1,702
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Beyond institutions and the system: Network approach to deliberative democracy

| (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1639876 | Received 14 Nov 2018, Accepted 12 Jun 2019, Published online: 22 Jul 2019

References

  • Amirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411–20. doi:10.1086/230450
  • Avritzer, L. (2006). New public spheres in Brazil: Local democracy and deliberative politics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(3), 623–637. doi:10.1111/ijur.2006.30.issue-3
  • Benhabib, S. (1996). Towards a normative model of deliberative legitimacy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 67–94). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bohman, J. (1998). Survey article: The coming of age of deliberative democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(4), 400–425. doi:10.1111/jopp.1998.6.issue-4
  • Boswell, J. (2013). Why and how narrative matters in deliberative systems. Political Studies, 61, 620–636. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00987.x
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook for theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
  • Chambers, S. (2009). Rhetoric and the public sphere: Has deliberative democracy abandoned mass democracy? Political Theory, 37(3), 323–350. doi:10.1177/0090591709332336
  • Chambers, S. (2017). Balancing epistemic quality and equal participation in a system approach to deliberative democracy. Social Epistemology, 31(3), 266–276. doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1317867
  • Cinalli, M., & O’Flynn, I. (2014). Public deliberation, network analysis and the political integration of Muslims in Britain. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16, 428–451. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.12003
  • Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy essays on reason and politics (pp. 67–91). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Davis, A. (2009). Evaluating communication in the British parliamentary public sphere. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 11, 280–297. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2008.00344.x
  • Della Porta, D. (2013). Can democracy be saved? Participation, deliberation and social movements. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Dryzek, J. S. (2001). Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29(5), 651–669. doi:10.1177/0090591701029005003
  • Dryzek, J. S. (2017). The forum, the system, and the polity: Three varieties of democratic theory. Political Theory, 45(5), 610–636. doi:10.1177/0090591716659114
  • Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  • Elster, J. (1997). The market and the forum: Three varieties of political theory. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy essays on reason and politics (pp. 3–33). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Ercan, S. A., Hendriks, C. M., & Boswell, J. (2017). Studying public deliberation after the systemic turn: The crucial role for interpretive research. Policy & Politics, 45(2), 195–212. doi:10.1332/030557315X14502713105886
  • Felicetti, A., Niemeyer, S., & Curato, N. (2016). Improving deliberative participation: Connecting mini-publics to deliberative systems. European Political Science Review, 8(3), 427–448. doi:10.1017/S1755773915000119
  • Ferejohn, J., & Pasquino, P. (2002). Constitutional courts as deliberative institutions: Towards an institutional theory of constitutional justice. In W. Sadurski (Ed.), Constitutional justice, ease and west: democratic legiitmacy and constitutional courts in post-communist Europe in a comparative perspective (pp. 21–36). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
  • Fishkin, J. S. (2009). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Fung, A. (2005). Deliberation before the revolution: Toward an ethics of deliberative democracy in an unjust world. Political Theory, 33(3), 397–419. doi:10.1177/0090591704271990
  • Gastil, J. (2008). Political communication and deliberation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Gastil, J. (2014). Democracy in small groups: Participation, decision making, and communication. State College, PA: Efficacy Press.
  • Gastil, J., Deess, E. P., Weiser, P., & Simmons, C. (2010). The jury and democracy: How jury deliberation promotes civic engagement and political participation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Geissel, B., & Gherghina, S. (2016). Constitutional deliberative democracy and democratic innovations. In M. Reushamps & J. Suiter (Eds.), Constitutional deliberative democracy in Europe (pp. 75–92). Colchester: ECPR Press.
  • Gerson, G. (2004). Deliberative households: Republicans, liberals, and the public-private split. Political Research Quarterly, 57(4), 653–663. doi:10.1177/106591290405700413
  • Goodin, R. E. (2003). Reflective democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Goodin, R. E. (2008). Innovating democracy: Democratic theory and practice after the deliberative turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddednes. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. doi:10.1086/228311
  • Grönlund, K., Bächtiger, A., & Setälä, M. (Eds.). (2014). Deliberative mini-publics involving citizens in the democratic process. Colchester: ECPR Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1996a). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy ( (W. Rehg, trans.)). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1996b). Three normative models of democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 21–30). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Hajer, M. A., & Wagenaar, H. (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jonsson, M. E. (2015). Democratic innovations in deliberative systems – the case of the Estonian citizens’ assembly process. Journal of Public Deliberation, 11(1), Art. 7.
  • Knops, A. (2016). Deliberative networks. Critical Policy Studies, 10(3), 305–324. doi:10.1080/19460171.2016.1188713
  • Lafont, C. (2015). Deliberation, participation, and democratic legitimacy: Should deliberative mini-publics shape public policy? The Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(1), 40–63. doi:10.1111/jopp.2015.23.issue-1
  • Lascher, E. L. (1996). Assessing legislative deliberation: A preface to empirical analysis. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 21(4), 501–519. doi:10.2307/440459
  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Maia, R. C. (2009). Mediated deliberation the 2005 referendum for banning firearm sales in Brazil. International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(3), 313–334. doi:10.1177/1940161209337090
  • Maia, R. C., Laranjeira, M. D., & Mundim, P. S. (2017). The role of experts across two different arenas in a deliberative system. Journal of Public Deliberation, 13(1), Art. 2.
  • Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. F., & Warren, M. E. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In J. Parkinson & J. Mansbridge (Eds.), Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale (pp. 1–26). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mendes, C. H. (2013). Constitutional courts and deliberative democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Owen, D., & Smith, G. (2015). Survey article: Deliberation, democracy, and the systemic turn. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(2), 213–234. doi:10.1111/jopp.2015.23.issue-2
  • Parkinson, J. (2006). Deliberating in the real world problems of legitimacy in deliberative democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Rollo, T. (2017). Everyday deeds: Enactive protest, exit, and silence in deliberative systems. Political Theory, 45(5), 587–609. doi:10.1177/0090591716661222
  • Rummens, S. (2012). Staging deliberation: The role of representative institutions in the deliberative democratic process. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 20(1), 23–44. doi:10.1111/jopp.2012.20.issue-1
  • Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2004). Deliberative political in action: Analyzing parliamentary discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stevenson, H., & Dryzek, J. S. (2014). Democratizing global climate governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sunstein, C. (2002). The law of group polarization. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2), 175–195. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00148
  • Tamura, T. (2014). Rethinking grassroots participation in nested deliberative systems. Japanese Political Science Review, 2, 63–87. doi:10.15545/2.63
  • Warren, M. E., & Pearse, H. (2008). Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia citizens’ assembly. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • White, H. C. (2008). Identity and control: How social formations emerge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.