homeownership after the housing crisis. Retrieved from Cambridge, MA: http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/research/publications/homeownership-symposium-reexamining-social-benefits-homeownership-after
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E., Stroh, L. K., & Flynn, C. A. (1998). Lake parc place: A study of mixed-income housing. Housing Policy Debate, 9(4), 703–740. doi:10.1080/10511482.1998.9521314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheller, D. S. (2015). Neighborhood governments and their role in property values. Urban Affairs Review, 51(2), 290–309. doi:10.1177/1078087414542088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Schram, S. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tach, L., & Emory, A. D. (2017). Public housing redevelopment, neighborhood change, and the restructuring of urban inequality. American Journal of Sociology, 123(3), 686–739. doi:10.1086/695468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thernstrom, A., & Thernstrom, S. (2004). No excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Vale, L. J., & Shamsuddin, S. (2017). All mixed up: Making sense of mixed-income housing developments. Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(1), 56–67. doi:10.1080/01944363.2016.1248475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows. The Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. (2006). Contesting spatial modernity in late-socialist china. Current Anthropology, 47(3), 461–484. doi:10.1086/503063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar