The potential impact of the application of electronic portfolio on Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance seeking their gender role

References

• Allan, D. (2004). Oxford placement test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alloway, N. (2007). Swimming against the tide: Boys, literacies, and schooling: An Australian story. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(2), 582–605. doi:10.2307/20466651
   Google Scholar
• Anson, C. M. (2000). Distant voices: Teaching and writing in a culture of technology. In K. B. Yancey (Ed.), Issues and trends in postsecondary English studies (pp. s167–189). Urbana-Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, S. M., & Finnemann, M. D. (1992). Sex differences in self-reported beliefs about foreign language learning and authentic oral and written input. Language Learning, 42, 471–495. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01041.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, H. C. (2005). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement, The Reflect Initiative, White Paper. Retrieved October 15, 2017, from http://electronicportfolios.org
   Google Scholar
• Black, L., Daiker, D. A., Sommers, J., & Stygall, G. (1994). New directions in portfolio assessment: Reflection practice, critical theory, and large-scale scoring. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bostock, S. (2000). Student peer assessment. Retrieved April 5, 2016, from http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/aa/landt/lt/docs/bostock_peer_assessment.htm
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. NY: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Irving, E., & Keegan, P. (2008). An introduction to educational assessment, measurement, and evaluation. New Zealand: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, C. B. (2000). Inside the portfolio experience: The student’s perspective. In K. B. Yancey (Ed.), Issues and trends in postsecondary English studies (pp. 148–164). Urbana-Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Calfee, R., & Perfumo, P. (1996). Writing portfolios in the classroom: Policy and practice, promise and peril. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2006). A matter of degrees: Female underrepresentation in computer science programs cross-nationally. In J. M. Cohoon & W. C. Aspray (Eds.), Women and information technology: Research on the reasons for under-representation (pp. 183–204). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. (2002). Factors associated with foreign language writing anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 35(5), 647–656. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb01903.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A., & Trafford, J. (1995). Boys into modern languages: An investigation of the discrepancy in attitudes and performance between boys and girls in modern languages. Gender and Education, 7(3), 315–325. doi:10.1080/09540259550039022
   Google Scholar
• Clark, I. L. (1993). Portfolio evaluation, collaboration, and writing centers. College Composition and Communication, 44(4), 515–524. doi:10.2307/358387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., & Macaro, E. (2007). Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, U. (1988). Research frontiers in writing analysis. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Landmark essays on ESL writing (pp. 75–90). NJ: Hermagoras Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corwin, T. (2003). Electronic portfolios. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 20(1), 32–38. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/mcb/165/2003/00000020/00000001/art00004
   Google Scholar
• Disenhaus, N. (2015). Boys, writing, and the literacy gender gap: What we know, what we think we know (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). The University of Vermont, Retrieved October 9, 2017, from http://scholarworks.uvm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1329&context=graddis
   Google Scholar
• Firoozzare, A. (2006). The effectiveness of alternative assessments and traditional methods. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Allame Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Graddol, D., & Swann, J. (1989). Gender voices. Oxford, UK: B. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Grey, C. (1998). Towards an overview on gender and language variation. Retrieved November 21, 2018, from http://www.eche.ac.uk/study/schsubj/ human/English/rh/modules/337-1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hajiabdolrasouli, L. (2006). The effect of e-mail writing on writing improvement of EFL college students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Allame Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hamdi Asl, S., & Dabaghi, A. (2012). Gender differences in Iranian EFL students’ letter writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(7), 155–169. doi:10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.7p.155
   Google Scholar
• Hamp-Lyons, L., & Kroll, B. (1996). Issues in ESL writing assessment: An overview. College ESL, 6(1), 52–72.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, M., & Levy, M. (2001). CALL begins with a “C”: Interaction in computer-mediated language learning. System, 29, 15–26. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00043-9
   Google Scholar
• Hashemian, M., & Fadaei, B. (2013). Fostering EFL learners’ autonomy in light of portfolio assessment: Exploring the potential impact of gender. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1(2), 135–151.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L., & Newell, A. (1999). Changes in the black-white gap in achievement scores. Sociology of Education, 72(2), 111–135. doi:10.2307/2673179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidari, F. (2009). Alternative assessment procedures in Iranian EFL writing classes: Thewashback effect and students’ attitudes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Allame Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Hirvela, A., & Sweetland, Y. L. (2005). Two case studies of L2 writers‟ experiences across learning-directed portfolio contexts. Assessing Writing, 10, 192–213. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2005.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, L. A., Zhao, Y., Kolenic, A., Fitzgerald, H. E., Harold, R., & Von Eye, A. (2008). Race, gender, and information technology use: The new digital divide. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11(4), 437–442. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jafari, N., & Ansari, D. N. (2012). The effect of collaboration on Iranian EFL learners’ writing accuracy. International Education Studies, 52,125–131 .Retrieved 15 November 2017, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1066784.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, J., & Brushwood Rose, C. (2003). Women @ work: Listening to gendered relations of power in teachers’ talk about new technologies. Gender and Education, 15(2), 169–181. doi:10.1080/09540250303854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JISC. (2008). Effective practice with e-portfolios: Supporting 21st century learning. Retrieved December 30, 2017, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/
   Google Scholar
• Kaider, F., Henschke, K., Richardson, J., & Kelly, M. P. (2009). Designing blended learning spaces to maximize student learning in work integrated learning programs (pp. 496–505). Auckland, New Zealand: Ascilite.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, A. (2006). Score drop prompts debate over effects of revised SAT: Girls outdo boys in writing. Education Week, 26(2), 18. Retrieved 20 May 2017, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2006/09/06/02sat.h26.html
   Google Scholar
• Kuppuswamy, S., & Narayan, P. (2010). The impact of social networking websites on theeducation of youth. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking, 2(1), 67–79. doi:10.4018/IJVCSN
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and women’s place. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, R., & Lee, I. (2010). Balancing the dual functions of portfolio assessment. ELT Journal, 64(1), 54–64. doi:10.1093/elt/ccp024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, K., & Hoyle, C. (2002). The gendering of information technology. In N. Yelland & A. Rubin (Eds.), Ghosts in the machine: Women’s voices in research with technology (pp. 3–32). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, G., & Ittelson, J. (2005). An overview of e-portfolios. Educause Learning Initiative, 1, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 52(3), 537–564. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandell, A., & Michelson, E. (1990). Portfolio development and adult learning: Purposes and strategies. Chicago, IL: The Council for Adult and Experiential Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Marefat, F. (2004). Portfolios revisited. International Journal of American Linguistics, 7, 79–96.
   Google Scholar
• Martino, W., & Kehler, M. (2007). Gender-based literacy reform: A question of challenging or recuperating gender binaries. Canadian Journal of Education, 302,406–431 .Retrieved 10 November 2017, from http://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cjerce/article/viewFile/2959/2248
   Google Scholar
• Masaeli, N., & Chalak, A. (2016). The effect of employing electronic portfolio on Iranian EFL learners’ writing skill. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(4), 746–751. doi:10.17507/jltr.0704.15.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda, P. K., & Silva, T. (2001). Landmark essays on ESL writing. NJ: Hermagoras Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monjezie, M. (2007). On the effect of using different media of communication (e-mail vs. pen and paper) and having different audiences on the discourse and syntax of the writing of EFL university students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Allame Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Mulac, A., Bardac, J. J., & Gibbons, P. (2001). Empirical support for the ‘gender as culture’ Hypothesis: An intercultural analysis of male/female language differences. Human Communication Research, 27, 121–152. doi:10.1093/hcr/27.1.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S., & Grant, B. (1996). Portfolio approaches to assessment: Breakthrough or more of the same? In E. White, W. Lutz, & S. Kamusikiri (Eds.), Assessment of writing: Politics, policies, practices (pp. 128–157). New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Mustafa, A. A. M. (2011). The impact of electronic assessment-driven instruction on preserviceEFL teachers’ quality teaching. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 10(1), 18–35.
   Google Scholar
• Nemati, A., & Bayer, J. M. (2007). Gender differences in the use of linguistic forms: A comparative study of Persian and English. South Asian Language Review, 2, 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Nezakatgoo, B. (2005). The effect of writing and assessing portfolio on final examination scores and mastering the mechanics of writing of EFL students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Allame Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, P. M., Korgen, K. O., Schumacher, P., & Delucchi, M. (2000). Internet use among female and male college students. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3(5), 855–862. doi:10.1089/10949310050191836
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R., Young, P. O., Ito, S., & Sumrall, M. (1993). Japanese by satellite: Effects of motivation, language learning styles and strategies, gender, course level, and previous language learning experience on Japanese language achievement. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 359–371. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1993.tb02292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 139–158. Retrieved 4 June 2017, from http://www.transf.co.uk/journals
   Google Scholar
• Patri, M. (2002). The influence of peer feedback on self- and peer- assessment of oral skills. Language Testing, 19, 109–131. doi:10.1191/0265532202lt224oa
   Google Scholar
• Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R., & Meyer, C. A. (1991). What makes portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezeshki, M. (2010). A comparative study of e-portfolios, portfolios and regular writing classes (Unpublished master’s thesis). Allame Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Saffarian, R., & Gorjian, B. (2012). Effect of computer-based video games for vocabulary acquisition among young children: An experimental study. Journal of Comparative Literature and Culture (JCLC), 1(3), 44–48.
   Google Scholar
• Saito, H. (2008). EFL classroom peer assessment: Training effects on rating and commenting. Language Testing, 25, 553–581. doi:10.1177/0265532208094276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajadi, S. A., & Maghsoudi, M. (2016). The effect of Iranian EFL learners’ gender and their learning styles on their English learning success. English for Specific Purposes World, 50(17), 1–27. Retrieved November 11, 2017, from http://www.esp-world.info/Articles_50/Sajadi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, J. (1995). Computers and Classroom Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shang, H.-F. (2013). Factors associated with English as a foreign language university students writing anxiety. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Wilhelm, J. (2002). Reading do fix no chevys: Literacy in the lives of young men. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. W., & Wilhelm, J. D. (2009). Boys and literacy: Complexity and multiplicity. In L. Christenbury, R. Bomer, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 360–371). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. W., & Wilhelm, J. D. (2004). “I just like being good at it”: The importance of competence in the literate lives of young men. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 46, 454–461.
   Google Scholar
• Song, B., & August, B. (2002). Using portfolios to assess the writing of ESL students: A compelling alternative? Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 49–72. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00053-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, J. (2010). What about “what about the boys?” Reconsidering gender equitable education. The Alberta Teachers’ Association. Retrieved November 19, 2017, from https://www.teachers.ab.ca/Pages/Home.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A., Kehler, M., & Martino, W. (2010). The problem of boys’ literacy underachievement: Raising some questions. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 53(5), 356–361. doi:10.1598/JAAL.53.5.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver-Hightower, M. (2008). The politics of policy in boys’ education: Getting boys “right.”. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmire, R. (2010). Why boys fail: Saving our sons from an educational system that’s leaving them behind. New York: Amacom.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, H. (2009). Empirical study on relations between gender differences and English vocabulary and the overall proficiency level. Asian Social Science, 5(10), 109–114. doi:10.5539/ass.v5n10p109
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S. (2009). Has portfolio assessment become standard practice in EFL classrooms? Empirical studies from China. English Language Teaching, 2, 98–118. doi:10.5539/elt.v2n2p98
   Google Scholar