Saturation controversy in qualitative research: Complexities and underlying assumptions. A literature review

References

• Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2018). Confounding issues related to determining sample size in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(5), 635–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1454644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for Qualitative Research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 19(4), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). Mis) conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’(2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(6), 739–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, M., Stamm, T. A., Stucki, G., & Cieza, A. (2012). Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison of two qualitative methods. Quality of Life Research, 21(2), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9943-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C. S., Georgiou, M., & Perdikogianni, M. (2017). A comparative method for themes saturation (CoMeTS) in qualitative interviews. Qualitative Research, 17(5), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116686650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugard, A. J., & Potts, H. W. (2015). Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: A quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(6), 669–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1005453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Thediscovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. The Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PloS One, 15(5), e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2017). How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods, 29(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16639015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2015). Sampling and thematic analysis: A response to Fugard and Potts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(6), 687–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1005456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, M. E., Amankwaa, L., Revell, M. A., & Mueller, D. (2016). Focus group data saturation: A new approach to data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 21(11), 2124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Weber, M. B. (2019). What influences saturation? Estimating sample sizes in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research, 29(10), 1483–1496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318821692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzel, A. (1992). Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In B. Crabtree & W. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 31–44). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, V., Glacken, M., & McCarron, M. (2011). Employing an ethnographic approach: Key characteristics. Nurse Researcher, 19(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2011.10.19.1.17.c8767
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Low, J. (2019). A pragmatic definition of the concept of theoretical saturation. Sociological Focus, 52(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2018.1544514
   Google Scholar
• Majid, M. A. A., Othman, M., Mohamad, S. F., & Lim, S. A. H. (2018). Achieving data saturation: Evidence from a qualitative study of job satisfaction. Social and Management Research Journal, 15(2), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.24191/smrj.v15i2.4972
   Google Scholar
• Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews [Paper presentation]. Forum qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: qualitative social research.
   Google Scholar
• McGhee, G., Marland, G. R., & Atkinson, J. (2007). Grounded theory research: Literature reviewing and reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(3), 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04436.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKerchar, M. A. (2008). Philosophical paradigms, inquiry strategies and knowledge claims: Applying the principles of research design and conduct to taxation.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2000). Determining sample size. Sage Publications Sage CA.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2015). Data were saturated. Sage Publications Sage CA.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, W. C., Lowery, D. R., & Steury, T. (2014). Exploring saturation of themes and spatial locations in qualitative public participation geographic information systems research. Society & Natural Resources, 27(5), 557–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.888791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2013). ‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 13(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112446106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, M. (2016). Qualitative research methods: Why, when, and how to conduct interviews and focus groups in pharmacy research. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 8(4), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands, T., Waddell, N., & McKenna, B. (2016). Are we there yet? A technique to determine theoretical saturation. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 56(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2015.11645799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, K., Zvonkovic, A., Goldberg, A., Sharp, E., & LaRossa, R. (2015). Sampling richness and qualitative integrity: Challenges for research with families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(1), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (2008). Theoretical Saturation. The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, (2), 875–876.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim, J., Saunders, B., Waterfield, J., & Kingstone, T. (2018). Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(5), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1454643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, V.-T., Porcher, R., Tran, V.-C., & Ravaud, P. (2017). Predicting data saturation in qualitative surveys with mathematical models from ecological research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 82(71–78), e72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Urquhart, C. (2012). Grounded theory for qualitative research: A practical guide. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rijnsoever, F. (2015). (I Can’t Get No) Saturation: A Simulation and Guidelines for Minimum Sample Sizes in Qualitative Research. Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) Working Paper Series, 15(5), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. L. (2012). Research column. The use of saturation in qualitative research. Canadian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 22(2).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, A. (2015). A guide to phenomenological research. Nursing Standard (2014+), 29(34), 38. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.29.34.38.e8821
   PubMedGoogle Scholar