Innovation and science dilemmas. Unintended consequences of innovation policy for science. Polish experience

References

• Ahlback, J. (2005). The Finnish national innovation system. European regions research and innovation network. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ali-Yrkko, J., & Hermans, R. (2004). Nokia: A giant in the Finnish innovation system. In G. Schienstock (Ed.), Embracing the knowledge economy. The dynamic transformation of the Finnish innovation system (pp. 105–127). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bąkowski, A., Cichocki, T., Gromada, G., Guliński, J., Kmita, S., Krzyżyński, T., & Zasiadły, K. (2005). Innowacyjna przedsiębiorczość akademicka – światowe doświadczenie. Warsaw: PARP.
   Google Scholar
• Bąkowski, A., & Mażewska, M. (Eds.). (2015). Ośrodki innowacji i przedsiębiorczości w Polsce. Raport z badań. Poznań/Warsaw: Stowarzyszenie Organizatorów Ośrodków Innowacji i Przedsiębiorczości w Polsce.
   Google Scholar
• Banerski, G., Gryzik, A., Matusiak, K. B., Mażewska, M., & Stawasz, E. (Eds.). (2009). Przedsiębiorczość akademicka (rozwój firm spin-off, spin-out) - zapotrzebowanie na szkolenia służące jej rozwojowi. Raport z badania. Warsaw: PARP.
   Google Scholar
• Bukovski, M., & Śniegocki, A. (2011). Globalizacja w wymiarze lokalnym. In M. Bukovski (Ed.), Zatrudnienie w Polsce 2010 – Integracja i globalizacji. Warsaw: Instytut Badań Strukturalnych (pp. 139–204).
   Google Scholar
• Bukovski, M., Szpor, A., & Śniegocki, A. (2012). Potencjał i bariery polskiej innowacyjności. Warsaw: Instytut Badań Strukturalnych.
   Google Scholar
• Cambrosio, A., Limoges, C., & Pronovost, D. (1990). Representing biotechnology: An ethnography of Quebec science policy. Social Studies of Science, 20, 195–227. doi:10.1177/030631290020002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture, vol. I: The rise of network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M., & Himanen, P. (2002). The information society and the welfare state. The Finnish model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Central Statistical Office of Poland. (2016). Branch yearbook. Demographic year book of Poland. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office. Retrieved from http://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/statistical-yearbooks/statistical-yearbooks/demographic-yearbook-of-poland-2016,3,10.html
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128–15. Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation. doi:10.2307/2393553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortell, A. P., & Peterson, S. (2001). Limiting the unintended consequences of institutional change. Comparative Political Studies, 34/7, 768–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2006). Emerging Institutions: Pyramids or anthills?. GRI-report, 7, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2009). Emerging institutions: Pyramids or anthills?. Organization Studies, 30/4, 423–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czerniak, J. (2013). Polityka innowacyjna w Polsce. Warsaw: Difin.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1981). Public and its problems. The later works of John Dewey. Vol. 2. J. A. Boydston. Ed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drori, G. S., Mayer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Schofer, E. (2003). Science in the modern world polity: Institutionalization and globalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (Eds.). (2016). The Global Innovation Index 2016: Winning with Global Innovation. Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO: Ithaca, Fontainebleau and Geneva. Retrieved from: www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2016-report#
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix. University-industry-government innovation in action. New York/London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2003). The role of universities in the Europe of knowledge. Brussels: COM.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2006a). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: Education, research and innovation. Brussels: COM.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2006b). Cluster ‘Modernization of Higher Education’ (Issue Paper on Governance No. MHE 7). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Pro inno Europe, innovation union scoreboard 2011. The Innovation union’s performance scoreboard for research and innovation. Brussel: COM.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). European innovation scoreboard. Brussels: COM.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2000). Presidency Conclusions. Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P., & Desrochers, P. (2004). Truth for its own sake: academic culture and technology transfer at Johns Hopkins University. Minerva, 42(2). doi:10.1023/B:MINE.0000030019.99709.a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finansowa zapaść. (2013, September). Forum Akademickie. Retrieved from https://forumakademickie.pl/fa/2013/09/kronika-wydarzen/finansowa-zapasc
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1974). The economics of industrial innovation. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1982). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., & Van Reenen, J. V. (2009). What if congress doubled R&D spending on the physical sciences?. In J. Lerner & S. Stern (Eds.), Innovation policy and the economy (Vol. 9, pp. 1–38) Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/h/nbr/nberch/8182.html
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B. (2002). The rise of innovation surveys: Measuring a fuzzy concept, The History and Sociology of S&T Statistics, Working Paper No. 6. Retrived from http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/Godin_16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B. (2008). Innovation: The History of a Category, Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation (Working Paper No. 1.) Retrieved from http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/IntellectualNo1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Haikio, M. (2006). Nokia. The inside story. Helsinki: Edita.
   Google Scholar
• Hyytinen, A., Paija, L., Rouvinen, P., & Yla-Anttila, P. (2006). Finland’s emergence as a global information and communication technology player. Lessons from the Finnish wireless cluster. In J. Zysman & A. Newman (Eds.), How revolutionary was digital revolution? (pp. 56–77). Stanford: Stanford Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jasiński, A. H. (2006). Innowacje i transfer techniki w procesie transformacji. Warsaw: Difin.
   Google Scholar
• Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). Chicago, London: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karpinska, A. (2016). Innovation trapped in the benchmarking mechanism. Horizons of Education, 33. doi:10.17399/HW.2016.153310
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, S. P., Kerr, W., Ozden, Ç., & Parsons, C. (2016). Global talent flows. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30, 83–106. doi:10.1257/jep.30.4.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiber, M., Kleer, J., Wierzbicki, A., Galwas, B., Kuźnicki, L., Sadowski, Z., & Strzelecki, Z. (2011). Raport Polska 2050. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Komitetu Prognoz ‘Polska 2000 Plus’, Polska Akademia Nauk.
   Google Scholar
• Klimczuk, M. (2011). Pojęcie przedsiębiorczości akademickiej. In B. Plawgo (Ed.), Przedsiębiorczość Akademicka– Stan, bariery i przesłanki rozwoju. Łomża: PWSZiIP–6.
   Google Scholar
• Koo, B. H., & Perkins, D. H. (Eds.). (1995). Social capability and long-term economic growth. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1994). The age of diminished expectations. U. S. Policy in the 1990s. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwiek, M. (2005). The University and the state in a global age: Renegotiating the traditional social contract? European Educational Research Journal, 3(4), 324–341.
   Google Scholar
• Kwiek, M. (2006). The University and the State: A study into global transformation. Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kwiek, M. (2008). On accessibility and equity, market forces and entrepreneurship: Developments in higher education in central and Eastern Europe. Higher Education Management and Policy, 20(1), 1–22. doi:10.1787/17269822
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2000). When things strike back: A possible contribution of ‘science studies‘ to the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology, 51, 107–123. doi:10.1080/000713100358453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrance, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrance, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of institutional organizational studies (2nd ed.) (pp. 215–254). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lemola, T. (2006). Finnish science and technology policy. In G. Schienstock (Ed.), Embracing the knowledge economy. The dynamic transformation of the Finnish innovation system (pp. 268–284). Cheltenham: Edward Elgars.
   Google Scholar
• Marciniak, S. (2010). Innowacyjność i konkurencyjność gospodarki. Warsaw: C. H. Beck.
   Google Scholar
• McMurtry, J. (1991). Education and the market model. Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 2, 209217.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R. (2002). National innovation system. Scientific concept or political rhetoric? Helsinki: Edita.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R. (2012). Innovation, human capabilities, and democracy. Towards an enabling welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R., Eela, R., & Rask, M. (1999). The emergence and institutionalization of technology assessment in Finland. Social Studies, 12, 4–63.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economy. (2006). Kierunki zwiększania innowacyjności gospodarki na lata 2007-2013. Warsaw: Ministry of Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economy. (2013). Strategia innowacyjności i efektywności gospodarki. Dynamiczna Polska 2020. Warsaw: Ministry of Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Science and Higher Education. (2013). Projekt rozporządzenia Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego w sprawie szczegółowych kryteriów i trybu oceny wniosków o wpisanie przedsięwzięcia na Polską Mapę Drogową Infrastruktury Badawczej. Retrieved from http://www.nauka.gov.pl/konsultacje/projekt-rozporzadzenia-ministra-nauki-i-szkolnictwa-wyzszego-w-sprawie-szczegolowych-kryteriow-i-trybu-oceny-wnioskow-o-wpisanie-przedsiewziecia-na-polska-mape-drogowa-infrastruktury-badawczej.html
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems, national innovation systems. A comparative analysis. Nowy Jork: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R., & Rosenberg, R. (1993). A retrospective. In National innovation system. A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niosi, J. (2002). National Systems of Innovation are ‘x-efficient’ (and x-effective). Why some are so slow learners? Research Policy, 31, 291–302. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00142-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD & EUROSTAT. (2005). The measurement of scientific and technological activities: proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data (Oslo Manual). Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Okoń-Horodyńska, E. (1998). Narodowy system innowacji w Polsce. Katowice: Akademia Ekonomiczna.
   Google Scholar
• Okoń-Horodyńska, E. (2012). Małopolska Regionalna Strategia Innowacji: Kolejne wyciskanie ‘brukselki’ czy szansa na ambitną politykę rozwoju?. Malopolska Strategia Rozwoju, 1–2, 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Okoń-Horodyńska, E. (2013, February). Polityka innowacji w UE: Przerost formy nad treścią? Paper presented at the 9th Congress of Polish Economists, Warsaw. Retrieved from http://www.pte.pl/kongres/referaty/Oko%C5%84-Horody%C5%84ska%20Ewa/Oko%C5%84-Horody%C5%84ska%20Ewa%20-%20POLITYKA%20INNOWACJI%20W%20UE%20-%20PRZEROST%20FORMY%20NAD%20TRE%C5%9ACI%C4%84.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Palmberg, C., & Martikainen, O. (2005). Nokia as an incubating entrant: Case of Nokia’s Entry to the GSM. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 7, 61–78. doi:10.5172/impp.2005.7.1.61
   Google Scholar
• Pawlak, M. (2011). Unintended consequences of institutional work. In A. Mica, A. Peisert, & J. Winczorek (Eds.), Sociology and the Unintended. Robert Merton revisited (pp. 355–370). Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Pelkonen, A. (2008). The Finnish competition state and entrepreneurial policies in the Helsinki Region. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plawgo, B., Klimczak, T., Czyż, P., Boguszewski, R., & Kowalczyk, A. (2013). Regionalne Systemy Innowacji w Polsce. Raport z badań. Warsaw: PARP.
   Google Scholar
• Poyago-Theotoky, J., Beath, J., & Siegel, D. (2002). Universities and fundamental research: Reflections on the Growth of University-industry partnership. Discussion Paper Series, no 200201, School of Economics and Finance, School of Economics and Finance, University of St Andrews.
   Google Scholar
• Pregiela, R. (2010). Przedsiębiorczość akademicka, dylematy rozwoju. Raport z badań. Warsaw: Polska Izba Gospodarcza Zaawansowanych Technologii.
   Google Scholar
• Riuvo, B. (1994). Phases or Paradigms of Science Policy. Science and Public Policy, 21(3). doi:10.1093/spp/21.3.157
   Google Scholar
• Rosell, C., & Agrawal, A. (2009). Have university knowledge flows narrowed?: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 38, 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski, I. (2014). Współczesne spojrzenie na instytucje: Ewolucja pojęć, problem modelu aktora i poziomy analizy instytucjonalnej. Przeglad Socjologiczny, LXIII/3, 89–114.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, -J.-J. (1996). A science policy to cope with the inevitable? Science, Technology & Society, 1, 206–207. doi:10.1177/097172189600100122
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London-New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy. Markets, states and higher education. Baltimore/London: The John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stehr, N. (2000). Deciphering information technologies: Modern societies as networks. European Journal of Social Theory, 3(1), 83–94. doi:10.1177/13684310022224697
   Google Scholar
• Weresa, M. A. (2015). Narodowy system innowacji w Polsce i jego zmiany w latach 2007-2014. In M. A. Weresa (Ed.), Polska. Raport o konkurencyjności 2015. Innowacje a pozycja konkurencyjna polskiej gospodarki w latach 2007-2014 (pp. 225–237). Warszawa: Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie – Oficyna Wydawnicza.
   Google Scholar